Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title Petrophysical Analysis of Fluid Substitution in Gas Bearing Reservoirs to Define Velocity Profiles – Application of Gassmann and Krief Models Digital.
Advertisements

The influence of wettability and carbon dioxide injection on hydrocarbon recovery Saif Al Sayari Martin J. Blunt.
Conductivity Testing of Unsaturated Soils A Presentation to the Case Western Reserve University May 6, 2004 By Andrew G. Heydinger Department of Civil.
Jan – Dec, 2006 University of Alaska – Fairbanks Pacific Northwest National Laboratory British Petroleum Exploration Alaska Injection of CO 2 for Recovery.
2010 SPWLA Topical Conference
Dual Mesh Method in Upscaling Pascal Audigane and Martin Blunt Imperial College London SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, 3-5 February 2003.
E. Putra, Y. Fidra and D.S. Schechter
HYDRUS_1D Sensitivity Analysis Limin Yang Department of Biological Engineering Sciences Washington State University.
Analysis of Production Data
Analysis of Layered Gas Reservoir Performance Using a Quasi-Analytical Solution for Rate and Pressure Behavior I Nengah Suabdi Department of Petroleum.
Predictive Pore-Scale Modelling
Saudi Aramco: Company General Use Testing the Predictive Value of Image-Based Computation of Relative Permeability Yildiray CINAR The 2 nd KFUPM workshop.
Introduction to Capillary Pressure Some slides in this section are modified from NExT PERF Short Course Notes, However, many of the slides appears.
Introduction to Effective Permeability and Relative Permeability
The Effect of Wettability on Relative Permeability, Capillary Pressure, Electrical Resistivity and NMR Saif AL-Sayari Prof. Martin Blunt.
Modeling and Measuring Water Saturation in Tight Gas Reservoirs Marcelo A Crotti Inlab S.A. INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON TIGHT GAS SANDS August 14th – 15th,
Principal Investigators: Ding Zhu and A. D. Hill
Go and look behind the Ranges – Something lost behind the Ranges.
OIL RECOVERY MECHANISMS AND THE MATERIAL BALANCE EQUATION
Property Scaling Relations for Nonpolar Hydrocarbons Sai R. Panuganti 1, Francisco M. Vargas 1, 2, Walter G. Chapman 1 1 Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering.
Estimation of parameters for simulation of steady state foam flow in porous media Kun Ma, Sibani Lisa Biswal and George J. Hirasaki Department of Chemical.
In the name of God Pore-Scale Modeling of Three-Phase Flow in Mixed-Wet Systems Mohammad Piri Martin Blunt Centre for Petroleum Studies Department of Earth.
CPGE Surfactant-Based Enhanced Oil recovery Processes and Foam Mobility Control Task 4: Simulation of Field-Scale Processes Center for Petroleum and Geosystems.
Soil Physics schedule: Overview on hydraulic characteristics
Capillary Pressure: Reservoir Seal Capillary Pressure / Saturation Relationship (S w * Model)
Identifying Applicability Domains for Quantitative Structure Property Relationships Mordechai Shacham a, Neima Brauner b Georgi St. Cholakov c and Roumiana.
Laboratory Measurement of Capillary Pressure
Fluid Saturation Introduction
Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations — Montney Shale Case Histories Yohanes ASKABE Department of Petroleum.
1 SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program Primary funding is provided by The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe.
Capillary Pressure Brooks and Corey Type Curve
Correlation of Solid Solubility for Biological Compounds in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide: Comparative Study Using Solution Model and Other Approaches Jaw-Shin.
A Semianalytical p/z Technique Abnormally Pressured Gas Reservoirs
Capillary Pressure and Saturation History Capillary Pressure in Reservoir Rock.
Net Pay Cutoffs from Capillary Pressure Andy May February 24, 2014.
Reservoirs Heterogeneity Characterization of the Shajara Member: Permo- Carboniferous Unayzah Formation *Al-Khidir, K. E., **Al-Laboun, A. A., ***AlQuraishi,
Research Institute of Petroleum Industry
Abnormally Pressured Gas Reservoirs
27 May, 2011 — College Station, TX Study of Nonideal and Secondary Fractures O.M. Olorode Slide — 1/18 A Numerical Study of Nonideal and Secondary Fractures.
Diffusivity Equations for Flow in Porous Media PETE 613 (2005A) Slide — 1 T.A. Blasingame, Texas A&M U. Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University.
Yohanes ASKABE Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) Slide — 1/80 Rate-Decline.
Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) Antu Xie Modelling Concepts for Fracture.
Capillary Pressure and Saturation History Capillary Pressure in Reservoir Rock .
Capillary End Effects during Core Flooding – Analytical Solutions and Capillary Numbers accounting for Saturation Functions Pål Østebø Andersen, Postdoc.
Algorithm of the explicit type for porous medium flow simulation
Hasan Nourdeen Martin Blunt 10 Jan 2017
The Development and Application of a New Semi-Analytical Model
Wettability in reservoir engineering.
Saudi Aramco – Course in Advanced Fluid PVT Behavior
On the equality of resistivity fractal dimension and geometric relaxation time fractal dimension of induced polarization for characterizing Shajara Reservoirs.
5. WEIGHT VOLUME RELATIONSHIPS
Impact of Flowing Formation Water on Residual CO2 Saturations
Gas Condensate Blockage
Capillary Pressure / Permeability Relations
Upscaling of 4D Seismic Data
Fluid Saturations Introduction
Introduction to Effective Permeability and Relative Permeability
Capillary Pressure Brooks and Corey Type Curve
Petrophysical study of Szolnok Formation, Endrod Gas Field, Hungary
Gas Condensate Blockage
Capillary Pressure and Saturation History Capillary Pressure in Reservoir Rock .
Induced Polarization Relaxation Time Fractal Dimension Derived from Capillary pressure data for characterizing Shajara Reservoirs of the shajara Formation.
Gas Condensate Blockage
Relative permeability
Capillary Pressure: Reservoir Seal Capillary Pressure / Saturation Relationship (Sw* Model) .
Capillary Pressure and Saturation History Capillary Pressure in Reservoir Rock .
Capillary Pressure: Reservoir Seal Capillary Pressure / Saturation Relationship (Sw* Model) .
Gas Condensate Blockage
MICP – typical data on small samples
Presentation transcript:

Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) Sarin Apisaksirikul +1.979.229.2702 sarin_a@tamu.edu 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Outline Capillary Pressure Thomeer MICP Model Brooks-Corey MICP Model Swanson Correlation Equivalence of Brooks-Corey and Thomeer-Swanson Models Method to Determine Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Examples Discussion Conclusion 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Capillary Pressure Cite References… 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Capillary Pressure ALWAYS use Equation Editor 3. 𝑝 𝑐 = 2𝜎𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃 𝑟 Washburn (1921): Leverett (1940): 𝐽( 𝑆 𝑤 )= 𝑝 𝑐 𝜎𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃 𝑘/𝜙 𝑘=10.66 (𝜎𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃) 2 𝐹𝜙 0 1 1 𝑝 𝑐 2 𝑑 𝑆 𝑤 Purcell (1949): 𝑘=0.136 𝜙 4.4 𝑆 𝑤𝑖 2 Timur (1968): Winland (1980): log 𝑅 35 =0.732 +0.588log𝑘 −0.864log𝜙 𝑘=389 𝑆 𝑏 𝑝 𝑐 𝐴 1.691 Swanson (1981): 𝑘=226 𝑙 𝑐 2 𝐹 Katz&Thompson (1986): 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Thomeer MICP Model (1960) 𝑺 𝒃 𝑺 𝒃∞ =𝐞𝐱𝐩 − 𝑭 𝒈 𝐥𝐧 𝒑 𝒄 𝒑 𝒅 ALWAYS use Equation Editor 3. 𝑺 𝒃 𝑺 𝒃∞ =𝐞𝐱𝐩 − 𝑭 𝒈 𝐥𝐧 𝒑 𝒄 𝒑 𝒅 Fg = Pore geometrical factor pc = Capillary pressure pd = Minimum "threshold" pressure at which a continuous phase exists in a porous medium Sb = Percent bulk volume occupied by mercury at a given capillary pressure Sb∞ mercury at infinite capillary Cite References… 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Brooks-Corey MICP Model (1964) Cite References… ALWAYS use Equation Editor 3. l = Pore-size distribution index. Sw* = Effective saturation function. Sw = Wetting phase saturation. Swi = Irreducible wetting phase saturation. pc = Capillary pressure. pd = Minimum "threshold" pressure at which a continuous phase exists in a porous medium. 𝒑 𝒄 = 𝒑 𝒅 ( 𝑺 𝒘 ∗ ) −𝟏/𝝀 𝑺 𝒘 ∗ = 𝑺 𝒘 − 𝑺 𝒘𝒊 𝟏− 𝑺 𝒘𝒊 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Swanson Correlation (1981) Cite References… Follow same guidance on x-axis and y-axis as in thesis. ALWAYS use Equation Editor 3. 𝒌 𝒂 =𝟑𝟖𝟗 𝑺 𝒃 𝒑 𝒄 𝑨 𝟏.𝟔𝟗𝟏 Air permeability 𝒌 𝒘 =𝟐𝟗𝟎 𝑺 𝒃 𝒑 𝒄 𝑨 𝟏.𝟗𝟎𝟏 Brine permeability 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Equivalence of Brooks-Corey and Thomeer-Swanson Models Brooks-Corey Model Thomeer-Swanson Model 𝒑 𝒄 = 𝒑 𝒅 ( 𝑺 𝒘 ∗ ) −𝟏/𝝀 Follow same guidance on x-axis and y-axis as in thesis. 𝒑 𝒄 = 𝒑 𝒅 𝝓− 𝑺 𝒃 𝟏− 𝑺 𝒘𝒊 −𝟏/𝝀 𝝓 −𝟏/𝝀 ALWAYS use Equation Editor 3. 𝑺 𝒃 𝒑 𝒄 = 𝝓 −𝟏/𝝀 𝒑 𝒅 𝝓− 𝑺 𝒃 𝟏− 𝑺 𝒘𝒊 −𝟏/𝝀 𝑺 𝒃 𝑺 𝒃 𝒑 𝒄 𝑨 = 𝒅 𝒅 𝑺 𝒃 𝑺 𝒃 𝒑 𝒄 =𝟎 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Equivalence of Brooks-Corey and Thomeer-Swanson Models ALWAYS use Equation Editor 3. 𝑺 𝒃 𝒑 𝒄 𝑨 =𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝟏 𝒑 𝒅 𝝀 𝟏+𝝀 (𝟏+ 𝟏 𝝀 ) (𝟏− 𝑺 𝒘𝒊 )𝝓 ( 𝑺 𝒃 ) 𝑨 =𝟏𝟎𝟎𝝓(𝟏− 𝑺 𝒘𝒊 ) 𝝀 𝝀+𝟏 𝑺 𝒘𝒊 =𝟏− ( 𝑺 𝒃 ) 𝑨 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝝓 𝟏+𝝀 𝝀 ( 𝒑 𝒄 ) 𝑨 = 𝒑 𝒅 𝟏 𝝀+𝟏 −𝟏/𝝀 𝝀= 𝒏 𝟏 + 𝒏 𝟐 𝒚 𝑫 + 𝒏 𝟑 𝒚 𝑫 𝟐 + 𝒏 𝟒 𝒚 𝑫 𝟑 + 𝒏 𝟓 𝒚 𝑫 𝟒 𝒅 𝟏 + 𝒅 𝟐 𝒚 𝑫 + 𝒅 𝟑 𝒚 𝑫 𝟐 + 𝒅 𝟒 𝒚 𝑫 𝟑 + 𝒅 𝟓 𝒚 𝑫 𝟒 Coefficient Optimized Value n1 0.000013 d1 -3.424593 n2 -4.338365 d2 3.995668 n3 0.322016 d3 0.000049 n4 -0.105426 d4 -0.149015 n5 -0.129459 d5 -0.405945 𝒚 𝑫 = 𝒆− ( 𝒑 𝒄 ) 𝑨 𝒑 𝒅 𝒆−𝟏 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Proposed Method pd Estimate pd using a semi-log plot of pc vs. Sw by extrapolation of the pc plateau trend to Sw = 1. Calculate for [Sb/pc] for the data set. Plot [Sb/pc] versus Sb on a Cartesian plot. Estimate (Sb)A from the Cartesian plot in Step 3 where the [Sb/pc] trend has a maximum (i.e., [Sb/pc]A). Calculate for (pc)A from [Sb/pc]A obtained in step 4 using the point (Sb)A. Solve for l from (pc)A obtained in Step 5 and pd obtained in Step 1. Solve for Swi from l obtained in Step 6. Follow same guidance on x-axis and y-axis as in thesis. (Sb/pc)A (Sb)A Follow same guidance on x-axis and y-axis as in thesis. 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Example 1 Sample #71 High quality MICP data set. pd and the Swanson Apex (Sb/pc)A can easily be identified. Both models capture the trend of the MICP data. Follow same guidance on x-axis and y-axis as in thesis. Follow same guidance on x-axis and y-axis as in thesis. 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Example 2 Sample #132 High quality MICP data set. pd and the Swanson Apex (Sb/pc)A can easily be identified. The MICP data does not match the Brooks-Corey model at low Sw. Follow same guidance on x-axis and y-axis as in thesis. Follow same guidance on x-axis and y-axis as in thesis. 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Discussion This method allows the determination of Swi and l directly from the clearly defined parameters such as pd and (Sb/pc)A. This method facilitates Brooks-Corey model matching over the use of regression. Many samples have MICP data deviated from Brooks-Corey model, especially at low Sw. This method helps identify if the MICP data follow Brooks-Corey model or not. Theoretically, l can be ranged from 0 to infinity. Our study found that l is never higher than 10 and unlikely to be higher than 5. We need to work on these … I would like to limit 1 line/bullet. We need to work on grammar and structure of words. 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Conclusion Capillary pressure critically affects reservoir initial fluid distribution and hydrocarbon recovery during primary or enhanced production. Relationship between capillary pressure, saturation, rock properties (porosity, permeability) exists. Brooks-Corey MICP model is widely accepted model to relate capillary pressure and wetting phase saturation. Brooks-Corey MICP model parameters are obtained by model matching using regression. Time consuming Subjective, many possible realizations Our proposed method facilitates the Brooks-Corey MICP model parameters determination. Direct calculation from the well defined parameters of displacement pressure and Swanson Apex. We need to work on these … I would like to limit 1 line/bullet. We need to work on grammar and structure of words. 2015 Student Paper Contest | 31 January 2015 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Complexity of Permeability Determination in Shale Gas Reservoirs Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) Sarin Apisaksirikul +1.979.229.2702 sarin_a@tamu.edu 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

References Huet, C. C. 2005. Semi-Analytical Estimates of Permeability Obtained from Capillary Pressure. MS thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas (December 2005). Wu, T. 2004. Permeability Prediction and Drainage Capillary Pressure Simulation in Sandstone Reservoirs. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas (December 2004). Thomeer, J.H.M. 1960. Introduction of a Pore Geometrical Factor Defined by the Capillary Pressure Curve. JPT 12(3): 73-77. doi:10.2118/1324-G. Brooks, R.H., Corey, A. T. 1964. Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media 3(3), Colorado State University Hydrology Papers. Swanson, B. F. 1981. A Simple Correlation Between Permeabilities and Mercury Capillary Pressures. Journal of Petroleum Technology 33 (12): 2498-2504. doi:10.2118/8234-PA. Comisky, J. T., Newsham, K., Rushing, J. A. et al. 2007. A Comparative Study of Capillary-Pressure-Based Empirical Models for Estimating Absolute Permeability in Tight Gas Sands. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, U.S.A., 11-14 November. SPE-110050-MS. doi:10.2118/110050-MS. Rezaee, R., Saeedi, A., Clennell, Ben. 2011. Tight Gas Sands Permeability Estimation From Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Data. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 88 - 89: 92-99. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2011.12.014. Blasingame, T.A.: “Petrophysics Lecture 4 – Capillary Pressure, ” Petroleum Engineering 620 Course Notes, Texas A&M University (2014). Leverett, M. 1941. Capillary behavior in porous solids. Transactions of the AIME. 142(01): 152-169. 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Derivation of the relationship between Swanson’s parameter and the Brooks-Corey model parameters 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Derivation of the relationship between Swanson’s parameter and the Brooks-Corey model parameters 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Derivation of the relationship between Swanson’s parameter and the Brooks-Corey model parameters 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Derivation of the relationship between Swanson’s parameter and the Brooks-Corey model parameters 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Derivation of the relationship between Swanson’s parameter and the Brooks-Corey model parameters 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Derivation of the relationship between Swanson’s parameter and the Brooks-Corey model parameters 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Estimation Function for Pore-Size Distribution Index (l) Eq. D6: Eq. D7: 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL

Brooks-Corey Log-log Plot of Sample #71 and #132 2016 Student Paper Contest | 30 January 2016 Texas A&M University | College Station, TX Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination Sarin APISAKSIRIKUL