Tax Foreclosed Property

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Highland Park, Illinois Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
Advertisements

Problem Properties Unit MN APA Conference September 22, 2008 Duluth, Minnesota
March Board Meeting March 27, Background 106 & 108 Como Ave Zoned as small business in residential area Put up for sale in 2008 for $100,000 and.
There Must Be 50 Ways to Dispose of Tax Delinquent Lands. Or…….. what happens to delinquent parcels once they leave the county.
to 2015 Operating Budgets Governance & Priorities Committee March 7, 2013.
A New Future for Our Old Places Liz Hersh, Executive Director, Housing Alliance of PA.
City of Fillmore Midyear Budget Recap March 27, 2012.
A City Council Workshop on Redevelopment July 12, 2011.
1111 Operating Budget – March 5, Council Budget Direction – April 2012  City will move to three year budget cycle  City will hold tax increases.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania October 6, 2011 The Partnership Potential of Municipal Land Banks and Community Land Trusts: Land Banks 101 Dan Kildee, Center.
Land Bank Program A Briefing to the Housing Committee Housing/Community Services Department September 21, 2015.
Tax Foreclosed Properties Housing Committee September 21, 2015.
2013 City Budget August 14 – Public Hearing Budget Overview $416,171 increase for FT/PT employee salaries (1.7% COLA; 2.0% merit; plus negotiated.
FEBRUARY 22, 2016 FY 2017 County Administrator’s Recommended Budget.
April 4, 2011 Presented by Christopher Norman – Executive Director Banking on Abandoned Properties Brownfields 2011 Conference.
Structure Stabilization Program Additional Tools In The Tool Box 1.
Economic Development Agreements with Radio Shack City of Fort Worth Housing and Economic Development Department May 18, 2010.
1 Homestead Exemption Presented to the City Council by Horatio Porter, Budget Officer January 21, 2010.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Tuesday, May 3 rd, 2016.
CITY OF DEKALB CITY OF DEKALB 2015 Property Tax Levy Presented to Finance Advisory Committee October 27, 2015.
Discussion of Crime Control Prevention District Telecommunications Services Sales Tax & Legislative Changes Related to Local Sales & Use Tax on Residential.
1 Presented to the City Council by Horatio Porter, Budget Officer September 15, 2009 Overview of FY2010 Budget.
CITY OF FORT WORTH PERFORMANCE PRESENTATION APRIL 10, 2012.
Updated Revenue Projections Fiscal Year 2012 Hampton City Council March 23, 2011 Revenue Projections 2012.
City of La Palma The Path to Fiscal Sustainability: FY Budget Adjustments and Long-Term Response Discussion September 18, 2012.
1 Budget Presentation Fiscal Year 2011 May 10, 2010.
1 TIF 9 (Trinity River Vision) Expanded and Updated Project and Financing Plans December 8, 2009 Presented to the City Council Jay Chapa Housing & Economic.
Ambassadors for Aging Well
Stormwater Utility City of Rowlett
Rosalie DeLarme Program Manager Department of Code Enforcement
The Future of Redevelopment in Folsom:
CITY SERVICES INSTITUTE
Michigan Community Resources Tuesday, July 8, 2014
New Online Land Inventory
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AUGUST 24, 2017 REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CHARTER THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH.
2018 Proposed Executive Budget
CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH
CITY OF WASECA 2017 Property Tax Levy Based on Recommended Budget Truth In Taxation Meeting December 6, 2016.
Montgomery County Capital & Operating Budget Process Briefing
City of Tucson: Financial Sustainability Plan
Strategic Revenue & Expenditure Discussion
City of Inglewood Fiscal Year MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW
Community Development November 2011
Budgeting for Outcomes:
Update on 440 Oakland Avenue Note Sale
Solanco School District Preliminary Budget
Property Tax Reform The League of Oregon Cities is committed to assisting with the passage of legislation that will enhance local decision-making, provide.
Mid-Year Financial Review Fiscal Year
Housing Department Update
City Council Meeting December 6, 2017
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK JULY 24, 2017 UPDATE REGARDING THE CALIFORNIA VOTER PARTICIPATION RIGHTS ACT (CVPRA) AND THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S.
Presentation to Cornwall City Council
Housing Policy Meeting #2
Building & Housing CDBG Budget Hearing February 2018
City Council Item 11 March 5, 2018
Proposed 2018 Budget Truth In Taxation Hearing December 5, 2017
Third Quarter, FY 2017 Financial Reports
Creating Conservation Funding in Chelan
Rate Commission Meeting
Introduction of Five Year
Vital services provided by LCU
Evanston FY 2018 Proposed Budget Presentation October 16, 2017.
2019 TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
Accessory Dwelling Units: Maximum Unit Size and Residential Impact Fee
West Contra Costa Unified School District May 18, 2011
Urgency Ordinance Amending Butte County Code Chapter 53
FINANCE & ECONOMIC STATUS REPORT
EVANSTON City Council Goals - Mid-year Update
Initiation of City/County Committee Process Resolution # A temporary committee to study cost saving measures and ideas between Chemung County.
Presentation transcript:

Tax Foreclosed Property Presented by Jesus Chapa, Director Housing and Economic Development April 10, 2012

Presentation Overview Update Regarding Sale of Tax-Foreclosed Property Request for Council Direction on Future Sales 2

= Tax Foreclosed Property 9

How does the City receive tax foreclosed properties? Each month Tarrant County holds a sale of properties foreclosed for non-payment of taxes. Properties located in Fort Worth which do not receive a bid are “struck off” to the City. The City holds the properties as trustee for all taxing entities must market and sell the properties. The sales proceeds (minus fees and lien releases) are divided amongst the various entities that were a party to the lawsuit. 3

How Does the City Sell Tax Foreclosed Properties? Direct Sale – Strategic Areas: An interested buyer must approach the City with a request to purchase the property. Must show how the property will be developed and funding New development must comply with zoning Allows the City to control the type of development that occurs in the strategic areas Sealed Bid Sale – Non Strategic Areas: Properties are added to bid sale once staff has verified the following: Zoning complies with Comprehensive Plan If not in compliance, work with Planning and Development to re-zone 4

Inventory Reduction 2010 – Over 1000 tax foreclosed properties Summer 2010 – March 2012 sold 523 properties for almost $3.4 million. City has received an estimated $1,420,000 Over $550,000 in city fees and lien release payments Over $870,000 in taxes $500 for mowing – Goes to Parks $600 for Board up or Demo– if this was done– goes to Code If funds remaining from sales proceeds– HED gets $500– to cover filing deeds and lien releases -- does not go into our budget– goes into General Fund Revenue- 5

Current Inventory Status 7-15 properties a month are “struck off” to the City 645 properties in the inventory as of March 2012. Of these, 266 are available for sealed bid sale. The remaining 379 are in strategic areas and must be sold via direct sale. Sealed bid sales are held every other month to reduce the inventory, but these sales do not address the 379 properties in strategic areas. 6

Tax Foreclosed Properties 7

Issues Related with a Large Inventory Lost tax revenues Ongoing mowing and maintenance costs Resources not available to fully manage which leads to: Illegal dumping Illicit uses Deterioration of properties Loss of opportunity for development 8

Breakout of Strategic Area 379 Properties in Strategic Area: 241 vacant residential lots 62 improved residential lots 43 vacant commercial lots 31 improved commercial lots 2 duplexes Source: TAD 9

CD #2 = Strategic Area Boundary = Tax Foreclosed Property 11

CD #3 = Strategic Area Boundary = Tax Foreclosed Property 12 NOTE: CD 3 has two strategic areas. There are no tax foreclosed properties in either area. 12

CD #4 = Strategic Area Boundary = Tax Foreclosed Property 13

CD #5 = Strategic Area Boundary = Tax Foreclosed Property 14

CD #6 = Strategic Area Boundary = Tax Foreclosed Property 15

CD #7 = Strategic Area Boundary = Tax Foreclosed Property 16

CD #8 = Strategic Area Boundary = Tax Foreclosed Property 17

CD #9 = Strategic Area Boundary = Tax Foreclosed Property 18

Strategic Area Properties Non Strategic Area Properties Detailed Inventory CD Strategic Area Properties Non Strategic Area Properties # of Properties TAD Value 2 51 $2,061,644 45 $1,336,960 3 $0 5 $327,832 4 10 $362,301 $157,512 169 $2,583,187 61 $2,181,578 6 $112,659 $78,060 7 93 $1,436,480 8 $1,583,773 52 $762,160 113 $4,642,761 9 $80,450 28 $567,160 TOTAL 379 $7,398,881 266 $10,875,636 19

Strategic Area Properties Non Strategic Area Properties Time In Inventory Years In Inventory Strategic Area Properties Non Strategic Area Properties # of Properties TAD Value 12+ 83 $905,577 46 $1,283,808 7-12 113 $1,774,440 53 $3,163,258 4-6 91 $1,843,190 36 $2,541,018 3 39 $1,800,648 13 $1,061,811 2 23 $715,292 34 $713,564 1 or less 30 $1,436,480 84 $2,112,177 TOTAL 379 $7,398,881 266 $10,875,636 20

Time In Inventory Average Non Strategic: 5 years, 8 months Strategic: 21

Expenses to Manage Police Department Fire Department calls to properties to address complaints Fire Department calls to properties to address fires Parks & Community Services Department mowing Code Compliance Department board –up Housing and Economic Development management 22

Parks & Community Services Mowing of Tax Foreclosed Properties 2010: Total: $768,900.20 Properties – 1170 Mowing Cycle – 35 days Cost – $73.02 9 mows per year 2011: Total: $590,804.82 Properties – 899 23

Code Compliance Department Board-Up of Tax Foreclosed Properties 2010: Total: $10,015 # of Board-Ups: 14 Avg. Cost per board-up: $715.36 2011: Total: $38,044 # of Board-Ups: 34 Avg. Cost per board-up: $1,118.94 2012*: Total: $19,718 # of Board-Ups: 10 Avg. Cost per board-up: $1,971.80 *From October 2011- March 2012 24

Code Compliance Department Demolition of Tax Foreclosed Properties 2010: Total: $529,991 # of Demos: 13 Avg. Cost per Demo: $40,768 2011: Total: $180,894 # of Demos: 49 Avg. Cost per Demo: $3,692 2012*: Total: $34,051 # of Demos: 6 Avg. Cost per Demo: $5,675 *From October 2011- March 2012 25

Code Compliance Department Clean-Up of Tax Foreclosed Properties 2010: Total: $16,203 # of Clean-ups: 3 Avg. Cost per Clean-up: $5,401 2011: Total: $37,104 # of Clean-ups: 8 Avg. Cost per Clean-up: $4,638 2012*: Total: $3,208 # of Clean-ups: 1 Avg. Cost per Clean-up: $3,208 *From October 2011 - March 2012 26

Options to Reduce Inventory Eliminate strategic areas – sell all tax foreclosed properties through bid sales Reduce the number and/or size of strategic areas Keep current procedures, however, adopt policy that properties can only be kept for a specific time period (for example 2 yrs.) before being placed on a bid sale. No change in current procedures 27

Next Steps Meet with City Council members individually to discuss: potential of reducing the size of strategic areas potential of reducing the number of strategic areas Potential for setting a time limit on properties whereby they become eligible for bid sales Present to City Council, as part of the budget process, any recommended changes to the current process 28

Questions/Discussion? 29