Identification on Significant Pressures - Surface Water Bodies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NGO work with the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Finland Hannele Ahponen Water project coordinator Finnish Association for Nature Conservation.
Advertisements

Our Water, Our Resource, Our Responsibility Module 2: Water Management Unit 2: Water Framework Directive.
Module 3: Environmental Objectives, Programme of Measures, Economic Analysis, Exemptions Environmental Objectives Yannick Pochon Afyon, 2015.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
Substantive environmental law driven by European Council (summits) Council (of env ministers) –Approve Commission strategies Commission –Environmental.
GIS development. Danube Commission+ISRBC meeting Sava GIS Sava GIS establishment –Performed in accordance with the Sava GIS Strategy EU WFD INSPIRE Directive.
This project is funded by the European Union ENVIRONMENTAL COLLABORATION FOR THE BLACK SEA GEORGIA, MOLDOVA, RUSSIA and UKRAINE Euroconsult This project.
The phased approach to the groundwater monitoring programme for the Drini River Basin.
MODULE 1 RBM Planning Senad Ploco. Policy Cycle Policy Formulation Project Implementation Management and Control Political weight Phase Problem Recognition.
Water Framework Directive Programme of Measures River Basin Management Plans Milan Matuška Ministry of the Environment Slovak Republic Water Protection.
Preview of the Draft River Basin Management Plan SERBD Advisory Council September 2008.
Water.europa.eu Assessment of the River Basin Management Plans – preliminary findings Conference on River Basin Management Planning Ankara, 28 February.
Characterization Report Module 2: Water Budget, Pressures and Impacts, Significant Water Management Issues, Monitoring, Characterization Report Characterization.
UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes A unique framework for improved management of shared waters.
EU Water Policy Sustainable water management for generations to come.
European Commission, DG Environment Unit B.1: Water, the Marine and Soil TAIEX Seminar « Management of Water Resources: River Basin Management in the Baltic.
Drish Water Management Unit Action Plan Name00Drish Water Management Unit Area205 km 2 River Basin DistrictSouth Eastern RBD Main CountiesTipperary Protected.
German Guidebook on the Implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive Dr. Harald Irmer Germany.
BUG PROJECT Information as a basis to establish transboundary cooperation: The experience of the Bug Pilot Project Małgorzata Landsberg-Uczciwek Voivodeship.
Powerpoint Templates Page 1 Powerpoint Templates Black Sea Basin Directorate – presentation of the scope, responsibilities and project interests Mrs. TANYA.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Water Framework Directive An Introduction David Whiles Anglian River Basin Manager.
THE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PRACTICE Case study. RBMP Detailed publication process in the directive...  art. 13: general rules  annex VII: detailed contents.
WFD Characterisation Report Dr Tom Leatherland Environmental Quality Manager 29 October 2003.
Water.europa.eu Water Framework Directive - a framework for Community action in the field of water policy Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European.
European Commission, DG Environment Unit B.1: Water, the Marine and Soil Joachim D’Eugenio Slide 1 The Common Implementation Strategy (CIS) for the Water.
Group Work IWRM Integrated River Basin Management.
1. Outline 2 “Pre-Harmonization” Groundwater Management Perspectives EU’s DirectivesWhy Are the New Approaches Needed? Turkey’s Institutional Structure:
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
1. Outline 2 Earlier Groundwater Management Approaches of Turkey European Union: An Example for Groundwater Management Turkey Current Situation and Distances.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
Program of Measures Guidance’s for the 2 nd cycle Antton Keto Northern calotte water authority meeting 16 th -18 th, April 2013.
Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.
EU Update/CIS England WFD Stakeholder Forum 4 April 2008.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/ES of the European Parliament and Council from October 23rd 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water.
Environmental policies in Europe
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Principles and Key Issues
Proposal for reporting on Programmes of Measures in 2016
Restoration target values?
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
CIS guidance document on E-Flows
Daughter Directive Groundwater - Working Procedure -
The EU WATER POLICY.
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
State of play of French progress in cost-effectiveness analysis
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
European Commission DG ENV Unit C1 Water
1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.
Expert Advisory Forum on
Preparing a River Basin Management Plan WFD Characterisation Manager
CASE STUDY: A SPECIFIC CASE OF NON-ACHIEVEMENT OF THE OBJECTIVE
GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISATION in England & Wales
Strong needs for coordination at EU level
EP Pilot project Comparative study of pressures and measures
Part I.
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
Water Framework Directive, Habitats Directive and Inland Waterway Transport Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
IMPRESS Guidance and Policy Summary Water Directors Copenhagen, 21-22nd November 2002 Working Group leaders: Volker Mohaupt, Umwelt Bundes Amt Isobel.
Water Quality 台灣地區河川污染特性 污染來源 工業廢水污染:老街溪、中港溪、大甲溪、北港溪、八掌溪、二仁溪、花蓮溪。
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003
WFD & Agriculture – Article 5
SCG May 2005 CIRCA review.
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
a) Thematic presentations: part 1: biophysical benefits
Presentation transcript:

Identification on Significant Pressures - Surface Water Bodies Oldřich Novický; Tomáš Navrátil; James Hunt – Twinning Project Ministry of the Environment

Twinning Project – Implementation of the Water Framework Directive Project Management - the Czech Republic institutions: Ministry of Environment + Ministry of Agriculture + supporting organisations The Member States: United Kingdom France Austria Experts from Germany have been invited to participate mainly in the preparation of a pilot river basin management plan (the Orlice River Basin). Twinning

Twinning Project – Implementation of the Water Framework Directive Components Review of Implementation Plan Secondary Legislation and Transposition analysis sub River Basin Management Plan - Orlice Guidance on Enforcement Guidance on Environmental Monitoring Systems Arrangements for Stakeholder Consultation Started May 2002 – Completion: January 2004 Twinning

The process of collecting information on pressures: Directive introduces the concept of significant pressures (important within the basin or the water body). Directive requires to collect and maintain records on all significant pressures (Member State can collect records on all pressures and subsequently only identify some of them as significant). The requirement can be implemented in two stages:           1) Catalogue of all pressures (and driving forces)         2) Screening to identify significant pressures Reasons: - there is a very wide range of pressures (variable type and magnitude) - it is not sensible or realistic to consider all pressures within the scope of analysis Method for selection of the important pressures and driving forces is required. Collecting of informations – two stages

all data will be concentrated on Povodí companies Situation in CR: wide range of information + many producers, not all necessary data are available yet all data will be concentrated on Povodí companies part of data is required to collect by current legislation ( Water Act Water Authorities permits for water uses) Data providers: Water Research Institute T.G.M. – pollutions, vulnerable areas, landfills, abstractions, loss of water, water use, hydrogeological characteristics, discharges, Povodí companies + water authorities – pollutions, fish farming, abstractions, morphological changes, erosion, water recreational use, water managment, discharges Czech Hydrometeorological Institute – industrial pollution, other diffuse point source pollution, water flow, abstractions, vulnerability of groundwater water bodies, hydrogeological characteristics, stratification, Situation in CR Data providers

Private water companies – loss of water, sludge treatment Czech Statistical Institute - agriculture pollution, agriculture abstraction Czech Ecological Institute – other point source of pollution, toxic pollution, geology + soil types, landfills Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Health – pollutions, fish farming, water quality, land use, water recreational use Private water companies – loss of water, sludge treatment Governmental Order – pollution Problems: incomplete data (some sources of pollution, water use, …) providers not identified yet (estimates of diffuse sources pollution) Data providers Data problems

Screening for Significance - determination which pressures from the Pressures Catalogue should be considered to be significant Significant Pressures individual process for each water body Impact Analysis identification of WB which are at risk of failing the objectives identification of pressures responsible for this failure subject of the Programmes of Measures Screening for Significance

Pressure Absolute Criteria Relative Criteria Significance – judged on: “absolute” criteria – does not take account of the receiving waters “relative” criteria – take account of the vulnerability or susceptibility of the receiving waters mixture of absolute and relative criteria Pressure Absolute Criteria Relative Criteria Point source pollution Emission Limit Standards EQSs (Imission standards) Diffuse source pollution Best Practice Abstraction Volume abstracted Proportion of „natural flow“ or „minimum flow“ or „ecological flow“ Water Regulation Size of structures Size in relation to size of „natural flow“ or „minimum flow“or „ecological flow“ Morphology Size of alteration Comparison with „natural morphology“ Absolute and relative criteria

Recapitulation of the Directive objectives: The issue of significance must be considered in relation to all objectives of the Directive.   Recapitulation of the Directive objectives: Prevent deterioration of the status of all bodies of surface water; Protect, enhance and restore all bodies of surface water with the aim of achieving good surface water status at the latest by 2015 Protect and enhance all artificial and heavily modified bodies of water, achieve good ecological potential and good surface water chemical status at the latest by 2015 To progressively reduce pollution from priority substances and ceasing or phasing out emissions, discharges and losses of priority hazardous substances Directive objectives

Thank you for your attention.