Discussion of Statistical Methods, Tools, and Simulations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIGO-G v2 Recovering Burst Injections in LIGO S5 Data Alex Cole Data Analysis Meeting May 6, 2014.
Advertisements

Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.
LIGO-G Z Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
LIGO-G Z Update on the Analysis of S2 Burst Hardware Injections L. Cadonati (MIT), A. Weinstein (CIT) for the Burst group Hannover LSC meeting,
GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
LIGO Reduced Data Sets E7 standard reduced data set RDS generation for future runs decimation examples LIGO-G Z Isabel Leonor (w/ Robert Schofield)
Burst detection efficiency  In order to interpret our observed detection rate (upper limit) we need to know our efficiency for detection by the IFO and.
LIGO- G R AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Simulation of Burst Waveforms and Burst Event Triggers Alan Weinstein Caltech Burst UL WG LSC meeting, 8/13/01.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Discussion of Statistical Methods, Tools, and Simulations  Review of tools and methods  (I am only familiar.
LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Zwerger Muller SN waveforms The 78 ZM waveforms differ in initial angular momentum they have (A parameter),
G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Progress on Burst Simulation  t-f character of burst waveforms  Burst waveforms  Calibration  E7 data.
LSC Meeting, 17 March 2004 Shawhan, Marka, et al.LIGO-G E Summary of E10 / S3 Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Szabolcs Márka, Bruce.
LIGO-G E ITR 2003 DMT Sub-Project John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Argonne, May 10, 2004.
G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Discussion of Statistical Methods, Tools, and Simulations  Review of tools and methods  (I am only familiar.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
Waveburst DSO: current state, testing on S2 hardware burst injections Sergei Klimenko Igor Yakushin LSC meeting, March 2003 LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
June 27, 2002 EK 1 Data Analysis Overview Erik Katsavounidis LIGO-MIT PAC12 – June 27, 2002 LIGO-G Z.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
LIGO NSF Rev LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 Upper Limits Groups: Status and Plans Alan Wiseman LSC Software.
LIGO PAC Meeting, 6 June 2003 Peter Shawhan (LIGO/Caltech)LIGO-G E First LIGO Search for Binary Inspirals Peter Shawhan (LIGO Lab / Caltech)
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
LIGO Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration -- UWM 1 LSC Data Analysis Alan G. Wiseman (LSC Software Coordinator) LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
G R LSC UL 13 Aug 011 Detector Characterization; Triggers, code infrastructure; Followup Analysis for the UL groups Nelson Christensen, Szabi.
LIGO- G D Burst Search Report Stan Whitcomb LIGO Caltech LSC Meeting LIGO1 Plenary Session 18 August 2003 Hannover.
LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Introduction to Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Isabel Leonor, Szabi Márka.
A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data LSC Inspiral Analysis Working Group LIGO-G Z LSC Meeting Andres C. Rodriguez.
LIGO-G Z 5 June 2001L.S.Finn/LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 LDAS Camp.
NSF Review, 18 Nov 2003 Peter Shawhan (LIGO/Caltech)1 How to Develop a LIGO Search Peter Shawhan (LIGO / Caltech) NSF Review November 18, 2003 LIGO-G E.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
S5 BNS Inspiral Update Duncan Brown Caltech LIGO-G Z.
1 Laura Cadonati, MIT For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS meeting Tampa, FL April 16, 2005 LIGO Hanford ObservatoryLIGO Livingston Observatory New.
Characterization of PEM Channels Chirpiness of the Test Mass motion due to “Noise” Anthony Rizzi Staff Scientist, LIGO LIGO-G D.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
LSC Meeting, August 2002 P. Shawhan / Inspiral U.L. Working GroupLIGO-G Z Vetoes Used in the E7 Inspiral Upper Limit Analysis Part 2 Peter Shawhan,
LIGO-G W Use of Condor by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1 Alan Weinstein Caltech Burst UL WG LSC meeting, 8/21/02.
LIGO-G Z r statistics for time-domain cross correlation on burst candidate events Laura Cadonati LIGO-MIT LSC collaboration meeting, LLO march.
LSC Meeting, 10 Nov 2003 Peter Shawhan (LIGO/Caltech)1 Inspiral Waveform Consistency Tests Evan Ochsner and Peter Shawhan (U. of Chicago) (LIGO / Caltech)
LSC Z000.0 LSC at LHO LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 Software Committee Report Alan Wiseman University.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 A Coherence Function Statistic to Identify Coincident Bursts Surjeet Rajendran, Caltech SURF Alan Weinstein,
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M DMT Monitor Verification with Simulated Data John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
LIGO-G D S2 Glitch Investigation Report Laura Cadonati (MIT) on behalf of the Glitch Investigation Team LSC meeting, August 2003, Hannover.
LIGO-G Z 23 October 2002LIGO Laboratory NSF Review1 Searching for Gravitational Wave Bursts: An Overview Sam Finn, Erik Katsavounidis and Peter.
LSC Z000.0 LSC at LLO LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 LSC Software Coordinator Report Alan Wiseman University.
Gravitational Wave Data Analysis  GW detectors  Signal processing: preparation  Noise spectral density  Matched filtering  Probability and statistics.
Inspiral Glitch Veto Studies
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave Astronomy
r-statistic performance in S2
LIGO Scientific Collaboration meeting
Overview of E10 / S3 Hardware Injections
WaveMon and Burst FOMs WaveMon WaveMon FOMs Summary & plans
Hardware Injections in S4
S2/S3 Glitch Investigation Update
Towards the first coherent multi-ifo search for NS binaries in LIGO
First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1
Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates
Searches for gravitational waves by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Environmental Monitoring: Coupling Function Calculator
The STACK-SLIDE Search Initial Report: PULG F2F UWM June 2003
Inspiral Waveform Consistency Tests
Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis
Performance of the WaveBurst algorithm on LIGO S2 playground data
Presentation transcript:

Discussion of Statistical Methods, Tools, and Simulations Review of tools and methods (I am only familiar with) tools and methods in use in the burst working group What are the special needs of other groups? What tools and methods used by other groups would be of general use? the simulation effort exercises and requires the entire analysis chain AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02

Data analysis model (burst group) Does the model used by burst WG fit the other WGs? generate fake signals, scaled to absolute h_strain filter fake signals through IFO response functions add to real data, or to white or colored gaussian noise run search DSOs on the resulting frames perform statistical analysis on results of DSO runs present results in a form suitable for publication(s). AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02

Generating simulated signals Generating simulated signals in units of strain is the easy and fun part! I think that all WGs have mechanisms for doing this. For burst WG: Chirps Ringdowns Hermite-Gaussians and sine-Gaussians Zwerger-Muller supernova GW simulations AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02

Waveforms buried in E2 noise, including calibration/TF chirp ZM supernova Hermite-gaussian ringdown AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02

Adding simulations to the data How are fake signals added to the data, minimizing uncertainty associated with special handling of simulated data relative to real data? Make fake frame files c code, matlab, ROOT tools can add to data or simulated noise before making frame, or can add to noise in LDAS job, "on the fly" add signals to real data or noise frames in datacondAPI or frameAPI (burst group) need more sequence manipulation tools in datacondAPI, so that one could add a signal from a file, at a run-time-determined time, amplitude, duration could actually generate the signal in datacondAPI maybe even convert from strain -> volts there as well This would facilitate the accumulation of high statistics simulation runs, without having to manage huge frame files padded with zeros. add signals in wrapperAPI / LAL code (inspiral group) How to ensure reliable IFO response functions? Shall we standardize the filtering algorithm / mechanism? I use matlab zpk to represent response function and lsim to filter the fake signal from strain -> volts. Better would be to use datacondAPI or LALWrapper. AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02

Example DatacondAPI algorithm -framequery { { R $site {} $times Adc($channel) } { F $site /ldas_outgoing/jobs/ldasmdc_data/burst-stochastic/burstscan_e7h2.F {} Adc(0) } } -aliases { x = _ch0; s = _ch1; } -algorithms { zx = slice(x,0,5914624,1); zy = slice(s,0,5914624,1); zm = mul(zy,$mulsim); zs = add(zx,zm); zz = tseries(zs, 16384.0, $stime, 0); stat = all(zz); intermediate(,stat.ilwd,stat,psd of ch0); pz = psd(zz,16384); intermediate(,pzs.ilwd,pz,psd of ch0); z = resample(zz,1,8); m = mean(z); y = sub(z,m); q = linfilt(b,y); r = slice(q,2047,737280,1); } Grab slice of data and simulated signal Multiply signal by a run-time-determined multiplier, Add to real data, make a time series Accumulate statistics and power spectrum Subtract mean; additional whitening AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02

AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 statistical analysis For burst and inspiral: output of DSOs are event triggers, deposited into database further analysis is done at the event trigger level, although in the future, will want to look back at raw data manipulate database entries merge multiple entries apply vetos from triggers on auxiliary channel (DMT?) find coincidences evaluate fake rates vs efficiencies at the same time Here, the Event Tool is being used Sigg and Ito. OO classes in the ROOT environment for manipulating database "event" entries. Can also use matlab tools, including LIGOtools (Shawhan) for ingesting xml files obtained from DB queries. Can also use the power of DB queries. How about the stochastic and pulsar analyses? AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02

Other sources of fake signals Use of simdata matlab package (Finn) to generate colored noise steep seismic noise spectrum makes it difficult but not impossible to generate desired spectrum Use of signals injected into interferometer using GDS system: bursts and inspiral signals (chirps, wiggles, blips, sombrero; Gonzalez, Marka, Shawhan, during E7) stochastic and line signals (Shawhan, Bose, Brown, during E7) How best to handle "model dependence"? The burst group must struggle with model dependence because we have no good models The other groups DO have good models, but will have errors and variations in those models). AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02

AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 LDAS and database What demands will be made on which LDAS installations? Shall we use the site installations? Or only LSC installations devoted to this task? How shall we coordinate these resources? (The LIGO Software Users Group has been discussing this) How/where should data streams from LHO and LLO be combined, for analyses that require cross-correlations, like stochastic? Standardized job control/bookkeeping scripts? (LSUG is developing job bookkeeping and monitoring tools, based on Shawhan’s LDASJob.) How to facilitate multiple passes through the data? (Large RDS’s at LDAS installations). What demands will be made on which LDAS databases? How best to avoid trashing the databases, and how/whether to get entries from one installation to another? (cf Peter Shawhan's proposals). AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02

AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 LDAS job bookkeeping Run date filter channel times mul ldas job Tall Tdatac Tmpi Ntrig hrms h(200-300) h(300-400) h(200-1000) 20020314145958 power H2:LSC-AS_Q 693913420-693913679 0e0 mit NORMAL691 122.66 58.10 20.40 510 3.73e+04 1.27e+00 1.28e+00 Trig691.xml 20020314150231 power H2:LSC-AS_Q 693913679-693913938 0e0 mit NORMAL693 124.84 57.86 20.43 509 3.38e+04 1.41e+00 1.42e+00 Trig693.xml 20020314150508 power H2:LSC-AS_Q 693913938-693914197 0e0 mit NORMAL695 125.50 57.28 20.44 510 3.64e+04 1.40e+00 1.41e+00 Trig695.xml 20020314150739 power H2:LSC-AS_Q 693914197-693914456 0e0 mit NORMAL697 120.11 57.78 19.43 510 4.09e+04 1.43e+00 1.44e+00 Trig697.xml 20020314151010 power H2:LSC-AS_Q 693914456-693914715 0e0 mit NORMAL699 121.36 59.06 19.33 510 3.50e+04 1.52e+00 1.54e+00 Trig699.xml 20020318155516 power H2:LSC-AS_Q 693913420-693913679 1e1 mit NORMAL766 115.09 51.75 20.44 498 3.73e+04 1.31e+00 1.40e+00 Trig766.xml 20020318155743 power H2:LSC-AS_Q 693913679-693913938 1e1 mit NORMAL768 117.45 50.05 20.40 493 3.38e+04 1.45e+00 1.54e+00 Trig768.xml 20020318160010 power H2:LSC-AS_Q 693913938-693914197 1e1 mit NORMAL770 118.14 52.13 20.42 497 3.64e+04 1.44e+00 1.53e+00 Trig770.xml 20020318160236 power H2:LSC-AS_Q 693914197-693914456 1e1 mit NORMAL772 115.99 49.76 19.37 494 4.09e+04 1.47e+00 1.56e+00 Trig772.xml 20020318160506 power H2:LSC-AS_Q 693914456-693914715 1e1 mit NORMAL774 120.77 50.49 20.43 497 3.50e+04 1.57e+00 1.66e+00 Trig774.xml Run date filter channel times mul ldas job Tall Tdatac Tmpi Ntrig hrms h(200-300) h(300-400) h(200-1000) 20020218205555 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693960121-693960481 0e0 mit NORMAL121 172.62 84.36 33.27 104 1.20e+07 1.80e+05 1.30e+05 6.59e+05 Trig121.xml 20020218205817 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693960481-693960841 0e0 mit NORMAL125 113.53 34.20 32.22 524 4.83e+03 7.89e-01 6.06e-02 8.64e-01 Trig125.xml 20020218210034 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693960841-693961201 0e0 mit NORMAL127 110.86 32.41 33.35 391 5.01e+03 7.66e-01 1.73e-02 8.01e-01 Trig127.xml 20020218210348 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693961201-693961561 0e0 mit NORMAL129 169.09 97.74 31.53 8 6.62e+06 9.08e+04 5.12e+04 2.71e+05 Trig129.xml 20020218210738 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693961561-693961921 0e0 mit NORMAL131 202.59 88.10 33.25 12 6.34e+06 8.43e+04 5.76e+04 3.09e+05 Trig131.xml 20020218211006 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693961921-693962281 0e0 mit NORMAL134 120.87 35.83 31.21 514 7.03e+03 9.45e-01 1.08e-01 1.08e+00 Trig134.xml 20020218211221 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693962281-693962641 0e0 mit NORMAL136 109.86 35.02 32.26 505 6.26e+03 9.30e-01 2.14e-02 9.71e-01 Trig136.xml 20020218211437 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693962641-693963001 0e0 mit NORMAL138 107.89 33.26 32.31 452 4.74e+03 9.28e-01 2.42e-02 9.75e-01 Trig138.xml 20020218211654 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693963001-693963361 0e0 mit NORMAL140 111.00 33.42 33.28 477 4.52e+03 9.06e-01 2.83e-02 9.64e-01 Trig140.xml 20020218211914 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693963361-693963721 0e0 mit NORMAL142 112.97 35.30 32.34 575 4.07e+03 9.13e-01 3.51e-02 9.90e-01 Trig142.xml 20020218212135 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693963721-693964081 0e0 mit NORMAL144 111.41 34.16 33.27 465 3.55e+03 8.76e-01 3.30e-02 9.49e-01 Trig144.xml 20020218212454 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693964081-693964441 0e0 mit NORMAL146 171.81 101.1 31.29 181 1.23e+07 2.06e+05 1.20e+05 6.13e+05 Trig146.xml 20020218212816 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693964441-693964801 0e0 mit NORMAL148 174.27 99.61 33.24 500 1.87e+07 2.96e+05 1.95e+05 9.20e+05 Trig148.xml 20020218213032 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693964801-693965161 0e0 mit NORMAL150 110.73 35.90 32.56 605 4.18e+03 1.60e+00 9.58e-02 1.76e+00 Trig150.xml 20020218213238 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693965161-693965521 0e0 mit NORMAL152 100.62 30.72 32.25 2 7.82e+05 2.16e+01 7.81e+00 9.14e+01 Trig152.xml 20020218213539 tfcluster L1:LSC-AS_Q 693965521-693965881 0e0 mit NORMAL154 154.24 84.77 32.27 154 1.21e+07 1.94e+05 1.32e+05 6.82e+05 Trig154.xml AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02

AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Modest proposal Collect useful tools and pubs in a web page Establish mailing list for people interested in developing or using these tools Coordinate with LSUG (and LDAS, datacond, etc) AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02