Mechanical Design and Analysis of LCLS II 2 K Cold Box

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design of Steel and Composite-Structures for Seismic Loading – Safety Requirements, Concepts and Methods – Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Fehling, University.
Advertisements

Generic Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR): Safety Systems Overview
Topsfield Engineering Service, Inc. Figure 1 Thermoelastic Analysis in Design William Bell & Paul-W. Young Topsfield Engineering Service, Inc. John Stewart,
N. Dhanaraj, Y. Orlov, R. Wands Thermal-Stress Analysis of CC1 Space Frame.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Tracker Solenoid Module Design Update Steve VirostekStephanie Yang Mike GreenWing Lau Lawrence Berkeley National LabOxford Physics MICE Collaboration Meeting.
-1- ICST/HIT The 23 rd MICE Collaboration Meeting Jan.13 to 17, Harbin/China MICE/MuCool Coupling Magnets Vacuum Vessel Design Guo, Xinglong.
1 RF-Structures Mock-Up FEA Assembly Tooling V. Soldatov, F. Rossi, R. Raatikainen
SELECTION OF SUPPORTING ARRANGEMENT FOR CRITICAL PIPING By DILEEP PILLAI.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe MLC external review October 03, 2012.
Pressure Vessels.
Multiple Coil Lift Calculation. Purposes of the Study  To investigate the stress distribution in the MCWF and the lifting device.  To make sure mounting.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Further optimization of the solenoid design A.Efremov, E.Koshurnikov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov, A.Vodopianov GSI, Darmstadt,
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Shear Load with Stainless Steel Bushing and Frictionless Shim-Flange Interface Two cases of shim plates were investigated.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15.
LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project 1x4 Grid Lift Fixture Weld Analysis September 19, 2003 Youssef Ismail.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 to 06/07/15 1.
Mechanical Design of Process Equipment FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND EQUATIONS Principal stresses Theories of failure
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Bolt Preload and Shear Load
Dump Heating temperature (Revision 2, part 2) Ang Lee April 7,
56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai
56 MHz SRF Cavity and Helium vessel Design
S. Lassiter, P. Brindza, M. Fowler, E. Sun - Jefferson Lab G. Markham - NovaTech, B. Wands - Fermi Lab Abstract—Jefferson Laboratory is developing a set.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
Andrew Biehl.  The objective of this project is to develop a method for determining the nut factor of a bolted joint using the finite element method.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe.
Warm cryostat mechanical calculations A.Catinaccio PH-DT Engineering Office, CERN Page 1 CERN, May 27th 2015.
8/29/07K. C. Wu - Brookhaven National Lab1 Major Components in ILC IR Hall Interchangeable Detectors.
Date of download: 6/2/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Technical Basis of Material Toughness Requirements in the ASME Boiler and Pressure.
Comments from the SNS Cryostat Design Review February 2010 Tom Peterson, Fermilab 15 February 2010.
Cryomodule Safety Approvals Jay Theilacker LCLS-II Production Cryomodule Final Design Review May 12-14, 2015.
PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS BY CAESAR-II SOFTWARE
PRESSURE VESSEL. 1.Determine the bursting steam pressure of a steel shell with diameter of 10 inches and made of ¼ in thick steel plate. The joint efficiency.
Hongyu Bai LCLS-II 2 K Cold Box PDR September 27, 2016
Coupled thermal-structural FEA of AS tooling for brazing of manifolds to disk stack R. Raatikainen, F. Rossi
Pipe Integrity Check using Finite Element Analysis
2K Cold Box Structural Analysis
Dana Arenius LCLS-II 4.5K Cold Box Director’s Review November 16, 2016
Process Requirements and Design Approach
2 K Coldbox Safety and ESH
2K Cold Box FDR Introduction
Process Simulation for the LCLS-II Cryogenic Systems
2K Cold Box PDR Introduction
Preliminary analysis for the dressed LHC RF cavity (2) April 28th 2016 – EDMS L. Dassa, L. Mettler.
GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE, BHAVNAGAR TOPIC : INTRODUCTION TO PRESSURE VESSELS Prepared By :- 1.Aal Akash Ansari Aarif.
2K CB Internal Piping Flexibility Analysis
2K Cold Box Structure Analysis
Crab Cavity HOM Coupler Specification Drawings & Tolerances
Status of design and production of LEP connection cryostat
Overview of Mechanical Design
Fredrik Fors Mechanical Engineering, JLab 09/29/2016
ASME Code Section VIII Pressure vessel design
Hongyu Bai LCLS-II 2 K Cold Box FDR March 9, 2017
CENF - LBNF cryostat Relevant safety codes
MKQXF FEA Model Haris Kokkinos
SC1R Cold Box PDR Mechanical Design
INTRODUCTION TO PRESSURE VESSELS
2K Cold Box Mechanical Design
2K Cold Box Mechanical Analysis – Anchoring
2K Cold Box Vacuum Vessel Structure Analysis
2K Cold Box Internal Piping Flexibility Analysis
SC1R Cold Box PDR Overview
Pressure Piping Analysis
Tracer Applications.
Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Riga,
Reinforced concrete column
SC1R Cold Box PDR Assembly Sequence
Shipping Support Post Analysis
JLAB CHL 2K COLD BOX REPLACEMENT
Presentation transcript:

Mechanical Design and Analysis of LCLS II 2 K Cold Box S Yang, K Dixon, N Laverdure, D Rath, M Bevins, H Bai, S Kaminski, V Ravindranath - Jefferson Lab and SLAC Authored by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under U.S. DOE Contract No. DOE-AC05-060R23177. Abstract— The mechanical design and analysis of the LCLS II 2 K cold box is presented while highlighting its features and functionality. ASME B31.3 was used to check the design of its internal piping and further compliance of this code was ensured through a flexibility analysis. The 2 K cold box vessel was analyzed using ANSYS 17.2 to meet the requirements of the applicable codes, ASME Section VIII Division 2 and ASCE 7-1. Seismic and transportation loads were explicitly considered in both analyses. TABLE 1. Maximum Stresses of Flexibility Analysis Mode Type of Stress Stress (MPa) [ksi] Percentage of Allowable Stress Transportation Maximum occasional stress 60.5 [8.78] 33% Normal Operation Maximum sustained stress 7.52 [1.09] 5% Maximum expansion stress 29.7 [0.43] 14% Normal Operation + Seismic Load 62.1 [9.01] 34% TABLE 2. Seismic Load Calculation of Cold Box Parameter Value Unit Name SDS 1.968 g Design Spectral Acceleration for short periods SD1 1.012 Design Spectral Acceleration for 1 sec Ie 1 NA Importance Factor R Response Modification Factor  Redundancy Factor Ω0 Overstrength Factor Cs Seismic Response Coefficient QE/W Horizontal Seismic Design Force ASD Loads – without Overstrength Factor Eh Horizontal Seismic Acceleration Eh1 0.590 30% Orthogonal Acceleration Ev 0.394 Vertical Seismic Acceleration Fig. 1 LCLS-II 2 K cold box vessel. The 2 K cold box system is being designed at JLab. It consists of cryogenic cold compressors and the control system, vacuum jacket, internal piping, external utility piping, bayonets for cryogenic transfer lines and insulating vacuum pumps. Fig. 2 Internal piping of cold box. All piping is designed in accordance with ASME B31.3-2014 Process Piping and local requirements. These local requirements include CBC, ASCE 7-10, and the Cryogenic Plant Seismic Design Criteria. AutoPIPE is used to perform flexibility analysis. Fig. 3 Center Column Design. A center column is required to reduce the displacement on the top plate. It is made of two sections of 8 inch NPS Sch. 80 stainless steel pipe. Two sections are connected by tie rods and nuts for alignment purpose. To reduce its shrinkage, copper clamp shells are clamped to the outside surface of the center column. Plates and radical gussets are designed so that the load could be evenly distributed to the vessel. TABLE 3. Basic Load Combinations (ASD) with Seismic Load Effect Case No. Code Requirement Calculated (QE = 1.968 W,  = 1) 5 (1.0 + 0.14SDS)D + 0.7QE 1.28D ± 1.38W (horizontal direction) ± 0.41W (30% orthogonal) 8 (0.6 – 0.14SDS)D + 0.7QE 0.32D ± 1.38W (horizontal direction) ± 0.41W (30% orthogonal) Fig. 6 AutoPIPE model of the section between bayonet and the CC2 inlet Nozzle for normal operation mode. The internal piping of the cold box was separated into 9 sections to simplify the analysis. Among them, the section between one of the three return flow inlet bayonets and the CC2 inlet nozzle has the highest stresses. Fig. 4 Stress distribution. Both the stresses and displacements were found to be acceptable. Although the maximum displacement was 4mm (0.16 in) on the top plate, the relative displacement in each cold compressor area was less than the cold compressor supplier required tolerance (1.6mm). The maximum von-Mises stress on the vacuum vessel body was below the allowable stress Fig. 5 Stress concentration. The overall stress of the center column was far below the allowable stress. Stress classification line (SCL) was created per ASME VIII Section 2. There were several points at which the sum of the primary local membrane stress plus primary bending stress was above the allowable stress, but the sum of the average membrane and primary bending stress was below the allowable stress. The local high stress on the center column was not a concern because it was due to stress concentration. TABLE 4. Basic Load Combinations (ASD) with Seismic Load Effect Stress Category Pm PL PL + Pb PL + Pb + Q SA240, 304SS (MPa) [ksi] 138 [20] 207 [30] 414 [60] SA516 Gr.70 (MPa) [ksi] Conclusion - The design of the LCLSII 2K cold box and the internal piping system conforms to the code requirements specified in ASME VIII Divisions 1 and 2, ASME B31.3, ASCE7-10 and LCLSII seismic requirements. Although the partial penetration welds do not meet the ASME VIII Division 1 requirements including those: between the top plate and top skirt, between the top skirt and shell body, and between the shell body and bottom head; however, these welds were simulated and analyzed per ASME VIII Division 2and the design stress requirements from this division were satisfied. (PL + Pb) <= 1.5S (Paragraph 5.2.2.4(e), ASME Section VIII Division 2); (PL + Pb + Q) <= 3S (Paragraph 5.5.6.1 (d), ASME Section VIII Division 2). The 2K CB was analysed per PART 5—Design by Analysis Requirements—of ASME Section VIII, Division 2.