Building a Shared Electronic Data Collection Instrument Library

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Appraising Evidence About Diagnostic Tests
Advertisements

50 Years of Experience in Making Grey Literature Available Matching the Expectations of the Particle Physics Community Carmen ODell.
REDCap Treatment Randomization Module
Transformations at GPO: An Update on the Government Printing Office's Future Digital System George Barnum Coalition for Networked Information December.
Administration & Workflow
Knowledge Management Applications MMU - TMNET - TM R&D Collaboration.
1 NIH Public Access Policy Policy on Enhancing Public Access to Archived Publications Resulting From NIH-Funded Research (Public Access Policy)
Development Principles PHIN advances the use of standard vocabularies by working with Standards Development Organizations to ensure that public health.
Introductory Overview
IPUMS to IHSN: Leveraging structured metadata for discovering multi-national census and survey data Wendy L. Thomas 4 th Conference of the European Survey.
Julie Hannaford, Meryl Greene, Kristian Galberg,
Depth customization of DSpace: Best practices and techniques of institutional repository at IIT Kanpur, India By S. K. Vijaianand V. D. Shrivastava Gaurav.
Michael F. Huerta, Ph.D. Associate Director for Program Development National Library of Medicine, NIH BD2K CDE Webinar – September 8, 2015 Common Data.
Lisa A. Lang, MPP Assistant Director for Health Services Research Information Head, National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health.
Open access, institutional repositories and UBIR 21 November 2008 – Sarah Taylor Open access, institutional repositories and UBIR The University of Bolton.
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Candidate Collaborative Projects for Net-Centric Application Michael F. Siok, PE Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company.
1 ARRO: Anglia Ruskin Research Online Making submissions: Benefits and Process.
GPO’s Federal Digital System December 10, 2009 U.S. Government Printing Office.
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Licensing in NAMIC 3 requirements from NCBC RFA (paraphrased)
What is NCIA? National Cancer Imaging Archive Searchable repository of in vivo cancer images in DICOM format Publicly available at no cost over the Internet.
The SharePoint Shepherd’s Course for End Users Based on the book by Robert L. Bogue Copyright 2011 AvailTek LLC All Rights Reserved.
© Trustees of Indiana University Released under Creative Commons 3.0 unported license; license terms on last slide. Informatics Tools at the Indiana CTSI.
Date of Presentation Name of Presenter Insert image _________ Toolkit.
All Hands Meeting 2005 BIRN-CC: Building, Maintaining and Maturing a National Information Infrastructure to Enable and Advance Biomedical Research.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. REDCap:
Instrument Development and Psychometric Evaluation: Scientific Standards May 2012 Dynamic Tools to Measure Health Outcomes from the Patient Perspective.
California Department of Public Health California Department of Public Health Accreditation Readiness Team (ART) Orientation Office of Quality Performance.
A Method for Improving Code Reuse System Prasanthi.S.
Introduction to PROMIS®
Introduction to Neuro-QoL
REDCap Basics Michael Gleason, Ph.D. Emily Glenn, MSLS
Introduction to ASCQ-MeSM
REDCap Software: What’s New & What’s Next
Bill Barnett and Michel Tavares
Usage scenarios, User Interface & tools
Deploying ArcGIS for Water
SCEC Drupal Website Development Overview and Status
VI-SEEM biobank implementation
Karen Dennison Collections Development Manager
ServiceNow Implementation Knowledge Management
Translating Evidence-based Assessment into Educational Practice:
2016 Consortium Committee Spotlight: FAQ Committee
Institutional role in supporting open access, open science, open data
The Benefits of Volunteering; A Brief Summary of the First 10 Months of REDCap REDLOC’s Spanish Subcommittee Eduardo Morales, PhD EE Orthopedic Research.
Introduction to ASCQ-Me®
Introduction to PROMIS®
Introduction to Neuro-QoL
INPE, São José dos Campos (SP), Brazil
Phase 4 Milestones.
e-Thesis Submission: What You Need to Know About Going Global
Sophia Lafferty-hess | research data manager
Increased Efficiency and Effectiveness
Electronic Health Information Systems
Submitted By: Usha MIT-876-2K11 M.Tech(3rd Sem) Information Technology
What Are Institutional Repositories?
Kevin A. Wilson, Michael Ham, Brenda Hair and Eugene Turner
PAN Forum June 27, 2014 ALA Annual Conference Las Vegas, NV
Introduction to PROMIS®
Intermountain West Data Warehouse
Introduction to Neuro-QoL
Introduction to ASCQ-Me®
Health Ingenuity Exchange - HingX
Standard Four Program Impact
Carolina Mendoza-Puccini, MD
Electronic Data Exchange and Evaluation System
Hands-on Introduction and Refresher Course
Research Infrastructures: Ensuring trust and quality of data
Introduction to PROMIS®
A Case Study for Synergistically Implementing the Management of Open Data Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications.
Annual Copyright License
Presentation transcript:

Building a Shared Electronic Data Collection Instrument Library Raymond Balise, Sean Banks, Fatima Barnes, Robert Butsch, Ceci Chamorro, Michelle Fernandez, Robert Geller, David Gutman, Eric Kaufmann, Jessie Lee, Amanda Miller, Brenda Minor, Stephanie Oppenheimer, Luis Sanchez, Laura Shackleford, Nachiketh Soodana-Prakash, Mei Xue, Haydee Zimmerman Building a Shared Electronic Data Collection Instrument Library   Future directions – Customized Institutional Libraries How to go about building your own institutional library. Consider the following: Determine the content Types of data collection forms surveys questionnaires tests scales other data capture tools b) Curated forms must be: validated (shown to demonstrate reliability in a defined population) and/or standardized approved for public domain distribution (copyright holder agreement or good faith effort) capable of being translated into REDCap field types and coding c) User-submitted forms must be approved for public domain and built in REDCap by the user 2) Adhere to best practices identify copyright holder and obtain approval to distribute the work publically create derivative work (if translating) search the literature for validation references, frequency of use, and feedback from the clinical community ensure all documents, e.g. coding, validation references associated with the instrument are version consistent get the human resources you need to support the effort, e.g. obtaining permissions, reviewing literature, building and testing the instrument Conclusion The REDCap Shared Data Instrument Library, an example of an electronic data collection library, continues to grow both in terms of volume and diversity. Development of coding and naming guidelines, and links to external sources has streamlined the process. Future plans are to expand on the external library access to include a mechanism for consortium partners to create their own institutional repository. References and Acknowledgements Jihad S. Obeid, Catherine A. McGraw, Brenda L. Minor, José G. Conde, Robert Pawluk, Michael Lin, Janey Wang, Sean R. Banks, Sheree A. Hemphill, Rob Taylor, Paul A. Harris, Procurement of shared data instruments for Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Available online 10 November 2012, ISSN 1532-0464, 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.10.006. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046412001608) Introduction REDCap’s shared electronic library known as the Shared Data Instruments Library (SDIL) benefits the research community in a number of ways: The library oversight committee (REDLOC) saves researchers time otherwise required to create quality instruments for a REDCap project by providing a curated set of validated, often utilized instruments, approved for public domain use and reconfigured into the REDCap format. The library fosters data sharing by providing instruments created with standardized naming convention and formatting, enhancing cross study and multisite collaboration. The library allows sharing of non-curated instruments, referred to as “bottom up submissions”, submitted by researchers and requiring a less rigorous review process. These can be shared within an institution or the consortium at large. Library Development and Usage Shared Data Instrument Library (SDIL) 929 instruments in the library 440 “standardized” instruments created by REDLOC Committee Public Use Validated instruments Established development guidelines, e.g. naming convention b) 323 “bottom-up” instruments Submitted by end-users No formal validation process by REDLOC Committee 2) End-users can search through list of instruments by keywords 3) Forms immediately ready for import into user’s REDCap project 4) External libraries - Data collection instruments from these libraries may be downloaded and uploaded into REDCap as an instrument ZIP file. Shared Library Floor Plan CAT Instruments CAT (Computer Adaptive Test) instruments are tailored questions based on responses. Examples of these instruments include the PROMIS-Neuro QOL CAT. The library was determined to be the best mechanism for delivering a collection of PROMIS® Adaptive surveys. These surveys are consistent with the criteria applied by REDLOC but are not under its oversight. External Local With the expansion of the REDCap library’s functionality comes the possibility for an institution to create a customized library for its own community. Standardized Instruments Instruments are verified by the REDLOC committee for: public domain access research relevance evidence of validation coding compatibility The instruments are built using established naming and coding conventions and can be imported into REDCap projects from the SDIL. Bottom-up Consortium Wide Access Instruments are submitted for use for the entire consortium and are available for viewing and downloading through on-line designer. These instruments are not viewable on projectredcap.org. External Shared The external shared library repository includes Medical Data Models and PhenX Toolkit. Data collection instruments from these libraries may be downloaded and uploaded into REDCap as an instrument ZIP file. Bottom-up Local Access Only Instruments are submitted for use by local institutions only. These instruments are not viewable on projectredcap.org and will only be visible by the home institution. 1