1. LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Zwerger Muller SN waveforms The 78 ZM waveforms differ in initial angular momentum they have (A parameter), governing degree of differential rotation initial rotational energy (B, or  = E rot /E pot ). A,B roughly govern how many bounce peaks are in the waveform, as seen on the left. Within each (AB) set, the adiabatic index  r is varied from 1.325 to 1.28 (stiff to soft), and the peak amplidue of the wave depends strongly on this parameter, as seen in the right.

2. LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project2 SineGaussians Sine Gaussians, f 0 evenly spaced in logf Left:  = 0.05 s,  f = 6.3 Hz Middle:  = 0.005 s,  f = 63 Hz Right:  = 10/f 0,  f ~ /f 0

3. LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project3 sensitivity with PZ fit to S1H2 My reconstruction with Mike’s PZ fit, on left. Right: Calibration web page. They agree very well. AND, the burst at 100 Hz injected into LDAS and passed through the response function in datacond, agrees perfectly with the matlab simulation. Confidence in use of response function!

4. LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project4 Same for S1H1

5. LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project5 And for L1

6. LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project6