Strategic Planning Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
Advertisements

Overview of Priorities and Activities: Shared Services Canada Presentation to the Information Technology Infrastructure Roundtable June 17, 2013 Liseanne.
Broader Impacts: Meaningful Links between Research and Societal Benefits October 23, 2014 Martin Storksdieck I Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning.
Sunflower blank National Science Foundation Dan Maki Kathleen Bergin Math and Science Partnership Education and Human Resources Directorate Division of.
Sustainability Engineering and Science at NSF National Science Foundation ENG/CBET Program Director Cindy M. Lee New Zealand Society for Sustainability.
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
The School of Medicine Research Roadmap Overview.
National Science Foundation Directorate for Engineering John J. McGrath Division Director American Society for Engineering Education Engineering Research.
External Forces and NSF Engineering National Science Foundation Directorate for Engineering Acting Assistant Director for Engineering Richard O. Buckius.
External Reports Overview Presentation for the ENG Advisory Committee By Michael Reischman Deputy Assistant Director for Engineering.
NSF Investments in Engineering Research Centers Vilas Mujumdar, P.E., S.E. Program Director Engineering Research Centers National Science Foundation Summative.
Sara Nerlove, Ph.D. Program Director, PFI:BIC
Cyberinfrastructure: Initiatives at the US National Science Foundation Stephen Nash Program Director, Operations Research U.S. National Science Foundation.
Biomedical Discovery and Innovation Funding Opportunities at NSF Semahat Demir, Ph.D. Program Director Biomedical Engineering Program National Science.
From the IT Assessment to the IT Roadmap ( )
Enhancing Institutional and Administrative Capacity case: POLAND
National Institute of Standards and Technology U.S. Department of Commerce TheTechnology Innovation Program (TIP) Standard Presentation of TIP Marc G.
AA Update of Directorate Activities Update of Directorate Activities John A. Brighton Assistant Director for Engineering Advisory Committee for Engineering.
UIUC Strategic Plan Melanie Loots Ruth Watkins August 18, 2006.
Reorganization at NCAR Presentation to the UCAR Board of Trustees February 25, 2004.
Engineering Education and Centers Division EEC and OII Joint Meeting.
NSF/ENG SBIR TASK FORCE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE NSF SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR) SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (STTR) PROGRAMS.
Unidata Policy Committee Meeting Bernard M. Grant, Assistant Program Coordinator for the Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences Division May 2012 NSF.
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 6, 2015 Selecting a Program Michael Shatruk Chemistry & Biochemistry FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY Ken Knappenberger Chemistry & Biochemistry.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
OCTA Strategic Planning March 8, 2011 STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED MANAGEMENT.
Innovations through Partnerships Industrial Innovation andPartnerships Kesh Narayanan Division Director.
Biomedical Science and Engineering Funding Opportunities at NSF Semahat Demir Program Director Biomedical Engineering Program National Science Foundation.
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 9, 2014 Selecting a Program Anant Paravastu Chemical Engineering FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY Ken Knappenberger Chemistry and Biochemistry.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure 10/31/06 Craig.
Promoting Diversity at the Graduate Level in Mathematics: A National Forum MSRI October 16, 2008 Deborah Lockhart Executive Officer, Division of Mathematical.
TCUP Leadership Forum January 3, 2014 Sylvia M. James, Ed.D. Division Director, Human Resource Development (HRD)
Draft Modernization Roadmap for the Geospatial Platform Karen Siderelis NGAC Meeting March 25,2010.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY OPP Advisory Committee 10/26/06.
Internet2 Strategic Directions October Fundamental Questions  What does higher education (and the rest of the world) require from the Internet.
Directorate for Education and Human Resources Photo credits (from left) : U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Intel Free Press, Kate Ter Haar, Woodley Wonder.
NSF Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program February 25, 2016.
Navigating NSF Programs Esin Gulari Dean, College of Engineering & Science Clemson University.
UNCLASSIFIED Lift the living standards and wellbeing of all Victorians by sustainably growing Victoria’s economy and employment and by working with the.
Today’s managers & leaders are challenged unlike any of the past generations in their roles.
JMFIP Financial Management Conference
NATIONAL e-STRATEGY Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Telecommunications & Postal Services DG: ROBERT NKUNA AUGUST 2017 Building a better life.
Coalition for National Science Funding (CNSF) 
Board on science education
Phase One: Re-inventing the Flagship University, Fall 2006-Fall 2007
PHMSA2021: Strategic Direction
Strategic Planning Process
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.
The Shifting Landscape of CI Funding
CSE Strategic Planning Background
Updating the Value Proposition:
Tuition Reimbursement Cap Waiver Proposal
National Science Foundation
Interoperability of Data Systems Administration for Children & Families Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation Robert (Bob) Garcia Regional Administrator,
EU Research and Innovation: Horizon 2020
Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR)
Jean-Eric Paquet.
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
IEEE Foundation: The Road Ahead
Director «Components & Systems»
KEY INITIATIVE Shared Services Function Management
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
NSF Funding Melissa A. Moss Professor, Dept. Chemical Engineering
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Yelena Shevchenko Director of Strategic Planning and
Humboldt Space Research Mission America. Humboldt Space Co. adopts a forward thinking stance in scientific research and technical development. Our policy.
Presentation transcript:

Directorate for Engineering Strategic Planning: The Road to Reorganization

Strategic Planning Process Background External Environment Internal Reports STG Report

Background: Existing Plans “The Long View” ENG’s last strategic planning document, produced in 1994 “NSF Strategic Plan” Mission, Vision, and Strategic Goals for NSF from 2003 through 2008

External Environment Reports and Recommendations         Assessing the Capacity of the U.S. Engineering Research Enterprise: NAE 2005 Engineer of 2020: NAE 2004 Innovate America: National Innovation Initiative Final Report: Council on Competitiveness 2004

Internal Reports Awards and Solicitation Awards Impact and Assessment July 2004 –Task Groups/Committees within the ENG Directorate were formed to study, assess, plan, and prepare actions for the Directorate for Engineering Awards and Solicitation Awards Impact and Assessment Making the Case for Engineering Engineering Education and Workforce Strategic Thinking Group Organization and Structure

Strategic Thinking Group “Strategic Planning Overview: Strategic Directions for Engineering Research, Innovation, and Education”   Developed by the ENG Strategic Thinking Group

ENG Mission To enable the engineering and scientific communities to advance the frontiers of engineering research, innovation and education, in service to society and the nation.

ENG Vision ENG will be the global leader in advancing the frontiers of fundamental engineering research, stimulating innovation, and substantially strengthening engineering education.

ENG 5 Goals Overarching Frontier Research Goal: Effectively invest in frontier engineering research that has potential for high impact in meeting national and societal needs. Overarching Engineering Innovation Goal: Effectively invest in fundamental engineering innovation that has potential for high impact in meeting national and societal needs.

ENG 5 Goals 3. Overarching Engineering Education and Workforce Goal: Effectively invest in frontier engineering education and workforce advancement that has potential for high impact. 4. Public Understanding of Engineering Goal: Effectively invest in and seek partnerships to educate the public about the value of engineering research and education. 5. Organizational Excellence Goal: Effectively organize the Directorate to provide agile, multidisciplinary leadership in engineering research, innovation, and education

ENG Research Priorities Biology in Engineering New Frontiers in Nanotechnology Critical Infrastructure Systems Complexity in Engineered and Natural Systems Manufacturing Frontiers

Implementation Organizational Structure

Forces Driving New Structure For past 15 years, ENG has had essentially the same organizational structure. Changing conditions have emerged New multidisciplinary research areas (nanotechnology, cybertechnology, bioengineering, etc.) National priorities (defense, economy, homeland security) Global competition in innovation To remain at the frontier, ENG must evolve to address these changes

External Rationale Engineering education and research becoming more interdisciplinary, team-oriented, and collaborative. Universities establishing centers, clusters, and cross-department divisions. Industry adopting more interdisciplinary research paradigm.

Internal Rationale STG Report identified opportunities in line with new structure (covered earlier) ENG has relatively large number of divisions, with relatively small budgets Divisions must have sufficient funds (at least $100 million) to have major impact

New Structure Must Enable ENG to (1): Position ENG at the frontiers of engineering research, education, and innovation Promote interdisciplinary collaboration Integrate across priority areas Integrate research and education Support the continuum from discovery through to early engineering innovation

New Structure Must Enable ENG to (2): Enhance flexibility for change by combining some units Provide opportunities to explore new areas Strategically allocate human and financial resources

Data-Driven Plan Based on ASTG Study Report Inventory of all ENG ongoing grant portfolio as of December 2004. Considered funding in each of about 30 topic areas for each division Selected a listing of topics within three-four thrust areas for each division.

Organizational Structure Report ENG Considered 4 Scenarios Scenario 1: Operational Effectiveness Scenario 2: Priority Led Matrix Structure Scenario 3: Cross-disciplinary Excellence on the Continuum from Discovery to Innovation Scenario 4: Aligning with Intellectually Stimulating National Priorities

Organizational Structure Changes A hybrid of Scenarios 1 & 2 has been selected New structure will better position ENG to be more effective both inside NSF and externally New structure better aligns with STG Overarching Goals

New Framework

Organizational Structure OAD EFRI EEC CBET CMMI ECCS IIP CBET: Chemical, Biological, Environmental and Transport Systems CMMI: Civil, Mechanical & Manufacturing Innovation ECCS: Electrical, Communication & Cyber Systems IIP: Industrial Innovation & Partnerships EEC: Engineering Education, Centers EFRI: Emerging Frontiers in Research & Innovation

Divisions and Cross-cutting Areas CBET CMMI ECCS IIP Crosscutting Areas EEC Division Eng Education ERC EFRI Cyberinfrastructure Nanotechnology Critical Infrastructure Complex Eng. Systems

EEC: Linkages to Divisions AdCom Subcommittee For K-12 EEC Division EHR Eng. Ed. Eng. Res. Centers CMMI CBET CMMI CBET IIP ECCS IIP ECCS

Implications for Engineering Community Greater flexibility to explore the emerging frontiers of engineering research, education, and innovation Engineering Education and Centers will be more deeply ingrained throughout all divisions Multidisciplinary focus will more closely match trends in research and education New divisions with larger budgets may help Improve Success Rate for ENG

Timing and Implementation Appoint an Implementation and Transition Team Coordinate with Division of Budget, Division of Financial Management, HRM, and NSF Employee Union Full implementation by FY 2007

Comments and Feedback Share your thoughts via the NSF Website: WWW.NSF.GOV Go to the Engineering “Program Area” “ENG Reorganization – Comments Invited” box at top of page Follow links to plans and reports, as well as feedback email (engquality@nsf.gov)

Questions & Answers General Discussion