Political theory and law

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Justice & Economic Distribution (2)
Advertisements

Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.
EM Winter Read for Friday  Chapter  Cases Eminent Domain Battling Over Bottled Water  Articles Isbister: Income distribution Maxwell:
2 H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved. Chapter 3: Political theory: Social justice and the state Barr: Economics.
Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?
PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.
Chapter Three: Justice and Economic Distribution
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
L To distribute goods and services fairly, protecting everyone’s right to equal opportunity and bettering the lives of all members of society (liberalism:
COMP 381. Agenda  TA: Caitlyn Losee  Books and movies nominations  Team presentation signup Beginning of class End of class  Rawls and Moors.
Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,
RAWLS 1 JUSTICE IS FAIRNESS. John Rawls Teachers: H. L. A. Hart Isaiah Berlin Students: Thomas Nagel Martha Nussbaum Onara O’Neill.
John Rawls, Who? GETTING TO THE ASSIGNED ARTICLE: A THEORY OF JUSTICE (1971) HOW WERE PEOPLE THINKG ABOUT ETHICS AND JUSTICE? – Utilitarian.
THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY: Bentham
RAWLS 2 CRITIQUES OF RAWLS.
Thomas Hobbes ( ) l Fear of others in the state of nature (apart from society) prompts people to form governments through a social contract l State.
Contemporary Liberalism: John Rawls: Justice as Fairness l All citizens should share in a society’s wealth and be given equal economic opportunities l.
Rawls John Rawls ( ): A Theory of Justice (Harvard UP, 1971) -and other books, notably Political Liberalism (1990) -and Justice as Fairness Restated.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
An Introduction to Ethics Week Nine: Distributive Justice and Torture.
Equality and Inequality: Perspectives from Political Theory
Chapter One: Moral Reasons
BAM321 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Session 7 Business and Management.
CRITICAL QUESTION How should the bounty of a society be distributed?
Ethics Theory and Business Practice
“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.
Distributive Justice II: John Rawls Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang.
Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Contractualism and justice (1) Introduction to Rawls’s theory.
Rawls IV: Wrapping-up PHIL Original position, cont. of discussion Exclusion of prejudices while contracting in the OP:  'One excludes the knowledge.
Justice Paradox of Justice Small volcanic island has two villages, “South Town” (Pop 300) and “North Village” (Pop 500). Threat of devastating volcanic.
Chapter One: Moral Reasons Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Distributive Justice John Rawls. Which is better? MusicCheese 65.
Arguments against the Market  Engels complains that free market is completely wasteful.  This is also a utilitarian argument. It leads crisis after crisis.
Justice and Economic Distribution
Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.
The Entitlement Theory of distributive justice
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls. Rawls looks at justice. Kant’s ethics and Utilitarianism are about right and wrong actions. For example: Is it ethical.
Justice/Fairness Approach Learning Plan #5 Sara Deibert, Sara Roxbury, Allie Forsythe, Robert Phillips March 31,2008.
John Rawls Theory of Justice. John Rawls John Rawls (February 21, 1921 – November 24, 2002) was an American philosopher and a figure in moral and political.
Consenting Adults Reading By Robert Pollock. Moral Equivalency? American academia and media were rife with the notion that the United States and the Soviet.
Equity: Ethical Approaches to Social Justice “Excuse me, but its important to get those drinks to those who need them the most.”
The System of Social Justice Principles in the Contemporary Law Tradition of the West dr. Jolanta Bieliauskaitė Brno, 2015.
Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.
WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)
Social Ethics continued Immanuel Kant John Rawls.
Justice Retribution distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live.
BEJ Lecture Three: Justice and Resources Distribution.
Political theory and law
PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.
Marxism PSIR308.
John Rawls Ronald Dworkin
Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance
ISLAM AND OTHER ECONOMIC SYSTEM
John Rawls’ theory of justice
Justice distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under.
Justice distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under.
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Theory of Health Care Ethics
John rawls -an American moral and political philosopher
Theories of justice.
Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.
MODULE 3 By: Chris Martinez.
Chapter 5 Ethical Decision Making
John Rawls Theory of Justice.
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.
Social and economic inequalities are arranged so that they are both:
Justice distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under.
Presentation transcript:

Political theory and law Week 11

Political theory and law JUSTICE

Political theory and law How should we define justice? Everyday understanding of justice Moral aspect ‘Due’ Distribution – Theories of Just distribution

Political theory and law Rawls’s Theory of Justice The Original Position – Veil of Ignorance The Original Position – Motivation Choice of Principles

Political theory and law 1. Everyone serves my interest – I get what I want

Political theory and law 2. Everyone acts fairly except me

Political theory and law 3. Everyone is allowed to advance their interests as they wish

Political theory and law 4. We maximize the aggregate level of goods

Political theory and law 5. We maximize the aggregate level of goods with a minimum level of goods for each individual

Political theory and law 6. We maximize the average level of goods

Political theory and law 7. We maximize the average level of goods with a minimum level of goods for each individual

Political theory and law 8. Certain ways of life are to be privileged because they have greater intrinsic value

Political theory and law 9. We balance a list of prima facie valid principles; we make an intuitive judgement about the correct trade-off between freedom and equality should they conflict

PolITICAL THEORY AND LAW The Democratic Conception – the Two Principles of Justice Equal Liberty Set of basic liberties 1. Equal Opportunity Equal access to jobs and services 2. Difference principle Inequalities are justified only if they benefit the least advantaged members of society.

Political Theory and law Nozick’s Theory of Justice Just Acquisition Just Transfer Rectification

Political theory and Law Cohen’s Marxist Perspective on Distributive Justice Marxist Theory of Ownership, Capital and Exploitation Cohen v. Rawls Cohen v. Nozick