Proposed Revisions to 10 CFR Part 61

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on NRC Low-Level Waste Program – Major Activities Large Scale blending of LLRW -Issued guidance to agreement states for reviewing proposals for.
Advertisements

Large scale blending of LLRW – Issued interim guidance in 3/2011 LLRW Storage Guidance Working Group – Issued Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) on storage.
Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation
Performance Assessment Issues in Waste Management and Environmental Protection Annual Meeting of the Baltimore-Washington Chapter of the Health Physics.
September 2014 Status Update on the NRC Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 61 Tom Corbett, Governor E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
1 Status of Ongoing Rulemakings and Safety Culture Update Deborah Jackson, Deputy Director Division of Intergovernmental Liaison and Rulemaking OAS Annual.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
1 10 CFR Part 61: Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste Gregory Suber, Branch Chief Environmental Protection & Performance Assessment.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Status of Ongoing Rulemakings OAS Annual Meeting August 29, 2012 Deborah Jackson, Deputy Director Division of Intergovernmental Liaison and Rulemaking.
Update on NRC Low-Level Waste (LLW) Program Activities.
Status of Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) Compacts and Update on Commercial LLRW Disposal Facilities.
Status Update on the NRC Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 61.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
Public Consultation Session: Consultation and Transparency Requirements for Offshore Petroleum Activities Francesca Astolfi A/g General Manager, Offshore.
Texas supports the requirement for a site-specific analysis and specific dose limit of 25 mrem/yr within the 1,000-year compliance period Texas.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
HOW MUCH RADIOACTIVE WASTE COULD POTENTIALLY BE IMPORTED INTO TEXAS
Background - Federal Legislation
Status Update on the NRC Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 61
NRC’s 10 CFR Part 37 Program Review of Radioactive Source Security
EPRI Comments Re: NRC “Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal”
Utah Division of Radiation Control
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Spring 2016 Meeting – Park City, UT
Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
Department of Environmental Quality
NRC Update of LLW Emerging Issues
Requirements for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Minimization Plans Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Implementation of the Revised Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation A. Christianne Ridge Division of Decommissioning,
Utah Division of Radiation Control
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Spring 2017 Meeting – Denver, CO
Leigh Ing Executive Director
NRC Update of Low Level Waste Emerging Issues
J. Scott Kirk, CHP Vice President of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards (NMSS)
NRC’s LLW Regulatory Program: Update of Emerging Issues
Updating the NRC’s Alternative Disposal Request Guidance Document
10 CFR Part 61 Low Level Waste Disposal Rulemaking Update
Fall Low Level Waste Forum Meeting
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum
NRC Export and Import Licensing 10 CFR Part 110
NRC’s LLW Regulatory Program: Update of Emerging Issues
EPRI Development of Nuclear Power Plant Implementation Guide for NRC Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Presented.
Clive 2018 Disposal Update presented by Dan Shrum
Earl Fordham, Deputy Director, Office of Radiation Protection
Overview of NRC Low-Level Waste Activities and Initiatives
NRC’s Ongoing Rulemaking Activities: Recent Developments and Path Forward April 17, 2018 Spring 2018 Low-Level Waste Forum San Francisco, CA Maria Arribas-Colon,
October 23, 2015 LLW Forum Meeting Chicago, IL Melanie Wong,
Groundwater and Waste Management Committee November 9, 2016
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Fall 2017 Meeting – Alexandria, VA
NRC’s Low-Level Radioactive Waste Program
John Greeves and Paul Lohaus
Revisions to the Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Branch Technical Position A. Christianne Ridge Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery,
Tom Wolf, Governor Patrick McDonnell, PA DEP Secretary
Industry Input on NRC’s Low-Level Waste Program Strategic Assessment
LLW FORUM Part 61 Working Group SRM overview
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Overview of NRC Low-Level Radioactive Waste Activities and Initiatives
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Fall 2018 Meeting – Richland, WA
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
NRC Update of LLW Emerging Issues
NRC Oversight on Storage of Special Nuclear Material
LL Forum Meeting Richland Washington
Mike Garner Chair/Executive Director Northwest Compact
Industry Perspectives on Part 61 Rulemaking
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Exempt and Low Activity Radioactive Waste Disposal
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Spring 2019 Meeting – Alexandria, VA
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Revisions to 10 CFR Part 61 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Fall 2015 Meeting October 22, 2015 – Chicago, IL Proposed Revisions to 10 CFR Part 61 Utah Perspective Rusty Lundberg, Deputy Director Division of Waste Management & Radiation Control Utah Department of Environmental Quality

Presentation Overview Part 61 process – stakeholder engagement Agency priorities Compatibility Utah regulatory activities Rules: Performance assessments Waste classification Subsequent rulemaking – waste classification

Stakeholder Engagement Appreciate Commission’s focus throughout the entire rulemaking development process Continual recognition of the importance of stakeholder involvement Participation and response from stakeholders reflects importance of this rulemaking Public meetings in all four sited states particularly beneficial

Agency Priorities Build and enhance public and regulated community confidence and trust Foster and work within a regulatory framework that is transparent and predictable Assure that LLW management within Utah is protective of public health and safety and the environment Promote and advance and information sharing and availability

Compatibility Flexibility for Host States State waste classification requirements Performance assessments (DU) In progress / Completed

Utah Depleted Uranium (DU) Rule (Adopted – April 2010) "Concentrated DU" means waste with DU concentrations greater than 5% by weight Land disposal of significant quantities of concentrated DU (> 1 metric ton in total accumulation) after June 1, 2010, shall submit a performance assessment (PA) PA revised, as needed, to reflect ongoing guidance and rulemaking from NRC

Utah Depleted Uranium (DU) Rule Performance assessment compliance period a minimum of 10,000 years. Additional simulations performed for the period where peak dose occurs and the results analyzed qualitatively No facility may dispose of significant quantities of concentrated DU prior to the approval by the Division Director of the performance assessment

Utah Depleted Uranium (DU) Rule Demonstrate the performance standards specified in 10 CFR Part 61 and corresponding provisions of Utah rules will be met for: Total quantities of concentrated DU and other wastes, including wastes already disposed of and Quantities of concentrated DU the facility now proposes to dispose

Utah Performance Assessment Rule (Adopted – February 2011) Conditions for requiring a performance assessment Waste was not considered in the development of the limits on Class A waste and not included in the analyses of the Draft EIS for 10 CFR Part 61 Waste would result in an unanalyzed condition not considered in the development of R313-25 (10 CFR 61.55) Waste is likely to result in > 10% of the dose limits during the time period at which peak dose would occur Waste will result in > 10% of the total site source term over the operational life of the facility

Waste Classification - Utah Utah’s Prohibition for Class B & C low-level radioactive waste Current Law 19-3-103.7. Prohibition of certain radioactive wastes.   No entity may accept in the state or apply for a license to accept in the state for commercial storage, decay in storage, treatment, incineration, or disposal: (1) class B or class C low-level radioactive waste; … Amended by Chapter 10, 2005 General Session (Utah Code Ann., §19-3-103.7)

Waste Classification – Utah “This proposed revision must not either explicitly or by interpretation be a means to by-pass the existing waste classification requirements of Subpart 61.55.” “It is vital to Utah's Class B and Class C prohibition that the existing classification system of low-level radioactive waste remain in place, with the ability of a state, such as Utah, to enforce state prohibitions on wastes with higher radioactive levels.” -- Gov. Gary R. Herbert

Waste Classification - Utah Independent verification Public confidence Waste Acceptance Criteria Host state resources impact Coordination with disposal facility and waste generators

Subsequent / Second Rulemaking Waste Classification – Depleted Uranium Commission request for comment Commercial disposal of large volumes of depleted uranium Initial basis for Part 61 rulemaking Waste classification of depleted uranium Significant ingrowth of progeny suggests depleted uranium is unique to other long-lived radionuclides

Subsequent / Second Rulemaking Waste Classification – Depleted Uranium National importance places this at the forefront of the regulatory agenda Better informs the site-specific rulemaking Public confidence and acceptance

SUMMARY Support The existing Part 61 regulatory framework is protective of health and safety for the original analyzed conditions/wastes Commenters – Separate rule subpart or section Adds greater clarity and enhances regulatory certainty Applicability to existing sites (10 CFR 61.1 Purpose & Scope) Continued use of waste classification tables under the proposed “hybrid” approach Potential impact on oversight resources Impact on completed or in-progress PA’s Compatibility – flexibility DU Waste classification

Low-Level Waste Forum – Fall 2015 Contact Information: Rusty Lundberg Deputy Director Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control Utah Department of Environmental Quality (801) 536-4257 rlundberg@utah.gov