Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics.
Advertisements

This module was developed by Carrie Ziegler, Nathan Auck, and Steve Jackson. They are the three principle designers of the course, Principles to Actions,
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
12.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION MAR 2015 SAMPLING, VARIABILITY, AND PROPORTION (OH MY)
Reflecting Throughout the Day Take a moment and reflect on this morning and what you learned about bringing change to a district.
Take a few minutes to complete the survey on your desk.
8.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 8 1 JULY 2015 POINTS OF CONCURRENCIES; UNKNOWN ANGLE PROOFS;
INSTITUTE for LEARNING This module was developed by DeAnn Huinker, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Victoria Bill, University of Pittsburgh Institute.
This module was developed by Lynn Raith, Mathematics Curriculum Specialist K-12. Video courtesy of NYC District 2 and the Institute for Learning. These.
Principles to Actions Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices The Case of Wobberson Torchon and the Calling Plans 1 Task Algebra I Principles to Actions.
EdTPA Task 4 Boot Camp Spring What is required for students to be mathematically proficient? According to The National Research Council (2001),
Measuring Circles Core Mathematics Partnership
Ant’s Picnic Imagine that you and the other members of your group are a team of picnic basket ants, and you have just reached a picnic basket filled with.
Using Tape Diagrams Multiplicative Structures- Comparison Problems
Using Tape Diagrams and Variables to Develop Algebra Skills
USOE Professional Learning Series
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Additive Comparison Situations
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Division with Fractions – Part 3 “Partitive Division Tools”
APA Format Tuesday July 8, 2014.
Ko-Kou and the Peacock’s Tail
Number Talks: Subtraction Strategies
Volume of Prisms and Pyramids
Volume Measurement Core Mathematics Partnership
Equality and Relational Thinking: Abstracting from Computation Part 1
Algebraic Reasoning Inquiry Project
Mathematical Rigor?.
Division of Fractions Core Mathematics Partnership
Classroom Discussions to Support Problem Solving
Connecting Two- and Three-Dimensional Figures
Pathways to Teacher Leadership in Mathematics Wednesday, July 2, 2014
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Pathways to Teacher Leadership in Mathematics Monday, July 7, 2014
Surfacing MP6, MP7 and MP 5 Core Mathematics Partnership
Applications of Angle Measurement
Project & Syllabus.
Exploring Symmetry Core Mathematics Partnership
Number Talks: Building Fluency with Division
Developing Linear Thinking & Extending to a Ruler
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Multiplication Concept Development & Word Problem Structures
Ratio Reasoning in 6th Grade The Road to Proportional Reasoning
Equality Project Part A Observations
Smarter Balanced Assessment Items
Use the next 10 minutes to share.... Goal…
Number Talks: Focusing in Computational Fluency
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Using Talk Moves to Help Students Engage in the Reasoning of Others
Number Talks: Developing Computational Fluency
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Principles to Actions: Establishing Goals and Tasks
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Number Talks: An Instructional Strategy used to Create a Classroom Culture of Listening, Sharing and Flexible Thinking Core Mathematics Partnership.
Exploring Transformations
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks (part 2)
Building Foundations for Mathematics
Understanding Ratios as Percents
Moving From Multiplicative Comparisons to Proportional Reasoning
K-6 Geometry and Geometric Measurement : Tying it All Up
A Language-Rich Math Class
Access & Equity Core Mathematics Partnership
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Student Work Presentation and Reflection Project Due: July 31
PCMI 3 weeks 3 roles Reflecting on Practice
Principles to actions Chapter: Effective Teaching and Learning
Student Work Analysis: Looking for Growth in Thinking
Reflecting on Practice: Worthwhile Tasks
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Presentation transcript:

Developing Procedural Fluency from Conceptual Understanding The Road to Proportional Reasoning Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and High-Leverage Instruction for Student Success January 7, 2016

Learning Intentions & Success Criteria We are deepening our understanding of the highly effective mathematics teaching practice Building Procedural Fluency from Conceptual Understanding. Success Criteria: We will be successful when we can articulate how procedural fluency was built from conceptual understanding in three different situations. Number Talk – procedural fluency with number talk Grade level posters Eureka problems

A Look at the Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices

Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Establish mathematics goals to focus learning. Implement tasks that promote reasoning and problem solving. Use and connect mathematical representations. Facilitate meaningful mathematical discourse. Pose purposeful questions. Build procedural fluency from conceptual understanding. Support productive struggle in learning mathematics. Elicit and use evidence of student thinking. Handout: MathTeachingPracticesList-ES-Casey.pdf Facilitation Suggestions The purpose of this slide is to shift the participants’ attention to the eight Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices. Distribute the handout listing the eight Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.

Jot down your responses. Teaching Practice Focus: Build Procedural Fluency from Conceptual Understanding Jot down your responses. What does it mean to be fluent with computational procedures? Why is it important to build procedures from conceptual understanding? Facilitation Suggestions Give participants 1-2 minutes to jot down their initial thoughts in response to the two questions on the slide. Then the participants can read the excerpts from the book on the next two slides. Participants should be looking for answers to the two questions and compare it to their own initial responses: What does it mean to be fluent with computational procedures? Why is it important to build procedures from conceptual understanding?

Build Procedural Fluency from Conceptual Understanding Effective teaching of mathematics builds on a foundation of conceptual understanding; results in generalized methods for solving problems; and enables students to flexibly choose among methods to solve contextual and mathematical problems. Recap of reading National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author. (p. 42)

Procedural Fluency Being fluent means that students are able to choose flexibly among methods and strategies to solve contextual and mathematical problems, they understand and are able to explain their approaches, and they are able to produce accurate answers efficiently. Fluency builds from initial exploration and discussion of number concepts to using informal reasoning strategies based on meanings and properties of the operations to the eventual use of general methods as tools in solving problems. This sequence is beneficial whether students are building toward fluency with single- and multi-digit computation with whole numbers or fluency with, for example, fraction operations, proportional relationships, measurement formulas, or algebraic procedures. Facilitation Suggestions Discuss the first question: What does it mean to be fluent with computational procedures? National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author. (p. 42)

Procedural Fluency Being fluent means that students are able to choose flexibly among methods and strategies to solve contextual and mathematical problems, they understand and are able to explain their approaches, and they are able to produce accurate answers efficiently. Fluency builds from initial exploration and discussion of number concepts to using informal reasoning strategies based on meanings and properties of the operations to the eventual use of general methods as tools in solving problems. This sequence is beneficial whether students are building toward fluency with single- and multi-digit computation with whole numbers or fluency with, for example, fraction operations, proportional relationships, measurement formulas, or algebraic procedures. Facilitation Suggestions Discuss the first question: What does it mean to be fluent with computational procedures? Now add to your notes about the 1st question. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author. (p. 42)

Conceptual Understanding & Procedural Fluency When procedures are connected with the underlying concepts, students have better retention of the procedures and are more able to apply them in new situations (Fuson, Kalchman, and Bransford 2005). Martin (2009, p. 165) describes some of the reasons that fluency depends on and extends from conceptual understanding: To use mathematics effectively, students must be able to do much more than carry out mathematical procedures. They must know which procedure is appropriate and most productive in a given situation, what a procedure accomplishes, and what kind of results to expect. Mechanical execution of procedures without understanding their mathematical basis often leads to bizarre results. Facilitation Suggestions Discuss the second question: Why is it important to build procedures from conceptual understanding? Now add to your notes National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author. (p. 42)

“Multiplication Strings” Watch the Video “Multiplication Strings” 8 minutes Watch the video up to right before the final student talks. How is the teacher helping students think multiplicatively? Up to this point, students are doing a lot of additive thinking. Ask the table groups to turn and talk to identify instructional moves that could be used to help students move to multiplicative thinking. Then finish the video.

Discussing the Video Discuss the teacher actions that Build procedural fluency from conceptual understanding. Be prepared to give examples and to cite line numbers from the transcript to support your observations. Handouts: Transcript-ES-Casey.pd Materials: VideoClip-ES-Casey.mp4 Facilitator Suggestions At this point, participants have established some common understanding of this mathematics teaching practice

Creating a Trajectory of Learning for Proportional Reasoning from 1st Grade to 7th Grade Part 2 of the evening

Building Proportional Reasoning Across Grades Silently review your homework reflection of your grade level’s work and its impact on the development of proportional reasoning. Beginning with the youngest grade, share your reflection with the teachers at your table. Create a poster that shows the development of proportional reasoning across the grades. 35 miniutes 3 minutes for each teacher to share. 10 minutes to create poster 10 minutes for gallery walk and final discussion.

How does the work in all the grades help students have procedural fluency for proportional reasoning based on conceptual understanding? What instructional moves do you need to make to ensure that you are developing proportional reasoning in your students? Stand and find someone to talk with. What are you understanding about building procedural fluency from conceptual understanding?

Selected Problems from Eureka Grade 6 Module 1 (packet from last session) Part 2 of the evening

Using Ratio Reasoning to Solve Problems Work in pairs to complete Exercise 2 from Eureka MathTM Grade 6, Module 1, Lesson 7. How does the conceptual understanding of ratios lead to the understanding of fractions and ratios?

Using Ratio Reasoning to Solve Problems Work in pairs to complete Exercise 1 from Eureka MathTM Grade 6, Module 1, Lesson 11 How did the use of ratio tables help to surface the concept of equivalent ratios?

Building Procedural Fluency in Grade 6 As a table group… Review the 4 problems in the packet. Review the student learning goals for each lesson. Discuss… How do these lessons build procedural fluency from conceptual understanding? Lesson 2, 5, 7, 11 Putting into a 4 square

Learning Intentions & Success Criteria We are deepening our understanding of the highly effective mathematics teaching practice Building Procedural Fluency from Conceptual Understanding. Success Criteria: We will be successful when we can articulate how procedural fluency was built from conceptual understanding in three different situations.

Homework: January 28 Read NCTM’s Principles to Action Page 42 to the top of page 46 The table of teacher and student actions on pp. 47 and 48. How do the general ideas in this section relate to the development of proportional reasoning at your grade level?

Disclaimer Core Mathematics Partnership Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013-2016   This material was developed for the Core Mathematics Partnership project through the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Center for Mathematics and Science Education Research (CMSER). This material may be used by schools to support learning of teachers and staff provided appropriate attribution and acknowledgement of its source. Other use of this work without prior written permission is prohibited—including reproduction, modification, distribution, or re-publication and use by non-profit organizations and commercial vendors. This project was supported through a grant from the Wisconsin ESEA Title II, Part B, Mathematics and Science Partnerships.