Teacher Based Teams Facilitating School Improvement in

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohio Improvement Process - OIP
Advertisements

Professional Learning Communities At Glasgow High School.
Building Professional Learning Communities. What is a Professional Learning Community? Ongoing teams that meet on a regular basis to learn, plan lessons,
Monitoring and Communication “Teams need to receive feedback on the effectiveness of their collaboration and the way in which they are using data – both.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
Creating Highly Effective Building Leadership Teams 18 critical components to help you identify your Building Leadership Team’s level of implementation.
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Adapted: Dr. Bessie Karvelas
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
OIP Resources and Training Documents Used in This PowerPoint
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
To use this PowerPoint you will need the following documents found in this module: OIP Stage 3 for the BLT The BLT 5-Step Process Visual The BLT 5-Step.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
AiZ and FT&LQ project Teachers working collaboratively in teams (PLTs, Triads) Teachers developing a shared understanding of effective teaching (PoLT,
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Missouri Integrated Model Mid-Year Meeting – January 14, 2009 Topical Discussion: Teams and Teaming Dr. Doug HatridgeDonna Alexander School Resource SpecialistReading.
DISTRICT CFASST MEETING #2
Professional Learning Communities. Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. Blackboard Collaborate Communication Tools 3.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Fall, 2013 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
Empowering a Learning Community Transforming Our Adult Education World NMUSD Adult School Professional Growth Plan Goals: Empower a professional.
Bringing About Change Using Professional Learning Communities OSPI Winter Conference 2006 Dave Colombini – Principal, South Kitsap High School Dan Whitford.
FASA Middle School Principal ’ s Leadership Academy Don Griesheimer Laura Hassler Lang July 22, 2007.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Angela M. Rios EDU 660 September 12,  Shared decision making leads to better decisions  Shared instructional leadership includes ◦ the supervisor.
Developing Structures for Teacher- Lead Learning Communities Jill Cabrera, Ph.D. Western Kentucky University.
What strategies can be shared throughout our school to improve student achievement? 1 With other teachers at my school, I can plan to implement strategies.
OEA Leadership Academy 2011 Michele Winship, Ph.D.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Redefining Leadership for Improved Instructional Practice and Student Performance.
Redefining Leadership for Inclusive Instructional Leadership: The Role of Higher Education Brian A McNulty Ph. D.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Avon Grove School District October 2009
NC State Improvement Project
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Before We Begin… Visit:
PLC.
Jeff McCoy, Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology
NMUSD Adult School Professional Growth Plan Martha Rankin
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Leadership for Standards-Based Education
PLC.
PLC.
Supporting the work of a PLC through formative assessment
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Leveraging DI Through Curriculum Implementation
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
Capacity Building In Higher-Performing Middle Schools
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff:
Lecturette 2: Mining Classroom Data
Intelligent Responsive System
Six Conditions Needed for Successful TBTs
Build Capacity to Train TBTs in Ohio 5-Step Process
Coaching TBTs and BLTs Brian A McNulty Ph. D..
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
An Overview April 2012.
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Based Teams Facilitating School Improvement in Instructional Practice and Student Performance Using Teacher-Based Teams Midview High School Building Leadership Team January 10, 2011 Larry Bowersox, Region 2 Facilitator

Research to Support Teacher-Based Teams Teachers working together rather than in isolation improves classroom instruction. Using data across the system results in improved student learning. Doing a few things well and deeply (focused) across the system results in sustainable improvement.

Teachers working together rather than in isolation improves classroom instruction. In schools where teachers examined the evidence of the impact of teaching effectiveness on student achievement and regarded their professional practices as the primary cause of achievement, the gains in student achievement were three times higher than in schools where the faculty and leaders attributed the causes to factors beyond their control. (Reeves, 2007) Students make larger academic gains in math, science, history and reading than their peers in traditional schools without collaboration. Students in schools with collaborative teams have lower dropout, truancy and absence rates. (Hord, 1997)

Using data across the system results in improved student learning. In an in-depth study of 15 high poverty successful schools Karin Chenoweth (2007) notes several monitoring characteristics that the schools share: the schools use “all data they can get their hands on”; all the educators in the school “constantly re-examine what they do” . Fullan (2008) states that principals working directly with teachers in the use of data are more than twice as powerful as any other leadership dimension.

Doing a few things well and deeply (focused) across the system results in sustainable improvement. The “flavor of the month” was one of the prevalent factors preventing schools and districts from turning knowledge into action. (Knowing-Doing Gap, Pfeffer and Sutton, 2000) The results of student achievement of faculties that implemented similar initiatives but at different levels of implementation are striking when 90% or more of faculty was actively engaged in an initiative versus only 10% of the facility were engaged. (Reeves, 2009) A few behaviors can drive a lot of change; enormous influence comes from focusing on just a few vital behaviors. (Patterson, 2008)

Research to Support Teacher-Based Teams Teachers working together rather than in isolation improves classroom instruction. Using data across the system results in improved student learning. Doing a few things well and deeply (focused) across the system results in sustainable improvement.

HANDOUTS Teacher-Based Team Effectiveness Checklist How does your school do? Traditional Data Teams And Ohio Teacher-Based Teams How does your school compare?

Relationship of DLT-BLT-TBT Information that occurs from the DLT to the BLT to the TBTs and the flow from the TBTs to the BLTs to the DLT. TBTs serve as the base or foundation of the process, as the entire focus of buildings and the district should be on student learning and the support of teachers in the teaching and learning process.

CONDITIONS FOR Getting Started with Teacher-Based Teams PREPARING TEACHERS TO WORK COLLABORATIVELY BY DEEPENING THE CULTURE OF INQUIRY INTO THE CLASSROOM FORMING OR REPURPOSING BUILDING TEAMS TO IMPLEMENT THE 5-STEP PROCESS CREATING SCHEDULES AND ROUTINES THAT SUPPORT COLLABORATIVE TEAMS MAKING TEACHER-BASED TEAM MEETINGS PURPOSEFUL DEFINING ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES COMMUNICATING PLAN INDICATORS AND PROVIDING AVAILABLE DATA TO ALL TEACHERS

A - Preparing teachers to work collaboratively by deepening the culture of inquiry into the classroom Stages of Team Development Stage One: Forming - Testing, polite, impersonal watchful, guarded Stage Two: Storming - Conflicts, confronting people, opting out, difficulties, stuck Stage Three: Norming - Getting organized, developing skills, procedures, giving feedback, confronting issues Stage Four: Performing - Mature, close, resourceful, flexible, open, effective, supportive

B - Forming or repurposing building teams to implement the 5-Step Process Collect and chart data Analyze student work specific to the data Establish expectations for implementing specific changes in the classroom including job-embedded professional development Implement changes consistently across all classrooms Collect, chart and analyze post- data, discuss successes, challenges and make decisions based on the results

C - Creating schedules and routines that support collaborative teams Late starts/ early releases Modified student or teacher days Support resources to generate teacher time Block schedules

D - Making teacher-based team meetings purposeful Plan effective and efficient agendas Keep time limits Bring discussions to a conclusion Stay focused Meet frequently

E - Defining Roles and responsibilities Chair, Co-Chairs, Team Leader/s Recorder Organizer Time Keeper Facilitator or Process Manager

F - Communicating plan indicators and providing available data to all teachers Assessment Data Other Data Including Adult Action Data State Assessments Leadership Practices Formative Assessments Levels 2, 3, 4 of the Decision Framework Commonly Developed Formative Assessments Observations of instructional strategies Value Added Growth PD Implementation

the 5-Step Process Collect and chart data Analyze student work specific to the data Establish expectations for implementing specific changes in the classroom including job-embedded professional development Implement changes consistently across all classrooms Collect, chart and analyze post- data, discuss successes, challenges and make decisions based on the results

Tips for Creating Effective Data Displays Step 1 - Collect and chart data Tips for Creating Effective Data Displays Provide Complete Information Assessment/Observation name and subject Grade/Class tested Date of assessment/observation Number of those tested Make Chart Simple and Easy to Read Appropriate choice of chart/graph style Good use of space and color Fonts large enough to read easily Clearly labeled legend and axes Appropriate y-axis scale Data-point values

Step 2 - Analyze student work specific to the data Assignment and Expectations Assessment of Selected Student Work Samples From Each Category Pattern Analysis Strengths and Obstacles

classroom including job-embedded professional development Step 3 - Establish expectations for implementing specific changes in the classroom including job-embedded professional development - What do we want each student to learn, or how do we want them to behave? - How will we know when each student has learned or acquired it (post-assessment)? - How will we respond when a student experiences difficulty in learning or behaving?

Step 4 - Implement changes consistently across all classrooms

Step 5 - Collect, chart and analyze post- data, discuss successes, challenges and make decisions based on the results Are results being compared with expectations? Are results being compared to previous data? (e.g. last year, prior quarters) Are results being compared among subgroups? (e.g. ethnic groups, disabilities or gender)

the 5-Step Process Collect and chart data Analyze student work specific to the data Establish expectations for implementing specific changes in the classroom including job-embedded professional development Implement changes consistently across all classrooms Collect, chart and analyze post- data, discuss successes, challenges and make decisions based on the results

What does a TBT look like at Midview High School?

Questions and Comments? Where do we go from here?

Teacher Based Teams Facilitating School Improvement in Instructional Practice and Student Performance Using Teacher-Based Teams Midview High School Building Leadership Team January 10, 2011 Larry Bowersox, Region 2 Facilitator

Teacher Based Teams Facilitating School Improvement in Instructional Practice and Student Performance Using Teacher-Based Teams Midview High School Building Leadership Team January 10, 2011 Larry Bowersox, Region 2 Facilitator