Development Charges May, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2013 Budgets Lower Paxton Township
Advertisements

ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES ORDINANCE. What the discussion should include: 4 Adequate Public Facilities Ordinances (APFO) allow local governments to deny.
January 20, 2015 City Council Meeting. Purpose Council direction on moving forward with: Housing linkage fee in short term based on 2009 Study and existing.
HEMSON COUNTY OF OXFORD 2004 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES STUDY COUNCIL BRIEFING May 12, 2004 HEMSON Consulting Ltd.
2012 City Budget ~ Manhattan ~ Kansas Work Session Four.
PUBLIC HEARING: Development (Impact) Fees - Land Use Assumptions & Infrastructure Improvement Plan Reports June 30, 2014.
March 9, 2015 Budget Work Session – Revenues. FY2016 Revenue Projections.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study Update Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing January 15, 2013.
Ordinance Temporarily Reducing Impact Fees Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing May 10, 2011.
Additional FTE - 11 Increase in overall Personnel – 5% (compares to 8% in FY2015, 7% in FY2014, 2% in FY2013) $87,225 in on-going operating $1,226,099.
City of Kyle, Texas City Manager’s Presentation of Fiscal Year Proposed Budget August 1, 2012.
First Budget Hearing (Final Hearing For Non-Ad Valorem Assessments) Board of County Commissioners September 06, 2007.
Impact Fee Updates Board of County Commissioners Public Hearings October 30, 2012.
2013 City Budget August 14 – Public Hearing Budget Overview $416,171 increase for FT/PT employee salaries (1.7% COLA; 2.0% merit; plus negotiated.
Presented By Public Resources Management Group, Inc. RECREATION IMPACT FEE STUDY Prepared on October 10 th, 2013.
City of Pitt Meadows Taxation 101– Townhall Meeting February 4, 2016.
City of Parkland Fiscal Year Proposed Budget Commission Workshop August 18, 2010.
Purpose The purpose of tonight’s meeting is to present the Proposed Final 2015/2016 Budget, following the required Act 1 timeline. SFASD must receive.
City of Ottawa 2014 Development Charges Background Study Affordable Housing July 8, 2014.
City of Burlington Planning Applications Fees Review Community Development Committee Presentation January 14, 2013.
Initial Budget Proposals 2015/16 Initial Budget Proposals 2015/16 Presentation by Leader of the Council and Portfolio holder for Performance and Efficiency.
What are they and how are they calculated? May 2015.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
Public Consultation Town of Penetanguishene November 13, 2013.
Portfolio Committee on Human Settlements 08 March 2016 Review Of Community Residential Units Programme (CRU) Mr. M. Tshangana.
2011 BUDGET PRESENTATION PUBLIC SESSION 1.  2011 Tax Supported Operating Budget  2011 Tax Supported Capital Budget  2011 Water Operating Budget  2011.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
1 Budget Presentation Fiscal Year 2011 May 10, 2010.
Fundamental Principles  Appropriate levels of service are being delivered to the community.  The Corporation is prepared to maintain its commitments.
Wolf Creek School Division No.72. Why do we adjust the spring budget? Alberta Education requirement of a budget update. This is an information only item.
BUDGET PROCESS & REVENUE & EXPENSE INFORMATION For FISCAL YEAR 2011.
Development Charge Overview Water / Wastewater Capital
Wakefield’s Financial Picture Finance Committee
Today we will discuss... Development Charges Overview
Municipality of South Bruce
Budget Study Session – May 22, 2012
Council Workshop Presentation June 26, 2017
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
City of Biddeford, Maine Capital Improvement Plan
Planning Commission Impact fees Planning Commission
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
Definitions Common Area Maintenance Utilities Local Tax Assessment
Development Charge Public Meeting October 23, 2017
What’s up with those “org unit” things?
WRCOG Fee Comparison Study – Lessons Learned
CAPITAL AND RATE SUPPORTED OPERATING BUDGETS
MUNICIPAL BUDGETED PROPERTY TAX COMPARISON The following is a yearly property tax comparison from FY to FY :
Queen Anne’s County Commissioners FY2018 Proposed Budget April 11, 2017 Gregg A. Todd, County Administrator Jonathan R. Seeman, Director, Budget,
Municipality of Central Elgin
May 2018 Proposed Electric Rate Increase - First Public Hearing
Fire Protection Impact Fee
3rd FY2015/2016 Budget Development Workshop
D.C. Council Presentation September 18, 2017
BUDGET WORKSHOP February 15, 2017.
Mechanicsburg Area School District
Work Session Follow UP Aug. 23, 2018.
David Jewell and Kyle Moore
Presentation and Discussion of the Draft Transportation Land Use Assumptions and Infrastructure Improvement Plan Report (Impact Fee Report) Town Council.
Preliminary Draft 2019 Operating and Capital Budgets
December 10, BUDGET PRESENTATION.
Funding the Town’s Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) – An Initial Discussion of Impact Fees Town Council Meeting March 1, 2017.
Gross Teacher Cost to the Conference and Net to Schools
Commission Workshop 3 Budget Presentation
USDA Rural Development: Financing Energy Projects
Development Charges Stakeholder Meeting
Introduction Last comprehensive review was undertaken in 2012/2013
Development Charges Stakeholder Meeting #2
First Public Hearing to Adopt the Tentative Budget and Millage Rate
AMCTO Zone 2: Bill Analysis of Proposed CBC
Presentation transcript:

Development Charges May, 2015

Purpose of Development Charges New development generates the need for new infrastructure which should be financed, in part, by the new development; Development Charges are a mechanism for recovering the net costs associated with the new infrastructure required due to residential and non-residential growth; and Development Charges may only be used for the purpose for which they were collected.

Current Schedule of Development Charges Determined through a Development Charge Background Study as required by the Development Charges Act, 1997; Background Study performed by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. in 2014 Study presented to the public in August 2014 to solicit input and answer questions; and By-Law number 1344 adopted August 25, 2014, with new charges effective September 1, 2014.

Methodology for Calculating Development Charges Identify amount, type and location of growth; Identify servicing needs to accommodate growth; Identify capital costs to provide services to meet needs; Deduct: Grants, subsidies and other contributions; Benefit to existing development; Statutory 10% deduction; and D.C. reserves where applicable; Net costs allocated been residential and non-residential and DC’s calculated for each.

Forecasted Growth Measure 10 Year 2014 to 2023 18 Year 2014 to 2031 Population Increase 1,432 3,650 Residential Unit Increase 780 1,735 Non-Residential Gross Floor Area Increase (square feet) 332,700 667,300

Capital Costs to Meet Needs Service Net Capital Cost Less Benefit to Existing Development Less: Grants, Subsidies & Other Contributions & Other Deductions Total Recovered from Development Charges Administrative Studies $ 386,000 $ 279,750 $ 24,150 $ 82,100 Recreation Facilities & Parkland $ 11,567,591 $ 8,527,345 $ 320,760 $ 2,719,486 Fire Facilities, Vehicles & Equipment $ 2,174,161 $ 1,387,392 $ 336,000 $ 450,769 Roads $ 3,193,000 $ 1,596,175 $ - $ 1,596,825 Roads Facilities & Vehicles $ 316,700 $ 52,800 $ 263,900 Police Facilities & Equipment $ 650,000 $ 33,766 $ 616,234 Total - Municipal-Wide Services $ 18,287,452 $ 11,877,228 $ 680,910 $ 5,729,314 Wastewater - Ward 1 $ 10,542,318 $ 5,562,930 $ 4,979,388 Wastewater - Ward 2 $ 107,423 Wastewater - Ward 3 $ 6,600,000 $ 3,300,000 Wastewater - Ward 4 $ 6,360,014 $ 5,190,620 $ 1,169,394 Total - All Services $ 41,897,207 $ 22,630,778 $ 3,980,910 $ 15,285,519 54.0% 36.5%

Current Development Charges Service Residential - Single & Semi Detached Residential - Apts. - 2 Bedrooms Residential - Apts. - Bachelor & 1 Bedroom Residential - Other Multiples Non-Residential (per square foot) Wind Turbines & Telecommunication Towers Solar Farms (per square foot) Municipal-Wide Services Roads and related $ 1,298 $ 753 $ 576 $ 895 $ 0.78 Fire service $ 548 $ 318 $ 243 $ 379 $ 0.33 Police services $ 464 $ 269 $ 206 $ 320 $ 0.27 Outdoor recreation $ 786 $ 456 $ 348 $ 542 $ 0.07 $ - Indoor recreation $ 3,197 $ 1,854 $ 1,418 $ 2,207 $ 0.25 Library serices $ 172 $ 99 $ 76 $ 119 $ 0.01 Administration $ 98 $ 57 $ 44 $ 68 $ 0.05 Total - Municipal-Wide $ 6,563 $ 3,806 $ 2,911 $ 4,530 $ 1.78 $ 2,408 $ 1.44 Area Specific Serices Wastewater - Ward 1 $ 3,390 $ 1,966 $ 1,503 $ 2,339 $ 2.05 Wastewater - Ward 2 $ 727 $ 421 $ 322 $ 501 Wastewater - Ward 3 $ 1,754 $ 1,017 $ 777 $ 1,210 $ 1.15 Wastewater - Ward 4 $ 2,473 $ 1,434 $ 1,096 $ 1,706 $ 1.42

Total Development Charges By Ward Residential - Single & Semi Detached Residential - Apts. - 2 Bedrooms Residential - Apts. - Bachelor & 1 Bedroom Residential - Other Multiples Non-Residential (per square foot) Wind Turbines & Telecommunication Towers Solar Farms (per square foot) Ward 1 $9,953 $5,772 $4,414 $6,869 $3.83 $2,408 $1.44 Ward 2 $7,290 $4,227 $3,233 $5,031 $1.78 Ward 3 $8,317 $4,823 $3,688 $5,740 $2.92 Ward 4 $9,036 $5,240 $4,007 $6,236 $3.20

Historical Development Charges – Residential (Per Unit)

Historical Development Charges – Non-Residential (Per Square Foot)

Comparison of Residential Development Charges (Per Unit)

Comparison of Non-Residential Development Charges (Per Square Foot)

Development Charge Reserves Service Opening Balance 2014 Interest Earnings 2014 Development Charges 2014 Withdrawals Closing Balance 2014 Administration $149,255 $1,869 $8,379 $159,503 Police $33,766 $428 $5,484 $39,678 Fire $1,792 $24 $12,642 $14,458 Roads $268,175 $3,353 $49,941 $321,469 Recreation: Library $0 $132 $10,374 $10,506 Outdoor Facilities $257,645 $3,221 $47,079 $307,945 Indoor Facilities $153,823 $1,940 $77,658 $233,421 Wastewater Ward 1 ($1,290,154) ($10,912) $100,216 ($361,710) ($1,562,560) Ward 2 $19,322 $235 $576 $20,133 Ward 3 $326,944 $4,052 $3,388 $334,384 Ward 4 ($46,547) ($280) $109,479 ($47,363) $15,289 ($125,979) $4,062 $425,216 ($409,073) ($105,774)

New Single Family Residential – 2011 to 2015 (Number of Homes)

Housing Starts – Windsor/Essex County Development Charges 2014 2014 as a % of Total Households 2013 Tecumseh $ 12,406 25 0.28% 24 Kingsville $ 7,550 45 0.55% 61 Leamington $ - 54 0.51% 15 Essex $ 9,495 63 0.71% 53 Amherstburg $ 12,139 75 0.92% 69 Lakeshore $ 16,278 177 1.32% 155 Lasalle $ 12,604 208 2.00% 145 Windsor $ 26,874 321 0.33% 315 781 0.47% 684

Area-Specific Discount of D.C.’s - Harrow Full D.C. On Full D.C. On D.C. Excluding Wastewater Municipal-Wide $ 6,563 $ 3,282 $ 1,641 $ - Wastewater $ 2,473 $ 1,237 $ 618 Total $ 9,036 $ 4,518 $ 5,755 $ 2,259 $ 4,114 Effective Reduction 0% 50% 36% 75% 54% 100% 73% Average No. SFR per Year 4 Reserve Funding Required $ 18,072 $ 13,126 $ 27,108 $ 19,689 $ 36,144 $ 26,252 Assume Increased SFR per Year 8 $ 54,216 $ 39,378 $ 72,288 $ 52,504