Texas FFA Poultry Judging

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Livestock and Poultry Evaluation Animal Science II.
Advertisements

Poultry Judging: Past Production, Egg Quality, Ready-to-Cook Poultry
Poultry Judging By: Kevin Kuykendall.
Egg hygiene practice Practical 10. Grading is a form of quality control used to divide a variable commodity or product into a number of classes. The United.
Evaluating Precooked, Breaded Chicken Patties Created By: Jerry Taylor Agriculture Education Teacher Madison County High School Ag. Ed. Curriculum Office.
Poultry Miss Kay. What An Ideal Chicken! Techno Chicken.
Group 2: Carin Cason, Jamie Daniels, Britni Engelmohr, Lindsey Franklin, Krista Gleghorn, Sara Kirby.
Understanding Poultry in the
Classes of the Contest Classes A & B - Live Birds B – Reasons Classes C – Ready-to-Cook Class E – Written Test Class G – Broken-Out Eggs Class H – Exterior.
What is the distance between the pubic bones and tip of the keel called in poultry?  Abdominal capacity.
Livestock Production Ms. Boyt
Poultry CDE Contest Information. Poultry CDE General Rules Composition and Scoring of State Teams: State Teams will be composed of a maximum of four members.
Career Development Event Meats Evaluation Main Objectives Develop employment skills for students who are interested in exploring or pursuing career opportunities.
Poultry Industry.
Modified from information found at: The Poultry and Egg Institute.
Monroe County Cooking Day Judges Scoring Sheet April 27, 2013 Safety & Sanitation Washed Hands Safe Food Handling No Cross-contamination Used cutting board(s)
Career Development Events Common Core/Next Generation Science Standards Addressed! RI.5.7 Draw on information from multiple print or digital sources,
Career Development Events Common Core/Next Generation Science Standards Addressed! WHST.11 ‐ 12.8 Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative.
Livestock and Poultry Evaluation Animal Science II.
Evaluation of Live and Dressed Poultry Cody Lowe.
Poultry CDE Practice: Further Processed Meat Products Evaluation Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office Catrina Kennedy, Dr. Frank Flanders,
Career Development Events Common Core/Next Generation Science Standards Addressed! WHST Draw evidence from informational texts to support analysis,
Best Informed Greenhand Josephine Smith. Purpose of the Contest UnderstandAimsPurposesHistoryStructure For the Local, State and National FFA student organization.
WF-R ANIMAL SCIENCE 1 Board Warmer Write our objectives today: 1.What are the different parts of poultry? 2.What are the different breeds? 3.How are layers.
Digestive Physiology of Farm Animals
Each team, consisting of four members, will prepare a communications project proposal for their chapter. The written proposal will explain the communications.
Changes made at the national level to the Dairy Foods CDE to become the Milk Quality and Products CDE Minnesota Ag Teacher Winter Conference January 17,
Poultry Judging Workshop
Career Development Events Common Core/Next Generation Science Standards Addressed! WHST Draw evidence from informational texts to support analysis,
Forage Kaylee Snyder Intro to Ag Science Teaching Kaylee Snyder Intro to Ag Science Teaching.
Tennessee FFA.  Production Hens  Broiler Breeders  Interior Quality  Further Processed Meats  Factors  Exterior Quality  Factors  Parts ID  Carcass.
FFA Poultry CDE Spring 2013.
Selection of Poultry Chapter 35.
Career & Leadership Development Events
Meat, Poultry, Fish, Dry Beans, Eggs, and Nuts
Mrs. Karen Swope Family and Consumer Sciences Columbian High School
Refer to: Iowa FFA Association 2018 Food Science CDE Refer to:
Tennessee FFA Poultry CDE.
Poultry Judging: Past Production, Egg Quality, Ready-to-Cook Poultry
Mrs. Karen Swope Family and Consumer Sciences Columbian High School
Poultry CDE Practice: Further Processed Meat Products Evaluation
Chicken Breeds.
For: ADVS 1110 Introduction to Animal Science
Junior Meats Evaluation and Technology
Poultry Judging: Past Production, Egg Quality, Ready-to-Cook Poultry
Poultry Judging: Past Production, Egg Quality, Ready-to-Cook Poultry
Breeds of Future McNuggets
Objective vs Subjective
Poultry.
2017 National Ag Sales CDE Workshop
Poultry Science.
Agricultural Sales Career Development Event
Poultry Judging CDE Practice Based on the 2002 State FFA Poultry CDE
Refer to: Iowa FFA Association 2018 Food Science CDE Refer to:
Introduction to the Poultry Industry
Poultry Miss Kay.
Place the USDA grade for the exterior egg shell quality of each egg.
Indicate the USDA grade for this broken out egg.
Further Processing Products categories
Evaluating Precooked Chicken Patties
Chapter 1 The Where, Why, and How of Data Collection
Eggs Chapter 23.2.
Chapter 1 The Where, Why, and How of Data Collection
Poultry.
Poultry, Fish and Shellfish
Poultry Grading and Consumption.
North Lincolnshire School Sport
Poultry Judging Interior Egg Quality
The Where, Why, and How of Data Collection
Chapter 1 The Where, Why, and How of Data Collection
Presentation transcript:

Texas FFA Poultry Judging By: Cassidy Krchnak

Purpose Students engaged in the Poultry Development Event learn to effectively make comparative observations, generalizations to the poultry industry, draw conclusions and make decisions. Students must apply USDA standards and make qualitative judgments concerning eggs, live birds, carcasses and further processed poultry products. Students learn foundational knowledge and master basic skills related to the poultry and food industries

Event Format Team Make-up Event Schedule A team is made up of 3-4 individuals per school. All students will be scored, and the 3 highest scores make up the team score. Event Schedule Participants will have 12 minutes to evaluate each class. There will be a two-minute warning alerting the participants of the impending end of the 12 minute period. Participants will have one minute to move from class to class.

Evaluation Classes Live Poultry (100 points) Each participant will place a class of four market broilers. Participants may not remove the broilers from the holding unit. Each participant will place a class of four egg-type hens. The birds will be Single-Comb White Leghorns, or commercial strains of Leghorn- type (inbred cross). Birds may be removed from coops but there may be no side by side comparison. c. Live Poultry Points Market broilers……..50 Egg-type hens……. 50

Evaluation Classes Ready-to-Cook Poultry (100 points) Each participant will grade a class of 10 ready-to-cook chicken and/or turkey carcasses and/or parts. Criteria for grading will be derived from USDA standards for chicken carcasses weighing two pounds to six pounds and for turkey carcasses weighing six pounds to 16 pounds. Four categories may be used, including the USDA quality grades A, B, C and the category NG (non-gradable). Participants may not touch any carcass or part; doing so will result in disqualification. Each participant will place a class of four ready-to-cook turkey carcasses. Criteria for placing will be derived from USDA standards for turkey carcasses weighing six pounds to 16 pounds. Participants may not touch any carcass; doing so will result in disqualification. Ready-to-Cook Poultry Points 10 chicken and/or turkey carcasses and/or parts for quality grading…….50 Four carcasses for placing………… 50

Evaluation Classes Shell Eggs (175 points) Each participant will grade a class of 10 white (or white-tint)-shell eggs. Criteria for grading will be derived from USDA standards for interior quality of market eggs. The USDA quality grades will be AA, A, B and Loss. Participants must candle the eggs to determine the appropriate USDA quality grade. Each participant will grade a class of 15 shell eggs. Criteria for grading will be derived from USDA standards for exterior quality of market eggs. The USDA quality grades will be AA, A, B and NG (non-gradable). Criteria for grading may include decisions related to the following quality factors: Soundness, Stains, Adhering Dirt or Foreign Material, Egg Shape, Shell Texture, Shell Thickness, No Defect. Each participant will determine written factors for the grading of the exterior chicken eggs. Shell Eggs Points Ten white-shell eggs for interior quality grading ………50 Fifteen chicken eggs for exterior quality grading……… 75 Evaluation criteria for Class 8 ……………………………50

Evaluation Classes Further Processed Poultry (150 points) Each participant will determine written quality factors for a class of 10 boneless further processed poultry meat products (e.g. precooked, poultry meat patties, tenders, nuggets or other boneless products). Criteria for evaluation will include coating defects, color defects, consistency of shape/size, broken and/or incomplete products, cluster/marriages and evidence of foreign material. Participants may not touch any product; doing so will result in disqualification. Each participant will determine written quality factors for a class of 10 bone-in further processed poultry meat products (e.g., precooked, bone-in wings or other bone-in poultry meat products). Criteria for evaluation will include coating defects, color defects, consistency of size, broken products, miscut products, mixed products and evidence of foreign material. Each participant will identify 10 poultry parts. Poultry parts to be identified will be randomly selected and consistent with those used in the chicken processing and merchandising industries. The participant may not touch any part; doing so will result in disqualification. Further Processed Poultry Points Boneless Further Processed Poultry Meat Products ……50 Bone-In Further Processed Poultry Meat Products ……..50 Ten chicken carcass parts for identification ……………...50

Evaluation Classes Poultry Management Written Exam (120 points) The written examination will be administered during the rotation. Each participant will complete a 30 item written examination on poultry production, management, anatomy and physiology. Five or more items will require mathematical calculations. Exam material will follow the rotation for the National Exam. Examination items will be developed from information found in the references. Written Exam Points Written Examination……. 120

Scoring Live Poultry ………………….….…..100 Ready to Cook ……………….….….100 Shell Eggs…………………………..175 Further Processed Products……..150 Written Exam ……………………..120 Total Points Individual ……..645 Team …………………………….1935

Tiebreaker Ties for team awards shall be broken as follows: The team with the higher written exam score will place higher. If still tied, the team with the higher score in the Live Poultry Evaluation will place higher. If still tied, the team with the higher score in shell eggs will place higher. If still tied, the team with the highest alternate score will place higher. If still tied, advisors will match for the team placing. Ties for individual awards shall be broken by substituting the word "individual" wherever the word "team" appears above.

Helpful Hints for a Successful Chapter Practice makes perfect. Hands on learning is the best way to learn. Practice with your team so they know you care. Reward your team for outstanding performances.

References https://www.texasffa.org/docs/2012- 15%20CDE%20Poultry%202.4.13.pdf