HUMAN ERROR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optimized Human Error Evaluation
Advertisements

Engineering Diploma Level 2 Unit 7 Application of Maintenance Techniques in Engineering In this unit you will get involved with both maintenance procedures.
MGT-555 PERFORMANCE AND CAREER MANAGEMENT
Leadership III for fire and ems: strategies for supervisory success
 Understand how safety behavior is shaped  Analyze employee behavior  Pinpoint, observe, and measure specific behaviors  Provide positive feedback.
SHE Training Series, Atul Limited1 AN INTRODUCTION TO Zero Injury Program.
HSE’s Ageing and Life Extension Key Programme (KP4) and Human Factors
Human Factors & Errors Key objectives of HF is to design systems that –people can use –increase efficiency and performance –minimise the risks of errors.
Freshmen Health. Pause for Thought? What is Health? How can I tell if I am healthy? Can I control my own health? How can I influence my own health?
BUILDING BRIDGES Session 3 - Safety and Environment BERTRANC - Accident Investigation Tasks 21 & 36 - Objectives: To facilitate the development of a common.
HFSD Overview & Intro JTBurns Nov HFSD Introduction Objectives To define Human Factors To establish the need for Human Factors in Systems Analysis.
1 Instructor: Vincent Duffy, Ph.D. Associate Professor of IE/ABE Lecture 20 – Safety Design Tues. April 10, 2007 IE 486 Work Analysis & Design II.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Why do people make mistakes? Learning Lite
Basics of Fault Tree and Event Tree Analysis Supplement to Fire Hazard Assessment for Nuclear Engineering Professionals Icove and Ruggles (2011) Funded.
 Students will be able to:  List items in a AI plan  List items to include in an AI kit  Explain why human error could be a cause or a symptom of.
Risk Assessment and Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Mario. H. Fontana PhD.,PE Research Professor Arthur E. Ruggles PhD Professor The University of.
Facilitating Safe and Reliable Operations! MME-1 Managing Maintenance Error Using Human Performance Improvement Department of Energy Human Performance.
University of Palestine software engineering department Testing of Software Systems Fundamentals of testing instructor: Tasneem Darwish.
Error Management OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 1.
Human factors in Complex Aviation Systems Cognition and some related errors.
The Field Guide to Human Error Investigations- The Old View (Chapters 1 – 6) By Dekker AST 425.
Topic 5 Understanding and learning from error. LEARNING OBJECTIVE Understand the nature of error and how health care can learn from error to improve patient.
Behavior Management “Help!” There’s a Disaster in Here!
1 Human Performance in Reactor Safety George E. Apostolakis Massachusetts Institute of Technology Presented at the Quality Colloquium,
Basic of Software Testing Presented by The Smartpath Information System An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Organization
Component 2: The Culture of Health Care Unit 9: Sociotechnical Aspects: Clinicians and Technology Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health.
1 IE 590D Applied Ergonomics Lecture 26 – Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Automation Vincent G. Duffy Associate Prof. School of IE and ABE Thursday April.
11th International Symposium Loss Prevention 2004 Prague Ľudovít JELEMENSKÝ Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, STU BRATISLAVA, SLOVAKIA.
Managing Rule Breaking
A guide to... Safe Systems of Work.
Michael A. Hitt C. Chet Miller Adrienne Colella Slides by R. Dennis Middlemist Michael A. Hitt C. Chet Miller Adrienne Colella Chapter 4 Learning and Perception.
1 ISE 311 Ch. 19 Chapter 19: Error Reduction ERROR: An event when an action other than desired takes place. Sequence: Consider accidents to be predictable.
Introduction to Work and Organizational Psychology Gerhard Ohrband 11 th lecture Safety at work.
Human Error The James Reason Model AST 425 AST 425 Dr. Barnhart.
Safe Systems of Work. Legislation w HSWA Section 2 (2) (a): Provide and maintain plant and systems of work that are, so far as is reasonably practicable,
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration AIRWORTHINESS Positive Safety Culture Failure to Follow Procedures 1 R1.
UNIT –II Presented By Senthil kumar.N. TODAYS discussion Review of last class Organizational behavior modification Learning theories UNIT II O & B.
Human Reliability HUMAN RELIABILITY HUMAN ERROR
© Thompson Educational Publishing, Inc., All material is copyright protected. It is illegal to copy any of this material without written permission.
NCSX Hutch Neilson NCSX Project Manager NCSX Team Meeting January 20, 2005 Meeting Our Safety Management Responsibilities.
Behavior-Based Safety for Supervisors. © Business & Legal Reports, Inc Session Objectives You will be able to: Understand how safety behavior is.
Motivation Questionnaires Motivation to Manage CLASS MEAN HISTORICAL MEAN CLASS MEAN HISTORICAL MEAN ERG CLASS MEAN HISTORICAL MEAN CLASS MEAN.
Review on Test-Based Approach of Software Reliability November 22 nd, 2010 Nuclear I&C and Information Engineering LabKAIST Bo Gyung Kim.
Karon Cormack Head of Clinical Risk.  “the scientific study of the relationship between man and his working environment” (Murell, 1965)  “the study.
Human Performance Improvement/ HRO
LORI SEARGEANT, MA, RHIA HS460 PROJECT DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT FOR HEALTHCARE.
MODELLING SAFETY NZISM
Motor Learning and Skill acquisition
An oil company in Canada
Human error A. H. Mehrparvar, MD Occupational Medicine department
Safety Culture Introduction
The Waterfall Methodology
Strategic Team Decision Making Florida Reliability Coordinating
Learning and Perception
Civil Redress for violence o the playing field
Human Errors and the Error Abstraction Process
Fatigue Awareness.
METHODS OF TREATING OFFENDERS
Safe Systems of Work.
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XXII Human performance Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by the IAEA.
The Driving Task DRIVER EDUCATION.
Summary and Future Directions
PHA 297: Laboratory Safety
Problem Solving & Relapse Prevention
A Culture of Safety/Just Culture
Production and Operations Management
The Aim of Human Performance
Unit 4 Unmanned Aircraft
Paul Scerri and Nancy Reed
Presentation transcript:

HUMAN ERROR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE

HUMAN ERROR AS A SOURCE OF RISK There are three major causes of risk: Hardware failures Human error Natural disasters So far, we’ve analyzed only hardware failures However, over time, hardware has become more reliable: And technology is getting more powerful and complex So, human error is now a larger share of the total risk 2

HUMAN ERROR AS A SOURCE OF RISK Moreover, studies of major accidents show similarities in the types of human errors that are involved: “Random error…is not the issue” Situations can predispose people to make errors Bley (2002) identifies the following predisposing factors: “Operation outside designer’s intention” “Resulting physical regime not well understood” “Operators refuse to believe or recognize…evidence” “Prepared plans are not applicable or helpful” Links and Notes: Bley, D. (2002). “New Methods for Human Reliability Analysis,” Environmental Management and Health, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 277-289, http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?Filename=/published/emeraldfulltextarticle/pdf/0830130305.pdf. 3

EXAMPLE Historically, Chernobyl considered inapplicable to U.S.: No containment Graphite moderator Bley (2002) identified common operational issues: Three Mile Island Chernobyl Work-around Intentional circumvention Lack of understanding of implications Lack of understanding in unusual situation Continued refusal to believe implications of instruments Continued refusal to believe instruments, field reports Links and Notes: Bley, D. (2002). “New Methods for Human Reliability Analysis,” Environmental Management and Health, Vol. 13, pp. 277-289, http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?Filename=/published/emeraldfulltextarticle/pdf/0830130305.pdf. 4

BASIC TYPES OF BEHAVIOR Skill-based (automatic, reflexive): Playing an instrument Driving a car Rule-based: Following a pre-specified rule or procedure Knowledge-based: Reasoning from one’s basic knowledge Links and Notes: Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering, Elsevier Science Ltd., New York, NY. 5

BASIC TYPES OF BEHAVIOR Over time, nuclear power has become more rule-based: And less knowledge-based Three Mile Island showed that operators may not find the right answer in a timely manner from basic knowledge However, we may now be overly rule-based: Leading to loss of broader “situational awareness” 6

ERRORS ASSOCIATED WITH BEHAVIOR TYPES Skill-based errors: Slips and lapses (driving home instead of to store) Rule-based mistakes: Misapplication of good rules Application of bad rules Knowledge-based mistakes: Misdiagnosis (e.g., due to instrument errors) Insufficient or incorrect domain knowledge Time pressure (e.g., on a calculus exam) Links and Notes: Reason, J. (1990). Human Error, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, http://books.google.com/books?id=WJL8NZc8lZ8C&pg=PA53&dq=james+reason+slips+lapses+human+error&client=firefox-a&sig=F39dTeu4TSBWnk6r3d1XXLJVFFM. 7

ERRORS ASSOCIATED WITH BEHAVIOR TYPES Some designs are much better than others: Easy to recognize Difficult to recognize However, with skill-based (reflexive) behavior: Someone who is used to the poor design may be prone to errors when using the “better” design Especially under time pressure or emergencies 8

ERRORS OF OMISSION AND COMMISSION Necessary action is not taken Errors of commission: Undesirable action is taken Historically considered impossible to analyze 9

ERRORS OF COMMISSION However, Macwan and Mosleh (1994) argued that most errors of commission are in principle predictable: Intentional skips (task viewed as unnecessary) Short cuts (taking the path of least resistance) Misdiagnosis (resulting in a sequence of errors) Delayed actions (e.g., due to conflicting goals) Links and Notes: Macwan, A., and A. Mosleh (1994). “A Methodology for Modeling Operator Errors of Commission in Probabilistic Risk Assessment,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 45, pp. 139-157 10

FACTORS PREDISPOSING TO ERROR Because most serious errors have complex causes: Bley (2002) refers to unsafe actions, not errors Action may not have seemed like an error at the time Predisposing factors: Plant conditions (work-around, circumvention) Performance shaping factors (fatigue, poor training) Error mechanisms (Thompson et al., 1997): “Not inherently bad behaviors but…allow humans to perform skilled and speedy operations” Links and Notes: Thompson, C. M., et al. (1997). “The Application of ATHEANA: A Technique for Human Error Analysis,” http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel3/4930/13600/00624860.pdf. 11

HUMAN BEHAVIORAL TECHNOLOGY People do what they’ve done before People do what they see others do People don’t do what they can’t do Behavior is a function of consequence Behavior is a function of structure Behavior is elicited by antecedents Experience makes an antecedent out of an item Reinforcement increases frequency Reinforcement works until it saturates Punishment decreases frequency Punishment elicits only its avoidance Null consequences are punishment for functional behavior Null consequences are reinforcement for dysfunctional behavior Links and Notes: Corcoran, W. R. (1999, 2004). The Firebird Forum, Vol. 2 (No. 5) and Vol. 7 (No.11), available on request from firebird.one@alum.MIT.edu. 12