Outcomes of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in patients with a Pre-Existing Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens S. Elderkin1A, E. Tu1A,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sérgio Kwitko, Tiago Lansini, Andressa P Stolz, Diane R Marinho Authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.
Advertisements

Venting Incisions in DSAEK Patients: Is It an Absolute Necessity?
Use of a Novel Y- Suture Technique to Reduce Detachments in Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) Habeeb Ahmad, MD Martin Heur,
The authors have no financial interests to disclose
Retrospective comparison of staged versus combined cataract surgery and Descemet’s-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in patients with Fuchs’ Dystrophy.
Early Outcomes of Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Pseudophakic Eyes with Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses Preeya K. Gupta.
Roy E Lehman MD*, Samuel F Fulcher MD**
Relationship Between Donor Graft Cell Count and Visual Outcome in DSAEK Patients Authors Silvin Bakalian MD PhD, Johanna Choremis MD FRCSC, Michele Mabon.
V. S. Liarakos, K. van Dijk, L. Ham, L. Baydoun and G.R.J. Melles Anterior Chamber vs Posterior Chamber IOL in DMEK for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy.
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ayr, Scotland
DSAEK in Eyes With Severe Pre-operative Visual Acuity Loss. 1. Sightline Ophthalmic Associates, Pittsburgh, PA 2. Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR 3.
Corneal Densitometry and Visual Outcome Comparisons of DSAEK and DMEK Eyes Xiaolin Zhang MD Robert L. Schultze MD Robert A. Eden MD Rahul Raghu.
Dislocation of the DSEK Donor Graft into the Posterior Segment An Intraoperative Complication in DSEK Surgery Mark M Fernandez MD, Mark S Gorovoy MD, George.
Bryan Y Kim 1, Shintaro Kanayama MD PhD 1, Tueng T Shen MD PhD 1, Thomas E Gillette MD 2 1 University of Washington Department of Ophthalmology, 2 Eye.
Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital Coimbatore
Dept. of Ophthalmology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. Outcome after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Irido-Corneal Adhesions and Fibrous Ingrowth into the Graft-Host Interface Causing Graft Failure in a Case of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial.
Lori Lombardi MD, Mark A. Terry MD, Neda Shamie MD, Anand K. Shah MD, Daniel J. Friend MS *Dr. Terry has a financial interest in Bausch & Lomb instruments.
Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.
Urrets-Zavalia Syndrome Following Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Claire Y. Chu, MD Pawan Prasher, MD Eric Dai, MD R. Wayne Bowman, MD V. Vinod.
Glaucoma and Penetrating Keratoplasty : Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes Sonika Gupta Consultant Ophthalmology Max Eye Care New Delhi, India Author.
DSAEK Outcomes in Normal and Abnormal, High-Risk Eyes at an University Practice Hugo Y. Hsu and Sean L. Edelstein The authors have no financial interest.
Case Report of Severe Haze After DSAEK
Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in patients with Toxic anterior segment syndrome induced endothelial failure First and Presenting.
1 Clinical Outcomes of DSEK Surgery Combined With Other Intraocular Procedures Neil Mahesh Vyas, MD Fei Yu, PhD Anthony J. Aldave, MD Sophie Deng, MD,
Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With an Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens: A Montreal Experience Georges M. Durr, MD 1,2 Johanna Choremis, MD, FRCSC.
Clinical outcome of DALK in Keratoconus – A one year follow up
E-Poster Price Vision Group & Cornea Research Foundation of America Descemet - Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty :Survival Outcomes in Eyes with Pre-
Mean Keratometry Measurement Post Penetrating Keratoplasty Jacky Yeung MSc MD, Stephanie Baxter MD FRCS(C) Department of Ophthalmology, Hotel Dieu Hospital,
Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty with a Graft Insertion Device : Technique and Early Results Dr Wei-Boon KHOR, MRCS(Ed), Dr Jodhbir.
Successful Use of Corneal Tissue from LASIK Donors in Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Case Series Mark D. Mifflin, MD Majid Moshirfar,
J. Brian Foster, MD No Financial Disclosures
Outcomes of Transscleral Sulcus Fixation of Intraocular Lenses through a 2.4-mm Incision with an Injector System: 1-Year Follow-Up Akiko Masai, MD, Tomoichiro.
Daniel D. Hayes, MD1; Carolyn Y. Shih, MD1; David C
Risk Factors and Outcomes of Donor Lenticule Dislocation Following DSEK Pravin K Vaddavalli MD, Suntia Chaurasia MD, Muralidhar Ramappa MD, Prashant Garg.
Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK) Vs Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK) in patients with Keratoconus (KC). Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital.
Jodhbir S Mehta, Donald Tan The Authors have a financial Interest in the Endoglide patent/royalty.
Etiological and decision making factors for repeat DSAEK or PK in cases of failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty First and Presenting.
DSEK for the treatment of endothelial disease in India -Initial Experience in 80 eyes- Authors have no financial interest Dr Ashish Nagpal MD, FRCS Dr.
Comparison of Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) Visual Outcomes with OCT Derived Corneal Thickness Measurements Authors Abraham K. Sleem, MD Robert L. Schultze,
Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty by novice endothelial keratoplasty surgeons Jason W. Much, M.D. 1 Paul M. Phillips, M.D. 1,2 Leslie.
First 25 Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Outcomes for an Experienced DSAEK Surgeon Authors: Victoria Epstein, MS.,DO, Josh Wallsh, MS-III,
Predicting Visual Acuity after Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty using Corneal Topography, Pachymetry and Posterior Curvature Asymmetry Indices.
Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK) in patients with prior Trabeculectomy or Tube shunt surgery. Thadani S.M. Fynn-Thompson N. Authors.
Effect of Donor Processing and Storage Time and Preoperative Endothelial Cell Counts on DSAEK Detachment Rates Daniel Demsey BScE Stephanie Baxter MD,
Varsha Rathi DO, P K Vaddavalli MS, S Murthy MS, V S Sangwan, MS
Corneal Endothelium Single layer of cells on the inner surface.
Late In-the-bag Intraocular Lens Dislocation:
Outcomes and Complications of DSEK in Eyes with Tube shunts or ACIOLs
World Cornea Congress VI April 7-9, 2010
Special considerations for DSEK in monocameral eyes
DSAEK using corneas with previous LASIK
Endothelial keratoplasty in failed grafts
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.
Anil Vedula MD Financial Disclosures: None Richard M. Awdeh MD
Hong A, Boehlke CS, Afshari NA, Kim T Duke University Medical Center
No Financial Interest in Study Material
Effects of Donor Age and Other Factors For Graft Dislocation Following Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Carver AA, Chen GW, Stone DU Department.
Michael R. Banitt, MD, João Baptista Malta, MD, Roni M
Amit Patel, FRCOphth Massimo Busin, MD
Traumatic Wound Dehiscence After Corneal Keratoplasty
Glaucoma Progression after Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Neelofar Ghaznawi MD, Melissa B Daluvoy MD, Ajoy Virdi MD, Edwin S Chen, Kristin.
Role of HSV Infection in the Histopathology of Failed DSAEK
Intraocular lens (IOL) Dislocation
Anand K Shah MD1 Neda Shamie MD1 Paul Phillips MD1 Mark A Terry MD1,2*
Postoperative Complications Following Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients with Prior Glaucoma Surgery Melissa B Daluvoy.
The S. Fyodorov EYE MICROSURGERY STATE INSTITUTION, Moscow, Russia,
Presentation transcript:

Outcomes of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in patients with a Pre-Existing Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens S. Elderkin1A, E. Tu1A, J. Sugar1A, S. Reddy1A, A. Kadakia1B, R. Ramaswamy1B, Djalilian1A  AOphthalmology, BMedical School, 1Univ of Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, Chicago, IL; Abstract Results (con’d) Purpose:  This study was performed to evaluate the outcome of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) in patients with a retained anterior chamber intraocular lens (ACIOL). Methods: Retrospective review of 11 patients with corneal decompensation an ACIOL who underwent DSAEK in the 2 year period. All patients except one had an open loop style ACIOLs, and in all cases, there was adequate anterior chamber depth. At the time of surgery, 6 patients had a temporary suture to secure their graft, 2 of which were retained from the suture method and the other 4 were placed additionally. Postoperatively, the rate of donor detachment, graft clarity, corneal pachymetry and visual acuity were noted.  This was one of the 5 patients who did not have a suture holding the graft. The dislocated graft was successfully reattached with an air bubble. The mean follow up period was 12 months (range 6 - 25 mos). By 6 months, all patients had experienced at least a 2 line improvement in their visual acuity except for patient #6 who had limited visual potential and patient #3, whose graft never completely cleared (primary graft failure). Patient #3 had required excessive manipulation intraoperatively to unfold the graft and therefore was considered iatrogenic failure. This patient has subsequently undergone a repeat DSAEK and at the 4 month follow-up was found to have a clear graft with UCVA of 20/70 and a CCT of 675µm (data not included). The final visual acuities in most patients were limited because of comorbidities (listed below). None of the 11 patients experienced acute graft rejection. In all patients except patient #3, the central corneal thickness (CCT) after DSAEK was lower compared to before surgery. The mean thickness pre-operatively was 910 µm (range 777 -1000+µm). The average CCT at the last recorded follow-up for the 10 successful cases was 668µm (range 595 - 785µm). (Fig 1). A Introduction Fig 1:  Patient #10 below after DSAEK demonstrating existing ACIOL and a clear graft Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) is now the preferred treatment for patients with symptomatic corneal edema whose pathology is limited to the endothelium.1, 2 It has several advantages over penetrating keratoplasty, most notably, a more rapid visual recovery, less induced astigmatism, and greater resistance to trauma post-operatively. Currently, the most popular technique for EK is the Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK).1, 2 Pseudophakic corneal edema is one of the most common indications for DSAEK. However, most reported cases involve patients with posterior chamber lenses.1, 2 Patients with an ACIOL and corneal endothelial decompensation, however, may also be candidates for DSAEK. Typically, if the ACIOL is felt to be directly responsible for the endothelial failure, an IOL exchange is indicated either prior to or at the time of DSAEK. However, in cases where the ACIOL is not considered the primary reason for the endothelial decompensation and there is adequate anterior chamber depth, it may be more desirable to leave the ACIOL in place. The presence of the ACIOL, however, can pose additional challenges during DSAEK. Specifically, it can interfere with the surgical placement of the donor graft while making it difficult to maintain an air bubble in the anterior chamber. Given these challenges some surgeons may lean towards exchanging the IOL prior to DSAEK in patients with an ACIOL.3 This series examines the early outcomes of DSAEK in patients with adequate anterior chamber where the ACIOL was left in place. Summary     This series confirms previous smaller reports that for select patients with corneal decompensation and an ACIOL, DSAEK without IOL exchange may be a viable alternative in order to minimize the risks of an IOL exchange. These patients include those with adequate anterior chamber depth whose risk of subsequent damage by the ACIOL is minimal. Moreover, this series demonstrates that the use of a suture, either as part of the insertion technique or as a “safety suture” at the end of the case may help reduce the risk of graft detachment without any significant adverse effects on the short term results. Further long term studies, including endothelial cell counts, are necessary to further confirm these results.  Patient Age Detached Day1? Clear or Failed? VA Pre, Post U or BCVA Comorbidities Pachy (6mos) Follow-up (mos.) 1 55 N Clear CF @ 3, 20/100 UCVA PDR, Fuchs 715 25 2 81 CF @ 2, 20/50 BCVA none 670 12 3 76 Edema 20/200, 20/100 ACG 973 4 77 Y 20/400, 20/70 RD 603 21 5 65 CF, 20/200 Acantham, RD, Prior PK 785 6 64 20/400, 20/300 Uveitic Glaucoma 676 17 7 78 20/300, 20/50 Glaucoma 725 8 85 20/400, 20/200 ARMD 660 13 9 70 20/200, 20/50 623 10 73 Chronic CME 595 11 CF, 20/60 Prior PK Results     A total of 11 eyes were identified and the clinical features of each patient are summarized in Table 1. The mean age at the time of DSAEK was 72 years (range 55 to 85 years). The time from ACIOL to DSAEK ranged from 6 months to 30 years. All patients except for one had an open loop style ACIOLs, patient #7, who had a closed loop ACIOL which had led to corneal decompensation over the course of 30 years. The primary etiology of the corneal decompensation in the other patients included complicated cataract surgery, multiple intraocular procedures, graft failure, and Fuchs dystrophy. There were no major intraoperative complications. There was one complete graft dislocation into the anterior chamber on POD 1 (#4). Table 1. Patients who underwent DSAEK from 10/06 to 11/08 References 1. Price MO, Price FW. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2007 Jul;18(4):290-4. 2. Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, Hoar KL, Friend DJ. Endothelial keratoplasty a simplified technique to minimize graft dislocation, iatrogenic graft failure, and pupillary block. Ophthalmology 2008 Jul;115(7):1179-86. 3. Wylegala E, Tarnawska D. Management of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy by combined descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty and intraocular lens exchange. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008 Oct;34(10):1708-14.