30 May 2017, FCC-Week, Berlin, Germany

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-Beam Effects for FCC-ee at Different Energies: at Different Energies: Crab Waist vs. Head-on Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-ee/TLEP physics.
Advertisements

Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
Loss maps of RHIC Guillaume Robert-Demolaize, BNL CERN-GSI Meeting on Collective Effects, 2-3 October 2007 Beam losses, halo generation, and Collimation.
MEIC Electron Cooling Simulation He Zhang 03/18/2014, EIC 14 Newport News, VA.
Ion Programme of LHC Hans-H. Braun Miniworkshop on Machine and Physics Aspects of CLIC based future Collider Option, Ion Programme of LHC Hans-H.
Theoretical studies of IBS in the SPS F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, Y.Papaphilippou MSWG – LIU meeting, 1/10/2013.
Alexei Fedotov, 02/02/12 1 Potentials for luminosity improvement for low-energy RHIC (with electron cooling) February 2, 2012.
Ion operation and beam losses H. Braun, R. Bruce, S. Gilardoni, J.Jowett CERN - AB/ABP.
DS Heat Load Scenarios in Collision Points and Cleaning Insertions. Prepared by F. Cerutti, A.Lechner and G. Steele on behalf of the FLUKA team (EN-STI)
IEFC WS March 2011 Middle-Long Term Needs for Ion Beams S. Maury 111 Middle-Long Term Needs for Ion Beams S.Maury Thanks to T. Bohl, C. Carli, D.
RADWG-RADMONLHC Beam Loss Rates1 Beam Loss mechanisms Where? Beam loss in cycle – when? Totals per fill: before and during physics Totals per annum Comparison.
Injection Energy Review D. Schulte. Introduction Will review the injection energy So could answer the following questions: Which injection energy can.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
A First Look at the Performance for Pb-Pb and p-Pb collisions in FCC-hh Michaela Schaumann (CERN, RWTH Aachen) In collaboration with J.M. Jowett and R.
FCC-hh as a Heavy-Ion Collider John Jowett, CERN Michaela Schaumann, RWTH-Aachen & CERN Acknowledgements: A. Dainese (INFN, Padova), B. Holzer (CERN) J.M.
J.M. Jowett, S. Maury, PANIC05 HI Satellite meeting, 23/11/ LHC as a Heavy-Ion Collider An update John M. Jowett, Stephan Maury I-LHC Project CERN.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
LHC Injectors Upgrade Project 1/12/2010 R. Garoby.
FCC-FHI 28/1/14 Requirements from Collider Draft parameters just available in EDMS:
IBS and luminosity evolution with higher harmonic RF Tom Mertens (former Technical Student now doing PhD in Quantum Field Theory in Brussels) Some changes.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
Positron Source for Linear Collider Wanming Liu 04/11/2013.
IBS and Touschek studies for the ion beam at the SPS F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou, T. Bohl.
LHC Injectors Upgrade Project 11/11/2010 R. Garoby.
Turnaround time in modern hadron colliders & store-length optimization
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
Y.Papaphilippou Thanks to
The CERN Physics Programme
S. Roesler (on behalf of DGS-RP)
Plans for ions in the injector complex D
Perspective on future challenges for very high energy hadron colliders
Longitudinal beam parameters and stability
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Joint Meeting SPS Upgrade Study Group and SPS Task Force
Beam-beam Effects in Hadron Colliders
of secondary light ion beams
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
Future Collider Projects at CERN
FCC-hh Machine Detector Interface
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Energy deposition studies in IR7 for HL-LHC
LHC status Benoit Salvant (Beams department, Accelerator and Beam Physics group) for the LHC complex teams With many thanks for their inputs to J. Boyd,
Turnaround: from LHC to FCC?
The Status of the LHC machine
FCC-hh injection group 7
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
Beam collimation for SPPC
Intensity Evolution Estimate for LHC
Beam loss mechanisms in relativistic heavy-ion colliders
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
LHC Beam Operations Past, Present and Future
Beam-Beam Interaction in Linac-Ring Colliders
Collimators: Operations - Baseline Assumptions
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Luminosity and time estimates
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
Another Immortal Fill….
Ion bunch formation options for 400GeV JLEIC
HE-JLEIC: Boosting Luminosity at High Energy
Operational Results of LHC Collimator Alignment using Machine Learning
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Operational Results of LHC Collimator Alignment using Machine Learning
LHC Physics Debris Simulation Update
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
Presentation transcript:

30 May 2017, FCC-Week, Berlin, Germany Heavy Ions at FCC-hh Michaela Schaumann, John M. Jowett, Efstathios Logothetis Agaliotis 30 May 2017, FCC-Week, Berlin, Germany

M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations Introduction LHC works extremely well as nucleus-nucleus and proton-nucleus collider Largest steps in collision energy in history of accelerators Already far into “HL-LHC” performance regime 3×(Pb-Pb) and 8×(p-Pb) design luminosity after 12 and 8 weeks total operation time (2010-2016) High precision heavy-ion physics and unexpected discoveries New beam physics limitations seen, solutions established FCC-hh can perform even better than LHC Strong radiation damping can be fully exploited LHC solutions can be extended to FCC-hh Physics case being elaborated, includes QGP physics but also ultra-peripheral photon-photon collisions (Higgs, top, ... )  More details about physics cases: David d’Enterria, today 16:10 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations Outline General Assumptions Beam parameters Filling Pattern Filling Time Run Schedule Update on Performance Estimates: Pb-Pb & p-Pb Luminosity and Beam Evolution Secondary Beams Other Ion Species Further Studies Conclusions 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations General Parameters LHC achieved HL-LHC baseline FCC-hh ultimate Circumference 26.66 km 97.75 km Beam Energy [Z TeV] 6.5 7 50 β-function at the IP [m] 0.6 0.5 1.1 0.3 No. Ions per bunch [1e8] 2.2 1.8 2.0 Transv. normalised emittance [μm.rad] ~1.5 1.65 1.5 Bunch spacing [ns] 100 Number of bunches 518 1256 2760 5400 Stored energy/beam [MJ] 10 21 362 709 Stored energy/beam at Injection [MJ] 0.7 24 47 new layout LHC experience 30% larger beam size as protons more than 10x smaller as for protons 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Filling Pattern (Baseline) Trains of 5x4 Bunches = 20 Bunches/Train, spaced by 100ns (limited by LHC extr. kicker flat top length) 1st LHC transfer: 1 Pilot + 36 Trains 2nd, 3rd, 4th LHC transfer: 34 Trains ~ 690 bunches per LHC cycle  2760 colliding bunches + 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Filling Time (Current LHC Injectors) with small upgrades 2.4s 1st train 2nd train SPS cycle time per train = 32.4 s Assuming: LEIR/PS cycle time = 2.4 s PS injections/train = 2x5 Preparation time = 8.4 s LHC preparation time = 7 min (+ 2 min 1st Filling) FCC filling time (2 beams) = 105 min (8x more SPS-LHC transfers than in p-p) Current estimate for p-p: 44 min W. Bartmann, Today at 15:30 per FCC beam 28.5 min 25.3 min 25.3 min 25.3 min Each LHC cycle injects same train into both FCC rings 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Tentative Run Schedule Similar strategy as for LHC: 1-month-long Heavy-Ion runs before each Technical Stop or Shutdown 3 such ion runs per FCC-Run of 5 years Month 15 x 1 month Ion-Physics time See Talk by A. Niemi, Thu 1 Jun, 15:30 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Beam Evolution Studies Time evolution of beam parameters obtained from numerical solution of a system of four coupled differential equations dN/dt, dεxy/dt, dσs/dt. Includes luminosity burn-off, intra-beam scattering (IBS) and synchrotron radiation damping Pb damps ~2x faster than protons. radiation damping times for Pb ~0.5h Initial IBS is weak, but damping is very fast. Fast emittance decrease at the beginning of the fill until IBS starts to counteract the damping. Plots of beam evolution can be found in the Extra Slides. 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Pb-Pb Luminosity Evolution Scenarios: Baseline and Ultimate 1 (solid) and 2 (dashed) experiments in collisions in main IPs The available total integrated luminosity is shared. Case of a special heavy-ion experiment installed in secondary IP:  larger β*, less colliding bunches Luminosity would be reduced We do NOT consider this scenario at present. 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Pb-Pb Integrated Luminosity per Run Considers: Particle losses on FCC injection plateau of already circulating trains. Optimum turn around Optimum time in collision for each scenario Neglects: Down time due to failures Current LHC injectors estimate 2x faster injectors min. in 2016 +10-15% Baseline: Ultimate: 1 exp. Lint/run: 35nb-1 110nb-1 2 exp. Lint/run: 23nb-1 65nb-1 Including a performance efficiency factor of 50% 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

p-Pb Luminosity Evolution Same color code as for Pb-Pb Assumed: same Pb-beam as in Pb-Pb p-beam with the same number of charges and geometrical emittance as Pb-beam. Longer luminosity lifetime, because for 82-Pb charges only 1-p is burned-off. Potential to increase p intensity as already done at LHC in 2016. 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

p-Pb Integrated Luminosity per Run Current LHC injectors estimate 2x faster injectors min. in 2016 +5-10% Baseline: Ultimate: 1 exp. Lint/run: 8pb-1 29pb-1 2 exp. Lint/run: 6pb-1 18pb-1 Including a performance efficiency factor of 50% 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

γ-γ and γ-A processes in Pb-Pb collisions Ultra-peripheral electromagnetic interactions dominate the total cross-section during Pb-Pb collisions. Bound-Free Pair Production Electro-magnetic Dissociation Hadronic cross section is 8 b (so much less power in debris). Each of these makes a secondary beam emerging from the IP. rigidity change: 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Secondary Beam Power P = σc L E ≈ 19kW (Baseline, 1 exp.) 75kW (Ultimate, 1 exp.) Continuous and very localised losses 19kW 10kW 2kW 0.5W nominal LHC: P ≈ 26W  mitigation methods are already required, long-term damage expected Baseline, 1 exp. Special collimators are required to absorb those beams and enable the FCC to run with heavy ions. 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Secondary Beam Trajectories IPA Collimators Main IPs have different crossing. Dispersion Suppressor Collimator positions for p-p can also absorb secondary beams from Pb-Pb collisions. Very localized loss:1σ beam size on collimator front plane ≥ 85/33μm (beam size at IP = 4μm) To be studied, if these collimators can absorb the deposited power 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations Other Ion Species Intensities form Injectors: possibly similar number of charges per bunch = more ions per bunch for lower Z Contribution of ultra-peripheral electromagnetic processes to the total cross-section would be reduced: σBFPP ~ Z7 σEMD ~ Z4 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Other Ion Species (Baseline) nucleon-nucleon Luminosity Pb208 Ar40 Increased luminosity lifetime, more particles available for hadronic interactions. 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Other Ion Species (Baseline) BFPP1 Power σBFPP ~ Z7 Pb208 Ar40 Reduced secondary beam power emerging from collision point. Worth considering small Z reduction from Pb! 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Outlook & Further Studies Heavy-ion beams to be included in the future evolution of the injector chain. Define beam parameters and requirements. Heavy-ion collimation studies are crucial. DS collimators (few 10th kW secondary beams) Beam Cleaning System Collimator design, material, shower calculations, quench risk, cleaning efficiency, etc. Decisions/Input from Experiments: Dedicated time for Heavy-ion operation Number and requirements of active experiments Preferred Ion species 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations Conclusions FCC-hh could be a very high performance heavy-ion collider. Complete review of all parameters and estimates has been performed since FCC week 2015 Baseline and ultimate scenarios have been studied 1 or 2 experiments in main IPs have been taken into account Keep as close as possible to p-p operation and design. The most important studies to be done before the CDR concerns collimation. 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations Extra Slides 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations References Presentations: M. Schaumann et al., A first look at heavy ion operation of the FHC, Ions at the Future Hadron Collider, 16-17 Dec. 2013, CERN.  https://indico.cern.ch/event/288576/timetable/#20131216 M. Schaumann et al., First look at performance for Pb-Pb and p-Pb collisions and required R&D, FCC Study Kickoff Meeting, 12-15 Feb. 2014, Geneva.  https://indico.cern.ch/event/282344/timetable/#20140212 M. Schaumann et al., Potential Performance for nucleus-nucleus and proton-nucleus collisions in the FCC-hh, Ions at the Future Hadron Collider, 22-23 Sep. 2014. (update to 100km)  https://indico.cern.ch/event/331669/timetable/#20140922 J.M. Jowett et al., FCC-hh as a heavy-ion collider, FCC week 2015. http://indico.cern.ch/event/340703/contributions/802113/ A. Dainese et al., Heavy-ion physics studies for the Future Circular Collider, FCC Week 2016.  https://indico.cern.ch/event/438866/contributions/1084977/ M. Schaumann et al., Current Status of the studies on Heavy Ions in the FCC-hh, FCC-hh General Design Meeting, 2 Mar. 2017, CERN.  https://indico.cern.ch/event/617603/ Documents: M. Schaumann, Heavy-ion performance of the LHC and future colliders, PhD Thesis (Chapter 9), CERN-THESIS-2015-195 M. Schaumann, Potential performance for Pb-Pb, p-Pb and p-p collisions in a future circular collider, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18, 091002 (2015). A. Dainese et al., Heavy ions at the Future Circular Collider, (update of LHC turnaround time and intensity) CERN-TH-2016-107, arXiv:1605.01389 [hep-ph] 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Filling Time (2x Faster Injectors) SPS cycle time per train = 16.2 s Assuming: LEIR/PS cycle time = 1.2 s PS injections/train = 2x5 Preparation time = 4.2 s LHC preparation time = 7 min (+ 2 min 1st Filling) FCC filling time (2 beams) = 67 min (8x more SPS-LHC transfers than in p-p) 1st train 2nd train 1.2s per FCC beam 18.7 min 16.2 min 16.2 min 16.2 min Each LHC cycle injects same train into both FCC rings 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations Injection at 1.2 Z TeV Ramping of the superconducting magnets becomes a significant fraction of the SPS cycle length ~2x 12sec ramp vs. 12-24sec filling Filling FCC with 2x138 trains into FCC takes ~1.5h-2h For heavy-ions one SPS cycle produces 2 train with 20 bunches Debunching losses from IBS are enhanced at lower energy. Reduction of total intensity Generally more losses and a longer dwell time Detailed studies needed. 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Pb-Pb Free Beam Evolution, Diff. Cases Single bunch evolution is shown, therefore the blue cases with β* = 0.3m and 2760 bunches is hidden behind the green. 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Pb-Pb Integrated Luminosity per Fill Available luminosity is shared between (equal) experiments 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations BFPP1 Power, Diff. Cases 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations Pb-Pb Beam and Luminosity Evolution, Baseline Scenario with Artificial Blow-up 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Particle losses on FCC injection plateau Consider 4 LHC injections: Dwell time at FCC injection plateau Particle losses (& emittance growth) Loss rate of Pb at 3.3TeV in FCC (from tracking simulations): Total beam intensity: 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations p-Pb Beam Evolution 1 proton is lost for 82-Pb charges Proton beam loses ~1% of its initial intensity, while the Pb intensity is completely burned-off Radiation damping time for p = ½ Pb 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

p-Pb Integrated Luminosity per Fill 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

Secondary Beam Trajectories IPG Collimators Main IPs have different crossing, which influences trajectory of secondary beams and their capture in collimators. 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations

M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations Other Ion Species 30/05/2017 M. Schaumann - FCC-hh Ion Cosiderations