Status of tracking Thijs Cornelissen, Genova

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

Track Trigger Designs for Phase II Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen, S.X. Wu, (Boston.
TRT LAr Tilecal MDT-RPC BOS Pixels&SCT 1 The Atlas combined testbeam Thijs Cornelissen, NIKHEF Jamboree, Nijmegen, December 2004.
B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
MC Study on B°  S (Status Report) Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 05/25/01.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
Increasing Field Integral between Velo and TT S. Blusk Sept 02, 2009 SU Group Meeting.
1 CMS Tracker Alignment and Implications for Physics Performance Nhan Tran Johns Hopkins University CMS Collaboration SPLIT
Pion test beam from KEK: momentum studies Data provided by Toho group: 2512 beam tracks D. Duchesneau April 27 th 2011 Track  x Track  y Base track positions.
Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Collaboration Meeting Sept 24, JLab.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
Performance of Track and Vertex Reconstruction and B-Tagging Studies with CMS in pp Collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV Boris Mangano University of California,
Vienna Fast Simulation LDT Munich, Germany, 17 March 2008 M. Regler, M. Valentan Demonstration and optimization studies by the Vienna Fast Simulation Tool.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
1 Th.Naumann, DESY Zeuthen, HERMES Tracking meeting, Tracking with the Silicon Detectors Th.Naumann H1 DESY Zeuthen A short collection of experiences.
CHEP07 conference 5 September 2007, T. Cornelissen 1 Thijs Cornelissen (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration The Global-  2 Track Fitter in ATLAS.
Status of K S   e analysis C. GattiT. Spadaro Selection on data Selection on MC Efficiencies from data, K L   e, K S    ,      , bhabha.
1 ATLAS SCT Endcap C Efficiency Measurement Nicholas Austin IoP Conference April 2009.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
1 Endcap C SCT Efficiency Calculation Update Nicholas Austin University of Liverpool Operations Meeting June 2007.
Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection December 11, 2006 Track Selection for T-Alignment studies Louis Nicolas EPFL Monday Seminar December.
Digitization and hit reconstruction for Silicon Tracker in MarlinReco Sergey Shulga, Tatiana Ilicheva JINR, Dubna, Russia GSU, Gomel, Belarus LCWS07 30.
Status of the hadronic cross section (small angle) Federico Nguyen February 22 nd 2005  the 2002 data sample and available MC sets  trigger efficiency.
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
T2K muon measurement 2014 Momentum module A.Ariga, C. Pistillo University of Bern S. Aoki Kobe University 1.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Pixel Results from CRAFT09 U. Langenegger (PSI), G. Giurgiu (JHU) Pixel General Meeting November 10, 2009.
1 Light Yield results from the KEK tracker test using G4MICE M. Ellis Tracker Phone Meeting 25 th January 2006.
L1Calo EM Efficiencies Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Joint Meeting, Stockholm 29/06/2011.
Leonardo Rossi INFN Genova - UTOPIA #12 0 What we have learned from UTOPIA so far? Defined a set of gauge histos to compare layouts Exercised on barrel-part.
1 Status of Tracker Alignment b-tagging Workshop Nhan Tran (JHU) On behalf of the Tracker Alignment Group.
1 Reconstruction tasks R.Shahoyan, 25/06/ Including TRD into track fit (JIRA PWGPP-1))  JIRA PWGPP-2: Code is in the release, need to switch setting.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
Muon HLT: status of the algorithms and performance Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon HLT group.
1 Underlying Event studies & Charged particle multiplicities in inelastic pp events with the ATLAS.
The CDF Upgrade - Incandela -CERN - January 26, 2001 slide 1 96 wire planes –(8 superlayers) –50% are 3 o stereo –Uniform drift (0.88 cm cell) –30,240.
Charged particle yields and spectra in p+p and Heavy Ion Collisions with ATLAS at the LHC Jiří Dolejší (Charles University Prague) for the ATLAS collaboration.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
Cocktail algorithm studies
Track reconstruction of cosmic ray real data with the CMS tracker Piergiulio Lenzi Dipartimento di Fisica & INFN Firenze on behalf of the Silicon Strip.
NIPHAD meeting 16 September 2005, T. Cornelissen 1 Tracking results in the testbeam Thijs Cornelissen.
UA - Antwerp - 21/04/09 Romain Rougny (CMS)‏1/16 Final Pixel CRAFT results Pixel General Meeting Romain Rougny, University of Antwerpen.
Approved Plots from CRAFT
RD. Schaffer, L. Iconomidou Fayard, D. Fournier
Alpine, very forward, EOS…
Using IP Chi-Square Probability
L2 Muon Trigger Study Status Report
Future Physics at HERMES
Tracking performances & b-tagging commissioning
Update of pattern recognition
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data
CMS Tracker Alignment with Cosmic Data and Strategy at the Startup
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
The LHC collider in Geneva
HPS Collaboration meeting, JLAB, Nov 16, 2016
STAR Geometry and Detectors
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Monitoring SCT Efficiency and Noise
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Summary of dE/dx studies in silicon and MS in muon system
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Quarkonium production, offline monitoring, alignment & calibration
Current Status of the VTX analysis
SCT Wafer Distortions (Bowing)
Presentation transcript:

Status of tracking Thijs Cornelissen, Genova Thanks to Claudia Gemme and Andrea Coccaro

Tracking algorithms Default `NewTracking’ runs several different algorithms: Inside-out tracking: start from spacepoint seeds in pixels & SCT Backtracking and TRT tracking: start from TRT segments, use only hits that were not already used by inside-out LowPt tracking: use remaining silicon hits to find tracks with 100 MeV < pT < 500 MeV Standard set of tracking cuts designed to give best trade-off between efficiency and fake rates in busy events (e.g. ttbar) Commissioning settings much more loose: Allow more holes on track Allow worse track fit quality (20 instead of 7), loose cuts on ‘outlier’ hits Use conservative measurement errors (cluster width/√12) Further increased by error scaling where needed

First collisions First collisions on Nov. 23. Challenging for tracking: Pixels off SCT at 20V (only 50% efficient) Momentum unknown (solenoid off), therefore cannot correct for material effects (scattering) Limits quality of reconstructed tracks Tracking ran with very loose cuts Accept tracks with large impact parameters and/or large number of holes (i.e. sensors without a hit)

Pixel and SCT hits Number of pixel and SCT hits on combined tracks, very good agreement between data and simulation Can distinguish SCT endcap disks Smooth variation in number of pixel hits due to disabled modules (up to 4%)

Tracking efficiencies Reconstruct ‘tracklets’ in each subdetector, check efficiency relative to combined track Pixel tracking most efficient, TRT least efficient Due to problems with TRT tracking algorithm, see next slide

TRT tracking CTB xK Compare standard TRT tracking for collisions (‘xK’) with modified cosmics tracking (‘CTB’) Higher efficiencies and lower fake rates with CTB Modified version of cosmics TRT extension also under study

TRT tracking (cont’d) Rtrack (mm) TRT simulation does not reproduce data well: less hits on track, worse resolutions (especially tails) Default cuts in tracking are rather tight, gets rid of most of the tail Commissioning settings much more loose, caused bad fit qualities in simulation (average c2/ndf around 2)

Silicon tracking efficiency Check silicon tracking efficiency by using pixel tracklets to probe combined track collection (`SCT extension’) Very good agreement between data and MC up to |h| ~ 2.2 Discrepancy at large |h| not yet understood

dE/dx per le tracce La dE/dx si calcola come media troncata del rilascio di energia di tutti I cluster appartenenti alla traccia. Troncata perche’ si escude il cluster con rilascio di carica maggiore (in modo da tagliare le code della Landau). dE/dx accesibile in InnerDetector/InDetRecTools/PixelToTPIDTool Puo’ essere usato per studiare risonanze come il L, f e, piu` tardi, l’identificazione di esotici (low b) Clusters cuts: Barrel and EndCap Residuals: abs(pullPhi)<5, abs(pullEta)<5 Spatial Incidence angle a : cos(a)>0.1 (i.e. a<1.47) Cut on Incident Angle in rf plane: none Tracks cuts: Tracks: Good clusters >=3

PID Runs 141811, 142165 Per adesso solo una rozza identificazione per poter fare I primi plot. p k p p k Positive: 9800 (p), 3000 (k) Negative: 2800 (p), 1800 (k) 10

Online tracking: pT spectrum In 2009 run, HLT including SiTrack was run in pass-through mode pT spectrum of reconstructed online tracks (red) and offline tracks (black) Good agreement (online tracking cuts at |pT| > 1 GeV)

Online tracking: z0 spectrum Vertex shifted along z during the run, due to LHC adjustments Shift detected both by SiTrack and IDScan

Online tracking: efficiencies Efficiencies of SiTrack (red) and IDScan (blue) relative to offline tracking (black) Inefficiencies in SiTrack thought to be due to initial misalignments, to be checked with upcoming trigger reprocessing Trigger reprocessing uses improved alignment (esp. endcaps)

Conclusions Tracking worked quite well from beginning Items to be understood/improved: TRT tracking efficiencies and fake rates Silicon tracking efficiency near |h| = 2.5 Need to work towards removing commissioning settings Would benefit from improved resolution (esp. pixels) Better rejection against fake tracks Online tracking works Need to study performance with updated alignment Will soon be needed to select events dE/dx tool now available Need to study efficiencies and fake rates of PID using data and MC

Backup

Tracking efficiency in MB analysis