On the feasibility of 1Gbps for various MAC/PHY architectures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/ Approach to NG60 Peak Rate Slide 1 January 2015 Yi Wang, Huawei Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone Hong LiHuaweiNo.2222,
Advertisements

Doc.:IEEE /0821r3 Submission July 2008 Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Some Ambiguities about Throughput Conditions in PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0535r0 Submission May 2008 Thomas Kenney, Minyoung Park, Eldad Perahia, Intel Corp. Slide 1 PHY and MAC Throughput Analysis with 80.
Doc.: IEEE /0778r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR July MHz PHY Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
China S1G Spectrum Performance Analysis
Kunal Amarnani, Ayush Bhardwaj, Angad Kumar Kapoor & Tejas Pargaonkar
VHTL6 task group work plan proposal (VHTL < 6 GHz)
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
VHT Metrics Considerations
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Requirements Discussion
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA
Colorado School of Mines
China S1G Spectrum Performance Analysis
VHTL6 Tutorial (VHTL < 6 GHz)
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
160 MHz PHY Transmission Date: Authors: March 2010
VHT SG Report to EC Date: Authors: July 2008 April 2007
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
HEW Study Group Documentation
Mobile cooperation usage models
Joint Multichannel CSMA
Discussion on 11ah Peak Throughput Requirements
Multi-band Modulation, Coding, and Medium Access Control
Multi-band Modulation, Coding, and Medium Access Control
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission
VHT Metrics Considerations
Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission
VHTL6 Throughput Metric Thoughts
VHT in Below 6 GHz Frequency Bands
VHT in Below 6 GHz Frequency Bands
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Data Subcarrier and Interleaving for 120MHz
Consideration on 320MHz Bandwidth and 16 Spatial Streams
Introductory TGah Proposal
Potential Benefits of Dual-radio VHT Systems
Stream Partition Index for MU-MIMO Transmissions
D1.0 PHY Comments Discussion
Mobile cooperation usage models
Usage Cases for ah Date: Authors: March 2011
Mobile cooperation usage models
Introductory TGah Proposal
VHT - SG Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
120 MHz PHY Transmission Date: Authors: January 2010
D1.0 PHY Comments Discussion
Reducing Channel Access Delay
11be Peak Data Rate Analysis
VHT SG March 2008 Closing Report
11ac 80MHz Transmission Flow
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Probing the will of the SG
MAC Efficiency Gain of Uplink Multi-user Transmission
Joint Multichannel CSMA
D2D Technology for HEW Date: Authors: January 2010
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
WLAN Overlay with 60 GHz Channels
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Fast passive scan for FILS
Analysis on IEEE n MAC Efficiency
Reducing Channel Access Delay
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
Multiple RF operation for ax OFDMA
Multi-AP backhaul analysis
Discussion on 11ah Peak Throughput Requirements
Presentation transcript:

On the feasibility of 1Gbps for various MAC/PHY architectures January 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/ March 2008 On the feasibility of 1Gbps for various MAC/PHY architectures Date: 2008-03-17 Authors: Roberta Fracchia (Motorola) Marc de Courville, Motorola

January 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/ March 2008 Abstract This analysis provides inputs on the technical feasibility of achieving 1Gbps aggregated MAC SAP throughput for below 6GHz amendment, by using different MAC layers which manage the access to different parallel channels Roberta Fracchia (Motorola) Marc de Courville, Motorola

March 2008 802.11n MAC Throughput Intel presentation 07/2431r0 shows that at least 160MHz BW for 4x4 MIMO are necessary to reach 1Gbps MAC throughput (corresponding to 2048 Mbps PHY rate) Throughput PHY rate 260Mbps 520Mbps 1040Mbps 1560Mbps 2080Mbps 4160Mbps Target MAC throughput 802.11n Considering a single channel, whose access is managed by a single MAC, the MAC efficiency is ~64% for 1Gbps PHY rate and ~40% for a PHY rate of 4Gbps (5 STAs) Roberta Fracchia (Motorola)

March 2008 Multichannel CSMA Performance can be improved by the use of multiple channels: multiple CSMA channels perform better with respect to a single-channel CSMA in case of fixed aggregated bandwidth Multi-channel CSMA protocols achieve higher performance than single channel ones since the MAC throughput doesn’t scale linearly with the PHY throughput: 3000 If the total bandwidth B is divided in N channels of bandwidth BN=B/N, the maximum total MAC throughput is Throughput_MultiCh (B) = N ·Throughput (BN) > Throughput (B) 2000 2x1000 MAC Throughput (Mbps) 2000 1000 1000 2000 3000 (As a first approximation PHY throughput for a given spectral efficiency scales linearly as a function of the bandwidth) PHY Throughput (Mbps) By allowing concurrent transmissions the number of collisions is also reduced, thus increasing the MAC throughput Roberta Fracchia (Motorola)

Maximum MAC throughput with multiple channels March 2008 Maximum MAC throughput with multiple channels 1600 BN=20MHz 1400 BN=40MHz We evaluate the maximum throughput that can be achieved considering AMSDU TXOP=2ms Packet size = 1500B CW=15 64 QAM 5/6 3 users per channel 1200 1000 NSS= 4 Aggregated MAC Throughput (Mb/s) 800 NSS= 3 600 NSS= 2 400 200 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Total bandwidth B (MHz) To reach 1Gbps throughput with 4 Spatial Streams: 100 MHz BW (with parallel channels) wrt 160 MHz BW (with a single channel) are required Roberta Fracchia (Motorola)

January 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/ March 2008 Remarks The finer the channel granularity, the higher the gain: 20 MHz channels are better than 40 MHz channels 80 MHz BW: 900 Mbps throughput with NSS=4 650 Mbps throughput with NSS=3 450 Mbps throughput with NSS=2 100 MHz BW: 1.1 Gbps throughput with NSS=4 850 Mbps throughput with NSS=3 550 Mbps throughput with NSS=2 120 MHz BW: 1 Gbps throughput with NSS=3 650 Mbps throughput with NSS=2 1200 100MHz BW NSS= 4 1000 Aggregated MAC Throughput (Mb/s) NSS= 3 800 NSS= 2 600 5 10 20 30 40 Total Number of users Roberta Fracchia (Motorola) Marc de Courville, Motorola

Architectural solutions for multiple CSMA (1/2) March 2008 Architectural solutions for multiple CSMA (1/2) We assume that the total bandwidth B is divided in N channels of bandwidth BN=B/N Each user has 1 radio, to access 1 of the N channels BN B MAC PHY STA One MAC/PHY for each user Many works in the literature proposing: Channel hopping strategies Synchronization and access methods Use of a Control channel Each user has N radios, one for each channel A Multi-Radio Unification Protocol for IEEE 802.11Wireless Networks, A. Adya, P. Bahl, J. Padhye, A. Wolman, L. Zhou (Microsoft Research) The access to the N channels given by N multiple wireless network cards (multiple MAC/PHY layers), coordinated by a MAC controller which: presents a single MAC SAP to layers above monitors the channel quality on each interface selects the interface to forward the packet on MAC PHY MAC controller STA Roberta Fracchia (Motorola)

Architectural solutions for multiple CSMA (2/2) March 2008 Architectural solutions for multiple CSMA (2/2) We assume that the total bandwidth B is divided in N channels of bandwidth BN=B/N Each user has multiple MACs but only one PHY layer Multiple MACs, coordinated by a MAC controller, regulate the access to the N channels A single PHY layer uses the total bandwidth: a single FFT is done on the bandwidth B The use of different channels is allowed, with the same number of antennas used for a single channel bandwidth MAC PHY MAC controller STA Roberta Fracchia (Motorola)

January 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/ March 2008 Conclusions Single channel bandwidth extension is not a suitable solution to match 1 Gbps throughput Parallel channels can highly improve the MAC throughput This stresses out the importance of introducing in VHT the support for multiple transmissions at the same time expanding on the multi-user dimension 1Gbps feasibility is provided with 100MHz BW for NSS=4 (~40% of bandwidth gain compared to single channel) 800 Mbps feasibility is provided with 100MHz BW for NSS=3 500 Mbps feasibility is provided with 100MHz BW for NSS=2 But opens up new challenges to define the most suitable architecture for the access to parallel channels Roberta Fracchia (Motorola) Marc de Courville, Motorola