Field-on measurement of multiple scattering

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

10 Aug 2010PC Analysis PC Schedule Tuesdays fortnightly Provisional dates 10 Aug 24 Aug 7 Sept 21 Sept But it’s holiday season so they may vary –

Advertisements

Monte Carlo simulation of the background for the Drell-Yan COMPASS Marialaura Colantoni Laboratory of Nuclear Problems Dubna Marialaura.

1 Simulation Status/Plans Malcolm Ellis Sci Fi Tracker Meeting Imperial College, 10 th September 2004.

Tracker Reconstruction Stuff Timothy Carlisle Oxford.

1 Approaching the Problem of Statistics David Forrest University of Glasgow CM23 HIT, Harbin January 14th.

Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.

Emittance–momentum matrix1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, MICE Video Conference, 21 January Initial 4D.

Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.

Analysis Meeting – – Slide 1 Beam momentum measurement using TOFs: progress report Analysis Meeting, February 2008 Mark Rayner.

Alain Blondel MICE: Constraints on the solenoids 2.Field Homogeneity: or ? this will be dictated by the detector requirements. TPG will be.

1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.

1 Statistics Toy Monte Carlo David Forrest University of Glasgow.

Beam line characterization with the TOFs1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, CM26 California, 24 March Initial.

1 Losses in the Cooling Channel Malcolm Ellis PID Meeting 1 st March 2005.

1 Emittance Calculation Progress and Plans Chris Rogers Analysis PC 18 August 2005.

1Malcolm Ellis - Software Meeting - 31st May 2006 Data Challenge Requirements  First list of requirements, based on Yagmur’s document: u

MICE Collaboration Meeting 8th Octorber KEK Beam Test Analysis Hideyuki Sakamoto 16 th MICE Collaboration Meeting 8 th October 2006.

Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.

18 August 09Mark Rayner – Momentum measurement by The TOFs1 Momentum measurement by the TOFs A correction to an O(4 MeV/c) bias on the current muon momentum.

Timothy Carlisle, Oxford CM 28. Step 3 Matching Step 3  Step 3 rematched for 830 mm spool piece  Calc. B(z) & BetaFn with the following:  Minimize.

Tracker Software Update Adam Dobbs, MICE CM37 7 th Nov 2013.

Report on the Analysis Group & Plans V. Blackmore MICE VC 163 Thursday, 12 th December /11.

Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.

Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.

Status of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Yagmur Torun Illinois Institute of Technology April 1, 2013.

Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.

A NALYSIS OVERVIEW & “T HE M ISSING P HYSICS ” V. Blackmore CM38 23rd February /14.

M ULTIPLE S CATTERING RAL Timothy Carlisle 1.

Multiple Scattering (MSC) in Geant4 Timothy Carlisle Oxford.

MICE at STFC-RAL The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment -- Design, engineer and build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the.

The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.

Positional and Angular Resolution of the CALICE Pre-Prototype ECAL Hakan Yilmaz.

© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Tracking & Ecal Positional/Angular Resolution Hakan Yilmaz.

1 Statistics David Forrest University of Glasgow May 5 th 2009.

MCS: Multiple Coulomb Scattering Sophie Middleton.

26 Oct 2010PC Physics Requirements of Software from Chris R ~19 Oct. My.

Step IV Studies Timothy Carlisle Oxford. Intro. CM28 – Step III vs Step IV Cooling formula & G4MICE disagree on – Also observed in ICOOL (note #199 –

Simulating the RFOFO Ring with Geant Amit Klier University of California, Riverside Muon Collaboration Meeting Riverside, January 2004.

Analysis meeting: Beam momentum measurements using TOFs Tuesday, 22 January 2008 Slide 1 of 10 Beam momentum measurement using.

18 th March 2008Measuring momentum using the TOFsSlide 1 Measuring momentum using TOF0 and TOF1 Progress report Mark Rayner (Oxford/RAL) Analysis Meeting,

Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November Beam characterization by the TOFs Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.

Measuring Multiple Scattering in Step IV Timothy Carlisle Oxford See MICE Note 374 for updated results.

M. Brooks, 28-Mar-02 Heavy/Light meeting 1 Muon Analysis Work Getting Code ready for first data pass - DONE Get ready for second pass on DSTs - muon identification.

A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee

MICE Tracker Software A. Dobbs CM32 9 th Feb 2012.

15 June 2010PC Analysis PC Schedule Tuesdays fortnightly Provisional dates 1 June 15 June 28 June (JC away) CM27 7 – 10 RAL Let me & Yagmur.

Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.

MICE Step IV Lattice Design Based on Genetic Algorithm Optimizations Ao Liu on behalf of the MICE collaboration Fermilab Ao Liu on behalf of the MICE collaboration.

MEASUREMENT OF EMITTANCE AND OTHER OPTICS QUANTITIES V. Blackmore 01/19.

(one of the) Request from MPB

MICE S TEP IV P HYSICS ‘D ELIVERABLES ’ V. Blackmore MAP 2014 Spring Meeting 30 th May, /15 AKA “What will we learn from Step IV?”

S TATUS OF THE P HYSICS A NALYSIS V. Blackmore MICE Project Board 29 th April, /30.

CM Nov 2009 DOES MICE NEED STEP III ? Somewhat hard to understand MICE Schedule… –If the gods are (un)kind it’s possible that SS1, SS2 & FC1 are.

Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.

1Malcolm Ellis - G4 Physics Validation Meeting - 17th July 2006 MuScat Validation of G4  Muon Scattering (MuScat) Experiment u Motivation: Ionisation.

Brunel University London Field-off LiH Energy Loss Rhys Gardener CM45 – July 28th.

Step IV Physics Paper Readiness

Spokesman's update.

The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector

Beam Energy-Loss measurement

MICE Analysis Status and Plans

MICE Step IV Lattice Design Based on Genetic Algorithm Optimizations

Neutrino factory near detector simulation

Offline Software A. Dobbs CM43 30th October 2015.

Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns

Tracker to Solenoid Alignment

Validating Magnets Using Beam

Global PID MICE CM43 29/10/15 Celeste Pidcott University of Warwick

Completing the Step IV Programme

How to turn on MICE Step IV

Presentation transcript:

Field-on measurement of multiple scattering MICE CM43 29/10/15 Celeste Pidcott University of Warwick

Introduction - Preliminary work on measuring the scattering angle at Step IV within magnetic fields has begun. - Based on the work done by Tim Carlisle, but using tracker reconstruction, as will be used on Step IV data. - Final aim of this work will be to measure the scattering in LH2. - However at the MC stage both LiH and LH2 absorbers will be considered.

Method Outlined in Tim Carlisle's thesis. - Measure a muon in the US tracker, with momentum p. Track this forward to the DS face of the absorber, but without scattering, to obtain p'. - Measure the same muon in the DS tracker, with momentum q. Track this back to the absorber to obtain q'. - Then calculate the the 3D scattering angle θ, using cos𝜃= 𝑝 ′⋅ 𝑞 ′ 𝑝′ 𝑞′

Approach 1) Studies of scattering angles obtained from Monte Carlo and Tracker Reconstruction (for legacy geometries). 2) Consider sources of error. 3) Repeat (1) for up-to-date geometries, and also present scattering distributions as the probability of scatter per angle (in order to be comparable with MuScat results). 4) Determine degree of unfolding required based on (3) 5) Apply TRUEE unfolding software to simulation output. 6) Determine statistics required for measurement.

Sources of error - PID → Validation of PID routines is underway - Tracker resolution → Unfolding - Rotations and misalignments of tracker → Under investigation by several people - Other sources of scattering in beamline. → Investigated (in legacy simulations so far) by removing elements from beam path

Approach (revisited) 1) Studies of scattering angles obtained from Monte Carlo and Tracker Reconstruction (for legacy geometries). 2) Consider sources of error. 3) Repeat (1) and (2) for up-to-date geometries, and also present scattering distributions as the probability of scatter per angle (in order to be comparable with MuScat results). 4) Determine degree of unfolding required based on (3) 5) Apply TRUEE unfolding software to simulation output. 6) Determine statistics required for measurement. Next steps are currently held up by issues with the tracker reconstruction/geometries.

Additional Slides

Empty channel, scattering angle for propagated MC and reconstructed muons (legacy geometry)

Empty channel, projected scattering angles for propagated MC and reconstructed muons (legacy geometry)

AFC + empty hydrogen vessel, scattering angle for propagated MC and reconstructed muons (legacy geometry)

AFC + empty hydrogen vessel, projected scattering angles for propagated MC and reconstructed muons (legacy geometry)

AFC + vessel + LH2, scattering angle for propagated MC and reconstructed muons (legacy geometry)

AFC + vessel + LH2, projected scattering angles for propagated MC and reconstructed muons (legacy geometry)

LiH, scattering angle for propagated MC and reconstructed muons (legacy geometry)

LiH, projected scattering angles for propagated MC and reconstructed muons (legacy geometry)