Computational Prediction of Mechanical Performance of Particulate-Reinforced Al Metal-Matrix Composites (MMCs) using a XFEM Approach Emily A. Gerstein.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mechanics of Composite Materials
Advertisements

Chap.8 Mechanical Behavior of Composite
ME 240: Introduction to Engineering Materials Chapter 8. Failure 8.1 CHAPTER 8.
ME 388 – Applied Instrumentation Laboratory Fatigue Lab.
Powder Production through Atomization & Chemical Reactions N. Ashgriz Centre for Advanced Coating Technologies Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering.
The American University in Cairo Mechanical Engineering Department MENG 426: Metals, Alloys & Composites Interactive MENG 426 Lab Tutorials Experiment.
Modeling of CNT based composites: Numerical Issues
Sharif Rahman The University of Iowa Iowa City, IA January 2005 STOCHASTIC FRACTURE OF FUNCTIONALLY GRADED MATERIALS NSF Workshop on Probability.
Japan-US Workshop held at San Diego on April 6-7, 2002 How can we keep structural integrity of the first wall having micro cracks? R. Kurihara JAERI-Naka.
Engineering materials
Manufacturing with Composite
There is a demand in the market for producing lighter and stronger composite materials.There is a demand in the market for producing lighter and stronger.
Assist.Prof.Dr. Ahmet Erklig
CH3 MICROMECHANICS Assist.Prof.Dr. Ahmet Erklig. Ultimate Strengths of a Unidirectional Lamina.
Fracture of Divertor Structures Jake Blanchard ARIES Meeting April 2011.
CHAPER THREE COMPOSITES MATERIALS REINFORCED POLYMER Introduction The major problem in the application of polymers in engineering is their low stiffness.
Miguel Patrício CMUC Polytechnic Institute of Leiria School of Technology and Management.
1 Chap. 9 Design of Composite Materials 9-1. Advantages of Composite Materials in Structural Design The main advantages of using composites in structural.
Mechanical Properties
Mechanical Engineering Department Advanced Composites Dr. Talal Mandourah 1 Lecture 1 ADVANCED COMPOSITES.
Constitutive modeling of viscoelastic behavior of CNT/Polymer composites K. Yazdchi 1, M. Salehi 2 1- Multi scale Mechanics (MSM), Faculty of Engineering.
November 14, 2013 Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) Arnab Ghosh Ph.D. Research Assistant Analytical Modeling of Surface and Subsurface.
AMML Effect of rise, peak and fall characteristics of CZM in predicting fracture processes.
Copyright Prentice-Hall Behavior and Manufacturing Properties of Part I Q1.1 (25): What is the difference between a material’s mechanical property and.
CHARACTERISATION OF ALUMINIUM 7075/SiCp COMPOSITES
Subject: Composite Materials Science and Engineering Subject code:
Welding Inspection and Metallurgy
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Namas Chandra and Sirish Namilae
7. Ceramic Matrix Composites Ceramic matrials strenth, stiffness temperature chemical inertness low density sensitive flaw thermal shock Ceramic matrix.
STRUCTURES Young’s Modulus. Tests There are 4 tests that you can do to a material There are 4 tests that you can do to a material 1 tensile This is where.
CRACK GROWTH IN NOTCHED SPECIMEN UNDER REPETITIVE IMPACTS Presented By: Gayan Abeygunawardane-Arachchige Gayan Abeygunawardane-Arachchige Prof. Vadim Silberschmidt.
6.1.3 In Situ Fabrication Techniques -Controlled unidirectional solidification of a eutectic alloy can result in a two-phase microstructure with one of.
The application of Composite materials
Pendahuluan Material Komposit
The various engineering and true stress-strain properties obtainable from a tension test are summarized by the categorized listing of Table 1.1. Note that.
Dual Phase Steels Producing a new high strength steels without reducing the formability or increasing costs.
Finite Element Modeling of Nacre
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING
Mechanical Properties
Dynamic Property Models
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Show relationship of stress and strain using experimental methods to determine stress-strain diagram of a specific material Discuss.
Samuel Sellner, Mechanical Engineering
selection of materials, stresses
– SOLID MECHANICS S.ARAVINDAN Lecturer
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Introduction to Composites
Dr. Thomas Pozegic Prof. S. R. P. Silva Dr. I. Hamerton
Material Properties Evaluation of Plastically-Deformed Metal via a Portable Indentation Device 구성용 이철용 김금동 장호현
Composites Composites form a class of materials that satisfy such rigid, often contradictory requirements as ensuring minimum construction mass, maximum.
Rigidity Modulus (Gpa)
Metal Matrix Composites
© 2016 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS
Chapter 3 Mechanical Properties of Materials
M. M. Shokrieh*, M. Salamat-talab
Poisons Ratio Poisons ratio = . w0 w Usually poisons ratio ranges from
Metal Matrix Composites
Chapter 2 Material and Manufacturing Properties
Lecture 4: Plastic Deformation
IDEAL VS REAL MATERIALS
Introduction to Materials Science and Engineering
Tutorial in Mechanical Properties
LECTURE-I Introduction Some important definitions
2 different distributions of Phases
PDT 153 Materials Structure And Properties
Simple Stresses & Strain
M. M. Shokrieh*, M. Salamat-talab
Mechanical Property 기계적 성질
Presentation transcript:

Computational Prediction of Mechanical Performance of Particulate-Reinforced Al Metal-Matrix Composites (MMCs) using a XFEM Approach Emily A. Gerstein and Chang-Soo Kim, Ph.D. Material Science and Engineering Department, CEAS, UWM 2017 Spring CEAS Undergraduate Poster Competition

Background Information Composite materials can offer an array of attractive properties for automotive and aerospace applications, including weight savings and increased critical load bearing capabilities. Silicon carbide (SiC) reinforced aluminum (Al) metal-matrix composites (MMCs) present a high stiffness-to-weight ratio, enhanced resistance to high cycle fatigue accompanied by a high threshold for fatigue cracking, improved wear resistance, a reduced coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), and a high thermal conductivity. The extended finite element method (XFEM) is an up-and-coming method for computationally predicting damage evolutions resulting from crack propagation within advanced composites. Fig. 1: Increased use of composites in aerospace applications1. Fig. 2: Projected use of composites in consumer vehicles2.

Experimental Characterization Data Property Considerations Research Objectives and Approach Development of a 2D XFEM approach for modeling damage evolution and crack propagation within particle reinforced Al-SiC MMCs. Prediction of stress-strain data and MMC failure mechanisms with various microstructural features and material properties such as particle arrangement, reinforcement volume fractions, and matrix critical strain energy release rates (G). This particular work utilizes 10, 20 and 30 vol % SiC in regular and random arrangements with variations in Al60601 G. Modeling Framework Experimental Characterization Data XFEM Shape Considerations Adaptive Remeshing scheme Property Considerations GIC Inclusion Size Vol % SiC Arrangement

Computational Methods SiC Al6061 Young’s Modulus (GPa) 350 80 Maximum Principle Stress (MPa) 205 Critical Energy Release Rate (J/m2) 5.26 1, 2, 5, 15, 30 Poisson’s Ratio 0.22 0.33 Table 1: XFEM composite material properties. 𝒖= 𝐼=1 𝑁 𝑁 𝐼 (𝑥) 𝒖 𝐼 +𝐻 𝑥 𝒂 𝐼 + 𝛼=1 4 𝐹 𝛼 (𝑥) 𝒃 𝐼 𝛼 XFEM Constitutive Relationship Study Assumptions and Approaches: Representative volume element (RVE) can represent the actual mechanical performance of composites. Therefore, Computation domains are representative of long-range material properties. Material properties are homogeneous in each phase (SiC reinforcement particles and Al metal matrix) and the two phases form coherent interfaces. The shape of reinforcement particles is spherical (circular in 2D).

Regular Particle Arrangement: Increasing Volume Fraction Regular, 10 vol % SiC, G = 30 J/m2 Initial 1.5% Strain 3% Strain Fig. 3: Stress-strain relationships in Al-SiC MMCs with regular particle distribution and varying particle volume fractions. Initial 1% Strain 2% Strain Regular, 20 vol % SiC, G = 30 J/m2

Random Particle Arrangement: Increasing Volume Fraction Fig. 4: Resulting stress-strain relationships in Al-Sic MMCs with random particle distribution with varying volume fraction. Initial 0.55% Strain 1.1% Strain Random 10 vol % SiC G = 30 J/m2

Regular Particle Arrangement: Increasing Fracture Energy Regular, 10 vol % SiC, G = 30 J/m2 Initial 1.5% Strain 3% Strain Fig. 5: Variation in stress-strain relationships with Al critical energy release rate in regularly distributed matrices with 10 vol % SiC. Initial 0.8% Strain 1.65% Strain Regular, 10 vol % SiC, G = 2 J/m2

Summary and Acknowledgements More regular arrangements of SiC particles within an Al matrix may allow for a stronger and more ductile materials. Yield and ultimate tensile strengths generally increase with increasing amount of reinforcement volume fractions at the expense of material ductility. These results demonstrate that XFEM can offer a viable means by which tensile data and information about the failure mechanisms of advanced composites, particularly those resulting from the propagation of flaws, may be garnered. Weak matrices with lower critical energy release rates are more prone to fracture at lower stress concentrations and under lower amounts of strain. This work was supported through the UWM College of Engineering and Applied Sciences Engineering Excellence Scholarship Program. Acknowledgements References Trilaksono, A., Waranabe, N., Kondo, A. et. al. (2014). Automatic damage detection and monitoring of a stitch laminate system using a fiber bragg grating strain sensor. Open Journal of Composite Materials, 4: 47-60. McConnell, V.P. (2011). Not just another road trip. Reinforced Plastics, 55(5): 3-54.