Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 15 Mar 2016 Lab 5 GPR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Advertisements

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
GG 450 April 30, 2008 Seismic Reflection Interpretation.
GG 450 April 31, 2008 Reflection Interpretation 2.
Anatomy of Anomalies Total Field Magnetics and Ground Penetrating Radar at a Potential Archaeological Site.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics This Week: No new lab assignment… But we’ll go over the previous labs 06 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 07 Feb:
Lab evaluations Go to Acadia Central Log in Click on Online Registration Click on Information.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 24 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Wed 26 Feb: Burger (§8.4) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation Well.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 25 Apr 2014 Final Project © A.R. Lowry 2014 Final Project Assignment Due 5:00 pm May 1.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 18 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Wed 20 Feb: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Reflection Data Processing Step.
Review of Labs 5 & 6: Gonna cut you some slack on labs… The focus from here on out will be on completing the work-up of data we will collect in the field.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 28 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
Seismic refraction along a profile across the La Bajada fault Max Moorkamp.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 11 Apr 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Mon 14 Apr: Burger (§ ) Last Time: DC Electrical Resistivity Modeling.
Dipping layer reflection events and the common midpoint gather
Introduction to Seismology
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 8 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Wed 10 Feb: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Seismic Reflection Travel-Time Cont’d.
Coincident Source receiver Concepts
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 22 Jan 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Mon 25 Jan: Burger (Ch 2.2.2–2.6) Last time: The Seismometer A seismometer.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics Last time: The Refraction Method Cont’d Multiple Horizontal Layers: Using Snell’s law, generalizes simply to: Dipping.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 29 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
Last Time: DC Electrical Resistivity In a layered medium, current penetration into a second layer depends on depth of layer interface, resistivities as:
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 23 Feb 2016 Lab 3 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Seismic Reflections Next assignment due one week from now Due noon Mar 1.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 24 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Fri 26 Feb: Burger (§8.4) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation Well.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 22 Mar 2016 Lab 6 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Gravity Start by discussing lab 3 assignment & your assignment for two weeks from.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Mon 29 Feb: Burger (§8.4) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation Seismic.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 10 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Seismic Reflection Travel-Time Cont’d Dix Equations for multiple layers:
The Use of Ground Penetrating Radar Data in the Development of Facies-Based Hydrogeologic Models Rosemary Knight, Elliot Grunewald, Richelle Allen-King,
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology Field measurements and mapping Terminology on folds and folds Stereographic projections From maps to cross-sections.
Geology 490M 3D Seismic Workshop tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV Demo, Wave.
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 25 Mar 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Last time: Normal Modes Normal modes are used for source modeling and estimation.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 23 Mar 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Fri 25 Mar: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Density; Gravity Anomalies & Modeling.
The Changing Sky Analyzing Images of the Sky As Time Goes By
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 5 Feb 2016
GPR Simulations for pipeline oil drainage
Ground-Penetrating Radar
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Introduction to Seismology
Single fold vs. Multi-fold CMP seismic profiling
Zero-Offset Data d = L o ò r ) ( g = d dr r ) ( g = d
Introduction to Seismology
Ketobe Knob, UT.
Technologies to model Ground water
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Introduction to Seismology
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II
Lab evaluations Go to Acadia Central
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I
The radar band is loosely taken to extend from approximately 0
INTRODUCTION STRF: 50m reflection line with dx=1.0m
The Wave Equation Modeled
Coincident Source receiver Concepts
Ground-Penetrating Radar
Reflected, Refracted and Diffracted waves
Normal Incidence (coincident source-receiver) Ray-Tracing
Presentation transcript:

Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 15 Mar 2016 Lab 5 GPR • & your assignment for one (!) week from now Due noon Mar 22 For Wed 16 Mar: Burger 349-378 (§6.1-6.4) © A.R. Lowry 2016

Lab 5: Ground Penetrating Radar Introducing the field locale: Southern segment of the East Cache Fault (near Paradise) Three radar lines; two trenches Three (?) fault strands East = west-dipping listric normal fault Central = antithetic West = Bonneville high-stand and/or (?) west-dipping normal fault C W E With thanks to Stephanie Davi & cohorts!

Useful Things to Remember Part 1: Diffractions appear in GPR much like they do in seismic sections (From a Historical Cemetery in Alabama)

Useful Things to Remember Part 2: Multiples look different than we’ve seen previously: Because we usually have common-offset or zero-offset source and receivers, look for reflections that consistently arrive at twice (or more) the two-way travel-time of “earlier” reflections. Can also get “ringing” of the ground surface…

Western Fault Strand (“W”) Antennae for Paradise surveys = 100 MHz! East dipping layers of the Tertiary Salt Lake Formation (TSL)

Central Fault Strand (“C”) Note relatively poor data quality (ringing, poor trace correlation)

Eastern Fault Strand (“E”) road (No trench dug on this section)

Lab 5: Carefully compare the information contained in trench sections with information in each radar profile. What correlative features can you identify? Are there major features in any of the radar profiles that seem to be missing in the trench? Why do you think they chose to trench where they did based on the radar images? (2) Using the information you’ve gleaned from the trench data and whatever else you may have available, draw an interpretive line drawing from each radar profile and label the features. Be sure to note any features (such as offset horizontal beds and/or diffraction arrivals) that might indicate a fault trace, and discuss whether and/or why (and where) you would (or would not) recommend any additional trenching based on these profiles.

(3) Recall that radar velocity is given by a. Try to find a horizon on each of the W, C radar profiles that you can calibrate to true depth by comparison to the trench photos. Assuming that  = 1, true is the true dielectric permittivity of the medium and assumed is the permittivity that was assumed in order to convert time to depth in the images, what is the approximate ratio of true/assumed for each profile?

b. Find at least one diffraction in each of the profiles. First derive a “depth” equation for the diffraction hyperbola given some assumed velocity Va. Then use the observed moveout in your diffraction hyperbolas to estimate V/Va. Do you think they used a value typical of soil or of sediment? Be sure to include a clear description of all calculations and assumptions that went into getting these numbers. Also in your write-ups, please include the number/letter scheme used here (i.e., (1), (2), (3)a and (3)b) and include separate bullet points for every question under each part.