FDA Perspective on Cardiovascular Device Development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FDA QS reg/CLIA Comparison: Overview
Advertisements

Entering the US Market: Medical Devices
1 GOOD MORNING! BONJOUR! GOEDEMORGEN!. 2 An Introduction to certain aspects of the US FDA Murray M. Lumpkin, MD Deputy Commissioner International Programs.
Rare Diseases and FDASIA
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the main consumer watchdog for numerous products: Drugs and biologics (prescription.
Introduction to Regulation
Becker Grand Rounds: Wally Pellerite June 30, 2011.
FDA Perspective Sally Loewke, M.D. Acting Division Director
ICORD 2009: Facilitating Cooperation in Regulatory Efforts Timothy Cote, MD MPH Director, FDA Office of Orphan Products Development, Food and Drug Administration,
Medical Devices Approval Process
Ohio Nano-Summit March 3, 2005 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY IN PUBLIC HEALTH FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Norris E. Alderson, Ph.D. Associate.
The FDA Landscape AdvaMed September 2008 Judith K. Meritz
+ Medical Devices Approval Process. + Objectives Define a medical device Be familiar with the classification system for medical devices Understand the.
Center for Devices and Radiological Health U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Al Taylor Acting Chief, Medical Electronics Branch Office of Science.
ONDQA Perspective on Post Approval Changes Eric P. Duffy, PhD Director, Division of Post-Market Evaluation, ONDQA, CDER, FDA Public Meeting: Supplements.
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research August 2005 Electroretinography: The FDA’s Viewpoint Wiley A. Chambers, MD Deputy Director Division of Anti-Infective.
Patient Safety and Medical Devices Sonia Swayze, RN, MA, C and Suzanne Rich, RN, MA, CT.
Industry Perspective on Challenges for Product Developers - Drugs Christine Allison, M.S., RAC Associate Regulatory Consultant, Global Regulatory Affairs.
Counter-terrorism at FDA Andrea Meyerhoff MD Director, Office of Counter-terrorism US Food and Drug Administration.
Humanitarian Use Devices September 23, 2011 Theodore Stevens, MS, RAC Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
Celeste F. Bové, M.A., CCC-A Senior Science Policy Analyst Office of Science Coordination & Communication Food and Drug Administration FDA Participation.
The New Drug Development Process (www. fda. gov/cder/handbook/develop
NAS/IOM Review of Rare Diseases Research and Orphan Products Development - USA Timothy Cote, M.D., MPH Director, Office of Orphan Products Development.
Module C FDA Regulations Regulatory Documents Patricia E. Koziol 1Module C Final Version 10-apr-2010.
REGULATION OF COMBINATION PRODUCTS Mark A. Heller Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP MassMEDIC Combination Product Program, March 28, 2006.
Nanotechnology - USDA - 18 Nov 2002 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY IN PUBLIC HEALTH FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Norris E. Alderson, Ph.D.
FDA Office of Orphan Products Development
Center for Devices and Radiological Health U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Al Taylor Acting Chief, Medical Electronics Branch Office of Science.
General Regulatory Issues in the Development of Drugs Intended for Treatment of Chronic Illness Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic,
1 Drug Safety Oversight Board: Recent Activities FDA Science Board Advisory Committee Meeting March 31 st, 2006 Douglas C. Throckmorton, MD Deputy Director.
Title Page Quality Mo Samimi, Ph.D. CMQ/OE Presented at the ASQ Biomedical Division Northern California Discussion Group. May 2011.
Human Specimen Repositories Requirements of 21 CFR Parts 50 & 56 PRIM & R May 5, 2004 Sally A. Hojvat, Ph.D. Director of Microbiology Devices Office of.
FDA’s Patient Advocacy Programs: Patient Representative Program & Patient Network Andrea Furia-Helms, MPH James Valentine, MHS Office of Special Health.
Auditing ISO Nancy Pasquan November Introductions I am….. You are….. And we are here to discuss: Auditing ISO Quality Systems for Medical.
Clinical Trials.
Medical Product Safety Network (MEDSUN) an Interactive Surveillance System: Eliminating Barriers to Reporting and Creating Two-Way Communication with FDA.
Cardiovascular Device Development in the United States: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
CLI and Device Intervention Across the Pacific – An FDA View
Australian Jurisdictional Update March 2017
The CRT of EFS Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going
Clinical Review Process for New Drug Development and Application
Division of Cardiovascular Devices
Patient Focused Drug Development An FDA Perspective
נמטוציטים משושנת ים Eli. S Lec. No.2.
U.S. FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health Update
FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices
Regulatory Considerations for Coronary Drug Coated Balloons (DCBs)
Regulatory– Terms & Definitions רגולציה - מונחים והגדרות
Jeff Shuren, MD, JD Center for Devices and Radiological Health U. S
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look
Balancing Pre and Postmarket Requirements Different Scenarios
Balancing Regulation and Innovation: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Reasonable Assurance of Safety and Effectiveness: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
The FDA Early Feasibility Study Pilot and the Innovation Pathway
Regulatory Synergies in Device Innovation
Introduction of New Technology: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
American Society for Quality Region 5 Quality Conference
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Early Feasibility in the USA –An Academic View
Lessons Learned: Past Present and Future Japan-USA Regulatory Interactions Erica Takai, PhD US Food and Drug Administration
FDA-CDRH in the Next Decade A Vision for Change
Erica Takai, PhD for Andrew Farb, M.D.
The Lifecycle of Pharmaceutical products
FDA Resources and Meetings
EDUCATE: A NESTcc Demonstration Project Regulatory Perspective
Visualization Using Open-Source Tools: some FDA perspectives
Suzanne M. Sensabaugh, MS, MBA
Patient Involvement in the Development and Safe Use of
FDA Perspective Marco Cannella, PhD Senior Lead Reviewer
Cardiovascular Device Development and Approval: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of.
Presentation transcript:

FDA Perspective on Cardiovascular Device Development Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices (HFZ-450) bdz@cdrh.fda.gov

FDA Organizational Chart Department of Health and Human Services Center for Veterinary Medicine Center for Food Safety And Applied Nutrition Food and Drug Administration Office of the Commissioner National Center for Toxicological Research Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Center for Drug Evaluation And Research (CDER) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH)

guide manufacturers in product development CDRH Mission: Ensure medical devices are safe and effective via premarket and postmarket evaluation guide manufacturers in product development evaluate data submitted on device design, performance, and clinical use authorize marketing of devices found safe and effective ensure that claims are supported by valid scientific evidence focus special emphasis on medical breakthrough devices (expedited review) 5

Total Product Life Cycle Coated Stents Coated Stents Brachytherapy

Total Product Life Cycle

Total Product Life Cycle And they interconnect. They interconnect because all parts of the cycle inform and are pathways to other parts. They interconnect because products further along in the cycle inform and affect new products earlier in the cycle. They interconnect because a safe and effective device or radiological health product can’t be developed without some knowledge of all the parts. The Pipeline

DCD Challenges Improved interaction with scientific community Meet user fee goals Development of better treatment strategies for atherosclerotic disease and diabetic vascular disease Improved post-market reporting Focus special emphasis on medical breakthrough devices (expedited review) 5

How Do We Get There? Improved interaction with scientific community Meet user fee goals Development of better treatment strategies for atherosclerotic disease and diabetic vascular disease Improved post-market reporting Focus special emphasis on medical breakthrough devices (expedited review) 5

Comparison of Device and Drug Development Developmental Feature Device Dr Rate of technolology High Low Ease of in vitro assessment High Low Reimbursement during clinical trials Frequent Rare Influence of physician technique on result High Low Ability to visualize performance after use High Low Definition of “Orphan” (number of patients) 4,000 200,000 Number of full scale studies usually required 1 2 Number of Regulatory Classes 3 1

“One size doesn’t fit all” Communication (FDA, Industry, & Investigators) is essential 2. Pre-IDE/IDE Mtg 3. Good planning shortens the timeline