Post Fellowship Skills Course

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building the highest quality services in the country Nigel Barnes March 2008.
Advertisements

Quality Improvement Introduction to Reliability This material (Comp12_Unit3) was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department of Health.
Standard 6: Clinical Handover
Scottish Patient Safety Programme SAPG/SAM 8 th June 2010 Dr Emma Watson HAI Lead Scottish Patient Safety Alliance Scottish Government Healthcare Policy.
Medication Safety Standard 4 Part 1- Introduction Margaret Duguid, Pharmaceutical Advisor Graham Bedford, Medication Safety Program Manager Standard 4.
Canadian Disclosure Guidelines. Disclosure - Background Process began: May 2006 Background research and document prepared First working draft created.
How to design reliable processes in Healthcare Frank Federico Executive Director, Strategic Partners.
Scottish Patient Safety Programme – Paediatric Update Jane Murkin, National Co-ordinator, Scottish Patient Safety Programme Julie Adams, National Facilitator,
Oxford AHSN Patient Safety Collaborative November
SAFE Care - ‘Safety Express’ – Mental Health & Learning Disabilities
Framing and Measuring Patient Safety Dr Jeanette Jackson This SPSRN work is funded by.
Hard Work and Vigilance: Necessary but Insufficient The Role of Human Factors in General Practice Dr Richard Jenkins Tuesday 2 nd November 2010.
Topic 5 Understanding and learning from error. LEARNING OBJECTIVE Understand the nature of error and how health care can learn from error to improve patient.
A Regional Approach to Improvement Julie Branter Associate Director for Clinical Governance and Patient Safety 21 September 2010 South West Strategic Health.
Building blocks Releasing time to care Leading Better Care SPSP Better Together E Health Strategy And of course YOU!!!!
SAYING SORRY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE R. Gyaneshwar Combined UOF/Sathya Sai Service Organisations Fiji Medical Seminar August 16, 2009.
SPSP Medicines Paediatric Networking Event Prepared by: David Maxwell.
Reliability Theory Concepts: (How to be a Coach) Delivering Uniformly Excellent and Highly Reliable Interventions Across a Healthcare System Roger Resar.
How to design reliable processes in Healthcare Moving to 95% Roger Resar MD Hilton Head June 2012.
Darlington Chamburuka Acting Chief Risk Officer Dec 2015
Review of Reliable Design QUEST Frank Federico. What does this line graph tell you? Education Standardization.
Medicines Reconciliation A Whole System Approach Arlene Coulson Principal Clinical Pharmacist, Specialist Services Gordon Thomson Principal Clinical Pharmacist,
System Analysis of Clinical Incidents The London Protocol
Content from National Patient Safety Agency material 2 Day Lead Investigator.
Reliable Process Design LS3 29 th - 30 th September.
BMS4667 Laboratory Leadership and Management Dr. David Ricketts.
Incident Management The Investigation. London Protocol System analysis Structured reflection Consistent approach Promotes openness.
11 June 2014 Annual Quality Statement – Next steps for 2014/15 Presenter: Jan Davies Annual Quality Statement – Next steps for 2014/15.
Facilitator: Prof. Dianne Parker University of Manchester and
Insert name of presentation on Master Slide Annual Quality Framework Quality & Safety improvement Reporting.
Clinical risk management Open Disclosure. Controlling Unpredictability of health Laws Civil law Parliamentary law & statues Client rights Professional.
CQC’s approach to inspection and regulation of General Practitioners
Title of the Change Project
Learning objectives Review HIV treatment goals
Patient Safety Take a little time to read through these slides, where a question is asked stop and consider it for a few moments before going on to the.
NHS Education for Scotland
cleanyourhands campaign
Proctor’s Implementation Outcomes
Critical Care Services Pharmacist Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital
Mortality and harm Learning Set. National context update
McQIC past, present, future
Reviewing the Quality of Outpatient Care today
APPLYING HUMAN FACTORS METHODS AND APPROACHES
Change Ginna Crowe, RN, MS March 2008.
Incident handling and transparency Duty of candour
Medication Reconciliation in Continuing Care
Could it Happen Here? Eye Surgery
Reducing Omitted Doses through Audit
World class healthcare for Wales by 2015
Introducing 1000 Lives Plus
Communication & Safety
راحله واردي كارشناس مسئول حاكميت باليني
Continuing Professional Development Knowledge Market
CITE THIS CONTENT: PETER YARBROUGH, “DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS”, ACCELERATE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH CURRICULUM, SEPTEMBER 14, AVAILABLE AT: 
Root Cause Analysis-RCA
ايمني بيمار PATIENT SAFETY حق بيمار و مسئوليت ما
IENE5(Intercultural Education of Nurses in Europe Project 5)
  Scottish Patient Safety Programme in Primary Care (SPSP – PC) Implementation & Spread Strategy 2013–2018.
Reducing Omitted Doses through Audit
System Analysis of Clinical Incidents The London Protocol
MCQIC: Phase 2 Prepared by: Bernie McCulloch
Positive and Safe for Service Users and Staff:
Patient Safety and Quality care Movement
  Implementing the Scottish Patient Safety Programme in Primary Care (SPSP – PC)
1. Reduce harms from the main preventable causes of poor health
Patient Safety WalkRounds
Introducing 1000 Lives Plus
Building Capacity for Quality Improvement A National Approach
The Myths The Perfection Myth: If I try hard enough I will never make a mistake The Punishment Myth: If we punish those who make mistakes, they will make.
Presentation transcript:

Post Fellowship Skills Course Background to Patient Safety Post Fellowship Skills Course

Patient Safety is... ‘The avoidance, prevention and improvement of adverse outcomes or injuries stemming from the process of healthcare’ (Vincent, 2006)

Policy Theory

SPSP Mental Health Maternity SPSP SPSP - Sepsis/VTE Revision of goals at the end of the first phase of Acute Adult Programme Primary Care SPSP Mental Health Maternity SPSP - Sepsis/VTE Medicines Management Network Safety in Primary Care SPSP Paediatrics SPSP 5 Acute Adult Care Workstreams Safer Patient Initiative 5 Acute Care Workstreams: Critical Care, General Ward, Periop, Leadership, Medicines 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Beyond

Patient Safety in Context 7 UK NHS organisations Failure rates (13-19%) Wide variation in reliability 1 in 5 operations involved wrong, faulty or missing equipment or staff didn’t know where it was or how to use it. 50% went well Delays and threats to patient safety http://www.health.org.uk/publications/research_reports/evidence_in_brief.html May 2010

>60% preventable 28% negligence ‘this was not my fault’ Leape L et al. Preventing medical injury. Quality Review Bulletin, 1993,8:144-149

We all make mistakes !

So poor communication is one of the main reasons for things going wrong in healthcare but there are other reasons , but why with all the good intentions and talent available in medicine, are clinical processes backed by solid medical advice carried out at such low levels of reliability? IHI identify 3 main reasons for the gaps in healthcare reliability.

Current improvement methods in healthcare are highly dependent on vigilance and hard work… from R Resar, Institute for Healthcare Improvement

All defects in process do not lead to bad outcomes…. from R Resar, Institute for Healthcare Improvement

from R Resar, Institute for Healthcare Improvement Permissive clinical autonomy creates and allows wide performance margins…. from R Resar, Institute for Healthcare Improvement

Systemic Migration to Boundaries INDIVIDUAL BENEFITS ‘ Driving 60 mph- the ‘Illegal-normal’ space (for almost all of us!) Belief Systems. Life Pressures Driving 80 mph – the ‘illegal-illegal’ space The posted speed limit is 50 mph- the ‘legal’ space VERY UNSAFE SPACE Perceived vulnerability ACCIDENT PERFORMANCE

Systemic Migration to Boundaries INDIVIDUAL BENEFITS ‘ Belief Systems. Life Pressures Only wash hands on audit days Handwashing when patient has MRSA Handwashing – every patient, every time VERY UNSAFE SPACE Perceived vulnerability ACCIDENT PERFORMANCE

Labels of Reliability For healthcare processes where failure does not cause immediate catastrophic consequences 80% performance lacks consistent clear understanding of the process (5 front line process users can not easily articulate the process) - chaotic process 95% performance has some variation but 5 front line users can easily articulate the process (These are IHI definitions and are not meant to be the true mathematical equivalent)

Improvement Concepts Associated with 80-90% Performance (Primarily can be described as intent, vigilance, and hard work) Common equipment, protocols, and written policies/procedures Personal check lists Feedback of information on compliance Suggestions of working harder next time Awareness and training 18 18

Improvement Concepts Associated with 95% or Better Performance (Uses human factors and reliability science to design sophisticated failure prevention, failure identification, and mitigation) Decision aids and reminders built into the system Redundant processes utilised Habits and patterns known and taken advantage of in the design Standardisation of process 19

Clinical Governance Strategy 2013 – 2016 Adverse event management

Copies available

Discuss in your groups an incident that you have been involved in. Identify things that went wrong in the system due to the way it was designed or managed. What improvement concepts could be tested to improve the reliability gaps that you have identified?

Safety is a moving target Harm has been defined too narrowly Seeing safety through the eyes of the patient Consequences for incident analysis