Addressing Breast Health Inequalities Among Women with Disabilities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BREAST CANCER SCREENING PRACTICES AMONG WOMEN WITH DISABILITIES Melissa A Clark, PhD Associate Professor of Community Health and Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Advertisements

KAREN CODJOE, MD, MPH, CLC HEALTH OFFICER FAYETTE COUNTY West Tennessee Cancer Mortality Disparity.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
THE NATIONAL INITIATIVE ON PRECONCEPTION HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE Presenter’s name.
Does It Work? Evaluating Your Program
Spreading and Scaling Prevention and Treatment Approaches: Centers of Excellence Model Janet E. Farmer, PhD School of Health Professions University of.
U.S.A. P roject A ccessibility Removing Barriers for Women with Disabilities: Improving Accessibility And Breast Health For Women With Disabilities.
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
 You can participate if :  You have cancer, including breast, ovarian, and other cancers, or  Your family members have cancer including breast, ovarian,
Breast Care for Women of Mid-Michigan (BCM) Mary Smania, MSN, FNP-BC Assistant Professor MSU College of Nursing Nurse Practitioner.
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
Program Collaboration and Service Integration: An NCHHSTP Green paper Kevin Fenton, M.D., Ph.D., F.F.P.H. Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral.
Northcentral University The Graduate School February 2014
Cancer Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
Legal Aspects of Special Education Eligibility and Placement IEP and 504.
The Impact of Navigation Services for Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening for Spanish- speaking Immigrant Latinas Lina Jandorf Mount Sinai School of Medicine.
Cooperative Agreement Number U58/CCU U58DP Spirit Health Education (S.H.E.) Circle Early Detection or Survivorship of Cancer in Underserved.
NSC 440 RESEARCH IN NURSING 4 UNITS DEPARTMENT OF NURSING SCIENCE FACULTY OF BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES 1.
Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch.
Proposed Preliminary Statewide Full Service Partnership Classification System BASED ON STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK THIS REPORT IS THE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OVERSIGHT.
GOALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE 2005 HINTS Data Users Meeting Gary L. Kreps, GMU Brad Hesse, NCI Rick Moser, NCI.
MBL Biomedical Informatics Spring 2006 Student Presentation.
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF BREAST CANCER IN MISSOURI, Faustine Williams, MS., MPH, Stephen Jeanetta, Ph.D. Department of Rural Sociology, Division.
California Department of Public Health / 1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH Standards and Guidelines for Healthcare Surge during Emergencies How.
What Is Child Find? IDEA requires that all children with disabilities (birth through twenty-one) residing in the state, including children with disabilities.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. COMMON.
Collaboration with Community Partners to Provide Breast and Cervical Cancer Services to the Underserved University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Tyler.
Grant Program Susan G. Komen Iowa Affiliate.
Application and Benefits of Using ICF Core Set in Vocational Rehabilitation Valentina Brecelj, University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia.
Community Score Card as a social accountability Approach Methodology and Applications March 2015.
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Uterine Fibroids and Reproductive Justice:
Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness
Miten A. Patel, M.P.H., Claudia Tamayo-Friedel, M.P.H.
DATA COLLECTION METHODS IN NURSING RESEARCH
Abstract # An innovative model for prioritizing health care needs for women, infants and children in Texas: Lessons from a Texas-wide.
Guidelines and Criteria from the AIMFREE Assessment Tool
Module 1 Introduction to the HAIL Program
11/4/ Grant Program Susan G. Iowa.
Policy & Advocacy Platform April 24, 2017
MUHC Innovation Model.
Results from a survey of UK patients at risk of bowel cancer, their experiences and information preferences. Selina Goodman, Heather Skirton, Ray Jones.
CESSATION SERVICES IN AMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITIES: RECOMMENDATIONS
FAMILY EMPLOYMENT AWARENESS TRAINING (FEAT) FEAT Format and Content
What is the impact of conducting NCI interviews on surveyors?
Improving Accessibility And Breast Health For Women With Disabilities
General Education Assessment
A qualitative assessment of factors impacting adoption and implementation of USPSTF age-based hepatitis C virus screening recommendations Amy B. Jessop,
Preventing Barriers in Cancer Services for Iowans with Disabilities
Disability and Social Safety Nets in Developing Countries
An Introductory Training to
Program Evaluation Essentials-- Part 2
Bringing It All Together: The PCI Framework
Daniela B. Friedman, University of South Carolina
Measuring Project Performance: Tips and Tools to Showcase Your Results
Opportunities for Growth
2017 Health care Preparedness and Response Draft Capabilities
The NH Community Transport Project
Module 2 Competency 1: Discuss disability models across the lifespan
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
E-learning as a key component of the Medical Education
Introduction to the PRISM Framework
Introduction Acknowledgments Identified need Project objective
The Hub Innovation Program Evaluation Plan
Proposal Development Support & Planning
Evaluation of Programs
VERITE – Dissemination plan
Injury epidemiology- Participatory action research and quantitative approaches in small populations Lorann Stallones, PhD Professor and Director, Colorado.
Significant Disproportionality Fiscal Webinar
Presentation transcript:

Addressing Breast Health Inequalities Among Women with Disabilities Patricia Welch Saleeby, Ph.D. Petra Heppner, MSW Student University of Missouri - St. Louis School of Social Work American Public Health Association Meeting November 7, 2007

Acknowledgement of Support Support for this population-specific research project “Improving Access to Breast Health Facilities and Services for Women with Disabilities” was provided by a grant from the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation.

Introduction Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths among women. According to the CDC’s National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities the number of women with disability in the United States ranges from 19.9 to 28.6 million depending on how disability is defined. As many as 1 in 5 women has some type of limitation in physical and/or mental functioning.

Breast Health Disparities Women with disabilities continue to experience inequalities in accessing their breast health screening, educational, and treatment services. Research has indicated that women with disabilities are less likely to have a clinical breast exam, screening mammogram, and diagnostic mammogram compared to women without disabilities.

Factors Affecting Breast Health Care There are numerous factors that contribute to women with disabilities being able or not able to access breast health care and services. Some common factors include physical accessibility, knowledge and attitudes among providers, financial and insurance issues. These factors may serve as either barriers or facilitators to obtaining proper breast care.

Common Examples of Barriers Inaccessible facilities and equipment Lack of health insurance coverage/low income Negative attitudes of breast health providers Lack of disability knowledge among providers No assistance available (professional/personal) Lack of accessible transportation No alternative formats of educational materials Difficulty remembering (lack of reminders)

Educational Materials As part of an earlier project, three specialized educational materials have been developed and distributed to address breast health inequalities among women with disabilities. A Consumer’s Guide to Breast Health for Women with Disability A Provider’s Guide to Breast Health for Women with Disabilities A Directory of Missouri Breast Health Care Centers for Women with Disabilities

Need for an Accessibility Instrument Although these materials have addressed the importance of accessible breast health facilities and equipment (e.g. mammography and exam tables), feedback from women with disabilities have indicated the need for a user-friendly tool that could be used to determine the level of accessibility or inaccessibility of breast health facilities and provide specific ways to address a feature that is not accessible within a facility.

Breast Health Accessibility Project The current three-year grant project funded by Susan G. Komen for the Cure (May 2006-April 2009) addresses recommendations made by consumers (women with disabilities), family members, and breast health providers. The project is currently developing and pilot testing an accessibility checklist and associated resource guidebook specifically designed for breast health facilities of all types (hospitals, community centers, radiological facilities, etc.).

Breast Health Accessibility Project Additionally, the project will track how the accessibility of breast health facilities impacts consumer use (women with disabilities). Finally, the project will evaluate the impact of the accessibility checklist and resource guidebook on breast health provider awareness, attitudes, and behaviors as well as consumer use of breast health facilities.

Overall Project Objectives To increase consumer awareness and knowledge of accessible breast health facilities and services among women with disabilities To increase the understanding of accessibility features and accommodation among breast health providers To provide resource information on improving accessibility of breast health facilities To improve overall access to breast health services and care for women with disabilities

Project Methodology Both quantitative and qualitative methods are being used to develop, evaluate, and test the content and format of the instrument prototypes. Methods include a literature and internet search, initial and follow-up focus groups comprised of consumers and providers, and actual facility site checks by both consumers and providers using the initial and revised instrument prototypes.

Literature and Internet Search A detailed literature and internet search has been conducted to identify and compile various types of accessibility instruments that have been developed. These tools have been reviewed and grouped into categories (e.g. too detailed/not detailed; user friendly/not user friendly). Based on these findings and other ideas proposed by the P.I. and project participants, several instrument prototypes were developed.

Focus Groups Focus groups have been conducted – one of women with disabilities and another of breast health providers - to provide initial feedback of the drafted instrument prototypes. Based on this input, the accessibility checklist and resource guidebook have been modified and they are now being pilot-tested by both consumers and providers on a small sample of breast health facilities in the St. Louis area.

Instrument Prototypes The accessibility checklist provides a list of key accessibility aspects that should be provided in any breast health facility including specialized equipment and alternatives to traditional features (printed materials, regular scheduling and intake procedures, etc.) The resource guidebook provides information on how to use the checklist and specific ways to improve the overall accessibility of facilities.

Next Steps Preliminary data will continue to be collected from the initial pilot test of five facilities. Data will be compared between testers for each facility as well as between facilities among all testers (consumers and providers). Feedback on the format, content, and ease of use of the checklist and guidebook at actual facilities will be compiled and analyzed. The findings will be used to modify the current prototype instrument versions.

Next Steps Continued The modified version will be modified and then tested across multiple facilities throughout Missouri enabling comparison of the instruments across different types of facilities and in varying geographical areas (larger city versus small rural community). The number of testers will be expanded to include a greater number of women with disabilities and breast health providers.

Concluding Remarks The presented project uses a participatory approach to addressing an identified breast health need by involving both women with disabilities and breast health professionals. Social workers have a role to advocate on behalf of those that are marginalized in terms of taking measures to alleviate and/or eliminate health disparities that may exist.

Contact Information For further information or to obtain copies of project materials, please contact: Patricia Welch Saleeby, Ph.D. saleebyp@umsl.edu Petra Heppner, Student phk95@umsl.edu School of Social Work University of Missouri-St. Louis