Ontology Framework: Results of Ontology Summit 2007

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Toronto Michael Gruninger University of Toronto, Canada Leo Obrst MITRE, McLean, VA, USA February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
Advertisements

Upper Ontology Summit March 14, 2006 Michael Gruninger Semantic Technologies Laboratory University of Toronto.
Towards Ontology-based Standards: What Can Ontologies Offer? Preparation for Ontology Summit 2009 Panel Discussion March 12, 2008.
Creating the Ontology Summit Communique Frank Olken National Science Foundation Olivier Bodenreider National Library of Medicine Presentation to Panel.
2009 Ontology Summit Launch Event January 15, 2009 OntologySummit2009 is an initiative co-organized by NIST, Ontolog, NCOR, NCBO, OASIS, UN/CEFACT, OMG,
Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE March 14, 2006 Upper Ontology Summit Issues: Opportunities and Challenges Tuesday, March 14, 2006 Upper Ontology Summit NIST.
2008 Ontology Summit Launch Event February 7, 2008 OntologySummit2008 is a joint NIST-Ontolog-NCOR initiative, supported by multiple communities and a.
Emerging Ontology Showcase Ken Baclawski Northeastern University.
Ontology Assessment – Proposed Framework and Methodology.
PSL and SWSL Michael Gruninger Institute for Systems Research University of Maryland Michael Gruninger Institute for Systems Research University of Maryland.
Upper Ontology Summit March 15, 2006 Michael Gruninger Semantic Technologies Laboratory University of Toronto.
The General Ontology Evaluation Framework (GOEF) & the I-Choose Use Case A Proposed Infrastructure for the Ontology Development Lifecycle Joanne S. Luciano,
1 Natural Language Processing Group HUGs Geneva Start.
Building and Analyzing Social Networks Web Data and Semantics in Social Network Applications Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham February 15, 2013.
Summary Issues and Suggestions Workshop on The Future of the UMLS Semantic Network NLM, April 8, 2005 Olivier Bodenreider Lister Hill National Center for.
(Information System) Architecture l Definition (Zachman, 1997): An Architecture is that set of design artifacts or descriptive representations that are.
Multiagent Systems and Societies of Agents
Web Pragmatics: Semantic Web plus Context-Awareness Prof. Dr. Kurt Englmeier.
Creating Architectural Descriptions. Outline Standardizing architectural descriptions: The IEEE has published, “Recommended Practice for Architectural.
Federal Controlled Vocabularies Data Architecture Sub-Committee (DAS) April 8, 2010 Brand K. Niemann.
From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The Making of a Web Ontology Language
Systems Engineering Foundations of Software Systems Integration Peter Denno, Allison Barnard Feeney Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory National Institute.
University of Toronto Michael Gruninger University of Toronto, Canada Leo Obrst MITRE, McLean, VA, USA July 15, 2015July 15, 2015July 15, 2015 Ontology.
IAOA The International Association for Ontology and its Applications Ontolog virtual panel, June 18th, 2009 Nicola Guarino ISTC-CNR, Laboratory for Applied.
Knowledge Interchange Format Michael Gruninger National Institute of Standards and Technology
Knowledge representation
Four Basic Principles to Follow: Test what was taught. Test what was taught. Test in a way that reflects way in which it was taught. Test in a way that.
School of Computing FACULTY OF ENGINEERING Developing a methodology for building small scale domain ontologies: HISO case study Ilaria Corda PhD student.
Semantic Web Applications GoodRelations BBC Artists BBC World Cup 2010 Website Emma Nherera.
1 MFI-5: Metamodel for Process models registration HE Keqing, WANG Chong State Key Lab. Of Software Engineering, Wuhan University
UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL Centre for Research in Geomatics, Université Laval, Cité universitaire, Quebec, QC Canada G1K 7P4 Semantic Interoperability of Geospatial.
1 Ontology Summit 2013 Track B Terry Longstreth Todd Schneider Ontology Summit 2013 Track B Finding the Scope Terry Longstreth Todd Schneider 24 January.
The Agricultural Ontology Service (AOS) A Tool for Facilitating Access to Knowledge AGRIS/CARIS and Documentation Group Library and Documentation Systems.
Ontology Summit 2015 Track C Report-back Summit Synthesis Session 1, 19 Feb 2015.
LOGIC AND ONTOLOGY Both logic and ontology are important areas of philosophy covering large, diverse, and active research projects. These two areas overlap.
A Declarative Similarity Framework for Knowledge Intensive CBR by Díaz-Agudo and González-Calero Presented by Ida Sofie G Stenerud 25.October 2006.
Communicative Language Teaching Approach 1960’s. New trendS IN THE PAST: (Audio-linguistic – Situational Language Teaching) Focus on Grammatical competence.
Collaboration Enabling QUOMOS How community interest built into a formal standardization activity January 27, 2010 Steve Ray 1.
1 Everyday Requirements for an Open Ontology Repository Denise Bedford Ontolog Community Panel Presentation April 3, 2008.
©Ferenc Vajda 1 Semantic Grid Ferenc Vajda Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
A Context Model based on Ontological Languages: a Proposal for Information Visualization School of Informatics Castilla-La Mancha University Ramón Hervás.
Dr. Leo Obrst Information Semantics Cognitive Science & Artificial Intelligence Information Technology Technical Center Center for Connected Government.
Ontological Implications of Service- Oriented Architecture Michael Gruninger NIST / Institute for Systems Research University of Maryland.
Conceptual Data Modelling for Digital Preservation Planets and PREMIS Angela Dappert.
Andreas Abecker Knowledge Management Research Group From Hypermedia Information Retrieval to Knowledge Management in Enterprises Andreas Abecker, Michael.
Leo Obrst, Fabian Neuhaus MITRE, NIST An Open Ontology Repository: Rationale, Expectations & Requirements Session.
Co-Champions: Ram D. Sriram (NIST) Leo Obrst (MITRE) Ontology Summit 2015: Internet of Things: Toward Smart Networked Systems and Societies Virtual Panel.
Enabling complex queries to drug information sources through functional composition Olivier Bodenreider Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications.
Open Ontology Repository Initiative Frank Olken Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory National Science Foundation presented to CENDI/NKOS.
Ontology Resource Discussion
Some Thoughts to Consider 8 How difficult is it to get a group of people, or a group of companies, or a group of nations to agree on a particular ontology?
RE-ENGINEERING AND DOMAIN ANALYSIS BY- NISHANTH TIRUVAIPATI.
General Chairs: Nicola Guarino, Leo Obrst Ontology Summit 2012 Ontology for Big Systems Postmortem April 26, 2012.
1 Developing an Ontology of Ontologies for OOR Preparation for Ontology Summit 2008 Panel Discussion April 10, 2008 Barry Smith and Michael Gruninger.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
Leo Obrst, Fabian Neuhaus MITRE, NIST An Open Ontology Repository: Rationale, Expectations & Requirements Session.
1 Adaptive Data Access Interface for STEP Model Repositories- support AEC product lifecycle management Frank Wang Donghoon Yang Chuck Eastman.
Ontologies for the Semantic Web Prepared By: Tseliso Molukanele Rapelang Rabana Supervisor: Associate Professor Sonia Burman 20 July 2005.
GAS ontology: an ontology for collaboration among ubiquitous computing devices International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (May 2005) Presented By.
Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE March 14, 2006 Upper Ontology Summit Issues: Opportunities and Challenges Tuesday, March 14, 2006 Upper Ontology Summit NIST.
1 Developing an Ontology of Ontologies for OOR Ontology Summit 2008 April 28-29, 2008 Michael Gruninger and Pat Hayes.
Ontology Summit 2012: Ontology for Big Systems Symposium NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA April 12,
Ontology Summit 2016: Launch Framing the Conversation: Ontologies within Semantic Interoperability Ecosystems Donna Fritzsche and Michael Grüninger February.
Dr. Amanda Vizedom (Criticollab, LLC)
Co-Champions: Ram D. Sriram (NIST) Leo Obrst (MITRE)
Ontology From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Analyzing and Securing Social Networks
Methontology: From Ontological art to Ontological Engineering
Guidelines for creation of P802.1CF Information Model
Metadata in Digital Preservation: Setting the Scene
Presentation transcript:

Ontology Framework: Results of Ontology Summit 2007 Michael Gruninger University of Toronto

Ontology Summit 2007 This is based on the communique from the 2007 Ontology Summit that took place April 22-23, 2007 in Gaithersburg, Maryland, at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Contributors: Olivier Bodenreider, Frank Olken, Leo Obrst, Peter Yim

Objective Provide a framework that ensures that we can support diversity without divergence, so that we can maintain sharability and reusability among the different approaches to ontologies. To this end, we can define a set of characteristics common to all approaches and then propose a set of features that can be used to distinguish among different approaches.

Dimensions We can identify a set of dimensions that can be used to distinguish among different approaches to ontologies. There are two kinds of dimensions: Semantic - how an ontology specifies the meaning of its vocabulary Expressiveness of the ontology representation language Level of structure Representational granularity Pragmatic - the purpose and context in which the ontology is designed and used Intended use Role of automated reasoning Descriptive vs prescriptive Design methodology Governance