Permanent GPS Stations and their Influence on the

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The development of a modern geodetic system in New Zealand GRAEME BLICK and NIC DONNELLY Customer Services - Geodetic.
Advertisements

The Geoscience Australia’s Online GPS Processing Service (AUSPOS)
Best Practices for Real-Time GNSS Network Administration Webinar July 31, pm ET RTK/RTN Precision vs. Accuracy & Occupation Time Mark L. Armstrong,
Procedure for GPS Height Transformation within a Small Local Area
29th December Tel Aviv EGNIS Workshop ISERD the Israel – Europe R&D Directorate.
Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research
National report of LITHUANIA THE 4th BALTIC SURVEYORS FORUM, 2013, Ventspils, LATVIA Eimuntas Parseliunas Geodetic Institute of Vilnius Technical University.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Designing the configuration of the Geodetic-Geodynamic Network in Israel Gilad Even-Tzur Department of Mapping and Geo-Information Engineering Faculty.
GEODETIC CONTROL SURVEYS
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
Permanent GPS Stations in Israel as Basis for
Setup “Do’s & Don’ts Presented By:
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW COORDINATE SYSTEM IN SLOVENIA Belgrade, 11 th and 12 th May 2007M.Sc. Blaž Mozetič.
Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA
AUSPOS Online GPS Processing Service John Manning, John Dawson.Ramesh Govind Geoscience Australia.
1 Using CORS and OPUS for Positioning Richard Snay NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey GIS-T Charleston, West Virginia April 14, 2010.
GNSS Verification Derrin Lee Registered Mining Surveyor Xstrata Glendell Mine AIMS Mudgee Seminar February 2008.
International Great Lakes Datum Overview Presented at a Height Modernization Program meeting January 9, 2014 by David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State.
Permanent GPS Stations and their Influence on the Geodetic Surveys in Israel Gershon Steinberg Survey of Israel 1 Lincoln St. Tel-Aviv 65220, Israel Gilad.
GEODETIC INFRASTRUCTURE Walter Volkmann Manager of Technical Operations L. D. Bradley Land Surveyors Gainesville, Florida.
The RSGPS program and OPUS - RS Getting There Faster –
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
≥107 RTN USA ≥35 DOT ACADEMIC/SCIENTIFIC SPATIAL REFERENCE CENTERS VARIOUS DOTS + MACHINE GUIDANCE COUNTY CITY GEODETICSURVEYS(NC,SC) MANUFACTURERS VENDOR.
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
CZEPOS – a Multipurpose Positioning System for the Czech Republic Oldřich Pašek – Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre Jan Řezníček – Land.
SU 4100 GEODETIC POSITIONING Instructor: Indra Wijayratne.
Transition of the ORGN from NAD 83(CORS96) epoch to NAD 83(2011) epoch Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT March 2013 ODOT.
Geography 370 Locating Positions on the Earth
Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department Geographic Information Systems Spatial Referencing Lecture 4 Week 6 1 st.
Common Marks. Datasheet Basics The NGS Data Sheet See file dsdata.txt for more information about the datasheet. DATABASE = Sybase,PROGRAM = datasheet,
Mr.Samniang Suttara B.Eng. (Civil), M.Eng. (Survey) Topcon Instruments (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Tel Satellite Surveying.
Best Practices for Real-Time GNSS Network Administration Webinar March 20, pm ET Key Considerations and Concerns When Using OPUS Projects to Position.
Height Modernization Making the Most of the Indiana HARN and the INDOT CORS March 14, 2007 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering,
Coastal Zone 2011 Conference “Cool Geodetic Resources For Your Project” A National Ocean Service, NOAA, Presentation 1)TOOLS TO OBTAIN GEODETIC CONTROL.
? Geodetski Inštitut Slovenije SLOVENIAN GPS NETWORK SIGNAL: SLOVENIA-GEODESY-NAVIGATION- LOCATION Dalibor RADOVAN Geodetic Institute of Slovenia Ljubljana.
Lecture 18: Vertical Datums and a little Linear Regression GISC March 2009 For Geoid96.
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
MD : ATIKUL ISLAM JUNIOR INSTRACTOR DEPT. OF. CIVIL SUB: surveying3 SUB CODE : 6452 MOB:
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
HEPOS A look at the Transformation Between the ETRF and the Greek Reference Geodetic System INF Vaios Balis – Christos Liapakis Geotech Ltd.
PRS92 Bonifacia Daet Sylvia Esperanza
Assessment of Reference Frame Stability trough offset detection in GPS coordinate time series Dragan Blagojević 1), Goran Todorović 2), Violeta Vasilić.
APPLICATION OF GPS TECHNOLOGY TO ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP PROJECT.
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Geography 70  Basic Geodesy  Map Projections  Coordinate Systems  Scale Locating Positions on the Earth.
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
Towards optimizing the determination of accurate heights with GNSS APRIL 14, 2015 Dan Gillins, Ph.D., P.L.S. and Michael Eddy, Ph.D. student.
Towards Optimizing the determination of accurate heights with GNSS OCTOBER 9, 2014 Dan Gillins, Ph.D., P.L.S.
ST236 Site Calibrations with Trimble GNSS
Geodetic Applications of GNSS within the United States Dr. Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland USA Munich Satellite.
P. Mitterschiffthaler, D. Ruess, G. Stangl, H. Titz, Ch. Ullrich, E. Zahn EUREF National Report Austria.
GPS Site Calibration Objectives  Explain the Co-ordinate systems used in GPS Surveying.  Explain what a calibration is.  Explain the 5 main process.
WESTERN REGION HEIGHT MOD WEBINAR NOVEMBER 19,
SC – VRS Network To Support Surveying and Machine Control.
Nic Donnelly – Geodetic Data Analyst 5 March 2008 Vertical Datum Issues in New Zealand.
Activities of the Italian Geodetic Observatory in Antarctica
Towards the Establishment of New Coordinates System in Palestinian
Height and Transformations
wvcors.tedis-wv.org - current wvcors01.cors.us - soon.
Appliance of IceCORS network 2017 by Dalia Prizginiene
Difference between GPS ellipsoid and sea level heights (N)
SVY207: Lecture 16 GPS Field Procedures and Computations
Geodetics RTD Software
Lecture 4 Geographic Coordinate System
Lecture 17: Geodetic Datums and a little Linear Regression
DIVISION 8 - SURVEYING AND MAPPING REVISIONS EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2006
CORS-Based Coordinate System WHAT IS CORS
Suggested Guidance for OPUS Projects Processing
Online Positioning User Service Review and new developments
Presentation transcript:

Permanent GPS Stations and their Influence on the Geodetic Surveys in Israel   Gershon Steinberg Survey of Israel 1 Lincoln St. Tel-Aviv 65220, Israel Gilad Even-Tzur Mapping and Geo-Information Engineering Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel (consultant to SOI)

Permanent GPS Stations in Israel, October 2006 Receivers: 7 Ashtech Z-XII 6 Leica SR500 5 Leica 1200 PRO Antennas: 9 Ashtech DM 6 Leica DM 2 Topcon CR4 1 Trimble DM Upgrade to GLONASS is coming up soon

Permanent GPS Stations in Israel, October 2006  11 stations are situated on stable roof tops NRIF

Permanent GPS Stations in Israel, October 2006  7 stations have geodynamic monumentation SLOM YRCM AREL DSEA NRIF LHAV

The Control Center The GPS receivers are connected to a control center, equipped with master and backup servers, through IPVPN connections.

The Communication Network

The GPS Data Flow  1 sec sampling rate  Data is downloaded in real time  The RINEX data is gathered into 1-hour interval files and posted on the internet

Operation Manager Software The network is controlled by the RTD software.

Permanent GPS Stations in Israel, October 2006  RAMO is the official IGS station in Israel  All the data is processed at SOPAC (Scripps Orbit and Permanent Array Center)  The data from RAMO and DRAG is also processed at EPN (EUREF Permanent Network)

The Permanent GPS Stations in Israel are called: APN Active Permanent Network

The VRS and RTK Options In order to enable GPS surveying over the entire state of Israel with direct connection to the permanent GPS network, VRS and RTK technologies are applied. The VRS and RTK are produced by the GEO++ software

The Plane Coordinates of the APN Points ► Each point from the APN network was connected by GPS observations to the nearest 1st order control points. ► A local datum transformation (3D) was calculated in order to assign plane coordinates to each permanent GPS station. The accuracy of the coordinates is equivalent to the accuracy of the classical 1st order control network (~6cm)

Permanent GPS Network A permanent GPS-based network is obviously more accurate, reliable and homogenous than the classical network. Permanent GPS Network Supreme Network

New Datum for APN A set of coordinates that was valid for GPS day 275 of the year 2004 (October 1st , 2004) in the ITRF2000 coordinate system was set as the fixed coordinates set for the permanent GPS stations This set of coordinates defined a new datum for APN, called IGD05 Israel Geodetic Datum 2005

5cm 50km Scale Network: Residual: Horizontal residuals resulting from the seven parameters transformation between the ITRF2000 (IGD05) datum and the Israeli Grid

New Datum for Israel Grid A new set of plane coordinates were adopted for the APN points by adding the residuals of the transformation. The new coordinates defined new datum for the Israeli Grid called: IG05 Israel Grid 2005

Official 7 Parameters Transformation IGD05 IG05 official 7 parameters transformation between the two systems

A flow chart for calculating new control points in IG05 coordinate system

Geodetic Control Networks The National Geodetic Control Network will be defined as 3D control. The network is based on the Permanent GPS stations of Israel (constitute the higher order). - Primary 3D class G - Secondary classes: S: horizontal coordinates. E: ellipsoidal heights.

  Horizontal Control The primary objective of the horizontal control network is to serve the cadastral surveys. The goal is to define the cadastral boundaries with an accuracy of 5cm (95%).

National Control Network Classification and Required Accuracy

Vertical Control Ellipsoidal Control There is neither practical possibility nor actual need to maintain a country-wide vertical orthometric control network. SOI will maintain vertical ellipsoidal height control network.

National Control Network Classification and Required Accuracy

Orthometric control The transition to ellipsoidal heights only, is premature yet. The orthometric heights will be used as having a local datum. HL can be measured either by geometric leveling, trigonometric leveling or GPS based on local benchmarks. HS (statutory heights) measured by GNSS and official geoid undulations model (OGUM).

THE IDEA OF OFFICIAL GEOID UNDULATIONS MODEL (OGUM) AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR ORTHOMETRIC CONTROL A very important objective of the leveling network is to bring consistent identical heights by every surveyor. There is no need to wait for the "perfect" geoid model. We suggest declaring the best available Geoid Undulations Model as an Official Model (OGUM). The combination of OGUM with vertical Ellipsoidal Control based on CORS, produces a practical country-wide network of Orthometric Height Control, appropriate for most of the geodetic/surveying needs.

Vertical Local Orthometric Control Networks Levels and Required Accuracy New: D is the horizontal distance. HL1 and HL2 can be measured by leveling only. HL3, HL4, HL5 can be measured by GPS also. E1 will produce HS1 and E2 will produce HS2.

Experiments In Israel Goal: To examine the accuracy of orthometric height differences based on GPS measurements and OGUM in different locations in Israel. Two alternatives for OGUM: 1. ILUM1.0 - Israeli Undulations Model, Based on 750 Benchmarks. 2. GPM98B- Global Geopotential Model (Wenzel), contains few gravity data from Israel.

Experiments In Israel (cont.) Six height-differences (between 4 adjacent benchmarks) were measured simultaneously by GPS (40 minutes' sessions). The relative accuracy of the known orthometric height -differences, as well as the measured ellipsoidal height- differences, is 1-2cm.

Experiments In Israel (cont.) Eight locations where the OGUM experiment was held in Israel. The numbers denote the place's name as appears in the next table.

Experiments - Results The RMS and the mean PPM values of the differences between the known orthometric height-differences and the orthometric height-differences obtained by GPS and the two alternatives for the OGUM.

Discussion For a reasonable orthometric control we actually need a height-differences accuracy of 25mm for benchmarks 1km apart: (25PPM). We achieved this goal in all our experiments with the temporary Israeli OGUM. It was achieved also using the Global model, except for Eilat. The results demonstrate the capability of the idea, for most of the engineering works. Not instead of existing good networks. A special benefit for areas were establishing a leveling network is practically impossible.