Disease Activity Scales in Patients with UPIA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hatem H Eleishi, MD Professor of Rheumatology, Cairo University Consultant Rheumatologist, Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital Rheumatoid Arthritis Wednesday,
Advertisements

Drug Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Adults Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Efficacy of Methotrexate and/or Etanercept for treatment of RA Rheumatoid Arthritis:
Achy shoulders and a very high CRP Sarah Tansley Rheumatology, Clinical Fellow.
Table 1. Comparison between the provisional diagnosis based on the proforma versus final diagnosis Early arthritis Rheumatoid arthritis 3 6 Psoriatic.
What is the definition of remission in RA? American Rheumatism Association (ARA)¹ Five or more of the following criteria must be fulfilled for at least.
Measuring Signs and Symptoms in Rheumatoid Arthritis David R. Karp, MD, PhD Chief, Rheumatic Diseases UT Southwestern Medical Center David R. Karp, MD,
Rheumatoid Arthritis Anila Malik GPVTS. Aims To cover the following: What is RA? Diagnostic criteria and clinical features Rheumatoid Factor Investigations.
PsA: Review of Available Assessment Instruments and Lessons from Trial Results Part II Christian Antoni Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg.
NSAIDs and Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis By Abd El-Samad El-Hewala Professor of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Faculty of Medicine.
Yusuf Yazıcı, MD NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York
EFFICACY OF SPA THERAPY IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS-A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY Mine Karagülle Department of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology.
Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Consultant Rheumatologist
Infectious arthritis Bacterial Viral Other Postinfectious (reactive) arthritis Rheumatic fever Reactive arthritis Enteric infection Other seronegative.
Outcome Measures in PsA Philip Mease MD Seattle, WA.
Recommendation 4: Antibody Testing in Patients with UPIA.
3e Initiative 2009 How to investigate and follow-up Undifferentiated Peripheral Inflammatory Arthritis? Case 1.
Recommendation 1: Defining & Diagnosing UPIA. Learning Objectives State the definition of Undifferentiated Peripheral Inflammatory Arthritis (UPIA) Describe.
Recommendation 6: MRI & Ultrasound in Patients with UPIA.
3e Initiative 2009 How to investigate and follow-up Undifferentiated Peripheral Inflammatory Arthritis? Case 2.
Recommendation 2: Predicting the Diagnosis & Prognosis in Patients with UPIA.
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
A NEW LOOK AT RA Interactive Hot Topics Series
Genetic Testing in Patients with UPIA
Radiographs in Patients with UPIA
SAT0699 Rapid assessment predicts disease activity improvement in newly diagnosed Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Mark Yates*, James Galloway, Neil Snowden,
Professor, Rheumatology Division, Ankara University Medical Faculty
Rheumatoid Arthritis: Management and New Therapies
From: Treatment of Very Early Rheumatoid Arthritis With Symptomatic Therapy, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs, or Biologic AgentsA Cost-Effectiveness.
Anti-TNF therapy improves hand function in rheumatoid arthritis
FRAX & ITS ASSOCIATIONS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
3rd National Rheumatology Congress of Kosova with International participants: November 3-4, 2016 Emerald Hotel, Prishtina, KosovoReumatology 2016 COMPLICATIONS.
3e Initiative 2009 How to investigate and follow-up Undifferentiated Peripheral Inflammatory Arthritis? Case 3 1.
New Criteria of RA Esraa Bukhari Houseofficer 29 Nov 2010.
Albarouni, Mohammed 1, Becker, Ingrid 2, Horneff, Gerd 1
Algorithm based on the 2016 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Algorithm based on the.
Rhematoid Rthritis Respiratory disorders
Mean change from baseline in disease and disability outcomes at 6 months for abatacept initiators by anti-CCP status. Mean change from baseline in disease.
Mean change from baseline in (A) DAS28-4(ESR), (B) CDAI and (C) HAQ-DI
Change in secondary endpoints over time: (A) LS mean change from baseline in DAS28-CRP through Week 32, (B) mean change from baseline in CRP through Week.
Mean change in patient-reported outcomes from baseline to Week 25 with biweekly or monthly pegloticase compared with placebo. Mean change in patient-reported.
(A) EULAR response based on DAS28 (ESR, otherwise CRP) and (B) Boolean remission, at 6 months in patients treated with abatacept as a first-line biologic.
BeSt Study: Patient Characteristics Total Population Female 67% Male % Age (years) Duration of symptoms (weeks) 23 Time diagnosis.
Efficacy end points: the percentage of patients achieving an improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) of (A) 20% (ACR20), (B) 50% (ACR50)
Improvement in PROs, TJC, SJC and PGA at month 6 in patients achieving (A) ACR50, (B) CDAI LDA and (C) HAQ-DI
Clinical and patient-reported outcomes for patients randomised to CZP 200 mg Q2W and CZP 400 mg Q4W to week 96. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes.
Correlations between observed patient-reported outcomes and disease activity scores at week 24. Correlations between observed patient-reported outcomes.
Disease activities evaluated as a comparison between abatacept plus MTX and placebo plus MTX groups. Disease activities evaluated as a comparison between.
Mean change from baseline in disease and disability outcomes at 6 months for TNFi initiators by anti-CCP status. Mean change from baseline in disease and.
OR for baseline predictors of MDA at weeks 12, 24, 48, 96 and 144 by univariate analysis of observed data. OR for baseline predictors of MDA at weeks 12,
Efficacy outcomes in patients aged ≥65 years versus younger patients: ACR outcomes at (A) week 12 and (B) week 24. Efficacy outcomes in patients aged ≥65.
Rheumatoid Arthiritis
Additional efficacy outcomes for the 12-week study of Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with baricitinib or placebo. Additional efficacy.
Clinical response in patients with early and established RA at month 24. *p
Improvement in PROs, TJC, SJC and PGA at month 6 in patients achieving (A) ACR70, (B) CDAI REM and (C) SDAI REM. For tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID treatment.
Percentage of patients with RA achieving DAS28(CRP)<2
Cox proportional-hazards model of time to first RA flare after treatment withdrawal for patients who entered the re-treatment period (n=146). Cox proportional-hazards.
Synovial Biopsy in Patients with UPIA
Percentage of patients achieving 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria at week 12 by patient demographic and disease characteristics.
Percentage of responders at month 6 by (A) ACR50, SDAI/CDAI LDA, and HAQ-DI
Acute Phase Reactants in Patients with UPIA
Explanatory power of the LPA solution for clinical and functional outcomes compared with the conventional threshold-based discordance definition. Explanatory.
(A) JIA-ACR30/50/70/90 response rates by visit in part 1.
 Frequency distribution of the number of fulfilled classification criteria for RA (ACR 1987) in relation to the proportion of positive anti-CCP antibodies.
Effect sizes (95% CI) of clinical variables per treatment group of studies directly comparing different dosages/routes. Effect sizes (95% CI) of clinical.
Mean disease activity score based on a 28-joint count (DAS28 (ESR)) (A), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score (B) and Simplified Disease Activity.
Multivariable model of adjusted
Algorithm based on the 2016 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Algorithm based on the.
Antibody treatment ameliorates inflammation in experimental arthritis.
Presentation transcript:

Disease Activity Scales in Patients with UPIA Recommendation 10: Disease Activity Scales in Patients with UPIA Recommendation 10

Learning Objectives At the end of this section participant should be able to: Compare and contrast potential disease activity scales for UPIA Describe the role and limitations of disease activity scales in the evaluation of patients with UPIA Explain how disease activity scales can be used to monitor patients over time Learning Objectives At the end of this section participant should be able to: Compare and contrast potential disease activity scales for UPIA Describe the role and limitations of disease activity scales in the evaluation of patients with UPIA Explain how disease activity scales can be used to monitor patients over time

Recommendation 10 Disease activity should be monitored [5, D], however no specific tool can be recommended [3b, C]. Recommendation 10 Disease activity should be monitored [5, D], however no specific tool can be recommended [3b, C].

Undifferentiated Arthritis Early stage of classifiable disease Part of an overlap of disease Partial form of a defined disease Disease of unknown origin UA envelops a heterogeneous group of recent onset arthritides that are not classifiable within established criteria sets such as those of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). UA may represent an early stage of a classified form of arthritis that will eventually be definable; an overlap of more than one disease; a partial form of a defined disease; or a disease of unknown origin. UA overall has a better prognosis than RA as it encompasses a spectrum of self-limited disorders. As compared to RA, a patient with UA usually presents with fewer affected joints, less radiographic erosions, better functional ability, and a greater likelihood of being seronegative. Patients with UA are also less likely than patients with RA to require treatment that involves the use of corticosteroids (such as Prednisone) or DMARDs and a substantial proportion of UA patients remit spontaneously. Hitchon CA, Peschken CA, Shaikh S, El-Gabalawy HS. Early undifferentiated arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2005;31:605-626.

How should disease activity be assessed? Acute Phase Reactants Physicians Global Assessment Tender/swollen joint counts Patient reported measures Patient function How should disease activity be assessed? Acute Phase Reactants Physicians Global Assessment Tender/swollen joint counts Patient reported measures Patient function There are many different aspects to the assessment of a patient with inflammatory arthritis. We sought to determine if there was any measure or measures which could be recommended for the assessment and follow-up of patients with UPIA.

Scales Identified in the Literature Search to assess UPIA WHODAS (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule) LHS (London Handicap Scale) DRP (Disease Repercussion Profile) HAQ (Health Assessment Questionnaire) 3 physical measures RADAI (RA Disease Activity Index) McROMI (McGill Range of Motion Index) NOAR-DJC (NOAR Damage Joint Count) Scales Identified in the literature search WHODAS (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule) LHS (London Handicap Scale) DRP (Disease Repercussion Profile) HAQ (Health Assessment Questionnaire) 3 physical measures RADAI (RA Disease Activity Index) McROMI (McGill Range of Motion Index) NOAR-DJC (NOAR Damage Joint Count) There were several scales which had been studied in patients with UPIA. Many of these focus on patient function and disability. While this is important in patient assessment, the list failed to capture the more commonly used composite measures of disease activity.

Commonly used measures of disease activity DAS DAS28 CDAI SDAI Tender joint count 66 28 Swollen joint count ESR/CRP + Patient global Physician global Commonly used measures of disease activity Other commonly used composite measures of disease activity are listed in the table above with differences highlighted.

How should disease activity be assessed? Acute Phase Reactants Physicians Global Assessment Tender/swollen joint counts Patient reported measures Patient function How should disease activity be assessed? Many options More important is to choose a validated measure(s) and follow over time Although no instrument of disease activity has been fully validated for its use in UPIA, experts felt that it was important to recommend that there should be a conscious effort to record disease activity. Time Many options available More important is to choose a validated measure(s) and follow over time

Summary Disease activity should be measured and followed, and there are many options available for how best to do this Summary Disease activity should be measured and followed, and there are many options available for how best to do this.

References Tunn EJ, Bacon PA. Differentiating persistent from self-limiting symmetrical synovitis in an early arthritis clinic. Br J Rheumatol. 1993 Feb; 32(2):97-103. Green M, Marzo-Ortega H, Wakefield RJ, Astin P, Proudman S, Conaghan PG, et al. Predictors of outcome in patients with oligoarthritis: results of a protocol of intraarticular corticosteroids to all clinically active joints. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 May; 44(5):1177-1183. El Miedany Y, Youssef S, Mehanna AN, El Gaafary M. Development of a scoring system for assessment of outcome of early undifferentiated inflammatory synovitis. Joint Bone Spine. 2008 Mar; 75(2):155-162. Mjaavatten MD, Haugen AJ, Helgetveit K, Sidenvall G, Nygaard H, Kvien TK. High anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide level is a stronger predictor than low level for persistent joint swelling in patients presenting with arthritis of <=16 weeks duration. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2008; 58(9):S770-S770.

References (cont.) Visser H, le Cessie S, Vos K, Breedveld FC, Hazes JM. How to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis early: a prediction model for persistent (erosive) arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Feb; 46(2):357-365. Boire G, Cossette P, de Brum-Fernandes AJ, Liang P, Niyonsenga T, Zhou ZJ, et al. Anti-Sa antibodies and antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide are not equivalent as predictors of severe outcomes in patients with recent-onset polyarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005; 7(3):R592-603. Mjaavatten MD, Nygaard H, Helgetveit K, Haugen AJ, Kvien TK. Clinical characteristics of patients presenting with oligoarthritis in a very early arthritis clinic in Norway: predictors of persistent arthritis at six month follow-up. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2007; 56(12):1638.