Minimum Hardware Commissioning – Disclaimer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam commissioning strategy Global machine checkout Essential 450 GeV commissioning System/beam commissioning Machine protection commissioning.
Advertisements

New HV test specification for the LHC N. Catalan for the EI section.
LARP Collaboration April 26 th 2006 The Commissioning of the Technical Systems of LHC 1.The final validation that all the collider components/systems.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Injection test1 Injection test in 2006 The installation schedule version 1.7 recently approved includes a ‘possible injection test’ - foreseen in April.
1 LBDS Testing Before Operation Jan Uythoven (AB/BT) Based on the work of many people in the KSL, EC and TL sections.
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
Powering of the Superconducting Circuits: Procedures and Strategies for Circuit Validation Antonio Vergara on behalf of the Hardware Commissioning Coordination.
HC Review, May 2005 Hardware Commissioning Review Hardware Commissioning Review Quality Assurance and Documentation of Results Félix Rodríguez Mateos,
CERN Rüdiger Schmidt FCC week 2015 Long Magnet Stringpage 1 Incident September 19 th Architecture of powering and protection systems for high field.
Preliminary Power Estimates for the FCC-hh FCC Week 2015 Washington, 26 April 2015 Rende Steerenberg, CERN - Geneva2 Rende Steerenberg, Paul Collier,
Interlock and Protection Systems for SC Accelerators: Machine Protection System for the LHC l The Risks l The Challenge l The LHC Layout l The Systems.
EPPOG - LHC Machine LHC machine (and some outreach) Mike Lamont.
AT-MEL-PM, R. Denz, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23 1 QPS system and its risks  Principal risks  General remarks  Quench heater circuits  Quench detection.
Analysis of Multipole and Position Tolerances for the ATF2 Final Focus Line James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Hardware Commissioning  Preparation Documentation MTF Programme  Status The Review The commissioning activity in Resources  Outlook The new.
Power Converters and DC cablesSlide 1/.. LHC - HC review Hugues THIESEN – AB/PO Thursday, 12 May 2005 Water cooled cables warm bus bars power converter.
1 Commissioning and Early Operation – View from Machine Protection Jan Uythoven (AB/BT) Thanks to the members of the MPWG.
BCWG - 16/11/20102 Content WHY do we need a HW Commissioning campaign? WHAT are we going to do? HOW are we going to do it? ElQA QPS Powering Tests Planning.
Faster ramp rates in main LHC magnets Attilio Milanese 7 Oct Thanks to M. Bajko, L. Bottura, P. Fessia, M. Modena, E. Todesco, D. Tommasini, A. Verweij,
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
Saturday 11.9 ● From Friday – Minimum required crossing angle is 100  rad in 2010 – Plenty of aperture at triplets: > 13  (n1 > 10) – Can stay with 170.
Cryo back at 17:30 Beam back at 19:00 IR2 aperture until ~03:00 Since then no beam from the SPS:  Connector problem on MKD  Connector eroded, needs to.
Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis Outline  Interviews of all the Group Leaders loosely or tightly concerned by hardware commissioning proposing them.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
The prototype test String 2 May 13, 20082Roberto Saban – Academic Training Lecture 1 – Why LHC Hardware Commissioning?
SC Undulators protection and commissioning W. Venturini Delsolaro Acknowledgements: R. Denz, R. Maccaferri.
RF Commissioning D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé. November 8 th 2007D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé2 RF systems in a few words (I) A transverse dampers system ACCELERATING.
Training LHC Powering – Blanca Perea Solano From Individual System Tests to Powering to Nominal Blanca Perea on behalf of Hardware Commissioning Coordination.
Hardware Commissioning Review, R. Denz, 12-May Superconducting circuits: what remains to be done during hardware commissioning R. Denz AT-MEL-PM.
NIKHEF Annual Meeting, December 18, The LHC Project Status report to the NIKHEF annual meeting Jos Engelen Based on last week’s reports to CERN.
MD Planning Fri – Sat (26. – 27.8.)
Wednesday 8.9 External crossing angles:
Powering LHC magnets version 30/3/2007.
LHC Commissioning with Beam
Saturday Coordinators weekend: Mike Lamont, Eva Barbara Holzer
The HL-LHC Circuits: Global View and Open Questions
HIE-ISOLDE Report Jose Alberto Rodriguez on behalf of Yacine Kadi and the HIE-ISOLDE project team.
LHC schedule.
The LHC - Status Is COLD Is almost fully commissioned
Powering the LHC Magnets
MPE main activities planned for LS2
Status of Magnet Setup Cycling for LHC
Powering from short circuit tests up to nominal
Circuits description and requirements - Closed Session-
Summary of week 7 Hardware Commissioning:
Detailed global view on protection and detection of the circuits
Status of the BLHC ….work in progress! Mike Lamont CERN/AB 18/01/2008
Monday 11/07: Recovery Plenty of accesses.
Rüdiger Schmidt and Karl Hubert Mess
LHC status & 2009/2010 operations
Mike Lamont 4th HERA and the LHC workshop 26th May 2008
Machine Protection Xu Hongliang.
Mon 22/8 – Tue 23/8 00:07 stable beams #2040. Initial luminosities: 2.1x1033 cm-2s-1 18:00 Programmed dump. End of physics #2040. ~83 pb-1 in ~18 hours.
Friday March 4th 08h32: Access for beam dump system.
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
450 GeV Initial Commissioning with Pilot Beam - Beam Instrumentation
LHC Beam Operations Past, Present and Future
Machine Protection System Commissioning plans
Warm Magnet Thresholds
LHC status & 2009/2010 operations
Brief report of the hardware commissioning activities
Commissioning of the LHC superconducting magnets systems: Why an LHC Hardware Commissioning? Specificity and complexity of this machine Roberto Saban.
Wednesday 23/2 Thanks CRYO!!!.
Another Immortal Fill….
Hardware Commissioning
15/12/2009 Vacuum interlock in sector 78 understood  out-gassing of a Penning gauge ignited as a result of ionization or dust arcing In conclusion: NO.
Review of hardware commissioning
Operational Results of LHC Collimator Alignment using Machine Learning
Presentation transcript:

Minimum Hardware Commissioning – Disclaimer Cryogenics Quench protection & Energy Extraction Powering interlocks Power converters RF Beam instrumentation Collimators Beam interlocks Warm magnets Injection & dump systems Other … 1 2 Only a first approximation of the circuits considered necessary and the respective highest current levels was made

TCC 060616

Cryogenics Laurent Tavian Good news The four weeks allocated for cool down include the commissioning of the instrumentation. Two would be enough for the cool down if all the logistics and the operation turn-out as expected. The four weeks are needed for the instrumentation. The shortening from 8 to 4 is possible because less current means more margin; this allows less precise instruments on some of the components; therefore shortened commissioning times for the instrumentation. 4 weeks

Cryogenics Laurent Tavian Identified issues Time for the conditioning and the flushing of the cryogenic circuits; could be done in parallel with the electrical quality assurance (evacuating the circuits at night and refilling for 8.30) Resources for operation & controls one additional team and additional tooling for the commissioning of the instrumentation

Quench Protection and Energy Extraction Karl Hubert Meβ Boundary conditions - Good news At the 1860 A, which is the current level needed for operation up to 1.1 TeV, only 2% of the nominal energy is stored in the magnets. The heaters are not needed at this current level; therefore we don’t commission them! The quench detection must work. It is being commissioned at warm; nevertheless we have to check it still works when the magnets are cold (1-2 days) Global quench detection at the circuit level (correctors, main bus-bars etc.) will work if The L(I) is inferred from experience with the fully commissioned circuits and adapted The dI/dt is kept low in the power converters so that a safe threshold for deciding a circuit is quenching can be imposed The Energy Extraction system is commissioned up to 1860 A All interlocks are tested except those involving the heaters !

Quench Protection and Energy Extraction Karl Hubert Meβ Recommendation/Condition Commission 78 and 81 as best as you can – by the book As long as the resources are not required for the commissioning of the last four sectors, carry-out the commissioning of 34 and 45 The consequence No more parallelism Much more to do in 2008

Power Converters Freddy Bordry Good news The commissioning of the power converters is considered done after the Short Circuit Tests with the exception of The interlocks with the quench protection system at cold The tuning of the control loops but this can be inferred from experience with the fully commissioned circuits and adapted The calibration of the DCCTs; some of it can be done at warm but may be a day will be needed in the end. The issues There is a difference between a 450 GeV “inject, squeeze & dump” run and a 1.1 Tev “inject, accelerate, squeeze & dump” run !

Powering interlocks Rüdiger Schmidt Good news Before July 2007, all hardware will have been installed, and a large part of the commissioning should be finished After the last sectors are cooled down to 1.9 K, there is still some time needed to finish commissioning of the system, since only then we can have “green light” from CRYO and QPS Time that is required should be maximum one week (assuming that lot of experience has been gained during the commissioning before) The issues In order to finish commissioning in 2008, (at least some of) our collaborators should still be available Very well optimised automatic procedures will be key to rapid commissioning (deserves more attention)

Which circuits Mike Lamont Main dipoles Separation dipoles (warm & cold) Spectrometer compensation Orbit correctors Sextupole spool Lattice Quad Insertion quads Lattice skew Tuning quads Dispersion suppressors quads Twin aperture warm quads Inner triplets 20 Wide aperture insertion quads Lattice sextupole Difficult to estimate how long it takes to commission the sector unless one has: the list of circuits needed for the run and the maximum current level required for each circuit nominal

Circuit commissioning procedures – what ? Félix Rodríguez 90

Circuit commissioning procedures – how long ? Félix Rodríguez

The minimum hardware commissioning to 1.1 TeV Assumptions 15 hour days & 5 day weeks Two adjacent sectors in parallel Two teams per sector (4 fronts per point) At most two chimneys in a DFB commissioned at the same time Only one main magnet circuit at a time except for QF (QD) which are commissioned in parallel on both sectors Main circuits 600 A circuits Individually powered 80-120 A circuits

The schedule Not in parallel

The minimum hardware commissioning to 1.1 TeV Assumptions 15 hour days & 5 day weeks Two adjacent sectors in not in parallel Four teams per sector At most two chimneys in a DFB commissioned at the same time Only one main magnet circuit at a time except for the inner triplet circuits which are commissioned in parallel the main magnets Main circuits 600 A circuits Individually powered 80-120 A circuits

What about 2008 The brute force approach: every cool down which was cut down to 4 weeks needs another 4 to refine the commissioning of the cryogenic instrumentation of the sector every powering test which was cut down to four weeks needs the complement to 10 or 12 depending on the sector Sector Cool down Power tests Total 12 4 8 23 34 2 45 56 6 10 67 Two sectors in parallel could give 12+2+10=24 weeks i.e. 5-6 months More refined approaches include: benefit from the 450 Gev run and measure, refine, validate more resources from the equipment & operation groups, hence more parallelism optimization – wait until 78 is commissioned learning curves, hence shorter test time

Conclusion In 2007, it looks it can be done, but its tight! Careful tuning of co-activities is needed Some additional resources will be needed in 2007 (man power and hardware) Resources not originally planned for will be needed in 2008 The program for 2008 must be closely watched to ensure that the remaining commissioning can really be done