r = Ag / Aopt > 2 or more, so Compton dominance varies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fermi rules out EC/CMB as the X-ray emission mechanism for 3C 273 Markos Georganopoulos 1,2 Eileen T. Meyer 3 1 University of Maryland, Baltimore County.
Advertisements

Almost every galaxy hosts a BH 99% are silent 1% are active 0.1% have jets Extragalactic jets: a new perspective G. Ghisellini in coll. with F. Tavecchio.
Connection between the parsec-scale radio jet and γ-ray flare in the blazar Venkatessh Ramakrishnan Aalto University Metsähovi Radio Observatory,
The Optical Microvariability of the BL Lacertae Object S and Its Multi-waveband Correlations Poon Helen Beijing Normal University.
Longterm X-ray observation of Blazars with MAXI Naoki Isobe (Kyoto University; & MAXI
Determining the location of the GeV emitting zone in fast, bright blazars Amanda Dotson, UMBC Markos Georganopoulos (advisor), UMBC/GSFC Eileen Meyer,
Modeling the SED and variability of 3C66A in 2003/2004 Presented By Manasvita Joshi Ohio University, Athens, OH ISCRA, Erice, Italy 2006.
X-ray synchrotron radiation and particle acceleration Martin Hardcastle University of Bristol, UK with Diana Worrall & Mark Birkinshaw (Bristol), Dan Harris.
Naoki Isobe, Yoshihiro Ueda (Kyoto University) Kousuke Sugimori, Nobuyuki Kawai (Tokyo Tech.) Hitishi Negoro (Nihon Univ.) Mutsumi Sugizaki, Masaru Matsuoka.
Markus B ӧ ttcher Ohio University Athens, OH VHE Gamma-Ray Induced Pair Cascades in Blazars and Radio Galaxies.
Modeling Variability of Blazar Jets with a Turbulent Magnetic Field Alan Marscher Institute for Astrophysical Research, Boston University Research Web.
Models for non-HBL VHE Gamma-Ray Blazars Markus Böttcher Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA “TeV Particle Astrophysics” SLAC, Menlo Park, CA, July 13 – 17,
Numerical Modeling of Electromagnetic Radiation from AGN Jets Based on  -ray emission and spectral evolution of pair plasmas in AGN jets Bottcher et al.
Multi-wavelength AGN spectra and modeling Paolo Giommi ASI.
COLOR STUDY OF BLAZARS Robert Filgas Supervisor: RNDr. René Hudec, CSc., AÚ AV ČR.
AGILE detection of variable gamma-ray activity from the BL Lac S during 2007 September - October observations F. D’Ammando 1,2, A. Chen 3, A.
Studying emission mechanisms of AGN Dr. Karsten Berger Fermi School, June ©NASA.
Blazars and Neutrinos C. Dermer (Naval Research Laboratory) Collaborators: A. M. Atoyan (Universite de Montreal) M. Böttcher (Rice University) R. Schlickeiser.
Leptonic and Hadronic Modeling of Gamma-Ray Blazars Markus Böttcher and Anita Reimer North-West University Universit ӓ t Innsbruck Potchefstroom, Innsbruck.
Leptonic and Hadronic Models for the Spectral Energy Distributions and High- Energy Polarization of Blazars Markus Böttcher North-West University Potchefstroom.
Lunch discussion on motivations for studying blazar variability Greg Madejski, SLAC Parts of this presentation use slides by Benoit Lott and Jun Kataoka.
Quasar large scale jets: Fast and powerful or weak and slow, but efficient accelerators? Markos Georganopoulos 1,2 1 University of Maryland, Baltimore.
1 Juri Poutanen University of Oulu, Finland (Stern, Poutanen, 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1217; Stern, Poutanen, 2007, MNRAS, submitted, astro- ph/ ) A new.
Multiwavelength observations of the gamma-ray blazars detected by AGILE Filippo D’Ammando INAF - Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica Roma.
Determining the location of the GeV emitting zone in fast, bright blazars Amanda Dotson, UMBC Markos Georganopoulous, UMBC/GSFC Eileen Meyer, STScI MARLAM.
1 Physics of GRB Prompt emission Asaf Pe’er University of Amsterdam September 2005.
Broadband Properties of Blazars
BL LAC OBJECTS Marco Bondi INAF-IRA, Bologna, Italy.
Probing the Inner Jet of the Quasar PKS 1510  089 with Multi-waveband Monitoring Alan Marscher Boston University Research Web Page:
We fit the high-state data to a model with three free parameters: the normalizations of the three radiation components. The figure below shows the fit.
Gamma-Ray Bursts: Open Questions and Looking Forward Ehud Nakar Tel-Aviv University 2009 Fermi Symposium Nov. 3, 2009.
Modeling the Emission Processes in Blazars Markus Böttcher Ohio University Athens, OH.
From the Black Hole to the Telescope: Fundamental Physics of AGN Esko Valtaoja Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, Finland Metsähovi Radio Observatory,
Blazars: the gamma-ray view of AGILE on behalf of the AGILE WG-AGN Filippo D’Ammando Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata” INAF - Istituto di Astrofisica.
The hard X-ray Extra-Galactic sky with INTEGRAL/IBIS High-z QSOs A.De Rosa on behalf of the INTEGRAL/AGN survey team.
VHE  -ray Emission From Nearby FR I Radio Galaxies M. Ostrowski 1 & L. Stawarz 1,2 1 Astronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University 2 Landessternwarte.
QUASAR-MICROQUASAR ANALOGY The scales of length and time are proportional to M BH R sh = 2GM BH /c 2 ;  T  M BH Unique system of equations: The maximum.
Modeling the SED and variability of 3C66A in Authors: Manasvita Joshi and Markus Böttcher (Ohio University) Abstract: An extensive multi-wavelength.
The non-thermal broadband spectral energy distribution of radio galaxies Gustavo E. Romero Instituto Argentino de Radio Astronomía (IAR-CCT La Plata CONICET)
Constraining the Location of Gamma-ray Emission in Blazar Jets Manasvita Joshi, Boston University Collaborators: Alan Marscher & Svetlana Jorstad (Boston.
Hydrodynamics of Small- Scale Jets: Observational aspects Esko Valtaoja Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, Finland Metsähovi Radio Observatory, Helsinki.
Tobias Jogler Max-Planck Institut für Physik IMPRS YSW Ringberg 2007 VHE emission from binary systems Outline Binary systems Microquasar Pulsar binaries.
Multi-wavelength observations of PSR B during its 2010 periastron passage Masha Chernyakova(DIAS), Andrii Neronov (ISDC), Aous Abdo (GMU), Damien.
Magnetized Shocks & Prompt GRB Emission
Multi-wavelength behaviour of III Zw 2
Radio Loud and Radio Quiet AGN
Catching Blazars in their ordinary life
Gamma Rays from the Radio Galaxy M87
Alessandro Buzzatti Università degli Studi di Torino / SLAC
Observation of Pulsars and Plerions with MAGIC
Total intensity radio variations in blazars
Broadband Properties of Blazars
Lecture 5 Multi-wavelength cosmic background
MODELS OF EMISSION LINE PROFILES AND SPECTRAL ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS
A statistical model to explain the gamma-ray flare and variability of Crab nebula Qiang Yuan Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Observation of microquasars with the MAGIC telescope
Relativistic outflows and GLAST
Junior Research Fellow,
Gamma-ray bursts from magnetized collisionally heated jets
Acceleration of Electrons and Protons by Plasma Waves in Sgr A*
From radio to gamma-rays: 3C 273 reveals its multi-component structure
Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)
How to classify a Gamma -ray source as a Blazar
X-Ray Binaries as Gamma-Ray Sources
Gamma-ray emission along the radio jet:
ACTIVE GALAXIES and GALAXY EVOLUTION
Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei
Group Nov. 01, USTC 4/18/2019 Group Nov. 01, USTC AGN-dominated SFG-dominated.
Center for Astrophysics
Presentation transcript:

r = Ag / Aopt > 2 or more, so Compton dominance varies. News concerning Blazars: 1) mirror effects in Flat Spectrum Radio Quasars 2) cyclic modulation in BL Lacertae Objects (V.Vittorini, M. Tavani, A. Cavaliere) 1) FSRQs: Remarkable flares g (0.1 ÷ 5 GeV) in 3C 454.3, 3C 279, PKS 1830-211 … show ratios of optical to g-ray variations r = Ag / Aopt > 2 or more, so Compton dominance varies. (vs. standard EC r = 1) Moreover, in these flares correlation of g-ray and optical bands is often complex or absent, g-flux doubles in a few hours, high energy spectrum may be very hard.

3C 279 shows orphan r = 6 r = 1 r = 0 r = 4 different degrees of correlation g - O, down to absence. The decay of Flare 2 is abrupt. To account for such complex behaviors, some variations are required in the external photon field

The source contains moving plasmoids like knots observed in radio superluminal counterparts. External photon seeds for IC is provided by a leading plasmoid that partially reflects S emissions from following ones. Photons are IC upscattered in the gap d = Rm (2Ge)-2 by electrons accelerated in situ (see below). G IC from gaps attains luminosities LIC ~ B2 G8÷10 ~ 1048 erg / cm2 s on timescale ~ d / (c Ge2) hours Here Ge ~ 5 is the relative boost between mirror and emitter.

mirror flares The model yields strong IC emission in g rays L ~ B2 G10 ≤ 1048 erg / cm2 s delayed by Rm / (cG2) ~ week relative to plateau emitted within the BLR  de-correlated g-ray flares! spiky plateau month zoom to hours Rise-time Rm / (4cG4) ~ hours. Low absorption by g g interactions.

2) Cyclic emissions g – O from BL Lac PG 1553 + 113 observed T ≈ 2.18 yr w. high significance Ackermann et al. 2015: multi l (g, soft X, O) observations w. cyclic modulation + X-ray outbursts A strong case for a binary SMBH system, M1 ~ 108 Msun M2/M1 ~ 10-1 , r ~ 10-2 pc

Non - circular, non - Keplerian orbits in a long inspiral stage Bulk properties of main jet affected by squeezing and shearing due to differential gravitational stresses Topology of B lines changed, by rearrangement and reconnections, known to cause plasmoid formation and electron acceleration to a flat power law with gcut ~ 103 and above (see Kagan, Sironi, Cerutti, Giannios 2015 also Melzani et al. 2014) Main parameters: magnetizations for bulk stability sj = B2 / 4p c2 mp np G2 ≈ 1, for acceleration se = G2 (mp / me) sj compressed / increased B rises sj and se ~ 104 sj  sheared / reconnected B-lines with se ~ 104 sj stir electron acceleration to high g

Increased B and high g yield strong X-ray outburst beyond the first SED peak

Here we plot the relative boost factor Ge = Gm Gint ( 1 – bm bint ) between mirror and emitter as a function of the mirror boost Gm and the emitter boost Gint

With a jet opening angle The knot K10 emerges from the core T=160 days after the flare (Jorstad et al. 2012). With a jet opening angle 1.6° K10 traveled Rc=16 pc before being resolved. For G = 10 and q = G-1 the predicted lag is T=(1-bcosq) Rc / c T=G-2Rc / c = 0.5 years 21 Apr 2011 10

PKS 1830: an extreme instance Orphan gamma-flare during a montly activity (Ag=3): Optical and X-ray remain at hystorical steady levels. Peak (Oct. 14) Flare (Oct. 14 – 18) 1 month enhancement Oct. 8 – Nov. 8 Steady g (EGRET) A second component of shocked particles (red dotted lines) can account for this monthly enhancement in gamma-rays with little or no contributions in optical and X-rays. But the fast orphan flare (Ag = 5 on 6 hours) around Oct. 14 would require some variation in the external field of seed photons ! Ciprini et al. 2010; Donnarumma et al. 2011

The November 2010 super flare of 3C 454 (Vercellone et al. 2011) start plateau precursor jump peak No gamma-ray counterpart: r = 0 at the precursor, whereas at the start r = 1 Faint soft X-ray counterpart (SC plays a secondary role!) MgII line flux variations of 30% (Leon Tavares 2013) Strong 1 day optical flare (energization of a new component in the inner jet) With courtesy of E. Striani and J. Leon Tavares 4

FSRQ standard model External: galaxy frame (z) , radiation connected with accretion External photons Next and jet electrons ne (g) produce External Compton (EC) Jet: blob moving with Lorentz factor G, beamed, non thermal radiation Electron distribution ne (g) and magnetic field B produce G Synchrotron + Inverse Compton (SSC) 14