Conflict & Negotiation Chapter 9 Conflict & Negotiation
Introduction All conflict is not the same There is much evidence regarding different styles of conflict resolution There are few more un-nerving events for a new manager than to be thrust into conflict situations and being asked to mediate between parties
Myths of Conflict & Negotiation Conflict is only dysfunctional Conflict is generally a “personality” problem Negotiation creates a winner and a loser Good conflict mediators are born not made
Types of Conflict and Their Effects Task conflict conflict about tasks, ideas, and issues divorced from evaluations of people’s character Relationship conflict personalized and highly threatening damaging for personal relationships, team functioning and problem solving
Positive and Negative Effects of Conflict
Sources of Conflict Relationship-centered disputes stem from what has transpired between two or more people often deteriorate into name-calling sessions sometimes outside of the scope of the manager to mediate
Sources of Conflict Task-centered disputes debates over competing ideas, proposals, interests, or resources
Question? What source of conflict involve scarce resources, uncertainty, degree to which competition is present? Informational Perceptual Role Environmental The correct answer is “D” – environmental. See slide 9-13.
Sources of Conflict Informational factors come into play when people have developed their point of view on the basis of a different set of facts
Sources of Conflict Perceptual factors exert their influence when people have different images or interpretations of the same thing each person selects the data that supports their point of view tends to devalue information that does not support it
Sources of Conflict Role factors people believe that their roles within an organization are somehow in conflict “turf” associated with their position is being usurped
Sources of Conflict Environmental factors Mixed-motive situation scarce resources, uncertainty, degree to which competition is present Mixed-motive situation employees are placed in scenarios where they are rewarded if they compete aggressively but told that they should work toward the department’s overall outcome as a whole
Sources of Conflict Personal factors incompatible personal values different personalities differing long and short-term goals
Matching Conflict Styles with Situations Accommodating Avoiding Compromising Competing Collaborating
Kilman’s Conflict Resolution Grid
Ineffective Conflict Management Techniques
Competition Dominant and non-supportive Individuals pursue their own concerns aggressively at the expense of others
When is Competition Appropriate? Safety is on the line Perception issues need to be resolved Unpopular actions need implementing Against people who take advantage of non-competitive behavior
Using Competition Effectively Be direct Explain later Use this strategy selectively
Accommodation Supportive and submissive, unassertive and cooperative Individuals neglect their own concerns to satisfy the concerns of others
When is Accommodation Appropriate? When you engage in a series of negotiations Someone knows more about the situation than you do Status or power differences in a dispute
Using Accommodation Effectively Acknowledge the accommodation Have a rationale
Avoiding Submissive and non-supportive, unassertive and uncooperative People do not immediately pursue their own concerns or those of others
Guidelines for Avoiding Set time limits Set goals for the “time-out” period
Compromising People want to find some expedient, mutually acceptable solution that partially satisfies everyone involved Splitting the difference, exchanging concessions
When is Compromising Appropriate? Conflict has significant role factors Obtain temporary solutions Time pressure
Collaborating Dominant and supportive, assertive and collaborative Involves attempting to work with the other person to find some solution that fully satisfies the concerns of both people
When is Collaborating Appropriate? Objective is to learn more about the other party Want to merge insights from other groups Work through feelings Need to gain commitment
How People Actually Respond to Conflict
Seeking Superordinate Goals objective that is so valuable to both parties that it transcends the dispute
Effective Negotiations Preparation Execution Evaluation
To Negotiate or Not? Important to question whether an issue that appears to be non-negotiable truly is If there is no way to create added value for yourself, you should not be negotiating
Outcomes of an Ideal Negotiation All parties believe they made a good deal The relationship is maintained or even improved Each negotiator’s constituents are satisfied with the agreement
Integrative (Win-Win) Negotiation Focused on cooperative problem solving Treat conflict as being separate from the relationship and that we work to seek a solution to the conflict that is mutually acceptable
Characteristics of Win-Win Negotiation
The Stages of Negotiation Preparation Understand needs List and discuss options Process tactics Ending Evaluation
Discussion Question? Which stage of negotiation is most important in solving conflict the quickest? Preparation List and discuss options Process tactics Ending There is no one best answer. All stages are important. See previous slide.
Negotiation Preparation Organizing the issues Talk to other people who have information you need Analyze the parties you’ll be negotiating with Consider your BATNA (best alternative to a negotiated agreement)
Negotiation Preparation Understanding the needs of other parties List and discuss possible options
Talk to Other People Seek out other people you know who have conducted similar negotiations Talk to your constituents Talk beforehand to the other parties
Some Difficult Negotiators
Some Common Forms of Leverage Legitimacy Timing Limited authority
Bluffing Carries a Risk Heavy-handed bluffing can strain relationships If the bluff fails, the negotiation can be over
Actions of Superior Negotiators
Question? What is an outside party who specializes in helping people in conflict reach an amicable agreement? Negotiator Mediator Arbitrator Moderator The correct answer is “B” – mediator. See next slide.
Mediation Mediator outside party who specializes in helping people in conflict reach an amicable agreement
Guidelines for Mediation Choose a comfortable, neutral space away from any party’s “turf.” Shorter is better—schedule short meetings and be involved for as short of a time as possible. Listen with an open mind and do not say much. Be respectful and express only positive opinions of the parties involved.
Guidelines for Mediation Emphasize a desire to help. Do not pick sides. Assure parties that all conversations are held in strict confidence. Be a role model and build a strong reputation for staying on task and doing what you say.
Effective Mediator Is dogged in learning and applying facts Frames the disputed claims into the real issues Maintains neutrality Seeks to understand the underlying interests of each party
Article Read an article on “Negotiating with Employers” from the University and College Union