- - - - - - - - - - - - - - NDVI - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nutrition of Fruit Trees
Advertisements

Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Use of sensor based nitrogen rates to improve maize nitrogen use efficiency in the Northern Argentinean Pampas. Ricardo Melchiori 1, Octavio Caviglia 1,
Reducing Soil Phosphorus Buildup From Animal Manure Applications Gerald W. Evers Texas A&M University Agricultural Research and Extension Center Overton.
PHOSPHORUS UPTAKE BY SILAGE CORN IN SOUTHERN IDAHO Amber Moore, Steve Hines, Brad Brown, Mario de Haro Marti, Christi Falen, Mireille Chahine, Tianna Fife,
The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Bell Peppers Michelle Le Strange, UCCE Farm Advisor, Tulare & Kings Counties and Marita Cantwell,
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
EVALUATION OF GREENSEEKER FOR NITROGEN FETILIZATION IN COTTON ALABAMA REPORT 1 Evaluation of Green Seeker for Nitrogen Fertilization in Cotton – Preliminary.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGIA AGROPECUARIA SECRETARIA DE AGRICULTURA, GANADERIA, PESCA Y ALIMENTACION "Wheat yield prediction by using an active sensor.
Results Effect of Simulated Grazing Intensity on Dual-Purpose Winter Wheat Growth and Grain Yield Dillon Butchee and Jeff Edwards Department of Plant and.
Sensor Orientation to maize canopy row and estimating biomass and Nitrogen Status Paul Hodgen, Fernando Solari, Jim Schepers, John Shanahan, Dennis Francis.
Use of Active Optical Sensor in North Dakota Dave Franzen and Lakesh Sharma, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Relationships Between NDVI and Plant Physical Measurements Beltwide Cotton Conference January 6-10, 2003 Tim Sharp.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
Development of tillering pattern under transplanting and direct sowing methods in spring planted sugarcane M. O. A. Galal *, A. M. Abou-Salama **, E. A.
Outline Introduction – Importance for SE Mississippi State – Sensor Comparison – Wavelength/Index Analysis University of Arkansas – Active detection of.
NUE Workshop: Improving NUE using Crop Sensing, Waseca, MN
Nitrogen Use Efficiency Workshop Canopy Reflectance Signatures: Developing a Crop Need-Based Indicator for Sidedress Application of N Fertilizer to Canola.
Surface Cover and Biomass in No-tillage Cropping Systems as Affected by Crop Rotation, Winter Cover Crop, and Winter Weeds Forbes Walker 1, Nick Ryan 1,
GreenSeeker® Handheld Crop Sensor
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Remote sensing of canopy reflectance on a field scale has been proposed as a useful tool for diagnosing nitrogen (N) deficiency of corn plants. Differences.
Nitrogen-use efficiency of a sweetgum forest in elevated CO 2 Richard J. Norby 1 and Colleen M. Iversen 2 1 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN;
Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing Ray Asebedo, David Mengel, and Randall Nelson Kansas State.
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
NITROGEN FERTIGATION OF SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATED BERMUDAGRASS M.A. Maurer* 1, J.A. Moken 2 and J.L. Young 1 1 Department of Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin.
Savoy,*H.J. 1, Leib, B. 1, and Joines, D. 2 1 Associate Professors, University of Tennessee, Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, Extension 2. Manager,
Development of Vegetation Indices as Economic Thresholds for Control of Defoliating Insects of Soybean James BoardVijay MakaRandy PriceDina KnightMatthew.
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Refinement of the Missouri Corn Nitrogen Algorithm Using Canopy Reflectance Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, and Scott Drummond USDA-Agricultural Research.
University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Applied Plant Sciences and Plant Biotechnology Universität für Bodenkultur.
Introduction Efficient use of nitrogen is becoming important due to increasing N fertilizer prices and the growing concerns about NO 3 - contamination.
LATE SEASON N APPLICATIONS FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED WHEAT PROTEIN ENHANCEMENT. S.E. Petrie*, Oregon State Univ, B.D. Brown, Univ. of Idaho. Introduction.
N Fertilization in Colorado Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19 th & 20 th Oklahoma State University Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
Expression of Spatial Variability in Corn (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Growth Stage Using Optical Sensor Measurements By-Plant Prediction of Corn (Zea.
IRRIGATED CORN RESPONSE TO NITROGEN FERTILIZATION IN THE COLORADO ARKANSAS VALLEY Ardell Halvorson 1, Frank Schweissing 2, Michael Bartolo 2, and Curtis.
Reduced tillage and crop rotation systems with winter wheat, grain sorghum, corn and soybean. Mark M. Claassen and Kraig L. Roozeboom Kansas State University.
Exploratory Research in Corn
Dr. J. P. Deshmukh Shri. S. N. Potkile Shri. P. V. Shingrup
Variable Rate Nitrogen
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
Phosphorus Fertilizer Management for Sugarbeets in the Bighorn Basin of Wyoming Nana Yaw Kusi1, Abdel Mesbah1,*, Bart Stevens2, Andrew Kniss1, Jay Norton3,
In-season Nitrogen Applications: How Late is Too Late?
Evolution of OSU Optical Sensor Based Variable Rate Applicator
Carbon Cycling in Perennial Biofuel Management Systems
Proportion of intermediate diameter roots
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
In-season Nitrogen Applications: How Late is Too Late?
1Dept. of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, AL
Fig 1: Nitrogen fertilizer application at V7.
How High Should NUE Be, and Can Knowing Soil N Help Us Get There
C. Kallenbach1. , W. Horwath1, Z. Kabir1, J. Mitchell2, D
Sensing Resolution in Corn
Fertilizer Decisions Trial Nutrient Responses
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
(L, C and X) and Full-polarization
Potassium for wheat on sandplain soils
Landscape Position Zones and Reference Strips
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
Gyles Randall and Jeff Vetsch University of Minnesota
Eric Miller August 3rd, 2010 Dr. Camberato & Dr. Nielsen
Methods of Determining Canopy Closure in Winter Wheat
K. Freeman, B. Raun, K. Martin, R.Teal, D. Arnall, M. Stone, J. Solie
Untreated Weed-Free Check
Variability in Corn Response to N Fertilizer along a 1000-ft Hillslope
Optimizing Revenue Through Defoliation Timing
Reflectance and Sensor Basics
Jeff Vetsch and Gyles Randall University of Minnesota
Presentation transcript:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - NDVI - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management T.J. Boring and R.J. Gehl Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824 Introduction Sugarbeet processing efficiency depends on both root quantity and sugar quality – factors that are largely influenced by N fertilization. While inadequate N supply limits total yield, excess N uptake affects the processing quality through decreased sucrose levels and increased impurities. Recently, measurement of the reflectance characteristics of crop foliage has been adopted for N status assessment in various crops. Research efforts have focused on the use of active sensors to estimate N use efficiency, N requirement, and yield potential for crops including corn and wheat. Similar in-season assessments for sugarbeets would be a valuable tool to assist in N management, as well as harvest scheduling and prioritization. Previous research has indicated that the use of active sensors during the sugarbeet growing season has potential as a means to predict root yield and quality and as an indicator of N return to the cropping system (from foliage). Accounting for residual plant N and applying that information for subsequent crops can improve crop yield and quality, and increasing grower profitability. Methods Sugarbeet canopy NDVI was measured in mid-June, mid-July, mid-August and at harvest using a Greenseeker (Ntech Industries, Inc., Ukiah, CA) optical sensor. Above-ground biomass samples were obtained immediately following Greenseeker scanning on day of harvest by removing all foliage from 4.5 m of each of the center two rows of each plot. Total biomass was measured as fresh weight and dry matter following drying, and subsamples analyzed for total N content. Root yield was determined by harvesting 2 row lengths of about 21 m each. Subsamples of 10-15 roots were analyzed for percent sucrose and clear juice purity (CJP). Recoverable white sucrose as Mg ha-1 (RWSA), an economic parameter used for grower payments, was calculated from the following formula:   Results In-Season Yield Prediction NDVI measurements collected during the growing season were strongly related to root yield in both July (R2=0.88, Fig. 1) and August (R2=0.88, data not shown). Results End-of-Season Total N NDVI readings at harvest were strongly related to total N remaining in the above-ground biomass (R2=0.90, Fig. 3), which would be subsequently returned back to the soil in production field systems. Figure 3. Day of harvest NDVI versus sugarbeet top total N determined in foliage biomass on a dry weight basis for 3 sites in 2006 and 2 sites in 2007. Figure 1. July NDVI versus sugarbeet yield for 3 sites in 2006 and 4 sites in 2007. Results In-Season NDVI Differences in relative greenness of the sugarbeet canopy between N rate treatments became more pronounced as the season progressed (Table 1). Only control N treatments were consistently differentiated from higher N rates at June and July sensing events in both 2006 and 2007. NDVI tended to increase throughout the growing season as the sugarbeet canopy developed, along with the ability to differentiate N rate treatments. Summary In-season NDVI was as an effective indicator of both sugarbeet yield and RWSA. NDVI readings collected during the season as a means for yield prediction may prove to be an effective tool for growers to determine harvest order of multiple fields and for processors to improve harvest scheduling and storage efficiency. End-of-season NDVI was strongly related to sugarbeet top total N. Our results indicate that delineation of N zones for subsequent crop N utilization using NDVI may be possible for Michigan sugarbeet cropping systems. This approach is similar to previous work using, among other tools, satellite imagery and aerial photography to construct N management zones. Determination of total N from crop residues, and subsequent compensation of that N for following crops, has potential to improve N management for the sugarbeet cropping system as a whole. In-Season RWSA Prediction Growing season NDVI readings were strongly related to RWSA (Fig. 2). For measurements recorded in July, a relationship of R2=0.87 was found for data from 3 sites in 2006, and R2=0.81 for 2 sites in 2007 (data from 2 additional sites in 2007 not yet available). When combining the 5 sites over both years, the relationship between NDVI and RWSA remained strong (R2=0.89). Similar results were found for the August NDVI readings (R2=0.84, 0.67, and 0.86 for 2006, 2007, and combined, respectively). Table 1. Mean NDVI measurements for 3 sites in 2006 and 4 sites in 2007, in relation to N fertilizer rate and sampling time. Means labeled with same letter on a given date are not different as determined by LSD at a=0.05. 2006 N rate June July August Harvest kg N ha-1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NDVI - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.2049b 0.5545b 0.5099b 0.6787c 45 0.2567ab 0.7221a 0.6092a 0.6921c 90 0.2741a 0.7432a 0.6781a 0.7270bc 135 0.2628a 0.7242a 0.6828a 0.7348bc 180 0.2584a 0.7581a 0.6836a 0.7705ab 225 0.2572ab 0.7255a 0.6900a 0.7935a 2007 0.4219b 0.6572b 0.6985c 0.6775e 0.4939a 0.6855b 0.7134c 0.6898de 0.4993a 0.7123a 0.7423b 0.7172cd 0.4990a 0.7188a 0.7518ab 0.7406bc 0.4896a 0.7226a 0.7691a 0.7601ab 0.5000a 0.7652a 0.7784a Objectives Evaluate optical sensor technology for in-season prediction of sugarbeet harvest yield and quality. Evaluate optical sensor technology for end-of-season measurement of sugarbeet above-ground biomass total N content. Figure 2. July NDVI versus sugarbeet recoverable white sucrose yield for 3 sites in 2006 and 2 sites in 2007. Methods Field experiments were established in Michigan at 3 locations in 2006 and 4 locations in 2007. Treatments included 6 N rates ranging from 0 to 224 kg N ha-1 in 45 kg N ha-1 increments. Granular urea N fertilizer at 45 kg N ha-1 was banded 5 cm x 5 cm at planting and sidedress N as 28% UAN was injected between rows in early June. Plots measured 4.6 by 12.2 m and were arranged in a RCBD with 4 replications.