A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19th – 20th of September 2007Cryogenic Expert Meeting at GSI, Jan Patrick Meier1/11 Cryogenic Experts Meeting at GSI, 2007 The SIS 100 Cryogenic Jumper.
Advertisements

MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.
SPL Intercavity support Conceptual design review 04/11/ A. Vande Craen TE/MSC-CMI.
ColUSM #51 30 th January, 2015 D. Duarte Ramos, C. Mucher, L. Gentini, T. Sahner, H. Prin, R. Wawrowski, Q. Deliege, V. Baglin, F. Savary.
4m Undulator Design Concepts Amanda J Brummitt CCLRC RAL On behalf of the HeLiCal Collaboration.
WA105 General Meeting at CERN 21 & 22-January-2014 Enrique Calvo Alamillo.
Integration of Cavities and Coupling Coil Modules Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting March 28 – April 1, 2004.
1 RF-Structures Mock-Up FEA Assembly Tooling V. Soldatov, F. Rossi, R. Raatikainen
1 Integration of collimators in the dispersion suppressors Status of 11 T cryo- assembly integration Dec 17, 2013
1 Presented at ColUSM by D. Ramos on behalf of the Cold Collimator Feasibility Study Working Group Longitudinal.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe MLC external review October 03, 2012.
Status of vacuum & interconnections of the CLIC main linac modules C. Garion TE/VSC TBMWG, 9 th November 2009.
R&D Status and Plan on The Cryostat N. Ohuchi, K. Tsuchiya, A. Terashima, H. Hisamatsu, M. Masuzawa, T. Okamura, H. Hayano 1.STF-Cryostat Design 2.Construction.
MQXF Cold-mass Assembly and Cryostating H. Prin, D. Duarte Ramos, P. Ferracin, P. Fessia 4 th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting November 17-21, 2014.
H. Prin, F. Savary, D. Duarte Ramos, L. Grand- Clement, C. Mucher, A. Temporal.
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule Yun He MLC external review October 03, 2012.
SCU Layout Concept - Minimal Segmentation Joel Fuerst (ANL) SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting Dec. 16, 2014.
SCU Segmented Cryostat Concept M. Leitner, S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers September 2 nd, 2014.
Arnaud Vande Craen (TE-MSC) 27/02/20131 EUCARD : ESAC Review – CEA Saclay.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.
Brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley US LHC ACCELERATOR PROJECT LHC IRQ Inner Triplet Review Q1, Q2, and Q3 Mechanics T. Nicol April 24-25, 2007.
Workshop Chamonix XV27-January-2006 DivonneMassimiliano Ferro-Luzzi 1 State of LHCb for the Sector Test  Overview  Agreement  Status of –VELO –exit.
56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai
C. Garion Presentation Outline  Overview of the inner triplet interconnections  Q1/Q2, Q2/Q3 interconnections  General view  Working conditions  Compensation.
9/17/07IRENG071 Cryogenic System for the ILC IR Magnets QD0 and QF1 K. C. Wu - BNL.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
Plan for test station Marta Bajko For the Technical Review of FReSCa2 June 2015 Saclay Paris.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe.
Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department 22 nd January 2015 C. Garion2 Beam Line Interconnection: snapshot of present design principles.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
HL-LHC 11 T Dipole for DS Collimation 8 th to10 th December, 2014 D. Duarte Ramos, C. Mucher, L. Gentini, T. Sahner, H. Prin, R. Wawrowski, F. Savary,
MQXFB design, assembly plans & tooling at CERN J.C Perez On behalf of MQXF collaboration team MQXF Workshop on Structure, Alignment and Electrical QA.
AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Beam Screens for Inner Triplet Magnets LHC Upgrade Phase 1 Nicolaas KOS  LHC Upgrade phase 1  Inner triplet BS Requirements.
SPL cryomodule specification meeting, CERN 19th October 2010 SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of the meeting SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of.
Magnet R&D for Large Volume Magnetization A.V. Zlobin Fermilab Fifth IDS-NF Plenary Meeting 8-10 April 2010 at Fermilab.
8/29/07K. C. Wu - Brookhaven National Lab1 Major Components in ILC IR Hall Interchangeable Detectors.
Ralf Eichhorn CLASSE, Cornell University. I will not talk about: Cavities (Nick and Sam did this) HOM absorbers (did that yesterday) Power couplers (see.
LHC Beampipes Ray Veness / AT-VAC FP XII 08Beam Vacuum- R.Veness.
Update on the ESS monolith design Rikard Linander Monolith and Handling Group ESS Target Division TAC 10, Lund, Nov 5,
ColUSM #63 18 th September, 2015 D. Ramos, C. Mucher, L. Gentini, H. Prin, Q. Deliege, A. Bastard, J. Hrivnak.
Summary of Presentation 1. Tolerances i. Vertical tolerances on BPMs (rf-BPM: ± 0.2μm, user BPMs: ±0.1μm, and X-BPMs: ± 0.1μm) ii. Tolerances on magnets’
ILC : Type IV Cryomodule Design Meeting Main cryogenic issues, L. Tavian, AT-ACR C ryostat issues, V.Parma, AT-CRI CERN, January 2006.
Inner Triplet Review 1 H. Prin AT/MEL Activities on the triplets at CERN Reception and Acceptance Triplet String Assembly in Building 181 Handling and.
Final Design Cryogenic and mechanical configurations
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Cryostats for superconducting magnets
ALIGNMENT OF THE NEW TRIPLETS
Panda Solenoid Content Interface Box Cold Mass Layout Cooling Lines
D. Ramos, H. Prin, M. Moretti, C. Eymin, A. Temporal, V. Parma, S
Cold mass design, assembly plans and QA/QC at CERN
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
Roadmap for triplet cryostats
Status of triplet cryostat and magnet support scheme
Internal review of IR2 LEP cryostats (WP11/WP5) Close out session
HFM Test Station Main Cryostat
LEP cryostat Procurement strategy and plans
Cryostat procurement, status and plan, QA/QC
Status of design and production of LEP connection cryostat
Cryo-assembly design D. Ramos, V. Parma, C. Mucher, H. Prin, M. Souchet, J. Hrivnak, M. Moretti, L. Mora, F. Savary, L. Gentini Review of the 11T Dipoles.
Challenges of vacuum chambers with adjustable gap for SC undulators
Status of cryostat integration and conceptual design
Cryostat design Mechanical design: Thermal screens: Specifications:
Cedric Garion, TE-VSC-DLM, WP12
The 11T cryo-assembly: summary of design and integration aspects
Design of Distribution Feedbox at LHC P7
Challenges for FCC-ee MDI mechanical design
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
Cryostats Some ideas for the new Q1 to Q3 Hi-Lumi WP3 meeting
Work Unit AIK 11.2 CDR of the CDS-SL Mechanics
Status of QQXF cryostat
Presentation transcript:

A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN LEP cryostat Design A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN Internal review of IR2 LEP cryostats (WP11/WP5)– 17 May 2017

Summary Introduction Requirements Basic concept Structural design Cryogenic design Instrumentation A. Vande Craen

Introduction Build to print design Use of standard LHC components when possible New concepts to Ease assembly Limit welding work Avoid deformations during fabrication and life cycle A. Vande Craen

LE requirements : LHC-LE-ES-0001 LHC equipment requirements for pressure, temperature and leak tightness LE requirements : LHC-LE-ES-0001 A. Vande Craen

Basic concepts A. Vande Craen

Concept Concept Goal Cold bore in helium vessel Limit maximum cold bore temperature Pipes in continuity of standard interconnection lines Limit helium inventory (vs. large helium vessel) Shuffling module at LEN extremity Adaptation of line layout Installation of busbars lyras Installation of heat exchanger Bolted supporting structure Limit welding work during assembly LEP-A mirror of LEP-B Limit components inventory A. Vande Craen

LEP vs LE A. Vande Craen

Existing connection cryostats LEP : No shielding needed Beam lines shielding Existing connection cryostats 20 mm lead shielding around beam lines LEP : No shielding needed RadWG meeting, 06/07/2016 Courtesy C. Bahamonde A. Vande Craen

Structural Requirements and solutions A. Vande Craen

Specific requirements Golden class magnet (most stringent) Tolerances distribution Source +/- Vertical [mm] +/- Horizontal Geometry (sag) 0.015 Geometry (straightness) 0.2 Play in V/V’ assembly Play in alignment system 0.1 0.35 Alignment tolerance 0.05 Stability over time Total 0.465 0.7 Maximum 0.5 0.8 A. Vande Craen

Cold bore/V’ supporting Goal V’ for cooling of cold bore with helium Insure positioning of cold bore inside V’ lines (play ~ 0 mm) No deformation of cold bore Solution Local “Punching” of V’ line to make contact with cold bore 3 deformation at 120° A. Vande Craen

Solution validated V/V’ support Tooling : lathe chuck Development campaign to find correct procedure Zero gap between tubes No deformation of cold bore Solution validated A. Vande Craen

Cold bore alignment system Goal Align beam lines within tight tolerances Solution Sleeve on V’ (tack welded) to improve pipe geometry Brass/Stainless steel contact to avoid seizing X-Y table for positioning Source Requirement Result V’/support +/- 0.1 (V) +/- 0.35 (H) +/- 0.05 Play in alignment system < +/- 0.05 A. Vande Craen

H-beam Ease access during assembly No structural welds No deformation/stresses Mechanical assembly for cold mass alignment Tight tolerances easy to achieve Machined plates  flatness = 0.2 mm/m Stress relieving  no later deformation due to stress relaxation Light cold mass (~ 2 tons) Lower mechanical rigidity than closed profile A. Vande Craen

Flexible M lines Tolerances and forces in interconnection Solution : reduce interconnection forces > 90% due to M lines bellows Negligible deformation of cold mass (<< 0.1 mm deformation due to weight) (See M. Moretti’s presentation) A. Vande Craen

Flexible line prototype Test : 5 mm vertical offset 25 bar (water) External radial excitation Results : Small line displacements V = 0.07 mm H = 0.1 mm No buckling Solution validated A. Vande Craen

H-beam supporting Two supports (spacing = 1985 mm) Support identical to 11T magnet Standard LHC dipole sliding support posts Fixed support post : dipole/SSS hybrid Standard Dipole height Fixed to vacuum vessel as in SSS Sliding support Fixed support A. Vande Craen

Cryogenics Requirements and solutions A. Vande Craen

Specific requirements Cold bore < 2.7 K in any point The cold bore temperature shall remain < 2.7 K, where H2 saturated vapour pressure is higher than the HL-LHC beam vacuum baseline N/M link for filling and cooling of N line Heat exchanger (LEP thermally independent) A. Vande Craen

Cold bore cooling Goal Solution Beam line heat load = 0.65 W/m (LHC-LE-ES-0001) Warmest point bellow 2.7 K Solution Addition of a V’ line around cold bores Filled with superfluid helium Connected to shuffling module Cooling by conduction through superfluid helium A. Vande Craen

Shuffling module Goal Solutions Create space for busbars lyras Transition between position of lines in standard interconnection and LEN House bayonet heat exchanger Solutions 2 welded stainless steel dished ends with nozzles 12 mm thick for deformations ~0.12 mm @ 20 bar A. Vande Craen

Bayonet heat exchanger Standard LHC heat exchanger tubes Stainless steel to Cu-OFE transition at extremities Cu-OF tube electron beam welded to transitions HX = 0.32 m long  maximum 9 W @ 1.9 K Estimated total heat load of LEP at 1.9 K : 6.6 W A. Vande Craen

N/M hydraulic link Goal : Solution Filling N line during cool-down Cooling N line to 1.9 K by superfluid conduction to M lines circuit Solution Rigid line with loop for thermal contractions (flexible hose in LE) Increased inner diameter : 22.3 mm  23.7 mm Connected to “M4 nozzle” on shuffling module  shift of ~ 2.5 m from LE Maximum temperature in N line (0.1 W/m2) LE : 1.907 K LEP : 1.908 K A. Vande Craen

H-beam cooling Goal Solution Uniform cool-down of the cold mass (no hot spot, no deformation) Cooling of the cold mass from 300 to 80 K < 1 week (on test bench) Solution Copper clamps on M1 and M2 lines  vertical symmetry Copper plates on H-beam for heat distribution Copper braids to connect clamps to plates All bolted solution Cooling time 300  80 K ~6 days (conservative assumption) (See M. Moretti’s presentation) A. Vande Craen

Instrumentation A. Vande Craen

Temperature measurement Instrumentation Temperature measurement Temperature sensors on beam line (warmest point) to give “Cryo-OK” (LHC-LE-ES-0002) For cold test : temperature sensors to measure temperature gradient during cool-down Voltage taps No voltage taps needed in the connection cryostats (A. Verweij, 23/03/2017) A. Vande Craen

Thank you ! A. Vande Craen