Feng Zhou LCLS-II AP meeting 02/23/2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RF-Gun beam based alignment at PITZ/FLASH
Advertisements

Diagnostics and commissioning on ERLP Yuri Saveliev ASTeC CONFORM Project: EMMA Design Review Workshop February 2007, Daresbury Laboratory.
Commissioning August & September. 2 Agenda 11:20 Coffee 11:30 Introduction Sue S 11:35 Controls (an overview) Brian M 10:55 Controls & Data Acquisition.
Possible new EMMA injectors bdm. Motivation ALICE due to shut down soon Alternate EMMA injection (assuming EMMA project continues which it should …) Several.
Paul Emma LCLS FAC April 16, Initial Experience with Injector Commissioning P. Emma, et al. Facilities Advisory Committee.
Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC LCLS RF Gun Thermal Analysis John Schmerge, SLAC November 3,
C.Limborg-Deprey Beam Dynamics Justifying L01 November 3 rd 2004 Beam Dynamics Justifications of modification of.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector Commissioning September Injector Commissioning Plans C.Limborg-Deprey Gun exit measurements.
Henrik Loos High Level 17 June 2008 High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning Henrik Loos.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector October Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Diagnostics and Commissioning GTL measurements.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
Modelling of the ALICE Injector Julian McKenzie ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory IOP Particle Accelerators and Beams Group Status and Challenges of Simulation.
Injector Setup/Mini-phase  Description of injector setup  sources of drift  Mini-phase procedure for injector  Checking the rest of the machine. Stephen.
ALICE Commissioning Part II : Injector Yuri Saveliev Seminar on 14-15/07/2008 Gun to Booster Booster to FCUP-01 The rest of the Injector.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
Transverse emittance Two different techniques were used to measure the transverse emittance. The multislit mask in the injector 9 MeV Quadrupole scan for.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
ASTRA Injector Setup 2012 Julian McKenzie 17/02/2012.
Interpretation of beam current experimental results in HoBiCaT Gun0 Vladimir Volkov.
Bruno Muratori (for the EMMA team) STFC, Daresbury Laboratory EMMA commissioning 02/09/08.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Electron Sources for ERLs – Requirements and First Ideas Andrew Burrill FLS 2012 “The workshop is intended to discuss technologies appropriate for a next.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
FLS2010 Workshop, Stanford, March 1-5, 2010 Florian Loehl (Cornell University) Commissioning of the High Current ERL Injector at Cornell Florian Loehl.
Status of the Simulations on Photo Injector Optimization for Low Charges Yauhen Kot BD Meeting,
LCLS-II Injector layout design and study Feng Zhou 8/19/2015.
S. Lederer & S. Schreiber (DESY Hamburg) L. Monaco & D. Sertore (INFN-LASA, Milano) Studies on the performance of Cs 2 Te photocathodes at FLASH and the.
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
11th February th CTF3 Committee - Wilfrid Farabolini1 Status and progress of the CTF3 probe beam 1.
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
Correlated Misalignments Studies for LCLS-II SC Linac
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
DC Injector and Space Charge Simulation Status
Beam-Based Feedback in LCLS-II
Part 2: Comparison of measurements and simulations for OBLA-500keV
Thermal emittance measurement Gun Spectrometer
Operational Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cavities
The Cornell High Brightness Injector
Cornell Injector Performance
LCLS Gun Commissioning Status & Plans David H
Electron Source Configuration
LCLS-II physics meeting 3/25/2015
Injector: What is needed to improve the beam quality?
Beam-Based Alignment Results
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Injector Topics for Discussion
Injector Commissioning C
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
Test of Booster at UITF Reza Kazimi (12/12/18)
Physics Design on Injector I
LCLS Commissioning P. Emma, et al
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Studies on orbit corrections
Injector Experimental Results John Schmerge, SSRL/SLAC April 24, 2002
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
Motivation Technique Simulations LCLS LCLS DOE Review, April 24, 2002
LCLS Injector/Diagnostics David H. Dowell, SLAC April 24, 2002
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Operational Experience with LCLS RF systems
LCLS Injector Commissioning P
Linac Design Update P. Emma LCLS DOE Review May 11, 2005 LCLS.
小型X線源の性能確認実験計画 高輝度・RF電子銃研究会 広島大学 高エネルギー加速器研究機構 浦川順治
Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Feb.8th 2006
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Andrew Hutton Concept suggested independently by Haipeng Wang
Presentation transcript:

Feng Zhou LCLS-II AP meeting 02/23/2017 Tuning Procedures for Early Injector Commissioning (EIC) Feng Zhou LCLS-II AP meeting 02/23/2017

Technical scope for EIC Pre-beam checkout Baking for gun/buncher and CW RF conditioning RF baking 150-200C for the gun (80kW peak, 3-4% duty cycle: ~3kW average) ~3 days Tape baking ~150C for the buncher ~3 days CW RF conditioning for gun/buncher Study for ‘quick’ gun power-turn on Major parameters to be characterized: Bunch charge, QE, and QE lifetime for different repetition rate Dark current vs. different gun energy/repetition rate Thermal emittance Beam energy Phase and amplitude calibration for gun/buncher BBA for the components

~1 MeV LCLS-II injector source in EIC RF gun, buncher, 2 solenoids, 5 pairs of x/y correctors Diagnostics: 1 ICT, 2 BPMs, 1 YAG screen, and one 300-W temporary dump w/ a Faraday cup

Pre-beam checklist for EIC First cut for the checklist, 10 pages in total for EIC. May add more details for the gun including pumps/gauges/RTDs in the gun body, two couplers and loadlock system

‘Quick’ gun power-turn on ~half an hour for every gun-turn on, which may become an issue for user operations (availability) New frequency push-pull tuner may help (x2 tuning range, about 250kHz) but … How to shorten RF gun turn-on time (~ a few minutes?): Block the gun water flow? Increase the heater power? How to slow down the temperature drop due to trips caused by vacuum or temperature or reflected power Block the gun water flow after the trip? Developing a plan for the study in the EIC To discuss with LBL experts

Dark current, bunch charge, QE & QE lifetime, and thermal emittance Dark current can be characterized with the Faraday cup for different gun energy Will borrow FC electronics from Diag0 Bunch charge can be measured with the ICT/faraday cup and the calibrated two BPMs TMIT BPM electronics ready for EIC QE and, QE lifetime for different repetition rate Thermal emittance can be measured by scanning the solenoid strength to record the beam size at the YAG screen (simple matrix: solenoid + drift) The method used at the LCLS1 and Apex

Assume gun phase is fixed, similar to LCLS1 Laser launch phase Assume gun phase is fixed, similar to LCLS1 Scan the charge (w/ ICT) vs. laser phase to determine zero- crossing laser phase w.r.t. RF reference Set laser phase to on- crest Zero-crossing

Buncher phase Buncher’s zero-crossing phase: Beam energy with buncher’s zero-crossing phase  gun energy On-crest phase at -3 due to phase slippage at <1MeV energy The -3 accuracy is not important for the optimized performance Bunching vs. debunching at zero-crossing : Beam size at YAG screen much larger beam size for bunching than debunching Debunching Bunching Zero-crossing Bunching Debunching

Buncher phase calibration steps Measure gun energy Scan the energy with the gun and buncher vs. buncher phase to determine zero-crossing phases Determine the zero-crossing phase for bunching through comparison of the beam size at the YAG screen Set buncher to desired phase w.r.t. zero-crossing at bunching side

Gun/buncher RF amplitude calibration (beam energy measurement) Assume the gun/buncher RF power has been pre- calibrated by RF experts. We are to discuss gun/buncher RF calibration with beam energy measurement: w/ a corrector: to measure the beam displacement at a viewing screen or BPM vs. corrector strength (slope) d: the distance between corrector and screen/BPM x/BL: the slope

Gun amplitude calibration Calibration steps: Turn off buncher and adjust SOL1 strength to focus the beam at YAG screen Scan the XC01 corrector and measure corresponding beam’s x-displacement (slope) Extract the gun beam energy with the measured slope Calibrate gun energy for different gun RF amplitude May resolve ~10 keV beam energy SOL1= 0.078 kG.m 10 keV energy difference

Buncher amplitude calibration Measure gun energy Turn on the buncher, set its phase on-crest with nominal RF power, and focus the beam at the YAG screen with adjustment of SOL1 strength Scan XC03 corrector and measure corresponding beam’s x- displacement at YAG (slope) Obtain net energy gain from the buncher by subtracting the gun energy from the total Calibrate different buncher RF amplitude @nominal RF power

Requirement for transverse alignment Misalignment -growth Cathode 100 µm <2% Solenoid 0.5mm or 2mrad <2.5% Buncher 1mm or <3% CM01 0.5 or 0.5mrad <1% And also alignment is crucial for subsequent emittance tuning with optimization of the solenoid strength

BBA for cathode APEX experience: Steps for the cathode alignment Cathode plug is aligned well with the gun (~10 m level) Only central 5mm of the cathode is doped with Cs Steps for the cathode alignment Map QE with scanning the laser mirror in x-plane and record laser mirror setting when QE starts dropping to zero on both sides of the central area, x1 and x2 Set laser mirror in x-plane = (x1+x2)/2 and repeat same step as above but for y-plane Cathode center =[(x1+x2)/2, (y1+y2)/2] Could align ~100m level according to APEX experience

BBA for solenoids Method: given the initial offset x0, x0’, y0, y0’ for solenoid, the beam’s x- and y-displacement at downstream BPM can be calculated with the matrix (a solenoid + a drift): where C=cos(KL) S=sin(KL) KL=BL/(2B) K=B/(2B) B: solenoid strength L: solenoid length d: distance between solenoid exit and BPM

BBA procedures for SOL1/2 Alignment steps: Record beam’s x- and y-displacement at BPM1 for >3 different SOL1 strength Directly solve the SOL1 misalignments (x0, x0’, y0, y0’) according to the equation Correct the misalignments through moving the solenoid actuators (x, y, x’, and y’), Check beam alignment again after the correction with different SOL1 strength; more iterations if still not fully aligned Replace SOL1/BPM1 with SOL2/BPM2 then can align for SOL2

BBA for buncher Set buncher to debunching zero-crossing Eliminated the effect of dispersion due to the stray fields Smaller beam size (extra focusing from debunching phase) Turn on SOL1 and adjust its strength to focus the beam at YAG screen Correct the offset using pairs of correctors xc01/02 through measuring difference of centroid beam at YAG for buncher on/off; may align <100 m.

HLAs requested Gun and buncher RF turn-on process (apex scripts available) Laser phase scan (migrated from LCLS1) Buncher phase calibration (new) Beam energy (apex script available) Thermal emittance (apex script available) Cathode alignment (new) Solenoid alignment (new) Buncher alignment (new)

Beam performance with one cavity failure Nominal (grad/phase) Cav1 failure Cav4 failure Cav5 failure Cav1 Cav2 Cav3 Cav4 Cav5 Cav6 Cav7 Cav8 7.9/-4 14/0 16/0 16/1 16/6 7.1/-8 15/-4 16/13 15/0  (µm) I (A) E (MeV) @100pC 0.29 12 94 0.54 7.5 0.4 96 0.39 95