Michael Conlin Michigan State University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Academic Achievement among STEM Aspirants: Why do Black and Latino Students Earn Lower Grades than their White and Asian Counterparts? Jessica Sharkness,
Advertisements

Institutional and Student Characteristics that Predict Graduation and Retention Rates Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment.
Percentiles and the Normal Curve
Irwin/McGraw-Hill © Andrew F. Siegel, 1997 and l Chapter 12 l Multiple Regression: Predicting One Factor from Several Others.
State of College Admission 2011 David A. Hawkins Director of Public Policy and Research NACAC Presented November 10, 2011 CACNY Meeting, New York.
Voluntary Disclosure, Inference and the Strategic Behavior of Colleges Michael Conlin Michigan State University Stacy Dickert-Conlin Michigan State University.
Inference by College Admission Departments: Bayesian or Cursed? Michael Conlin Michigan State University Stacy Dickert-Conlin Michigan State University.
Grade Point Average - Your grade point average (GPA) is calculated by dividing the total amount of quality points earned by the total amount of.
University Education in the United States. U.S. UNIVERSITIES Quality of education overall: Figure dominantly among the highest ranked universities in.
A Statistical Analysis of The University of Oregon’s Retention Rates for Minority Groups Zoe Grover & Joe Croson June, 2006 Economics 419.
A Balanced Formula for Your College Applications The three categories that will help you find confidence.
State of College Admission 2009 Report David A. Hawkins Director of Public Policy and Research NACAC Melissa E. Clinedinst Assistant Director of Research.
Presentation Outline  Introductions  Why are “price sensitivity” and “value” important?  Strategic pricing & value enhancement framework  From research.
Multiple Regression. In the previous section, we examined simple regression, which has just one independent variable on the right side of the equation.
Asian Americans and Affirmative Action. What is Affirmative Action? Institutional efforts to increase the number of underrepresented minorities in U.S.
COLLEGE PLANNING PRESENTATION.  Exciting  Stressful  Overwhelming  Time Consuming.
Kenyon College 2008 Financial Aid Optimization Analysis Prepared October 2008.
Chapter 6 Lecture 3 Sections: 6.4 – 6.5.
COLLEGE PLANNING PRESENTATION.  Exciting  Stressful  Overwhelming  Time Consuming.
Voluntary Disclosure and the Strategic Behavior of Colleges Michael Conlin Michigan State University Stacy Dickert-Conlin Michigan State University Gabrielle.
Voluntary Disclosure Not Covered in Textbook. You’re on a job interview and the interviewer knows what the distribution of GPAs are for MBA students at.
Student Quality and Reported Student Quality: Higher Education Admissions Decisions Michael Conlin Michigan State University Stacy Dickert-Conlin Michigan.
 It’s not just about graduation!  We want to prepare your child to become an independent, responsible, contributing member of society.  This is your.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Undergraduate Enrollment Growth Study Interim Report Presented to the Board of Trustees March 27, 2008.
Chapter 6 Lecture 3 Sections: 6.4 – 6.5. Sampling Distributions and Estimators What we want to do is find out the sampling distribution of a statistic.
Examining the Enrollment and Persistence of Students with Discrepant High School Grades and Standardized Test Scores Anne Edmunds, Ed.D. Higher Education.
Take out a piece of paper. Typical SAT Question How many non-overlapping spaces can you cut the SHADED space of the donut into with just 2 straight lines?
The Profile of the New American University October 2006.
Weighting and imputation PHC 6716 July 13, 2011 Chris McCarty.
Academic Performance and Persistence of Washington State University Students Vicki A. McCracken, Professor, School of Economic Sciences Fran Hermanson,
Agenda Getting Started as Juniors Selecting Colleges
Bellwork: 9/21/16 DO NOT write on my article (USE YOUR OWN PAPER)
State of College Admission
How Can High School Counseling Shape Students’ Postsecondary Attendance? Exploring the Relationship between High School Counseling and Students’ Subsequent.
Let’s Get College-Ready
Inference: Bayesian, Cursed, …
Heritage High School College Planning 101
Affirmative Action Bans and the “Chilling Effect”
FINA262 Financial Data Analysis
IT – Staffing and Support
Pace’s Inaugural Retention Conference June 16, 2017
Student Entry Information Cumulative1 2nd Semester
University of Michigan
Susquehannock High School’s Counseling Department Presents...
OCAN Advisor Training New Advisor Track
Trends in College Admissions (From the National Association for College Admission Counseling and the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education)
POSC 202A: Lecture Lecture: Substantive Significance, Relationship between Variables 1.
Agenda Getting Started as Juniors Selecting Colleges
College Credit Plus An introduction for students and families at Cincinnati Christian Schools for the school year.
Allison Ambrose, PhD Illinois State University
Screen Stage Lecturer’s desk Gallagher Theater Row A Row A Row A Row B
University of British Columbia
College Planning Presentation
STA 291 Summer 2008 Lecture 23 Dustin Lueker.
Linda DeAngelo CIRP Assistant Director for Research
Sampling and Power Slides by Jishnu Das.
Junior Year: Fall Semester
Chapter 7: The Normality Assumption and Inference with OLS
Class of 2021 Enrollment
Amir Ghaisi Grigorios Fountas Panos Anastasopoulos Fred Mannering
Preparing for AP Classes
Getting Prepared for College
Inferential Statistics
Getting Prepared for College
Presented by the MRHS counseling department
STA 291 Spring 2008 Lecture 23 Dustin Lueker.
Advanced Placement Enrollments & Exam Results
Chapter 4: More on Two-Variable Data
Chapter 4 Science, Mathematics, and Computer Science Courses
Junior Year: Fall Semester
Presentation transcript:

Student Quality and Reported Student Quality: Higher Education Admissions Decisions Michael Conlin Michigan State University Stacy Dickert-Conlin Michigan State University Jeffrey Wooldridge Michigan State University Gabrielle Chapman Syracuse University IUPUI – October 4, 2007

Overview Introduction to policy and goals Data Reduced form Model Future Work

Optional SAT Policies Whether they get 1300 or 1250 doesn’t really tell you anything about them as a person or a student” says Ken Himmelman, Bennington dean of admissions. All the attention to numbers “becomes so crazy it’s almost a distraction.” - Bruno in USA Today (2006)

Optional SAT Policies “I SOMETIMES think I should write a handbook for college admission officials titled “How to Play the U.S. News & World Report Ranking Game, and Win!” I would devote the first chapter to a tactic called “SAT optional.” The idea is simple: tell applicants that they can choose whether or not to submit their SAT or ACT scores. Predictably, those applicants with low scores or those who know that they score poorly on standardized aptitude tests will not submit. Those with high scores will submit. When the college computes the mean SAT or ACT score of its enrolled students, voilà! its average will have risen. And so too, it can fondly hope, will its status in the annual U.S. News & World Report’s college rankings.” Colin Driver, President of Reed College, New York Times, 2006

Optional SAT Policies The thesis, first stated last year by The New Republic, is that colleges are being less than honest about why they abolish requirements that applicants submit their SAT scores. Behind the rhetoric about "enhancing diversity" and creating a more "holistic approach" to admissions, the theory goes, many colleges "go optional" on the SAT to improve their rankings. The logic is rather simple: At an SAT-optional college, students with higher scores are far more likely to submit them, raising the institution's mean SAT score and hence the heavily test-influenced rankings. Brownstein (2001) in The Chronicle of Higher Education

Prevalence of Optional Policy As of Spring 2007, more than 700 colleges have SAT- or ACT- optional policies. 24 of the top 100 liberal arts colleges ranked by U.S. News & World are SAT- or ACT- optional. (Bruno, 2006)

Research Questions How much does a school attempt to maximize the quality of their student body compared to the reported quality of their student body? How would the composition of the student body change if the schools did not consider rankings when making admission decisions? Key: Use optional SAT Policy as means to identify How does this policy inform the voluntary disclosure literature?

Data Application data for 2 liberal arts schools in the north east Each with approximately 1800 students enrolled. Both report a typical SAT I score in the upper 1200s/1600 College X: 2 years ≈ 5 years after the optional policy was instituted. College Y the year after the optional policy was instituted.

College Board Data SAT scores for those who elected not to submit them to the college. Student Descriptive Questionnaire (SDQ) SAT II Scores Self Reported income High school GPA High school activities

Optional SAT I policies College X required applicants to choose between submitting the ACT scores or three SAT II: Subject Tests must submit one of the above if do submit SATI scores 15.3 percent of the 7023 applicants choose option At College Y, must submit SAT II ACT three Advanced Placement (AP) exams or a combination of the above testing requirements. 24.1 percent of the 3054 applicants choose option

Voluntary Disclosure Models with Zero Disclosure Costs SAT I Score Probability 1300 0.2 1200 0.4 1100 0.3 1000 0.1 Example: Student i with given characteristics has the following probability distribution in term of SAT I scores: School knows distribution of SAT I scores and applies Bayes Rule when inferring an SAT score for a student who doesn’t report. Bayesian Nash Equilibrium results in every type except the worst revealing and the worst being indifferent between revealing and not revealing.

Voluntary Disclosure Models with Zero Disclosure Costs Comments: Distribution depends on student characteristics that are observable to the school such as high school GPA. With positive disclosure costs, the “unraveling” is not complete and only the types with the lowest SAT I scores do not disclose. Eyster and Rabin (Econometrica, 2005) propose a new equilibrium concept which they call cursed equilibrium.

Table 1 College X N=7,023 College Y N=3,504 Consider Not Consider SS Income Missing (sr) 0.453 (0.498) 0.462 (0.499) 0.559 (0.497) Income <50K (sr) 0.092 (0.289) 0.114 (0.318) ** 0.076 (0.264) 0.097 (0.296) 50K <Income <100K (sr) 0.186 (0.390) 0.191 (0.393) 0.159 (0.366) 0.129 (0.335) SAT1 Score 1272 (124) 1137 (113) *** 1267 (144) 1229 (120) Female Student 0.657 (0.475) 0.777 (0.416) 0.487 (0.500) 0.548 White 0.836 (0.370) 0.832 (0.374) 0.877 (0.328) 0.859 (0.348) Attended Private HS 0.475 0.507 * 0.353 (0.478) 0.431 (0.495) From State where College resides 0.132 (0.339) 0.122 0.335 (0.472) 0.254 (0.436) From Northeast 0.638 (0.481) 0.600 (0.491) 0.498 0.568 (0.496) N 5883 1072 2659 845

Table 1 College X N=7,023 College Y N=3,504 Consider Not Consider SS Income Missing (sr) 0.453 (0.498) 0.462 (0.499) 0.559 (0.497) Income <50K (sr) 0.092 (0.289) 0.114 (0.318) ** 0.076 (0.264) 0.097 (0.296) 50K <Income <100K (sr) 0.186 (0.390) 0.191 (0.393) 0.159 (0.366) 0.129 (0.335) SAT1 Score 1272 (124) 1137 (113) *** 1267 (144) 1229 (120) Female Student 0.657 (0.475) 0.777 (0.416) 0.487 (0.500) 0.548 White 0.836 (0.370) 0.832 (0.374) 0.877 (0.328) 0.859 (0.348) Attended Private HS 0.475 0.507 * 0.353 (0.478) 0.431 (0.495) From State where College resides 0.132 (0.339) 0.122 0.335 (0.472) 0.254 (0.436) From Northeast 0.638 (0.481) 0.600 (0.491) 0.498 0.568 (0.496) N 5883 1072 2659 845

Table 2 College X College Y SAT I Score (1600) – all applicants 1272 Consider SAT I Do Not SS Do Not Consider SAT I SAT I Score (1600) – all applicants 1272 (124) [5883] 1137 (112) [1072] *** 1267 (144) [2659] 1229 (120) [845] Predicted SAT I Score* (based on those that submitted) (88) [5879] 1224# (79) 1262 (77) 1258# Probability of Acceptance .417 (0.493) .392 (0.488) .445 (0.497) .488 (0.500) ** SAT I Score conditional on Acceptance 1323 (110) [2456] 1171 (98) [421] 1344 (115) [1182] 1260 (103) [412] Probability of Enrolling if Accepted .294 (0.455) .451 (0.498) .297 (0.457) .328 (0.470) SAT I Score conditional on Enrollment 1281 (107) [725] 1155 (99) [190] 1299 (114) [351] 1227 (97) [135] Freshman GPA (4.0 Scale for College X; 100 Scale for College Y) 3.29 (0.428) [721] 3.26 (0.392) 84.9 (5.4) [334] 84.7 (5.2) [132]

Reduced Form Student’s Decisions: College’s Decisions: Submit SAT I and Apply Early Enroll College’s Decisions: Admit Financial Aid Grant Followup – Freshman GPA

Table 3 Linear Probability - SUR (Dependent variable Don’t Consider SAT = 1) (Dependent variable Apply Early = 1) College X College Y Don’t Consider Early Income Missing (sr) 0.025** (0.012) -0.0003 (0.009) 0.007 (0.022) 0.002 (0.018) Income <50K (sr) -0.013 (0.016) -0.007 0.070** (0.031) 0.005 (0.023) 50K <Income <100K (sr) 0.014 (0.013) -0.002 (0.010) (0.025) 0.009 Intend to Apply for Financial Aid -0.012 -0.021*** (0.007) -0.062*** -0.047*** SAT1 Score/100 -0.128*** (0.004) -0.010*** (0.003) -0.081*** -0.023*** (0.005) SAT2 Score(s) available (1=yes) -0.301*** (0.053) 0.032 (0.040) -0.520*** (0.091) 0.178*** (0.067) Average SAT2/100*SAT2 Score(s) available (1=yes) 0.052*** (0.006) 0.106*** (0.015) -0.028*** (0.011) _Constant 1.628*** (0.059) 0.212*** (0.044) 1.145*** (0.097) 0.471*** (0.071) N 6951 3504 R2 0.16 0.04 0.08

Table 3 Linear Probability (Dependent variable Don’t Consider SAT = 1) (Dependent variable Apply Early = 1) College X College Y Don’t Consider Early No High School GPA reported (sr) 0.018 (0.019) 0.009 (0.014) 0.025 (0.033) -0.020 (0.024) HS GPA A+ (SR) 0.062*** -0.023 (0.018) 0.007 (0.041) -0.067** (0.030) HS GPA A (sr) 0.069*** (0.017) -0.011 (0.013) 0.027 (0.032) -0.010 (0.023) HS GPA A- (sr) 0.041*** (0.015) -0.014 (0.011) 0.060** -0.036 (0.022) HS GPA B+ (SR) -0.004 (0.016) 0.014 (0.012) 0.067** HS GPA B- (SR) -0.029 (0.029) -0.102* (0.056) -0.007 HS GPA C or below (sr) -0.109** (0.054) 0.015 (0.040) -0.161* (0.093) -0.063 (0.068) N 6951 3504 R2 0.16 0.04 0.08

Table 3 Linear Probability (Dependent variable Don’t Consider SAT = 1) (Dependent variable Apply Early = 1) College X College Y Don’t Consider Early Female Student 0.033*** (0.009) -0.009 (0.007) 0.033** (0.014) -0.022** (0.011) African American -0.113*** (0.025) -0.042** (0.019) 0.036 (0.041) -0.094*** (0.030) Native American 0.051 (0.067) 0.078 (0.050) -0.002 (0.157) 0.026 (0.114) Asian American -0.011 (0.020) -0.035** (0.015) -0.041 (0.032) -0.052** (0.024) Hispanic -0.066 (0.021) 0.000 (0.016) -0.001 (0.038) -0.067** (0.028) Unknown Race 0.001 -0.030** Legacy (1=yes) 0.012 (0.026) 0.043** -0.034 (0.029) 0.068*** (0.022) Attended Private HS 0.021** 0.042*** -0.012 (0.012) N 6951 3504 R2 0.16 0.014 0.04 0.08

Table 3 Linear Probability (Dependent variable Don’t Submit SAT = 1) (Dependent variable Apply Early = 1) College X College Y Don’t Submit Early Filled in College Board Survey (sdq) 0.046*** (0.016) 0.010 (0.012) -0.009 (0.034) -0.035* (0.021) # of HS Extracurricular Activities (sr)*Filled in sdq -0.001 (0.002) 0.001 (0.001) -0.003 (0.004) 0.003 (0.003) # of HS sports (sr)*Filled in sdq 0.004 (0.005) 0.007** # of HS offices/awards (sr)*Filled in sdq 0.002 -0.010* (0.006) 0.005 # of HS honors classes (sr)*Filled in sdq 0.000 0.005** -0.002 _Constant 1.628*** (0.059) 0.212*** (0.044) 1.145*** (0.097) 0.471*** (0.071) N 6951 3504 R2 0.16 0.014 0.04 0.08

Table 3 Linear Probability - SUR (Dependent variable Don’t Consider SAT = 1) (Dependent variable Apply Early = 1) College X College Y Don’t Consider Early Income Missing (sr) 0.025** (0.012) -0.0003 (0.009) 0.007 (0.022) 0.002 (0.018) Income <50K (sr) -0.013 (0.016) -0.007 0.070** (0.031) 0.005 (0.023) 50K <Income <100K (sr) 0.014 (0.013) -0.002 (0.010) (0.025) 0.009 Intend to Apply for Financial Aid -0.012 -0.021*** (0.007) -0.062*** -0.047*** SAT1 Score/100 -0.128*** (0.004) -0.010*** (0.003) -0.081*** -0.023*** (0.005) SAT2 Score(s) available (1=yes) -0.301*** (0.053) 0.032 (0.040) -0.520*** (0.091) 0.178*** (0.067) Average SAT2/100*SAT2 Score(s) available (1=yes) 0.052*** (0.006) 0.106*** (0.015) -0.028*** (0.011) _Constant 1.628*** (0.059) 0.212*** (0.044) 1.145*** (0.097) 0.471*** (0.071) N 6951 3504 R2 0.16 0.04 0.08

Table 3 Linear Probability (Dependent variable Don’t Consider SAT = 1) (Dependent variable Apply Early = 1) College X College Y Don’t Consider Early No High School GPA reported (sr) 0.018 (0.019) 0.009 (0.014) 0.025 (0.033) -0.020 (0.024) HS GPA A+ (SR) 0.062*** -0.023 (0.018) 0.007 (0.041) -0.067** (0.030) HS GPA A (sr) 0.069*** (0.017) -0.011 (0.013) 0.027 (0.032) -0.010 (0.023) HS GPA A- (sr) 0.041*** (0.015) -0.014 (0.011) 0.060** -0.036 (0.022) HS GPA B+ (SR) -0.004 (0.016) 0.014 (0.012) 0.067** HS GPA B- (SR) -0.029 (0.029) -0.102* (0.056) -0.007 HS GPA C or below (sr) -0.109** (0.054) 0.015 (0.040) -0.161* (0.093) -0.063 (0.068) N 6951 3504 R2 0.16 0.04 0.08

Table 3 Linear Probability (Dependent variable Don’t Consider SAT = 1) (Dependent variable Apply Early = 1) College X College Y Don’t Consider Early Female Student 0.033*** (0.009) -0.009 (0.007) 0.033** (0.014) -0.022** (0.011) African American -0.113*** (0.025) -0.042** (0.019) 0.036 (0.041) -0.094*** (0.030) Native American 0.051 (0.067) 0.078 (0.050) -0.002 (0.157) 0.026 (0.114) Asian American -0.011 (0.020) -0.035** (0.015) -0.041 (0.032) -0.052** (0.024) Hispanic -0.066 (0.021) 0.000 (0.016) -0.001 (0.038) -0.067** (0.028) Unknown Race 0.001 -0.030** Legacy (1=yes) 0.012 (0.026) 0.043** -0.034 (0.029) 0.068*** (0.022) Attended Private HS 0.021** 0.042*** -0.012 (0.012) N 6951 3504 R2 0.16 0.014 0.04 0.08

TABLE 4 Linear Probability (Dependent variable Accepted = 1) College X College Y Applied Early Admission 0.508*** (0.020) 0.510*** 0.345*** (0.023) 0.346*** Income <50K (sr) 0.092*** (0.021) 0.093*** -0.037 (0.031) -0.039 50K <Income <100K (sr) 0.037** (0.016) 0.040** (0.025) -0.038 Intend to Apply for Financial Aid -0.020* (0.012) -0.053*** -0.052*** SAT1 Score/100 0.079*** (0.006) 0.055*** 0.135*** (0.007) 0.056** (0.028) Requested school use SAT1 Score -0.114*** (0.015) -0.424*** (0.143) -0.141*** (0.052) -1.102*** (0.326) Requested school use SAT1 Score* SAT1 Score/100 0.027** 0.083*** SAT2 Score(s) available (1=yes) -0.779*** (0.068) -0.345*** (0.127) -0.803*** (0.091) -0.795*** (0.093) Average SAT2/100*SAT2 Score(s) available (1=yes) 0.133*** (0.011) 0.059*** 0.137*** Requested school use SAT2 Score -0.003 (0.017) -0.526*** (0.132) -0.119** (0.056) -0.543* (0.324) Requested school use SAT2 Score* SAT2 Score/100 0.088*** (0.022) 0.026 (0.018) N 6951 3504 R2 0.28 0.34

School is behaving strategically when deciding who to admit. Possible Explanations for Negative Coefficient Estimate Associated with Submit SAT1 For those who don’t submit, school might be “overestimating” their score Not submitting may be correlated with error term – applicants who do not submit are “more mature” or are athletes. School is behaving strategically when deciding who to admit.

TABLE 4 Linear Probability (Dependent variable Accepted = 1) College X College Y No High School GPA reported (sr) 0.132*** (0.024) 0.115*** (0.032) HS GPA A+ (SR) 0.346*** (0.031) 0.345*** 0.308*** (0.040) 0.302*** HS GPA A (sr) 0.292*** (0.021) 0.295*** 0.267*** 0.265*** HS GPA A- (sr) 0.203*** (0.019) 0.205*** 0.186*** (0.030) 0.184*** HS GPA B+ (SR) 0.106*** (0.020) 0.107*** 0.113*** 0.112*** HS GPA B- (SR) -0.089** (0.037) -0.020 (0.056) -0.029 HS GPA C or below (sr) -0.112 (0.069) -0.108 0.082 (0.092) 0.086 N 6951 3504 R2 0.28 0.34

TABLE 4 Linear Probability (Dependent variable Accepted = 1) College X College Y Female Student -0.163*** (0.011) 0.087*** (0.014) 0.086*** African American 0.387*** (0.032) 0.504*** (0.040) 0.499*** Native American 0.092 (0.084) 0.085 0.251 (0.155) 0.252 Asian American 0.154*** (0.025) 0.289*** 0.287*** Hispanic 0.141*** (0.027) 0.139*** 0.406*** (0.038) 0.402*** Unknown Race -0.081*** (0.023) -0.079*** Legacy (1=yes) 0.204*** (0.033) 0.202*** 0.074** (0.029) 0.075*** Attended Private HS 0.031*** 0.049*** (0.016) 0.050***

TABLE 4 Linear Probability (Dependent variable Accepted = 1) College X College Y From State where College resides 0.017 (0.015) 0.016 (0.017) From Midwest 0.106*** (0.024) 0.112*** -0.019 (0.035) -0.013 From West -0.007 (0.019) -0.004 0.008 (0.028) 0.007 From South -0.031* (0.018) 0.121*** (0.032) 0.119*** Filled in College Board Survey 0.034* (0.021) 0.034 -0.040 (0.025) # of HS Extracurricular Activities (sr)*Filled in College Board Survey 0.004* (0.002) -0.006 (0.004) -0.005 # of HS sports (sr)*Filled in sdq -0.007** (0.003) 0.006 (0.005) 0.005 # of HS offices/awards (sr)*Filled in sdq 0.008** 0.009** 0.003 (0.006) # of HS honors classes (sr)*Filled in sdq 0.003** (0.001) 0.004** _Constant -0.732*** (0.076) -0.463*** (0.141) -1.409*** (0.106) -0.490 (0.326) N 6951 3504 R2 0.28 0.34

TABLE 5 – Tobit – College Y only (Financial Aid Award|Accepted) Applied Early Admission 2248* (1151) 1678 (1352) Income Missing (sr) 7467*** (1223) 10547*** (1425) Income <50K (sr) 15652*** (1615) 23783*** (1997) 50K <Income <100K (sr) 9737*** (1278) 16903*** (1536) Intend to Apply for Financial Aid 23914*** (1062) SAT1 Score/100 792 (1495) 544 (1802) Requested school use SAT1 Score 2474 (18073) 1077 (22004) Requested school use SAT1 Score* SAT1 Score/100 -49 (1503) 45 (1816) SAT2 Score(s) available (1=yes) 737 (945) -922 (1130) Requested school use SAT2 Score 6468 (17456) 11439 (21168) Requested school use SAT2 Score* SAT2 Score/100 -427 (938) -788 (1127) N 1594 R2 0.07 0.03

TABLE 5 – Tobit – College Y only (Financial Aid Award|Accepted) No High School GPA reported (sr) -3073 (2372) -2148 (2744) HS GPA A+ (SR) -292 (2367) 8427*** (2805) HS GPA A (sr) 98 (2180) 5466** (2557) HS GPA A- (sr) -2679 (2188) 911 (2554) HS GPA B+ (SR) -3831 (2326) -2890 (2683) HS GPA B- (SR) -3300 (4908) 640 (5781) HS GPA C or below (sr) 11220 (11801) 8594 (15226) N 1594 R2 0.07 0.03

TABLE 5 – Tobit – College Y only (Financial Aid Award|Accepted) Female Student 142 (758) -20 (902) African American 3728** (1876) 11866*** (2373) Native American -285 (6417) 2350 (7842) Asian American 4507*** (1375) 7090*** (1686) Hispanic 6644*** (1685) 12556*** (2066) Legacy (1=yes) 1469 (1528) -1280 (1814) Attended Private HS -2591*** (865) -5665*** (1023) From State where College resides 684 (860) -26 (1033) From Midwest 321 (1888) -891 (2227) From West -1094 (1568) -3284* (1829) From South -498 (1671) -3210 (1988) _Constant -31521* (18315) -16807 (22150)

Enrolled|Accepted SAT Optional: negatively correlated (College Y) Ability: negatively correlated (safety school) Diversity: race negatively correlated Income positively correlated

Freshman GPA Is there additional info (unobserved to us) contained in decision to withhold score that manifests itself in first year performance Cannot reject 0 coefficient on SAT optional variable + correlations: SATI (for College X), SAT 2, HS GPA, women - correlations: minorities, lower income (College Y)

Literature on College Objective Function Ehrenberg (1999) single well-defined objective function may explain “fairly well the behavior of small liberal arts colleges…” (page 101). Epple, Romano, and Seig (2006) GE model students are matched with institutions of higher education, how financial aid packages are selected for different students, and how educational expenditures vary across schools. assume a school maximizes quality(average quality of the student body, school expenditure per student, and the mean income of the student body) s.t. balanced budget constraint and a fixed student body size. Ours allows uncertainty associated with student body size Our objective function reported average student body quality gender and racial compositions of the student body

College’s Objective Function The Liberal Art Colleges make decisions to maximize the mean quality of the student body in current and subsequent years The school decides whether to admit each student i=1…N and how much financial aid to offer student i (fai) in order to maximize the objective function

Ψi is probability student i is admitted and attends P, sticker price of college fai, financial aid offered to student i ΛP is the perceived average ability of the incoming students, ΛR is the reported average ability of the incoming students γ is the weight the college places on perceived quality relative to reported quality f(Ω) is a function of the demographic characteristics of the student body.

Student’s maximization problem Whether or not to apply early decision Whether or not to submit SAT I score

Ψi is probability student i is admitted and attends WTPi is student i’s willingness to pay to attend the school Csub,I is i’s cost of submitting her SAT I score

Ψi (early decision, submit SAT I)

Conclusions Students are strategic: Lower actual SAT I scores more likely to choose option Same students have higher predicted scores Colleges are strategic: Colleges are less likely to admit students who submit their SAT I scores, unless their SAT I scores are particularly high Suggestive of maximizing reported quality College goals appear to include diversity

Future Work Estimate Model to determine the weight the college places on perceived quality relative to reported quality (γ). Simulate the Model to determine how admissions would change if γ = 1 and how the admissions changes affect quality of student body. Estimate how school infers SAT score for a student who doesn’t report (Bayesian Nash Equilibrium or Cursed Equilibrium?)

TABLE 6 - Linear Probability (Dependent variable Enrolled = 1|Accepted) College X College Y Applied Early Admission 0.679*** (0.022) 0.659*** (0.029) Income Missing (sr) 0.010 (0.020) 0.051* (0.028) Income <50K (sr) 0.078*** 0.007 (0.046) 50K <Income <100K (sr) 0.020 (0.023) -0.026 (0.034) Intend to Apply for Financial Aid 0.022 (0.017) 0.004 (0.021) SAT1 Score/100 -0.058*** (0.009) -0.049* (0.027) Did not want SAT1 considered -0.029 -0.038*** (0.012) SAT2 Score(s) available (1=yes) 0.280** (0.109) 0.130*** (0.040) Average SAT2/100*SAT2 Score(s) available (1=yes) -0.040** 0.236 (0.147) Wanted SAT II considered -0.017 (0.025) -0.034 N 2876 1594 R2 0.35 0.36

TABLE 6 - Linear Probability (Dependent variable Enrolled = 1|Accepted) College X College Y No High School GPA reported (sr) -0.058 (0.039) -0.111** (0.056) HS GPA A+ (SR) -0.114*** (0.043) -0.126** (0.060) HS GPA A (sr) -0.071** (0.036) -0.151*** (0.053) HS GPA A- (sr) -0.076** (0.034) -0.130** (0.052) HS GPA B+ (SR) -0.010 (0.035) -0.062 (0.054) HS GPA B- (SR) 0.134 (0.085) 0.052 (0.128) HS GPA C or below (sr) -0.165 (0.193) 0.609 (0.383) N 2876 1594 R2 0.35 0.36

TABLE 6 - Linear Probability (Dependent variable Enrolled = 1|Accepted) College X College Y Female Student 0.011 (0.015) 0.009 (0.019) African American -0.186*** (0.040) -0.118** (0.057) Native American 0.213* (0.127) 0.627*** (0.189) Asian American -0.115*** (0.033) -0.068* (0.038) Hispanic -0.171*** -0.095** (0.048) Unknown Race -0.011 (0.036) Legacy (1=yes) 0.057 (0.037) 0.034 Attended Private HS -0.045*** (0.016) -0.074*** (0.022) From State where College resides -0.006 0.025 (0.023) From Midwest -0.013 (0.032) 0.042 (0.045) From West 0.008 (0.026) -0.034 From South -0.032 (0.025) -0.016

TABLE 6 - Linear Probability (Dependent variable Enrolled = 1|Accepted) College X College Y Filled in College Board Survey -0.010 (0.030) -0.012 (0.034) # of HS Extracurricular Activities (sr)*Filled in College Board Survey 0.0004 (0.003) 0.010** (0.005) # of HS sports (sr)*Filled in sdq -0.003 (0.004) -0.0001 (0.007) # of HS offices/awards (sr)*Filled in sdq -0.008 (0.008) # of HS honors classes (sr)*Filled in sdq -0.001 (0.002) _Constant 1.060*** (0.128) 0.808*** (0.182) N 2876 1594 R2 0.35 0.36

TABLE 7 – OLS Freshman GPA College X (4.0 Scale) College Y (100 point scale) Applied Early Admission -0.011 (0.026) -0.600 (0.506) Income Missing (sr) -0.028 (0.036) -0.096 (0.707) Income <50K (sr) -0.078 (0.049) -2.631** (1.224) 50K <Income <100K (sr) -0.025 (0.041) -1.619* (0.894) Intend to Apply for Financial Aid 0.080*** (0.030) 0.392 (0.692) Financial Aid Grant 0.00002 (0.00004) SAT1 Score/100 0.038** (0.016) 0.362 (0.313) Did not want SAT1 considered 0.046 (0.035) 0.775 (0.673) Requested school use SAT2 Score 0.050 (0.042) -0.106 SAT2 Score(s) available (1=yes) -0.529*** (0.1812) -9.150** (3.584) Average SAT2/100*SAT2 Score(s) available (1=yes) 0.088*** (0.029) 1.571*** (0.564)

TABLE 7 – OLS Freshman GPA College X (4.0 Scale) College Y (100 point scale) No High School GPA reported (sr) 0.074 (0.060) 1.340 (1.169) HS GPA A+ (SR) 0.327*** (0.082) 5.102*** (1.450) HS GPA A (sr) 0.310*** (0.056) 4.581*** (1.099) HS GPA A- (sr) 0.124** (0.053) 2.737** (1.081) HS GPA B+ (SR) 0.101* (0.052) 2.006* (1.050) HS GPA B- (SR) -0.280** (0.110) 3.073 (2.366) HS GPA C or below (sr) 0.262 (0.267) 5.689 (5.267) Female Student 0.160*** (0.027) 1.282*** (0.472) African American -0.275*** (0.078) 0.450 (1.622) Native American -0.289* (0.154) -7.792*** (2.897) Asian American -0.109 (0.068) -0.573 (1.173) Hispanic -0.407*** (0.077) -2.745** (1.360) Unknown Race -0.089 (0.067)

TABLE 7 – OLS Freshman GPA College X (4.0 Scale) College Y (100 point scale) Filled in College Board Survey 0.004 (0.053) -0.897 (0.851) # of HS Extracurricular Activities (sr)*Filled in College Board Survey 0.003 (0.006) 0.158 (0.118) # of HS sports (sr)*Filled in sdq -0.009 (0.008) -0.343** (0.161) # of HS offices/awards (sr)*Filled in sdq -0.002 (0.010) -0.028 (0.208) # of HS honors classes (sr)*Filled in sdq -0.005 (0.003) 0.038 (0.072) _Constant 2.567*** (0.212) 77.555*** (4.319) N 908 466 R2 0.281 0.263