Progress on Aid Effectiveness: Monitoring the Global Partnership and the Moldova Partnership Principles Lucreția Ciurea, State Chancellery Jakob Schemel, UN Moldova Donors’ Meeting, 28 November 2013

The global monitoring framework of indicators Indicator No Indicator description Country level Others 1 Development co-operation is focused on results that meet developing countries’ priorities X Piloted in 10 countries, including Moldova 2 Civil society operates within an environment that maximizes its engagement in and contribution to development   CIVICUS Enabling Environment Index 3 Engagement and contribution of the private sector to development Desk review in collaboration with the World Bank Institute 4 Transparency: information on development co-operation is publicly available TBD 5a+b Development co-operation is more predictable (annual and medium-term) 6 Aid is on budgets which are subject to parliamentary scrutiny 7 Mutual accountability strengthened through inclusive reviews UNDESA work on mutual accountability 8 Gender equality and women’s empowerment Collected by UN Women 9a Quality of developing country PFM systems CPIA Desk review 9b Use of developing country PFM and procurement systems 10 Aid is untied Collected by OECD-DAC

ODA disbursed to Moldova (in million USD) Sources: Paris Declaration Surveys on 2005, 2007 and 2010; 2012 Global Partnership Monitoring

Major Financial Flows to Moldova in 2012 (in million USD) Sources: (1) Foreign Direct Investments: 2012, World Bank. World Development Indicators; (2) Remittances: 2012, National Bank of Moldova; (3) ODA: 2012, Global Partnership Monitoring

Indicator 1 is piloted in 10 countries worldwide, including Moldova Indicator 1. Development co-operation is focused on results that meet developing countries’ priorities Indicator 1 is piloted in 10 countries worldwide, including Moldova Assesses extent to which development partners use country-led results frameworks and their M&E systems

Global Partnership Survey 3 year average (2009 – 2011) Global Partnership Survey MOF Data

Indicator 5a. Development co-operation is more predictable (annual predictability, MOF data)

Indicator 5b. Development co-operation is more predictable (medium-term predictability)

Indicator 6. Aid is on budgets which are subject to parliamentary scrutiny

Indicator 7. Mutual accountability among development co-operation actors is strengthened through inclusive reviews Criteria for Mutual Accountability Existence of an aid or partnership policy that defines a country’s development co-operation priorities Existence of country-level targets for effective development co-operation for both developing country government and providers of development co- operation Assessment against these targets undertaken jointly by government and providers at senior level in the past two years Active involvement of local governments and non-executive stakeholders in such reviews. Comprehensive results of such exercises are made public

Indicator 9. Effective institutions: developing countries’ systems are strengthened and used Overall score of Moldova on the World Bank Country Policy and Institutional Assessment: 4.0 Disbursements for the Government sector using national …

Post Busan principles and future discussion Inclusive Development Partnerships. e.g. Sector coordination council meetings, supported by lead donors Results. e.g. Provider strategies using national indicators; improved capacity for statistics Transparency and accountability. e.g. Public financial management systems further strengthened and used Country Ownership. e.g. Aid, including Technical Assistance, reflected in budgetary documentation

Areas for Feedback Annual Assessment of aid effectiveness Quality data entered into the new Aid Management Platform Revision of the Partnership Principles Implementation Plan Reduction of the number of indicators Revision of targets where applicable Joint Partnership Council: expectations from development partners