Updating the Regulation for the JINR Programme Advisory Committees

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO GFCS Governance proposal Process of development.
Advertisements

European COoperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research Role and rules of procedure for Management Committee Carine Petit Science Officer.
PHILLIP FRENCH DIRECTOR AUSTRALIAN CENTRE FOR DISABILITY LAW 2012 Asserting human rights under the Optional Protocol.
IPCC Products, Procedures and Processes Amsterdam, 14 May 2010 Dr. Renate Christ, Secretary of the IPCC.
NORDRESS Consortium Agreement highlights. All participating institutions have signed the CA This presentation gives a brief overview of the main items.
1 7th Framework Programme Specific Programme “Ideas” European Commission Directorate B November 2005.
Proposal for a Constitution for MICE A Plan for Discussion P Dornan G Gregoire Y Nagashima A Sessler.
02/07/2015 MUNICIPAL FINANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMME 1 FINANCE CHAIRPERSONS’ FORUM TYPES OF COMMITTEES.
1 106 th Session of the JINR Scientific Council Joint Institute for Nuclear Research On the Financial Support for the Seven-Year Plan for the Development.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
1 PUBLIC EXPENDITURE AND AUDIT COMMITTEE Jānis Reirs Member of Public Expenditure and Audit Committee Public Expenditure and Audit Committee.
EPOCA – 11. June EPOCAConsortiumOrganisation.
Institutional Arrangements for Adaptation Achala Chandani Researcher International Institute for Environment and Development european capacity building.
Meeting of the TEMPUS DoQuP Project –Workshop on “Documentation for Quality Assurance of Study Programs" 1-6 May 2012, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan Accreditation.
Dr. Marion Tobler, NCP Environment Evaluation Criteria and Procedure.
Quality Assurance at the University of Arts in Belgrade Novi Pazar, 14 th February 2011 Olga Stanković General Secretary.
Assessment of recommendations of the 5 past ACHR sessions 26 th – 30 th Dulitha N. Fernando.
th session of JINR SC 1 JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH Recommendations of the JINR Directorate for the financing of projects and themes.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 4.2 JOINT FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE MODULE FOUR – SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR CODEX WORK 4.2 Requesting, accessing.
Geographical Enlargement of CERN Associate membership Principles and criteria S. Intoudi / 8 July
1 PRESENTATION TO JOINT RULES COMMITTEE ON THE OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL 19 MARCH 2008.
SEYCHELLES EXPERIENCE Hon. Nichole Barbe, PAC Member, Seychelles.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Joint Committee on Environment, Culture and the Gaeltacht 21 May 2013 Outline Heads of the Climate Action and Low Carbon Development Bill 2013 John McCarthy.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
Polish National Rural Network Bureau of Technical Assistance Responsible for: -Technical Assistance in Programs of Rural Development for period.
Public health, innovation and intellectual property 1 |1 | The Global Strategy on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Technical Briefing.
THE INTRODUCTION AND SUPPORT OF RESEARCH PROJECTS AS PART OF THE FUTURE ROLE OF THE RCARO Dr Waqar Ahmad Dr John Easey.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
Nacionalna agencija Republike Slovenije za kakovost v viskoem šolstvu - NAKVIS Slovenian Quality Assurance Agency of Higher Education - SQAA presented.
THE INTRODUCTION AND SUPPORT OF RESEARCH PROJECTS AS PART OF THE FUTURE ROLE OF THE RCARO Dr Waqar Ahmad Dr John Easey.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Pennsylvania Climate Change Act
Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann Institute of Science
Programming Committee - composition
EU Law Law 326.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Communications on the:
Procedure for the resolution of grievances in the ILO
ORIENTATION SESSION FOR COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Tender Evaluation and Award Process
Monitoring the State of Conservation of World Heritage Properties
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Preparation for ITU Council 2016
WP1 - Consortium coordination and management
Governance and Collaboration By-Laws
Parochial Church Council & Synod Members Orientation Summit
WHAT IS THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ?
Objectives of the Training
REPORT OF THE ELECTRONIC WORKING GROUP UNEP(DEC)/CAR WG.29/INF.12
Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Bill [B 75–2008]
Agenda 5.11 General Regulations
Roadmap to Enhanced Technical Regulations of WMO
Setting Actuarial Standards
SAPS Audit Committee 26 October 2016.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING.
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
European Environment Agency
Institutul Bancar Român ROMANIAN BANKING INSTITUTE
Summary report of EC meeting I
FISHERIES AND ENVIRONMENT
The evaluation process
To achieve improvement through: Self assessment Benchmarking
Jill Michielssen European Commission, DG Environment
REFIT Platform 20/02/2019 Diversity Europe Group.
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Meeting of PAP/RAC Focal Points, Split, Croatia, 8-9 May 2019
Local School Improvement Council (LSIC)
POSITIVE PARTNERSHIPS
Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation title 12th meeting of the Adaptation Committee Agenda item 5 (a) Review of adaptation-related institutional arrangements under the Convention.
Presentation transcript:

Updating the Regulation for the JINR Programme Advisory Committees The draft of the new version of the Regulations: provides an extended description of the PAC functions; specifies the evaluation criteria to be used for examination of JINR projects and research themes; enables the PACs to establish their operating procedures independently and develop specific criteria, methods and forms of evaluation of projects and research themes in consultation with the JINR Directorate; allows the PAC members to carry out evaluation of projects and research themes by means of electronic communications; encourages the PACs to appoint one or two of its members to perform continuous monitoring of a specific project jointly with the principal investigator; addresses a number of minor corrections suggested by the JINR Directorate and PACs.

General provisions 1.1. The Programme Advisory Committees (PACs) are advisory bodies to the JINR Directorate and to the JINR Scientific Council, established with a view to facilitating the development and implementation of the scientific programme of JINR in its major areas of research. 1.2. The Programme Advisory Committees: – evaluate proposals for projects of experimental research at basic facilities of JINR and of other research centres; – review the progress and results of on-going experiments in the evaluation of proposals for their continuation or termination; – review projects for the upgrade and further development of JINR facilities, and for the construction of new facilities; – evaluate topics of theoretical research at JINR and their relevance to the needs of experiments carried out at JINR; – evaluate developments in the fields of accelerator technology and experimental techniques, information technology, as well as consider educational programmes of JINR; – provide advice in the development of medium-range and long-range strategies of JINR.

1.3. To implement these functions, at their meetings the PACs evaluate proposals from international scientific collaborations, scientific institutions –– partners of JINR in the Member States and other countries, JINR Laboratories and scientists. These proposals are submitted for consideration to the PACs by the JINR Directorate in accordance with the Rules for the Preparation of Projects at JINR. 1.4 The PACs carry out the examination of projects and formulate their conclusions in written form based on the following evaluation criteria: – scientific merits and intellectual contribution; – technical feasibility of the project within the proposed timescale; – compliance of the requested financial resources with the project objectives; – availability of adequate human resources at JINR and in the collaborating institutions. 1.5. The PACs independently establish their operating procedures. Specific criteria, methods and forms of examination of projects submitted to the PACs for evaluation are developed and applied by the PACs in consultation with the JINR Directorate.

1.6. For each PAC session, a written report containing the results of its work and the corresponding recommendations, signed by the Chairperson and by the Scientific Secretary of the PAC, is submitted to the Scientific Council and JINR Director. 1.7. In view of the major areas of research established at JINR by the Scientific Council and by the Committee of Plenipotentiaries, the following Programme Advisory Committees have been set up: – PAC for Particle Physics; – PAC for Nuclear Physics; – PAC for Condensed Matter Physics. 1.8. The further establishment or the cancellation of PACs is carried out by a joint decision of the JINR Directorate and the Scientific Council.

2. Composition and structure 2.1. The Scientific Council appoints to each РАС, upon proposal by the JINR Director, from 8 to 12 outside experts in the relevant fields. They are appointed for an initial term of three years. Every three years, one third of the РАС members can be replaced by new members with a view to ensuring both change and continuity. 2.2. The JINR Director appoints members of the JINR Directorate, Directors of the Laboratories and leading scientists of JINR as ex officio members to each PAC without a right to vote. 2.3. The Chairpersons of the PACs are appointed by the JINR Scientific Council upon proposal by the JINR Director for a term of three years which can be renewed for an additional three-year mandate. 2.4. In consultation with the Chairperson of the PAC, the JINR Directorate appoints a Scientific Secretary of the PAC responsible for the organizational aspects and for providing technical support to the PAC activities.

3. Procedure 3.1. The PACs meet at JINR at least once a year, usually twice a year. 3.2. The Chairperson and the Scientific Secretary of the PAC are responsible for the preparation of the agenda of the meetings, in cooperation with the JINR Directorate. 3.3. Proposals prepared in accordance with the Rules for the Preparation of Projects at JINR are submitted to the relevant РАС Chairperson not later than two months before the meeting. 3.4. All proposals are presented at public sessions of the PACs. Each proposal is reviewed by at least one РАС member. 3.5. Proposals for the agenda of a РАС meeting are submitted to the Chairperson of the PAC by the Scientific Secretary in consultation with the JINR Directorate not later than 6 weeks before the meeting. 3.6. The material for a PAC meeting is prepared by its Scientific Secretary and is dispatched to the members not later than one month before the meeting.

3.7 The РАС recommendations are adopted at the PAC closed sessions by simple majority of votes of all РАС members, with a required quorum of two thirds of them being present at the meeting. The PAC recommendations are published and sent to all РАС members, leaders of the projects discussed at the meetings, and to the members of the Scientific Council. 3.8. If necessary, the PACs may carry out evaluation of projects by means of electronic communications, set up panels to consider specific issues and convene dedicated meetings. 3.9. If necessary, joint meetings of several PACs may be held upon recommendation of the Scientific Council or the PAC Chairpersons. 3.10. In order to control the implementation of large projects, the PACs may appoint one or two of its members to perform continuous monitoring of a specific project jointly with the principal investigator. 3.11. The Chairpersons of the PACs are invited by the JINR Directorate to present the recommendations of the PACs at sessions of the JINR Scientific Council.

3.12. The evaluation of a project is accomplished by one or several PAC members. Outside experts can also be invited for the evaluation, taking into account the common standards on potential conflicts of interests. The principle of the proposal evaluation consists in producing written referee reports, summarizing the evaluation of a project according to the criteria mentioned in Paragraph 1.4. Each referee report should be structured following the evaluation criteria. At the end of the report the referee summarizes the weaknesses and strengths of a project. The final recommendation is made at the general discussion during the PAC meeting based on the available referee reports with the possibility for PAC members to reconsider or modify their initial assessment following the debate at the meeting and the additional opinions that emerged in the discussion. Optionally, in addition to written reports, a referee may evaluate each of the criteria by giving points (from 0 to 10 points) that can serve to compare and rank different projects.