Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IDEA 2004 and Section 504: Key Differences Wayne County Public Schools Exceptional Children Program Teresa Smith, EC Transition Coordinator Rhonda Wiggins,
Advertisements

DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
Working with Parents of a Child with Disabilities Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
English as a Second Language, Special Education, or both? Melanie Manares The Kansas State Department of Education KSDE Annual Conference October 2010.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
- Where is the gap?. Litigation & Legislation Earlier, many students with disabilities were being excluded or participated in inferior educational programs.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
Independent Educational Evaluations Developed by Contra Costa SELPA As Recommended for LEA Board Policy
COSA Special Education Conference October Zen and the Art of RTI.
Legal and Ethical Issues
The Personnel and Procedures of Special Education Chapter 2 Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2006 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
ASSESSMENT Developed by Contra Costa SELPA
Assessment of Special Education Students
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
True or False A student’s need for AT must be considered at every ARD.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Chapter 2: The Personnel and Procedures of Special Education Chapter 2 Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008.
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
Identification & Evaluation Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Assessment Definition Pre-referral Decisions: Attempt to ameliorate the problem prior to referral (classroom based assessment) Entitlement Decisions:
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) For Families and Advocates Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act.
Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University.
REFERRAL AND ASSESSMENT DIVISION OF PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY SPECIAL EDUCATION WEBINAR: MARCH 27, 2012.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 RTI: Instructional Process and Evaluation Component Response.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
Response to Intervention within IDEIA 2004: Get Ready South Carolina Bradley S. Witzel, PhD Department of Curriculum and Instruction Richard W. Riley College.
1 Diagnostic/Academic Assessment Julie Esparza Brown, EdD SPED 512 – Diagnostic Assessment Fall 2010 Portland State University.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
Under 34 CFR , the public agency must conduct a full and individual evaluation Under 34 CFR , the public agency must ensure: The child is.
ECC. What is it?  Nine areas A C C R O S S V I Is it Separate?  The ECC is inclusive The regular curriculum is appropriate The regular curriculum is/should.
Nondiscriminatory Evaluations NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS.
Legal Foundations of Special Education Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 1.
1 Parents, Students and Schools as Partners Rights and Responsibilities in Special Education.
504 Evaluation Issues Jefferson Parish School Board August 23, 2017 Wayne T. Stewart, J.D., Ph.D. 8/23/2017 © 2017 Hammonds, Sills, Adkins & Guice,
Identifying and Supporting English Learners with
Understanding the IEP Process
Chapter 14 Early Childhood Special Education
Introduction to Evaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Legal Foundations of Special Education
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Teaching Students With Exceptionalities
Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Documentation that Informs the 3 Global Outcomes and Eligibility Determination Facilitator’s Notes: Handouts used in.
Who is a member? The IEP Team: How to Operate the Slide:
Teaching Students With Exceptionalities
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Special Education Procedures Pre-Referral Through IEP
Chapter 1 Special Education Assessment.
Monitoring Children’s Progress
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Six Major Principles of IDEA
Presented By: Eric G. Rodriguez
Who is a member? The IEP Team: How to Operate the Slide:
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Who is a member? The IEP Team: How to Operate the Slide:
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004

This module answers these questions: What is evaluation? What is the purpose of evaluation? What is required to conduct a technically sound evaluation? Evaluation series… Intro to evaluation Initial evaluation & reevaluation Identification of children with specific learning disabilities

Susana. Kevin. Richard.

Purposes of Evaluation To see if the child is a “child with a disability” as defined by IDEA 2004 To gather information that will help determine child’s educational needs To guide decision making about appropriate educational program for the child

Before Any Initial Evaluation Public agency must: Provide parent(s) with notice Obtain parent’s informed consent

The “What” of Evaluation The “How” of Evaluation Must use of a variety of assessment tools and strategies to… The “What” of Evaluation …gather information about the child, including information provided by parents. Relevant… functional developmental academic information.

The “Why” of Evaluation To assist in determining: Whether the child is a “child with a disability” Content of the child’s IEP Including info related to enabling the child… to be involved in and progress in the general education curriculum for a preschool child, to participate in appropriate activities

The “How” of Evaluation Is sufficiently comprehensive… …to identify all of the child’s special education and related services needs The “What” of Evaluation whether or not those needs are commonly linked to the disability category in which the child has been classified

The “What” of Evaluation The “How” of Evaluation May not use any single measure or assessment as the sole criterion for determining … The “What” of Evaluation Whether the child is a “child with a disability” An appropriate educational program for the child

The “How” of Evaluation Must use technically sound instruments … …that assess the relative contribution of: cognitive and behavioral factors physical or developmental factors The “What” of Evaluation

The “How” of Evaluation Assessments and other evaluation procedures must be administered: by trained and knowledgeable personnel in accordance with documented instructions for the purposes for which the assessments or measures are valid and reliable The “What” of Evaluation

The “What” of Evaluation All areas related to the suspected disability, including (if appropriate): health vision hearing social and emotional status general intelligence academic performance communicative status motor abilities The “What” of Evaluation

The “How” of Evaluation Assessments and other evaluation procedures must be: Selected and administered so as not to be discriminatory on a racial or cultural basis Provided and administered in child’s native language or other mode of communication,* and in the form most likely to yield… *unless it is clearly not feasible …Accurate information on what child knows and can do The “What” of Evaluation Academically Developmentally Functionally

The “How” of Evaluation Assessments and other evaluation procedures: Yes. No. Those tailored to assess specific areas of educational need Not merely those designed to provide a single general intelligence quotient The “What” of Evaluation

The “How” of Evaluation If an assessment is administered to a child with impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills, the assessment results… Yes. No. Accurately reflect child’s aptitude or achievement level (or whatever other factors the test purports to measure) Do not just reflect child’s impaired skills (unless those are the factors test purports to measure) The “What” of Evaluation

When Students Transfer* Assessments are coordinated between old and new public agencies— As necessary As swiftly as possible To ensure prompt completion of full evaluations * Between 2 public agencies, in same school year

Roundup Time!