Electron acceleration behind self-modulating proton beam in plasma with a density gradient Alexey Petrenko.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vulcan Front End OPCPA System
Advertisements

Erdem Oz* USC E-164X,E167 Collaboration Plasma Dark Current in Self-Ionized Plasma Wake Field Accelerators
The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
Particle acceleration in plasma By Prof. C. S. Liu Department of Physics, University of Maryland in collaboration with V. K. Tripathi, S. H. Chen, Y. Kuramitsu,
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Historical Review on the Plasma Based Particle Accelerators Congratulation for opening “Plasma and Space Science Center” Yasushi Nishida Lunghwa University.
Particle-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration James Holloway University College London, London, UK PhD Supervisors: Professor Matthew wing University College.
Chengkun Huang | Compass meeting 2008 Chengkun Huang, I. Blumenfeld, C. E. Clayton, F.-J. Decker, M. J. Hogan, R. Ischebeck, R. Iverson, C. Joshi, T. Katsouleas,
Erik Adli CLIC Workshop 2015, CERN, CH 1 Erik Adli Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Norway Input from: Steffen Doebert, Wilfried Farabolini,
Industry and the ILC B Barish 16-Aug May-05ILC Consultations - Washington DC2 Why e + e - Collisions? elementary particles well-defined –energy,
Lecture 3: Laser Wake Field Acceleration (LWFA)
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
 An h=4 (30 MHz) RF system will be used for electron operation. For protons, this would correspond to h=56, and the 1 kV maximum gap voltage would only.
2 Lasers: Centimeters instead of Kilometers ? If we take a Petawatt laser pulse, I=10 21 W/cm 2 then the electric field is as high as E=10 14 eV/m=100.
Photon Collider at CLIC Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk LCWS 2001, Granada, Spain, September 25-30,2011.
R & D for particle accelerators in the CLF Peter A Norreys Central Laser Facility STFC Fellow Visiting Professor, Imperial College London.
The AWAKE Project at CERN and its Connections to CTF3 Edda Gschwendtner, CERN.
Parameter sensitivity tests for the baseline variant Konstantin Lotov, Vladimir Minakov, Alexander Sosedkin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS,
FACET and beam-driven e-/e+ collider concepts Chengkun Huang (UCLA/LANL) and members of FACET collaboration SciDAC COMPASS all hands meeting 2009 LA-UR.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
Recent Results on the Plasma Wakefield Acceleration at FACET E 200 Collaboration 1)Beam loading due to distributed injection of charge in the wake reduces.
W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C.Joshi, W.B.Mori
High gradient acceleration Kyrre N. Sjøbæk * FYS 4550 / FYS 9550 – Experimental high energy physics University of Oslo, 26/9/2013 *k.n.sjobak(at)fys.uio.no.
SINGLE-STAGE BUNCH COMPRESSOR FOR ILC-SB2009 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC, Jan , 2011 N.Solyak, Single-stage.
Consideration for a plasma stage in a PWFA linear collider Erik Adli University of Oslo, Norway FACET-II Science Workshop, SLAC Oct 14,
James Holloway University College London, London, UK PhD Supervisors: Professor Matthew Wing University College London, London, UK Professor Peter Norreys.
GWENAEL FUBIANI L’OASIS GROUP, LBNL 6D Space charge estimates for dense electron bunches in vacuum W.P. LEEMANS, E. ESAREY, B.A. SHADWICK, J. QIANG, G.
Physics of Self-Modulation Instability Konstantin Lotov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk,
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 1 Erik Adli Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Norway Input from: Steffen Doebert, Wilfried Farabolini,
Non Double-Layer Regime: a new laser driven ion acceleration mechanism toward TeV 1.
Latest results on electron trapping and acceleration Konstantin Lotov, Alexey Petrenko, Alexander Sosedkin, Petr Tuev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics.
Prospects for generating high brightness and low energy spread electron beams through self-injection schemes Xinlu Xu*, Fei Li, Peicheng Yu, Wei Lu, Warren.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Ultra-short electron bunches by Velocity Bunching as required for Plasma Wave Acceleration Alberto Bacci (Sparc Group, infn Milano) EAAC2013, 3-7 June,
AWAKE: A Proton-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Experiment at CERN C. Bracco on behalf of the AWAKE collaboration C. Bracco - ICHEP2014.
Beam quality preservation and power considerations Sergei Nagaitsev Fermilab/UChicago 14 October 2015.
Ionization Injection E. Öz Max Planck Institute Für Physik.
X-band Based FEL proposal
AWAKE Run 2 : 1) Interstage considerations 2) CALIFES as plasma technology test facility Erik Adli and Carl A. Lindstrøm University of Oslo, Norway AWAKE.
Jayakar Thangaraj Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee November 7-9, 2011 PROTOPLASMA: Proton-driven wakefield experiment at Fermilab.
LCODE: a code for fast simulations of plasma wakefield acceleration Konstantin Lotov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia Novosibirsk.
Introduction to Plasma Physics and Plasma-based Acceleration Wakefield acceleration Various images provided by R. Bingham.
Self-modulation of long particle beams
LSC/CSR Instability Introduction (origin of the instability) CSR/LSC
V.N. Litvinenko (SBU) C. Joshi, W. Mori (UCLA)
Proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration in hollow plasma
The 2nd European Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop
F Braunmüller, M. Hüther, M. Martyanov, P Muggli, E. Öz
8-10 June Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris, France
Plasma Wakefield Acceleration and a possible eP scattering Experiment MPP Retreat January 21, 2014 Allen Caldwell.
It is all about extreme high acceleration gradients
Longitudinal beam parameters and stability
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
Proton driven plasma accelertion
Wakefield Accelerator
Future Collider Projects at CERN
Proton Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration
potential CERN facilities to study proton-driven plasma acceleration
Higgs Factory, do we really need more than 50 km?
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
2. Crosschecking computer codes for AWAKE
Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Zhirong Huang
Proton-driven plasma wakefield Acceleration (PDPWA)
Outlook for PWA Experiments
AWAKE Experiment at CERN
Plasma : high electic field can accelerate electron and proton laser plasma accelerator can reduced size of future accelerator can produced particle beam.
Presentation transcript:

Electron acceleration behind self-modulating proton beam in plasma with a density gradient Alexey Petrenko

Outline AWAKE experiment Motivation Baseline parameters Longitudinal motion of electrons Effect of plasma density gradient Summary

What is the AWAKE experiment? AWAKE: Advanced Proton Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Experiment Use SPS proton beam as drive beam (Single bunch 3e11 protons at 400 GeV) Inject electron beam as witness beam Proof-of-Principle Accelerator R&D experiment at CERN First proton driven plasma wakefield experiment worldwide First beam expected in 2016 AWAKE Collaboration: 14 Institutes world-wide: Novosibirsk Vancouver Oslo Glasgow Manchester Hamburg, Greifswald London Dusseldorf Munich CERN Lisbon

Motivation LHC nominal beam parameters: Accelerating field of today’s RF cavities is limited to <100 MV/m Several tens of kilometers for future linear colliders Plasma can sustain up to three orders of magnitude higher gradient SLAC (2007): electron energy doubled from 42GeV to 85 GeV over 0.8 m  52GV/m gradient However to reach 1 TeV energy with 50 GeV drive beam will require 20 stages. Similar staging problem exists for laser-driven plasma wakefield accelerators. Why protons? There are proton beams available at CERN with TeV scale energy per particle and huge total stored energy. For example: LHC nominal beam parameters: (2808 bunches)*(1.15e11 protons)*(7 TeV) = 360 MJ Fully loaded A320 (80 t) at take-off speed (300 km/h) carries similar amount of kinetic energy (280 MJ). (However the momentum of the airplane is ~ c/v ~ 106 times larger than the LHC beam momentum) Single LHC proton bunch (7 TeV, 1.2e11 protons) carries 130 kJ Single SPS proton bunch (0.4 TeV, 3e11 protons) carries 19 kJ Single ILC electron bunch (0.5 TeV, 2e10 e+/e-) carries 1.6 kJ Using LHC beam as a driver it’s possible to obtain TeV-level (e-/e+/muons) in a single stage!

Motivation A. Caldwell, K. Lotov, A. Pukhov, F. Simon, Nature Physics (2009): Proton bunch driver: 1 TeV, σz = 0.1 mm Unloaded wake Witness bunch of 1.5·1010 electrons Loaded wake Final witness energy spread = 1% Unfortunately compressing 10 cm long LHC bunch down to σz = 0.1 mm is very challenging and expensive (although technically possible).

Self-modulation of long proton bunch in plasma N. Kumar, A. Pukhov, K. Lotov, Phys. Rev. Letters (2010): x, mm z, mm lp = 1.2 mm Self-modulated proton bunch resonantly drives plasma wakefields.

The AWAKE experiment configuration & baseline parameters: >50 mJ, 200 fsec, 780 nm

On-axis injection: LCODE simulation of electron trapping and acceleration Electrons are trapped from the very beginning by the wakefield of seed perturbation Trapped electrons make several synchrotron oscillations in their potential wells After z=4 m the wakefield moves forward faster than the speed of light

Electron trajectory in the longitudinal electric field (uniform plasma density): Laser pulse 16 cm protons 8 cm See K. V. Lotov et al. Phys. Plasmas 21, 123116 (2014)

Rubidium vapor source with continuous flow: Rb Rb What if these two sources are not perfectly symmetrical? T1 T2 n s How sensitive is the acceleration to such plasma density gradient over the whole system?

Electron trajectory in the longitudinal electric field (10% gradient case): Longitudinal plasma density profile: -10 % over 10 m +10 % over 10 m

Final electron energy distribution as a function of ξ: long No density gradient +4% over 10 m +10% over 10 m Final electron energy distribution as a function of ξ:

Final electron energy distribution as a function of ξ: long -2% over 10 m No density gradient +2% over 10 m Final electron energy distribution as a function of ξ:

With longitudinally compressed proton bunch (2x compression) even higher density gradients are allowed: Compressed p-beam current profile Baseline p-beam current profile Final energy of accelerated electrons Final energy of accelerated electrons +20% over 10 m +20% over 10 m

Conclusions Plasma density gradients offer a simple way to control the development of the proton beam self-modulation instability and acceleration of particles in it. In the AWAKE experiment it is possible to accelerate electrons injected on-axis to high energy (~1 GeV) in a plasma section with density gradient of up to 10% along 10 m. Using small positive gradients (below 10 % over 10 m) should simplify the electron injection and improve the overall stability of acceleration because we will rely on significantly less micro-bunches to drive the plasma wake-field (optimum electron injection position shifts towards the laser pulse). Even small negative plasma density gradient (-2% over 10 m for example) significantly reduces the achievable electron energy. With longitudinally compressed proton bunches it is possible to operate at higher density gradients (20% with 2x compression) – this will improve the acceleration stability further.