Update on PANDA solenoid design

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Panda Solenoid Timelines. General Layout constraints and HOLD POINTS.
Advertisements

Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
Zian Zhu Superconducting Solenoid Magnet BESIII Workshop Zian Zhu Beijing, Oct.13,2001.
CEA DSM Irfu - Bernard GASTINEAU - R3B Technical Board Meeting -April 4, Reactions with Relativistic Radioactive ions Beams GSI Large Acceptance.
Guenther Rosner FAIR Design Study, PANDA 3, GSI, 19/1/06 1 PANDA3: Magnet design and integration of detectors Tasks & participants Progress Milestones.
AMS-02 tracker mechanics status of assembly and integration at UniGe Outer planes: - Tests of evaporator (cooling loop) integration - Tools to develop.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Video Conference 114 September 18, 2008.
October, 2003 P. Fabbricatore and S. Farinon Spectrometer magnets – Possible layout of cryostat in the end region In order to define the cryostat layout.
AMS-02 tracker mechanics status of assembly and integration Inner tracker integration completion: - Assembly and cabling - Temperature and magnetic field.
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
1 The Genoa Tracker Solenoids and their Contribution toward a New Design Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Pasquale Fabbricatore.
Twin Solenoid Twin Solenoid - conceptual design for FCC-hh detector magnet - Matthias GT Mentink Alexey Dudarev Helder Pais Da Silva Leonardo Erik Gerritse.
Update Hardware for conductive cooling of the quench resistors has been fabricated at LBNL. Preparation for installation to start this week. Installation.
ZTF Cryostat Finite Element Analysis Andrew Lambert ZTF Technical Meeting 1.
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Further optimization of the solenoid design A.Efremov, E.Koshurnikov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov, A.Vodopianov GSI, Darmstadt,
24 January 2014 LARP VTF Follow-up Meeting P. Kovach VTF 1 LARP Vertical Test Facility Vertical Dewar Design, Magnet Prep And Installation Paul Kovach.
1 WANG,Li/SINAP WANG Li, WANG ShuHua, LIU YiYong, SUN Sen, HU Xiao, YIN LiXin Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, CAS, Shanghai , China Shanghai.
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
February 13, 2012 Mu2e Production Solenoid Design V.V. Kashikhin Workshop on Radiation Effects in Superconducting Magnet Materials (RESMM'12)
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 1 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule Norihito Ohuchi, Norio Higashi KEK Xu QingJin IHEP 2008/3/3-61Sendai-GDE-Meeting.
Cold test of SIS-300 dipole model Sergey Kozub Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP), Protvino, Moscow region, Russia.
ILC IR FINAL FOCUS & EXTRACTION MAGNETS Prepared by Andy Marone ILC Workshop, Sept
MICE CC Magnet Cryostat Design Overview Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CC Cryostat Design Review LBNL, February.
Update on the conductor analysis for the PANDA solenoid Gabriella Rolando Herman ten Kate Alexey Dudarev Helder Pais Da Silva 19 September
Thermal screen of the cryostat Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov, GSI, Darmstadt September 8, 2015 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna)
Preliminary analysis of a 16 T sc dipole with cos-theta lay-out INFN team October 2015.
Update on PANDA solenoid design and analysis Gabriella Rolando Helder Pais Da Silva Herman ten Kate Alexey Dudarev 3 November
PANDA Solenoid Design Status Herman ten Kate, Alexey Dudarev, Gabriella Rolando, Helder Pais Da Silva Panda Collaboration FAIR/GSI-Darmstadt,
EC: 7 DISK concept Preliminary considerations
Thermal Analysis of the Cold Mass of the 2 T Solenoid for the PANDA Detector at FAIR G. Rolando 1, H. H. J. ten Kate 1, A. Dudarev 1 A. Vodopyanov 2, L.
Miscellaneous MEC Topics Mainz, CM September 2016, MEC Session J
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Panda Solenoid Content Interface Box Cold Mass Layout Cooling Lines
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
Status of work (cryostat, control Dewar, cooling system)
MQXC Nb-Ti 120mm 120T/m 2m models
Status of the PANDA Magnet mechanics (yoke & cryostat)
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
Development of the Canted Cosine Theta Superconducting Magnet
Status of Detector Solenoid and Anti-DID
LARP Vertical Test Facility
JLAB MEETING FDR – April 23-24th 2013
Plans for the PSI Canted-Dipole Program
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
Conceptual Design of CEPC Interaction Region Superconducting Magnets
Introduction to the technical content The Q4 magnet (MQYY) for HL-LHC
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Magnet Options Forward dipoles vs. forward solenoids
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
BESIII Collaboration Meeting, June 5~6, 2002, Zian Zhu
MQXF coil cross-section status
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 2 Paolo Ferracin European Organization for Nuclear Research.
P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon
PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET
Dipole Project for Fusion
The superconducting solenoids for the Super Charm-Tau Factory detector
Cryomodule Assembly Plan
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
CEPC Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole and Anti-solenoid Magnets
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics,
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
F.Pasdeloup, H.Prin, L. Williams
Presentation transcript:

Update on PANDA solenoid design Herman ten Kate, Alexey Dudarev, Gabriella Rolando, Helder Pais Da Silva Panda Collaboration Meeting @ Jülich, December 9, 2014 Content: 1. Conductor 2. Coil layout 3. Eddy current loss in coil windings and casing 4. Magneto structural analysis 5. Cold mass warm dimensions 6. Shrink fit FEM analysis 7. Cryostat - Cold mass integration and test layout 8. Conclusion, next steps

1. Conductor Final conductor chosen: 8-strands Al-stabilized Rutherford cable with low height-to-width-ratio Two serious suppliers identified and cost per meter confirmed and within expected range (and budget) of 100-120 €/m Final specification ready, waiting for budget confirmation and tender !! Parameter TDR design Final design Shape No. of strands 20 8 Strand diameter [mm] 0.8 1.4 Cu : nonCu ratio 1.5 1.0 Cable dimensions [mm] 8 x 1.15 2.6 x 5.3 Conductor bare dimensions [mm] 24.6 x 3.4 7.9 x 10.9 Temperature margin ΔT [K] 1.8 2.4

2. Coil sizes, small modification of center coil Parameter TDR design Final design Iop [kA] 5 4.96 Inner radius [mm] 1050.0 1050.1 Outer radius [mm] 1100.0 1099.9 Layers / coil 2 6 Upstream coil [mm] -1025.0 < z < -143.4 -1024.9 < z < -143.5 turns = 464 turns = 468 Center coil [mm] 157.4 < z < 552.6 157.25 < z < 552.75 turns = 208 turns = 210 Downstream coil [mm] 853.4 < z < 1735.0 853.5 < z < 1734.9 One extra turn/layer in center coil to avoid sign change in the integral of the radial field component over the tracker region

Integral of the radial field component Integral of the radial field component over the tracker region, in mm.

3.1. Eddy current loss in the coil windings Parameter TDR design Final design Bpeak [T] 3 ρAl-RRR=1000 @ 4.5 K [Ω·m] 2.480 e-11 tramp [s] 2000 Pconservative [W] 2.9 0.3 ! Prealistic [W] 0.7 0.09 ! Eddy current loss in center coil during 2000 s current ramp with the Final conductor design Conservative estimate: B = Bpeak on all the turns No magneto-resistance Realistic estimate: B = local field on each turn Magneto-resistance included Prealistic is peak value during ramp as induced current decreases with magneto-resistance

3.2 Eddy current loss in the casing Eddy currents loss in the casing assessed with analytic formulas 𝑃= 𝑉 2 𝑅 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 ; 𝑉=𝑀∙ 𝑑𝐼 𝑑𝑡 and FEA (Opera/ ANSYS) Eddy currents in the casing produce the main loss contribution during ramp & slow dump Parameter Value I [kA] 5 ρAl-5083 @ 4.5K [Ωm] 3.03e-8 tramp [s] 2000 Panalytic [W] 9.8 PFEA [W] 8.8

4. Magneto-structural analysis Work in progress: verification of 2D and 3D FE magneto-structural models stress analysis for different coil-casing contact conditions, i.e. bonded versus sliding interface Expect no problems, just for verification

5. Cold mass warm dimensions Analytical approximations used: thin coil infinite coil no axial stress no bonding between support shell and coil FEA model takes analytical warm dimensions and applies: shrink fit bond coils to support shell cool down energize the magnet Analytical warm dimensions [mm] FEM cold dimensions mismatch [mm] Coil Ri 1054.3 9x10-2 Coil thickness 50.0 2x10-2 Support Cylinder Ri 1103.6 7x10-2 Support Cylinder thickness 40.0 1x10-2 Position upstream coil -1029.29<z<-144.10 0.21 / 6x10-2 Position Center Coil 163.58<z<549.43 2x10-2 / 6x10-2 Position downstream coil 857.09<z<1742.28 0.11 / 0.22 Analytical warm dimensions [mm] Coil Ri 1054.3 Coil thickness 50.0 Support Cylinder Ri 1103.6 Support Cylinder thickness 40.0 Position upstream coil -1029.29<z<-144.10 Position Center Coil 163.58<z<549.43 Position downstream coil 857.09<z<1742.28

6. Shrink fit FEA analysis of support cylinder The stress in the FEA model is about the same as with the analytical approximation. Max stress (MPa) Cylinder Coil Analyt-ical FEM Shrink Fit 29 26 15 20 Cold 21 27 14 Operational 59 66 23 24

7.1 Integration: cryostat disassembly procedure 1 - Cryostat and cold mass on supports 2 - Move the vacuum vessel on to the beam

Cryostat disassembly procedure Disassembly ryostat 1-Cryostat and cold mass on supports 2-Move the vacuum vessel on to the beam 3 - Move outer support in and remove central support

Cryostat disassembly procedure 1-Cryostat and cold mass on supports 2-Move the vacuum vessel on to the beam 3-Move outer support in and remove central support 4 - Remove cryostat flanges 5 - Remove thermal shield flanges

Cryostat disassembly procedure 1-Cryostat and cold mass on supports 2-Move the vacuum vessel on to the beam 3-Move outer support in and remove central support 4-Remove cryostat flanges 5-Remove thermal shield flanges 6 - Hold inner shell on temporary supports and move central support in 7 - Store remaining flange

Cryostat disassembly procedure 1-Cryostat and cold mass on supports 2-Move the vacuum vessel on to the beam 3-Move outer support in and remove central support 4-Remove cryostat flanges 5-Remove thermal shield flanges 6-Place inner shell temporary supports and move central support in 7-Store remaining flange 8 - Put beam’s outer support in and remove the central support 9 - Remove inner shell temporary supports. Slide the outer shell to the other side of the beam

Cryostat disassembly procedure 1-Cryostat and cold mass on supports 2-Move vacuum vessel on to the beam 3-Move outer support in and remove central support 4-Remove cryostat flanges 5-Remove thermal shield flanges 6-Place inner shell temporary supports and move central support in 7-Store remaining flange 8-Put beam’s outer support in and remove the central support 9-Remove inner shell temporary supports. Slide the outer shell to the other side of the beam 10 - Move beam’s central support in 11 - Store inner shell and thermal shield

7.2 Integration: magnet assembly procedure 1 - Move cold mass to the beam 2 - Remove central support

Magnet assembly procedure 1 – Move cold mass to the beam 2- Remove central support 3 - Slide outer shell over the cold mass and install the radial supports 4 - Move outer shell and cold mass to the other side of the beam

Magnet assembly procedure 1 – Move cold mass to the beam 2- Remove central support 3-Slide outer shell over the cold mass and install the radial supports 4-Move outer shell and cold mass to the other side of the beam 5 - Place beam’s central support in and remove outer one 6 - Place inner shell on the beam

Magnet assembly procedure 1 – Move cold mass to the beam 2- Remove central support 3-Slide outer shell over the cold mass and install the radial supports 4-Move outer shell and cold mass to the other side of the beam 5-Move in beam’s central support in and remove outer one. 6-Place inner shell on the beam 7 - Remove beam’s central support 8 - Attach the inner shell to the outer shell

Magnet assembly procedure 1 – Move cold mass to the beam 2- Remove central support 3-Slide outer shell over the cold mass and install the radial supports 4-Move outer shell and cold mass to the other side of the beam 5-Move in beam’s central support in and remove outer one. 6-Place inner shell on the beam 7- Remove beam’s central support 8-Attach the inner shell to the outer shell 9 - Move magnet to the other side of the beam 10 - Move stored flange into the beam

Magnet assembly procedure 1 – Move cold mass to the beam 2- Remove central support 3-Slide outer shell over the cold mass and install the radial supports 4-Move outer shell and cold mass to the other side of the beam 5-Move in beam’s central support in and remove outer one. 6-Place inner shell on the beam 7- Remove beam’s central support 8-Attach the inner shell to the outer shell 9-Move magnet to the other side of the beam 10-Move stored flange into the beam 11 - Install thermal shield flanges 12 - Close end flanges

7.3 Integration: work on turret and test platform Test and services integration set-up to be put in place in early stage to allow routing of services: cryolines, bus bars, control cables A main frame supports the control dewar Light beams for supporting the floors Floor can be partially removed giving access for crane manipulations

8. Conclusion, next steps Conductor specification ready, waiting for release of budget needed for starting the tender Cold mass design in advanced state, working on details, technical specification in progress, decision needed on way of tendering Winding pack slightly adapted to avoid sign change in Int-Br Eddy currents in conductor and casing cross-checked with FEM, much lower values (and thus gradients) than in TDR due to shape of conductor, great! Eddy current loss in coil casing calculated and result acceptable Magneto-structural analysis on details of cold mass in progress Technology for coil winding and integration drafted Cryostat and cold mass integration scenario, and space needed worked out Final test set-up sketched, area preparation in progress However, resources now exhausted ! ! work urgently requires funding!