Corporate-level evaluation on efficiency

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EuropeAid Pre-Assessment and Assessment for Parliamentary Development Promoting domestic accountability: engaging with parliaments EC support to governance.
Advertisements

Independent Office of Evaluation, IFAD 7-8 December, 2009.
With the Support of the TEMPUS programme of the European Union Information on PRIUM: Promoting a model of Integrated University in the fYR of Macedonia.
Corporate-level Evaluation on Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment Preliminary Findings 63 rd Session of the Evaluation Committee July 2010.
Competition and Regulation in India: Evaluation of Status & Perceptions and Associated Advocacy (ICRR Project, 2011) PROSAIG Advisory Group Meeting 8 th.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN IFAD-SUPPORTED OPERATIONS 2014 ARRI Learning Event Rome, 19 September 2014.
Progress update on developing Health Sector Strategic Plan (HSSP IV) Joint Annual Health Sector Review Technical Review Meeting Wednesday 5 th.
WLE Operations Team Planning Meeting 2 nd February 2015, Water’s Edge.
This is an example text TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING DecOctSepAugJulyJuneAprilMarchFebJanMayNov 12 Months Example text Go ahead and replace it with your own.
National Roundtable Workshop Nairobi 8 June 2011 Republic of Kenya Country Programme Evaluation Independent Office of Evaluation.
China Country Programme Evaluation Main Findings and Recommendations National Roundtable Workshop Beijing, 17 July 2014 Presentation by the Independent.
Joint Evaluation of General Budget Support Progress Report to 3 rd meeting of DAC Network on Development Evaluation, Paris, June 2 nd 2005 Mike Hammond,
India Country Programme Evaluation Inception Workshop New Delhi, 13 February 2009.
Independent Office of Evaluation IFAD’s Approach to Evaluation of Agriculture programmes Presentation at ECD Workshop, Addis Ababa, 6 November 2015.
Cultural Heritage and Global Change: a new challenge for Europe Working for strengthening the European Research Area Towards Joint Programming in Research.
1 IFAD consideration of a Code of Conduct for Executive Board Representatives Historical Background Presentation to an Informal Seminar of the Executive.
Council March PREVIOUS Reductionistic Whole = Sum of the Parts A Snapshot of the institution at a specific moment in time NEW Synergistic Whole.
Trauma Center Recommendation San Joaquin General Hospital French Camp, California May 31, 2009 San Joaquin General Hospital French Camp, California December.
THE INDEPENDENT OFFICE OF EVALUATION’S WORK PROGRAMME FOR September 2013.
The Joint ECE-Eurostat programme on the new recommendations for the 2010 round of Population and Housing Censuses in the ECE region Joint ECE-Eurostat.
Project Parkway Timeline to 2011 April 1, 2010 Town Hall Meeting Steering Committee Schools February 2009 May 18, 2009 Project Parkway Community Kick-
INDEPENDENT OFFICE OF EVALUATION (IOE) OF IFAD IFAD9 MEETING, 24 OCTOBER 2011 Corporate level Evaluation on IFAD’s Efficiency.
© JABEE 2015 Fundamental Concept of JABEE Evaluation and Accreditation JABEE evaluation and accreditation is to confirm the engineering educational program.
Periodic Reporting Europe and North America Progress report and future strategy 11 March 2004 Information Meeting UNESCO Headquarters.
Technical Evaluation Reference Group (TERG) of the Global Fund TERG Update Prof Rolf Korte, Chair of TERG Prof Rose Leke, Vice-Chair of TERG Fifteenth.
Updated Strategic Plan Presented to Reedley College Fall Classified Assembly Marilyn Behringer September 28, 2011.
The CED’s & DED’s role in the Tenure & Promotion of Agents
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Session 2. revision of Handbooks, manuals and guidelines
Olathe South ACT Timeline
Liaison Orientation October 2010
Training frontline functionaries of rural local bodies and village based institution in Tamenglong,Churachanpur and Bishnupur districts of Manipur.
Overview Of CREW Activities July 2013 – June 2014
Accreditation 2016 Session 1.
Curriculum Development Updates
UNC System Archivists and Records Managers Meeting
GEOSS Data Sharing Principles
Budget & Planning Calendar.
Appendix C New Administration General Assembly Session
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Update on New NSDS Guidelines
CEOS Work planning Steven Hosford, ESA/CNES, CEO
STAFF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT IN-SERVICE
LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST (LAR) CALENDAR [2016‐2017]
Potential Milestones A timeline to finish in one year
Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
UNCAC Review Methodology
Preparatory Action 2011 European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps Call for proposal
دائرة الإحصاءات العامة
The Contribution of the Independent Office of Evaluation (IOE) of IFAD to the Results Measurement Framework IFAD9 Meeting, 24 October 2011.
Dr. W. Robert Ashurst Faculty Research Committee Chair
Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
United Way of Benton & Lincoln Counties
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
63rd Session of the Evaluation Committee July 2010
CYCLE 2019 Application Process & Timeline
Center for Vision (CVN) on Block 33 Move Planning & Logistics Timeline
Back-End Payor Sub-Group
Student Administration and Support Programme and Project Timelines
ESS.VIP ADMIN EssNet on Quality in Multi-source Statistics, progress report 19TH WORKING GROUP ON QUALITY IN STATISTICS, 6 December 2016 Fabrice Gras,
PLANNING LOOKING AHEAD…. Long Term Goals (Assigned to…)
Project overseer Song Yanqin November 4, 2002 Seoul
Second Independent Evaluation of UNAIDS
University Senate February 11, 2019
Goal 1.5 Evaluation Documents Faculty and Staff
PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
Timeline of activities
Presentation transcript:

Corporate-level evaluation on efficiency Presentation of the draft Approach Paper to the IFAD Evaluation Committee, 66th Session 3 March 2011 Office of Evaluation

Background Requested by IFAD’s Executive Board in December 2010 Efficiency of IFAD operations consistently rated as one of the weakest evaluation criteria IOE organized a learning workshop on efficiency in 2010, which underlined the importance of a thorough reflection on institutional efficiency ARRI 2010 included a dedicated chapter on efficiency

The various dimensions of efficiency IFAD Governing Bodies Operations efficiency IFAD’s institutional efficiency Efficiency of recipient Government’s institutions and processes Administrative efficiency Efficiency of IFAD-supported projects

Evaluation objectives Assess operations and administrative efficiency; Examine the efficiency of IFAD governing bodies; Evaluate the efficiency of recipient country government’s institutions and processes;

Evaluation objectives (2) Evaluate how the efficiency of IFAD as well as the recipient government's institutions and processes affects project efficiency, and develop efficiency indicators, approaches and requirements for better assessing project level and IFAD’s institutional efficiency; and Develop recommendations to improve all four dimensions of efficiency.

Evaluation approach Period of coverage since around 2000 Six building blocks: (i) evaluation of IFAD’s operations efficiency; (ii) evaluation administrative efficiency; (iii) efficiency of IFAD governing bodies; (iv) efficiency of recipient government’s institutions and processes; (v) evaluation of how IFAD builds, organizes and utilizes its human resources; and (vi) evaluation of IFAD’s approach to fostering high efficiency. Evaluation will rely on mixed methods: desk review of documents, bi-lateral interviews, focus group discussions, monkey survey and visits to selected countries.

Evaluation process and timeline April 2011 Inception phase May-June 2011 Desk review phase July-Sept. 2011 Interviews and focus groups in Rome Sept. 2011 Visits to comparable organisations Sept.-Oct. 2011 Country visits Nov. 2011-Feb. 2012 Final report preparation May-June 2012 Preparation Agreement at Completion Point June-July 2012 Finalisation Evaluation documents July 2012 Discussion in the Evaluation Committee Sept. 2012 Presentation to the Executive Board