DUAL POLARIZATION AND ZDR CALIBRATION IMPROVEMENTS 5.2(6)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POLARIMETRIC RADAR IMPROVEMENTS
Advertisements

Radial-by-Radial Noise Power Estimation Igor Ivić and Christopher Curtis CIMMS/University of Oklahoma and NSSL/National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Software Development & Maintenance Process
CLEAN-AP Update Cl utter E nvironment An alysis using A daptive P rocessing Sebastián Torres and David Warde CIMMS/The University of Oklahoma and National.
Page 1 Operational use of dual- polarisation: lessons learned at Météo France after 8 years of experience at all wavelengths (S / C / X) P. Tabary Météo.
NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.
21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Future QPE: Dual-Pol and Gap-Filler Radars Kevin Scharfenberg University of Oklahoma/CIMMS.
Direct PM 2.5 Emissions Data, Testing, and Monitoring Issues Ron Myers Measurement Policy Group SPPD, OAQPS.
DUAL-POLARIZATION OF WSR-88D NETWORK
Radar-Derived Rainfall Estimation Presented by D.-J. Seo 1 Hydrologic Science and Modeling Branch Hydrology Laboratory National Weather Service Presented.
Rainfall Monitioring Using Dual-polarization Radars Alexander Ryzhkov National Severe Storms Laboratory / University of Oklahoma, USA.
Staggered PRT Update Part I Sebastián Torres and David Warde CIMMS/The University of Oklahoma and National Severe Storms Laboratory/NOAA NEXRAD TAC Norman,
What can Dual-Polarization Doppler Radar Do for You? Neil Fox Department of Atmospheric Science University of Missouri - Columbia.
DITSCAP Phase 2 - Verification Pramod Jampala Christopher Swenson.
Surveillance Weather Radar 2000 AD. Weather Radar Technology- Merits in Chronological Order WSR-57 WSR-88D WSR-07PD.
Data Windowing in ORDA Technical Briefing Sebastián Torres 1,2, Chris Curtis 1,2, Rodger Brown 2, and Michael Jain 2 1 Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale.
11/18/02Technical Interchange Meeting Progress in FY-02 Research RDA –Capability to collect time series data –Control of phase shifter Phase coding –Sigmet’s.
March 14, 2006Intl FFF Workshop, Costa Rica Weather Decision Technologies, Inc. Hydro-Meteorological Decision Support System Bill Conway, Vice President.
Proposed revision of ITU-R Recommendation providing EESS (active) Performance and Interference Criteria May 13, 2015 Committee On Radio Frequencies Thomas.
1. 1. Overview: Telecommunications Project  Planning and implementation (2007-today) 2. Discussion: Proposal to Improve Infrastructure  Upgrade horizontal.
Mark Heggli Innovative Hydrology, Inc. Consultant to the World Bank Expert Real-time Hydrological Technology Module 1: Essential Elements of a Hydrological.
Installation and Maintenance of Health IT Systems
Software Engineering Lecture # 17
Event Management & ITIL V3
Module 4: Systems Development Chapter 12: (IS) Project Management.
Dual-Polarization Operations Assessment Status Update on Development Process Progress on RDA work Progress on RPG work Where we are with Beta and Deployment.
COMET HYDROMET Enhancements to PPS Build 10 (Nov. 1998) –Terrain Following Hybrid Scan –Graphical Hybrid Scan –Adaptable parameters appended to.
Technical Interchange Meeting Spring 2008: Status and Accomplishments.
Radiometric Correction and Image Enhancement Modifying digital numbers.
A Hardware Perspective DUAL POLARIZATION UPGRADE.
The new DWD polarimetric weather radar network: a new radar data processing framework and new products Michael Frech 1, Nils Rathmann 2, Jörg Steinert.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 In Situ SST for Satellite Cal/Val and Quality Control Alexander Ignatov.
Radar Palet e Home Dual Polarized Analysis & Diagnosis 1 Precipitation Phase – Radar Signatures Radar characteristics of precipitation types –Stratiform.
1 WP2: Communications Links and Networking – update on progress Mihael Mohorčič Jozef Stefan Institute.
What to make of this new radar technology Luke Madaus, UW Atmospheric Sciences 11/2/2011.
Sebastian Torres NEXRAD Range-Velocity Ambiguity Mitigation Fall 2004 – Technical Interchange Meeting.
Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.
NCAR Activity Update John Hubbert, Cathy Kessinger, Mike Dixon, Scott Ellis, Greg Meymaris and Frank Pratte To the NEXRAD TAC October 2005 San Diego,
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
WSR-88D PRECIPITATION ESTIMATION FOR HYDROLOGIC APPLICATIONS DENNIS A. MILLER.
BME 353 – BIOMEDICAL MEASUREMENTS AND INSTRUMENTATION MEASUREMENT PRINCIPLES.
Integration of Pulse The process of summing all the radar pulses to improve detection is known as “Pulse integration” A search-radar beam scans, the target.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Estimating Rainfall in Arizona - A Brief Overview of the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing Subsystem Jonathan J. Gourley National Severe Storms Laboratory.
Observations of Specific Differential Phase, KDP Chris Collier Acknowledgements: Lindsay Bennett, Alan Blyth and David Dufton.
PRESENTATION SATRACK DIPTI ON SUBMITTED BY : EC (3) BBDESGI
Travis Smith U. Of Oklahoma & National Severe Storms Laboratory Severe Convection and Climate Workshop 14 Mar 2013 The Multi-Year Reanalysis of Remotely.
Core Competencies Training for Supervisors
Chapter 18 Maintaining Information Systems
Core Competencies Training for Supervisors
X-band Mobile Radar Data Update
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Sixth Edition
NPOL Olympex Located N/ W, 157 m ASL
11 ii. Develop a plan for aDSM
Impact of Wind Turbines
Software Project Management
A dual-polarization QPE method based on the NCAR Particle ID algorithm Description and preliminary results Michael J. Dixon1, J. W. Wilson1, T. M. Weckwerth1,
THE PROCESS OF EMBEDDED SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Overview Calibration Exciter Receiver Oscillators
Technology Planning.
1 Stadium Company Network. The Stadium Company Project Is a sports facility management company that manages a stadium. Stadium Company needs to upgrade.
Maintaining Information Systems (SAD- 18)
Update on “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems” Document
Presenter: Kate Bell, MA PIP Reviewer
M. Kezunovic (P.I.) S. S. Luo D. Ristanovic Texas A&M University
Chapter 18 Maintaining Information Systems
GL 51 – Statistical evaluation of stability data
IT Next – Transformation Program
Presentation transcript:

DUAL POLARIZATION AND ZDR CALIBRATION IMPROVEMENTS 5.2(6) March 1, 2017 Christina Horvat NWS Radar Operations Center

Since Dual Polarization Deployment We learned there are many contributing factors that can lead to radars being out of calibration and negative impacts to data quality. Specifically, the Radar Operations Center has studied the sources of systemic biases and proposed modifications to improve the baseline calibration process. We completed an assessment outlining five findings and recommending twenty three solutions. The recommendations were developed into a comprehensive action plan. Twenty three solutions were broken down into four Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) based on the amount of time and resources required to complete the work.

2017 Work In Progress With dual polarization modification and upgrades with the digital receiver and signal processor, there exists an opportunity to vastly improve data quality. In 2017, we continue support for differential reflectivity calibration by investigating technical sub-elements of the Cross Polarization Power Dual Polarization Calibration method, including solar and ground clutter scans. Calibration stability issues are being explored including possible temperature effects on antenna bias and on transmit power division. Work includes CMD algorithm support, Hybrid Spectrum Width Estimator, investigation of a new spectral clutter filter (CLEAN AP), with emphasis on Staggered PRT Clutter Filtering support. Work includes CMD algorithm support, Hybrid Spectrum Width Estimator, investigation of a new spectral clutter filter (CLEAN AP), with emphasis on Staggered PRT Clutter Filtering support. Work also includes improving Dual Polarization variable data quality and system noise estimation techniques.

Software and Hardware Improvements for ZDR Calibration ECP 715 focuses on improving ZDR calibration methods associated with RDA test software. A refinement to Suncheck Sub-test 1 was accomplished. Technical manual updates were done that streamline the process. CW test signal timing and receive linearity tests were updated. Remaining work focuses on improved solar scans for obtaining pedestal pointing corrections, absolute antenna gain and differential antenna bias. ECP 716 is to migrate separate tools to the NEXRAD Radar Product Generator for analyzing ZDR bias from external targets (rain, snow, Bragg Scatter, sun). The ability to monitor calibration status is needed for performance measurement and future improvements. It also lays ground work for eventual migration of the bias estimation process to the RDA. The implementation of external target monitoring to the RPG is included in RPG Build 18.

Software and Hardware Improvements for ZDR Calibration (Continued) ECP 718 is to improve Dual-Polarization hardware calibration and testing. The in-field calibration routine for the RF Pallet and AME equipment is cumbersome, difficult to execute and in some cases inaccurate. The calibration routine needs update and depot-level expertise needs to be developed. The task focuses on hardware in the RF Pallet, including the critical test couplers. One of the six identified projects was completed. The task completed ensured that all sites were using the correct factory measured values for the coupling factors. Future work includes improved methods for estimating the coupling factors based on engineering analysis and testing at the ROC. ECP 4(TBD) is dependent on the outcome of the other ECPs. ECP 4 provides for RDA hosted external target ZDR calibration, to correct transmit and receive paths using external targets, cross polarization power calibration, and performance check box scans.

Provide ZDR Bias Adjustment Option for the Radar Product Generator Due to current limitations of WSR-88D hardware, it is very difficult to eliminate a bias in ZDR through current calibration procedures. Dual polarization products, such as hydrometeor classification and rainfall estimates, have suffered whenever the bias exceeds the specifications for the algorithms that create those products. The success of dual polarization has often been measured by the improvement in quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE), the algorithm for which is highly dependent upon a well-calibrated system for reflectivity and ZDR. Even though +/- 0.2 dB is considered to be the recommended range of acceptable ZDR bias values, many WSR-88D systems have exceeded these limits for months or longer periods of time, resulting in rainfall underestimates or overestimates. Recently, three methods of estimating the ZDR bias have been used: Bragg scatter, dry snow, and rain. These are measured routinely. In 2018, we plan to use the ZDR bias estimates to make a correction to RPG ZDR used by algorithms such as the Hydrometeor Classification Algorithm (HCA) and dual pol QPE. This corrected ZDR will also be visible in Level III ZDR products.

Reference Data and Current Status Fleet wide ZDR data have been processed monthly since October 2014. The ROC monitors ZDR biases using external hydrometeor targets. Methods are used to show when sites have significant absolute systematic ZDR biases (e.g. > 0.20 dB). The methods, when compared to the hardware calibration measurements and configuration parameters, have been used successfully to indicate trends and to isolate gross potential component failures and/or human errors. On a site-by-site basis, the ROC and the field sites are successfully cooperating to correct sites exhibiting poor calibration, and bring them back into acceptable tolerance. At this time, the ROC estimates that between 60 and 70 percent of the sites are operating within the 0.2 dB margin.