Post Secondary Outcomes Sally Simich, Oregon Department of Education

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collecting and Using Post-School Outcome Data New Mexico Cadre Summer Camp June 11-12, 2007.
Advertisements

State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicator #14 Post School Outcomes Study Cohort III: Exiters Technical Assistance Session #2 Presented by The New.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
This document was developed by the National Post-School Outcomes Center, Eugene, Oregon, (funded by Cooperative Agreement Number H326U090001) with the.
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
Using and Understanding Post School Outcome Data Collection Presented by Kentucky Post School Outcome Center (KyPSO) Beth Miller Harrison, Ph.D. Tony LoBianco,
Hard to Find. Purpose of IDEA To ensure that all children with prepare them for further education, employment disabilities have available to them a free.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
1.Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2.CCTS will conduct a sound check.
OAVSNP 2014 Charlotte Alverson, NPSO Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE 1.
Data and Fiscal Management Monthly Webinar May 5, 2015.
Your Students, Your Outcomes: Using Your PSO Reports Sally Simich, ODE Pattie Johnson, TRI Charlotte Alverson, NPSO 1.
1 Oregon Post School Data Collection Jackie Burr, Oregon Department of Education (ODE) Pattie Johnson, Teaching Research Institute (TRI)
Clarification Week…. How’s it going? Do you need anything from us?
Got Data! Now What? Charlotte Y. Alverson April 14, 2011.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
Indicator 14 and Kentucky’s Continuous Monitoring Process (KCMP) Prepared by Kentucky Post School Outcome Center (KyPSO) Human Development Institute University.
Center for Change in Transition Services Improving post-school outcomes for students with disabilities in Washington State Cinda Johnson Sue Ann Bube.
CCTS 1.Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2.CCTS will conduct a sound.
State of Oregon Department of Human Services
Do We Have all the Workers? Strategies for Gaining Representativeness Loujeania W. Bost, Ph.D. NDPC-SD & Deanne Unruh, Ph.D. NPSO State Planning Institute.
Everyone Counts, Everyone In: Essentials for Participation in the 2015 Post School Outcomes (PSO) Survey Requirements, Data Collection, and Results Spring.
“TAKING IT TO SCALE” A Statewide Model For Delivering Transition Services presented at 2007 CEC Annual Convention April 18-21, 2007 Louisville, Kentucky.
( ':~
Collecting Post-school Data Webinar #2 November 18, 2009 Presented by: Center for Change in Transition Services Cinda Johnson, Wendy Iwaszuk, Denny Hasko,
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
National High School Center Summer Institute What’s the Post-School Outcomes Buzz? Jane Falls Coordinator, National Post-School Outcomes Center Washington,
1 Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008 Jackie Burr, Oregon Department of Education Pattie Johnson, Teaching Research Institute.
July 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report Indicators 8, 11, 12, 13, and 14 July 2009.
New Mexico Post-School Outcomes Sub-group Analysis 2009 A Comparison of Outcomes by Ethnicity and Gender and Strategies to Address Disparities NPSO Presentation.
Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Revised May 2010 (Revisions indicated in red font)
New Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions 3 rd Annual Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May12-14,
Introduction to CCTS Webinar Series Website: Phone:
North Carolina Post-School Outcomes (Indicator 14) January 14, 2016 David W. Test, UNC Charlotte.
Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Introduction to the Indicator 14 Post School Outcomes (PSO) Report
Cumberland County Schools Transition. Indicator 1 Graduation Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma is.
Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Introduction to the Predictor Rubric Transition Improvement.
[School] School Principal Selection Welcome! [Date]
OREGON Department of Education Spring Training: Child Find, June Exit and Post School Outcomes Year-End Special Education Collections
Transforming the Future with PSO Data.  Understand why collecting PSO data is so important for district decisions on how to best serve students  Learn.
EMPLOYER ENGAGEMENT How to develop relationships with companies that will provide work experiences for transition age youth.
YTP and the Responsibility for Transition Keith Ozols, YTP Statewide Coordinator Office of Vocational Rehabilitation Services IEPYTP Employment Education.
Source: The National Council of State Title III Directors
Post-Secondary Transition
YOYO Training for New Interviewers
Transforming the Future with PSO Data
Post School Outcomes and Mock Sheltered Workshops
Transition Resources for Youth
YouthBuild Webinar Series MIS Data Management Tools and Strategies
EXTENDED SCHOOL YEAR SERVICES (ESYS)
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
What is “Annual Determination?”
Independent School Districts
Career and Vocational Training In k-12
Improving Local Programs with Outcome Data Charlotte Alverson, NTACT
Post-Secondary Transition: IEP Do’s and Don’t’s
Career and Vocational Training In k-12
Aging Out of foster care and the transition into adulthood
Trend Data Guest Speakers: Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE
Transition: Preparing for Life after High School
Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008
Wisconsin Transition Improvement Grant (TIG) Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Tools to Improve the Postsecondary education and employment outcomes.
Frequently Asked Questions (Revisions indicated in red font)
Post Secondary Outcomes Sally Simich, Oregon Department of Education
Maryland Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #8
Utilizing Indicator 14 data and Evidence Based Resources 2017
Post-School Outcome Data Review
Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study (OLTS)
Indicator B-13 Data Collection Changes – Survey Results
CHILD COUNT FY 2019 October 1, CHILD COUNT FY 2019 October 1, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Post Secondary Outcomes Sally Simich, Oregon Department of Education

What is the Post School Outcome(PSO) Data collection? What is required? Timeline How to complete this collection and use our data to make effective decisions for transition programs

Data Collected Yearly by States #14: Percent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were: 1. Enrolled in “higher education” 2. In “competitive employment” 3. Enrolled in “other postsecondary education or training” 4. In “some other employment”

PSO Data Entry Screen The Follow Up and Exit Interviews can be completed online. Questions appear as needed, depending on answer to previous question. Eliminates data entry errors Does not allow for entry of additional comments district might like to capture

Timelines Exit Interviews PSO Survey Opens in April and closes in September PSO Survey Must be one year after the student left high school List of students posted in April Data entry for the interviews will open June 1st and close at the end of September.

District Size Very Small Small Medium Large Total 1-4 5-15 16-50 District Size Information District size   Very Small Small Medium Large Total Leavers per district 1-4 5-15 16-50 51-355 Number of districts 48 51 43 19 161 Total leavers 112 431 1,231 2,329 4,103 Selected for interviews 109 427 908 1,261 2,705 Number interviewed 61 243 699 911 1914 Response rate 56% 57% 77% 75% 72% Engagement Rate 80% 71% 67% 70%

Post-School Outcomes 2011-2012 and FFY 2012 Percentage Target 2011 (2011-2012) A) 25.1% B) 55.3% C) 71.8% A) 26% B) 52% C) 68% 2012 (2012-2013) A) 25.7% B) 54.4% C) 70.0% A) 27% B) 53% C) 69%

Strategies for Contacting Hard-­to­‐Find Youth Show Interest When Conducting the Survey Be enthusiastic and interested in the answers Convey a non-judgmental tone Provide Incentives Remind students that information will be shared to help other students and improve school services. Modest, $5.00 monetary incentive to “hardest” of the hard to find youth Maintain Contact Know who in family is still in school Leave call back number on messages so youth know it’s you Use PSO logo on all materials, reminders, etc.

Strategies for Contacting Hard-to-Find Youth Provide Pre-Notification In school, discuss the interview with students Share what district has learned from past students Include PSO information with other information Have students identify who should call them during last IEP meeting (teacher, coach, etc.) Create Familiarity Best motivator from study = help other students Practice interview

Post Card Notification of Post School Outcome Data Collection . you may receive a post card, like the one below,  alerting you that your high school may be calling you to ask some questions.  Please help your high school and fellow students, by taking 10 minutes to answer those questions.

Sample Text for the Postcard The (insert School or district name) needs your help! We want to learn from former students how we can improve high school transition services. You will receive a phone call that asks questions about what you have been doing since you left school, such as have you worked or gone to school? Answering the questions will take about 10 minutes. Teachers will use answers from students like you to learn what they can do to help other youth get jobs and go to school after high school. To make sure you have a chance to answer the questions, please call xxx-xxx-xxxx to help the district find you or a family member who can help with this information. We want to hear from you: what you tell us is very important. Questions? Contact your district or Pattie Johnson at johnsop@wou.edu   ________________________________________________

What do districts use to make changes to their transition Programs??????

In Oregon….. School districts that did exit surveys were more likely to successfully make contact with students The calls made by Teachers, Administrators, and YTP were more likely to result in complete interviews! . School districts that did not collect information on the exit interview did not have data to make informed decisions about whether their program launched students with adequate skills Calls made by Paraprofessionals, Assistants, and clerical staff were less likely to result in completed interviews.

Not Engaged 574 students (30% of all interviews) Follow Up questionnaire reports no activity, or less than a 90 days experience in work or school activities Federal reporting requirements do not include students who fail to qualify for the three outcome measurements. ) are of great interest to the districts and to the state.

Looking at Data: Process summary How representative are these data? What direction are our outcomes going? Are there differences in outcomes by subgroups? What is contributing to our outcomes? Not taking time to go over all the results, but selecting descriptive components for exploration Iterative process case dependent

Sally Simich Sally.simich@state.or.us http://tcntransition.org Oregon Department of Education Secondary Transition for Students with Disabilities http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/results/?id=266 Transition Community Network (TNC) http://tcntransition.org