PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A short Introduction to the Ideas of the Algorithm used in MVQCA
Advertisements

CASPA Comparison and Analysis of Special Pupil Attainment SGA Systems SGA Systems Limited A brief overview of CASPA's graphs and reports.
1 H2 Cost Driver Map and Analysi s Table of Contents Cost Driver Map and Analysis 1. Context 2. Cost Driver Map 3. Cost Driver Analysis Appendix A - Replica.
PCWG 9 th Meeting: 12 December Glasgow Introduction, Agenda and Review of Actions.
10 Software Engineering Foundations of Computer Science ã Cengage Learning.
Software Quality Assurance Inspection by Ross Simmerman Software developers follow a method of software quality assurance and try to eliminate bugs prior.
University of Leeds Department of Chemistry The New MCM Website Stephen Pascoe, Louise Whitehouse and Andrew Rickard.
Celso Ferreira¹, Francisco Olivera², Dean Djokic³ ¹ PH.D. Student, Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University ( ² Associate.
Power Curve Working Group Overview
PCWG 9 th Meeting December Glasgow PCWG 2015 Roadmap: Detailed Survey Results.
PCWG 9 th Meeting: 12 December Glasgow Proposed PCWG Data Sharing Initiative.
LiDAR analysis at a site with simple terrain Alex Clerc, Lee Cameron Tuesday 2 nd September
Pet Fish and High Cholesterol in the WHI OS: An Analysis Example Joe Larson 5 / 6 / 09.
© 2006, Cognizant Technology Solutions. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Automation – How to.
Handling Data and Figures of Merit Data comes in different formats time Histograms Lists But…. Can contain the same information about quality What is meant.
Updated Release of R-Code Occultation Timing Extractor Programmed by Robert L. (Bob) Anderson Presentation by Tony George at the 2014 Bethesda, Maryland.
BIRT: general info and initial experience Katia Danilova 02/27/2008.
3D Power Deviation Matrix PCWG Meeting – New Orleans, LA. September 14, 2015 Alex Head.
Power Curve Working Group Update New Orleans 15 th September 2015.
RMsis – v Simplify Requirement Management for JIRA.
Power Curve Working Group Update Roskilde 26 th June 2015.
Practical Image Management for Pharma Experiences and Directions. Use of Open Source Stefan Baumann, Head of Imaging Infrastructure, Novartis.
A New Theoretical Basis for Describing Low Turbulence Wind Turbine Performance Peter Stuart PCWG Meeting – 26 June 2015.
MEASURE : Measurement System Analysis
TSS Database Inventory. CIRA has… Received and imported the 2002 and 2018 modeling data Decided to initially store only IMPROVE site-specific data Decided.
PCWG 15 th Meeting December 2015 – Kings Langley PCWG 2016 Roadmap: Detailed Survey Results.
PCWG-Share-01 Initial Results PCWG Meeting Kings Langley 9 th December 2015 Peter Stuart (RES), Lee Cameron (RES), Alex Clerc (RES) & Andy Clifton (NREL),
RMsis – v now with JIRA 5.0 support Simplify Requirement Management for JIRA.
8th October Aarhus PCWG-Share-01 Introduction.
Understanding the Power Curve Interpolation Issue Power Curve Working Group, , Hamburg Axel Albers.
PCWG-Share-01 Current Status PCWG Meeting Hamburg 10 th March 2016 Peter Stuart (RES) and Andy Clifton (NREL), on behalf of the Power Curve Working Group.
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative 10 August 2016 NREL, Colorado, US.
IEC Ed 2 Collaboration IEA Task 32 Round Robin & PCWG Worked Examples NREL, Colorado, US 10 th August 2016 IEC Task 32: Luke J Simmons (DNV GL)
PCWG 2016 Update 20th May 2016 Peter Stuart.
IEC FDIS 2016 Worked Example Industrial Project
IEC FDIS 2016 Consensus Analysis Project
PCWG 2016 Update Wednesday, 13 December 2016 Glasgow, Scotland
IEC FDIS 2016 Worked Examples Ellie Weyer, AWS True Power
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative Update
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative Update 13 December 2016
Testing dan Implementasi Sistem materi 4
Comparing Systems Using Sample Data
Alternative Turbulence Correction Methods
PCWG 2016 Roadmap & Meeting Overview
WSP quality assurance tool
Chapter 7 Process Control.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Power curve loss adjustments at AWS Truepower: a 2016 update
Introduction Purpose Objectives Content Learning Time
Overview – SOE PatchTT December 2013.
Chapter 8 – Software Testing
Evaluation of the Cuban Wind Atlas
Power Curve Interpolation, What We’ve Learnt?
Using the Excel Creation Template to Create a Variable Parameter Problem (Macro Enabled “Alpha 1.4.2”) Getting started – Example 1 Note – You should be.
Maintaining software solutions
MEASURE : Measurement System Analysis
Tutorial for using Case It for qPCR analyses
TI measurement techniques for pulsed Lidars – the Current Status
Adding and editing users
Tools of Software Development
Dimensioning with SolidWorks - Demo
PX-Web 2017 v1 and The situation at Statistics Sweden right now
Types of CAATs Session 3.
Software Systems for Survey and Census
Dimensioning with SolidWorks - Demo
PCA of Waimea Wave Climate
ESS VIP ICT Project Task Force Meeting 5-6 March 2013.
Module Recognition Algorithms
Outline System architecture Current work Experiments Next Steps
Implementation Business Case
Presentation transcript:

PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative 8 September 2016 Pamplona, Spain

PCWG-Share-01: PCWG Analysis Tool PCWG-Share-01: Enabled by PCWG Analysis Tool. Consistent data analysis and anonymous report generation. ‘Just do it’ PCWG-Share-01 button (minimise set-up time) Excel Benchmark and PCWG Analysis Tool Comparison

PCWG-Share-01 Definition Document Download PCWG-Share-01 Definition Doc from www.pcwg.prg

PCWG-Share-01: Neutralising Commercial Sensitivities Inner Range Power Curves Extracted from the Dataset Itself: the data analysis process has been designed such that the warranted power curve is never considered. Instead a power curve is extracted from a subset of the data (Inner-Range) which is then used to model the power output in the outer-range.   Intelligence Sharing, not Data Sharing: the data analysis process has been designed such that the datasets do not need to be shared outside of the participant organisations. Instead of sharing the actual data, participants will share performance metrics which describe the accuracy of the trial methodologies.

PCWG-Share-01: Data Flow Hypothesis/Trial Methodology Analysis Definition Y Analysis Definition Y Analysis Definition Y Analysis Definition Y Proprietary Dataset A Proprietary Dataset B Proprietary Dataset C Proprietary Dataset D Organization A Organization B Organization C Organization D Hypothesis Performance Metrics Aggregator (Academic Institution ) Combination Analysis How well did the trial method perform? Aggregated Hypothesis Performance Metrics

PCWG-Share-01: Error Metric Definitions See PCWG-Share-01 Definition Document for Further Details

PCWG-Share-01: Submissions by Participant Type

PCWG-Share-01: Baseline Error, Inner vs Outer Range Version 0.5.9/10 Still unexpectedly large errors for baseline inner range (further investigation required) Smaller inner baseline errors still warrant further investigation ‘Uncertainty’ associated with ‘Outer Range’ effects. Std Dev ≈ 2%

PCWG-Share-01: Baseline Errors by Wind Speed (0.5.8) Large errors above rated for certain datasets.

PCWG-Share-01: Errors by Method (‘Four Cell Matrix’)

PCWG-Share-01: Improvements by Method (‘Four Cell Matrix’)

Erroneous Outlier Issue

PCWG-Share-01: Baseline Histogram for ‘Follow Up’ Datasets PCWG participants were asked for permissions to allow the data aggregator to investigate their submissions for sources of error. Owners of 34 datasets responded positivity. A baseline NME histogram for these participants is shown below.

PCWG-Share-01: Baseline Errors by Wind Speed (Outliers Only) The 4 large negative NME outliers all have a distinct ‘by wind speed error signature’. Further investigation is required to ascertain what is going on with these datasets. Large errors at high wind speeds

PCWG-Share-01: Baseline Errors by Wind Speed (Non-outliers) The ‘by wind speed’ errors of the non-outliers look more reasonable, although some notable behaviour is observed (as highlighted). Re-plot once interpolation issue is resolved. Interpolation Issue Notable behaviour for ‘blue’ dataset. Notable behaviour for ‘red’ dataset.

PCWG Analysis Tool Release 0.6.0 Release 0.6.0 marks a major step forward for the PCWG Analysis Tool (PCWG-AT). This release implements several points of feedback raised by PCWG members during 2015-2016, specifically: Usability: Several changes have been made to make PCWG-AT easier to use.   Turbine parameters moved: Following user feedback the turbine parameters (cut-in speed, cut-out speed, rated power, diameter and hub height) have been moved from the Analysis to the Dataset. This change acknowledges that these turbine parameters are inherently tied to dataset and will not charge according to what analysis is performed. This change has also helped simplify the implementation of the dataset portfolio feature (see below). Faster and easier PCWG-Share-X participation: A new dataset portfolio feature has been introduced to reduce the time and effort required to participate in PCWG-Share-X. After initial set up participation should now take ‘one click’. Enhanced Relative File Path Support: The handling of relative file paths within PCWG-AT has been made more robust. Additionally there has been a substantial overhaul of the PCWG-AT source code structure, specifically the separation of the code into several component libraries. This reorganisation has helped increase the maintainability of the code and will hopefully lead to faster development and issue resolution in the future.

Join the Power Curve Working Group at: www.pcwg.org Many thanks to all PCWG-Share-01 Participants and special thanks to Andy Clifton of NREL Join the Power Curve Working Group at: www.pcwg.org