Linac4 Beam Characteristics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEBT Design Considerations The beam energy in the MEBT is sufficiently low for the space charge forces to have a considerable impact on the beam dynamics.
Advertisements

LINAC4 and 3 MeV test stand at CERN
C. Rossi – L4 Project Meeting 3 March 2011 Status and Plans of 3 MeV Test Stand.
ESS End-to-End Optics and Layout Integration Håkan Danared European Spallation Source Catania, 6 July 2011.
H. Haseroth July 26 – August 1, 2004 NuFact04, Osaka 1 The 3 MeV H - Test Stand at CERN - The first part of the SPL - H. Haseroth on behalf of the SPL.
Experience with Bunch Shape Monitors at SNS A. Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge, USA.
Part2: Cavities and Structures Modes in resonant cavity From a cavity to an accelerator Examples of structures JUAS 2015 Linacs-JB.Lallement - JUAS
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
Cell-Coupled Drift Tube Linac M. Pasini, CERN AB-RF LINAC4 Machine Advisory Committee 1 st meeting CERN January 29-30, 2008.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector October Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Diagnostics and Commissioning GTL measurements.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Linac4 Status C. Carli presenting (a slightly adopted selection of) slides prepared by and on behalf of M. Vretenar Looking from this point and with a.
ESS DTL beam commissioning
Field and Phase Error Studies in Normal Conducting Structures LLRF and Beam Dynamics in Hadron Linacs – EuCARD2 Workshop Ciprian Plostinar
LINAC4 STATUS Alessandra M. Lombardi for the LINAC4 team 1.Motivation and goals 2.Status of Linac4 2 years after official start of the project ( )
Chopping Simulations Results M. Garcia Tudela, JB. Lallement, PA. Posocco, A. Lombardi, G.Bellodi, M. Eshraqi, E. Sargsyan, L. Hein 1 17/06/2010.
FFAG-ERIT Accelerator (NEDO project) 17/04/07 Kota Okabe (Fukui Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
1 Linac4 Overview M. Vretenar, SLHC Meeting, Motivations 2.Layout 3.Main parameters 4.Schedule 5.Status.
Linac4 and SPL Linac4 and SPL R. Garoby for the linac team.
J. Alessi RF Structures EBIS Project Technical Review 1/27/05 RF Structures J. Alessi Some general thoughts on what our approach will be.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
LINAC4 COMMISSIONING A.Lombardi BCC 8-19 Nov 09 Linac4 BCC Nov 2009Alessandra Lombardi.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
ICFA-HB 2004 Commissioning Experience for the SNS Linac A. Aleksandrov, S. Assadi, I. Campisi, P. Chu, S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, G. Dodson, J. Galambos,
1 PS Days - Evian / MV The SPL : a High-Power Superconducting H – Linac at CERN  Motivations  Applications  Design features  Improvements.
Linac4 Status 1 M. Vretenar sLHC public event
Module 5 A quick overview of beam dynamics in linear accelerators
LIU Day – 11 th april 2014 ALESSANDRA LOMBARDI LINAC4 COMMISSIONING OVERVIEW.
LINAC4 and the Upgrade of the LHC Injector Complex R. Garoby 26 February, 2013.
3 MeV test stand measurement plans A. Lombardi for the LINAC4 team 10/01/2013BCC MeV test stand measurements1.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Lecture17(Course Summary).PPT - E. Wilson - 3/3/ Slide 1 COURSE SUMMARY A Design Study of a Compressor ring for A Neutrino Factory MT 2009 E. J.
LINAC4 transfer line – optics M. Eshraqi, L. Hein, A. Lombardi (BE-ABP) LINAC4 transfer lines : m (from PIMS out to foil); m new line,then.
Linac4 DTL Beam Dynamics 1Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011 Mini-workshop on DTL design – 13 September 2011 JB Lallement,
Beam Manufacture in PS2 M. Benedikt, S. Hancock. LHC Beams in the PS by 2015 Typeh injε l inj [evs] h ejN bunch ej RF ej [MHz] ε l ej [evs] τ ej [ns]
Linac4 & SPL Status of preparation and Opportunities M. Vretenar (R
Linac4 status and perspectives
Present and possible future schemes for hadron therapy linacs Alberto Degiovanni for the ADAM team HG2017 Workshop , Valencia.
Plans for a Superconducting Proton Linac at CERN
Linac4 M. Vretenar for the Linac4 design team
HIPPI yearly meeting, sep28-sep
Progress in the Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Part2: Cavities and Structures
1- Short pulse neutron source
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
LINAC4 commissioning plans etc.
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
Collective Effects and Beam Measurements in Particle Accelerators
Part2: Cavities and Structures
A Design Study of a Compressor ring for
commissioning and measurements
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
The SPL-based Proton Driver at CERN
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
Status of the JLEIC Injector Linac Design
Damping Ring parameters with reduced bunch charge
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Simon Jolly UKNFIC Meeting 25th April 2008
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Presentation transcript:

Linac4 Beam Characteristics Alessandra M. Lombardi Giulia Bellodi, Mohammad Eshraqi, Jean-Baptiste Lallement, Sara Lanzone, Edgar Sargsyan. Nominal LINAC4 beam at the PSBooster Generation of energy modulation Tunability and uncertainties

Linac4 Layout H- RFQ CHOPPER DTL CCDTL PIMS RF volume source (DESY) 45keV 3MeV 3MeV 50MeV 102MeV 160MeV H- RFQ CHOPPER DTL CCDTL PIMS RF volume source (DESY) 45 kV 1.9m LEBT Radio Frequency Quadrupole 352 MHz 3 m 1 Klystron 0.6 MW Chopper 352 MHz 3.6 m 11 EMquad 3 cavities Drift Tube Linac 352 MHz 18.7 m 3 tanks 3 klystrons 4 MW 111 PMQuad Cell-Coupled Drift Tube Linac 352 MHz 25 m 21 tanks 7 klystrons 6.5 MW 24 EMQuads Pi-Mode Structure 352 MHz 22 m 12 tanks 8 klystrons ~12 MW 12 EMQuads Total Linac4: 80 m, 19 klystrons RF Duty cycle: 0.1% phase 1 (Linac4) 3-4% phase 2 (SPL) (design: 10%) 4 different structures, (RFQ, DTL, CCDTL, PIMS) Ion current: 40 mA (avg. in pulse), 65 mA (bunch)

Beam OUT of Linac4 Beam pulse length = 400 µsec Repetion rate = 1 Hz Microbunch freq. = 352 MHz (2.8 nsec) Current per microbunch = 65mA Current per pulse = 40 mA (chopping) Transverse emitt =0.35 μm Energy = 159MeV (±1MeV modulation) Energy spread rms = 80 keV Energy jitter 1 σ = 78 keV (assuming 0.5deg 0.5% klystron stability) Transverse phase space , scale: 20 mm X 2 mrad Longitudinal phase space , scale 1 MeV X 180 deg at 352 MHz NB : betalambda = 440 mm , beam is 3 mm long

Energy modulation PSBooster asked for a linear energy variation over 10 + 10 µsec (20 turns) to better fit the 100 µsec pulse to the booster bucket The field in the last two tanks of the PIMS is linearly increased /decreased from 2.6 to 3.28 MV/m over 20 µsec to vary the beam energy by ± 1MeV /160 MeV Nominal field in the 1 tanks of the PIMS structure (100-160 MeV)

Energy modulation EoT (n=11,12)=3.28 MV/m DE=+1MeV EoT (n=11,12)=2.93 MV/m  nominal E=159.4 MeV EoT (n=11,12)=2.6 MV/m DE=-1MeV The beam transverse and longitudinal phase space is practically identical in the three cases Longitudinal phase space at LINAC4 output for nominal and extreme setting of the last PIMS tank.

Transfer line to the booster About 170 meter long New part : 70 m , debuncher (0.7MV), 17 quads and 4 bends (35deg H, 28 deg V) Existing line : 100 m, 18 quads and 2 bends (22 and 24deg), distribution system. Beam dynamics Issues : space charge with dispersion uncompensated space charge forces (increase of energy spread) 3) limited aperture in distributor and septum ( 50 x 25 mm ; 15 X 34 mm) Side View Top View

Transfer line to the booster

Nominal beam at the injection foil Transverse Phase planes , scale 20 mm X 2 mrad Alpha=-0.4 Beta = 3 m Emittx =0.39 μm Alpha=-0.8 Beta = 23 m Emitty = 0.45 μm

Longitudinal Plane at the injection foil Current per microbunch = 65mA Current per pulse = 40 mA (chopping) Transverse emitt =0.4 μm Energy = 159MeV (±1MeV modulation) Energy spread rms = 160 keV Energy jitter 1σ = 20 keV Scale 1 MeV X 180 deg at 352 MHz

Nominal beam at the injection foil Beam transverse size rms = 1.4 x 4.3 mm Dispersion = -1.4 m Jitter in x position 1 σ = 0.1 mm scale : 20 mm X 20 mm

Tunability - Dispersion Dispersion at BHZ40 (handover point) when varying QFN50 QDN55 QFN60 QDN65 QFW70 QDN75 by 10% Randomly around their nominal value In all cases : Emittx,y increase is limited to 5% Full transmission

Tunability – alphas and betas Transverse alphas and beta at BHZ40 (handover point) when varying QFN10 QDN20 QFW30 QDW40 QFW50 QDW60 by 10% Randomly around their nominal value In all cases : Emittx,y are constant Full transmission Dispersion almost unchanged

Conclusions The beam from LINAC4 can be successfully transported and matched to the PSB Optics parameters in the injection region can be tuned in a sufficiently (?) wide range A lower current, higher emittance and a higher energy jitter should be expected during initial operation.

Reserve-energy spread in TL

Reserve – dispersion in TL

Reserve-emittances in LINAC4