The National Center for Biomedical Ontology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The National Center for Biomedical Ontology One of three National Centers for Biomedical Computing launched by NIH in 2005 Collaboration of Stanford, Berkeley,
Advertisements

BioPortal Status and Plans September 2011 Ray Fergerson NCBO Project Director Stanford University 1.
BioPortal as (the only functional) OOR SandBox (so far) Natasha Noy, Michael Dorf Stanford University.
Upper Ontology Summit Tuesday March 14 The BFO perspective Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo National Center.
Mark A. Musen Stanford University
Upper Ontology Summit Wednesday March 15 The BFO perspective Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo National.
The Open Innovation Center Susie Stephens, Principal Research Scientist, Eli Lilly.
The National Center for Biomedical Ontology Online Knowledge Resources for the Industrial Age Mark A. Musen Stanford University
Prof. Carolina Ruiz Computer Science Department Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Program WPI WELCOME TO BCB4003/CS4803 BCB503/CS583 BIOLOGICAL.
The Future of the Information Professional Dr. Mark Burfoot April 16 th 2013 SLA Pharmaceutical & Health Technology Division.
Iowa State University Animal Science Department Bioinformatics & Computational Biology Program - 01/16/06 1 Overview of Animal Trait Ontology and PATO.
THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR BIOMEDICAL ONTOLOGY Ontology-based Tools to Enhance Data Curation Trish Whetzel, PhD Outreach Coordinator December 9, 2010.
Fungal Semantic Web Stephen Scott, Scott Henninger, Leen-Kiat Soh (CSE) Etsuko Moriyama, Ken Nickerson, Audrey Atkin (Biological Sciences) Steve Harris.
Neil McKenzie, Dedicon Multimedia training Packages by EUAIN.
How to Organize the World of Ontologies Barry Smith 1.
New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences Biomedical Ontology in Buffalo Part I: The Gene Ontology Barry Smith and Werner Ceusters.
Vivien Bonazzi Ph.D. Program Director: Computational Biology (NHGRI) Co Chair Software Methods & Systems (BD2K) Biomedical Big Data Initiative (BD2K)
IDR Snapshot: Quantitative Assessment Methodology Evaluating Size and Comprehensiveness of an Integrated Data Repository Vojtech Huser, MD, PhD a James.
Information Resources and Technology We facilitate excellence in education, biomedical and clinical research, and patient care through the application.
1 Enhancing Organism Based Disease Knowledge Using Biological Taxonomy, and Environmental Ontologies Ken Baclawski Northeastern University Neil Sarkar.
The National Center for Biomedical Ontology Stanford – Berkeley Mayo – Victoria – Buffalo UCSF – Oregon – Cambridge.
NIH Activities Related to Big Data Jerry Sheehan Assistant Director for Policy Development National Library of Medicine Board on Research Data and Information.
Background: Clinical and Translational Research Centers promote scientific collaborations. The Puerto Rico Clinical and Translational Research Consortium.
“This initiative will help bring our best ideas to market right here in New York State.” – Governor Andrew Cuomo.
The Agricultural Ontology Service (AOS) A Tool for Facilitating Access to Knowledge AGRIS/CARIS and Documentation Group Library and Documentation Systems.
NIH Common Fund Library of Integrated Network- based Cellular Signatures LINCS Applicant Information Webinar for RFA-RM September 6, :00 –
Ontologies GO Workshop 3-6 August Ontologies  What are ontologies?  Why use ontologies?  Open Biological Ontologies (OBO), National Center for.
Facilitate Scientific Data Sharing by Sharing Informatics Tools and Standards Belinda Seto and James Luo National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering.
Ontologies in Biomedicine What is the “right” amount of semantics? Mark A. Musen Stanford University.
Protein Information Resource Protein Information Resource, 3300 Whitehaven St., Georgetown University, Washington, DC Contact
Philip E. Bourne Professional Development Lecture 7 Understanding and Working the Publishing Process.
Content Management Systems. CMS DEFINED: A system of collective procedures used to manage various work flows in a collaborative environment. A system.
Tom Furlani Director, Center for Computational Research SUNY Buffalo Metrics for HPC September 30, 2010.
Core 2: Bioinformatics NCBO-Berkeley. Core 2 Specific Aims 1.Apply ontologies  Software toolkit for describing and classifying data 2.Capture, manage,
Using the Iowa Assessments Interpretation Workshops Session 3 Using the Iowa Assessments to Track Readiness.
A Practical Approach to Metadata Management Mark Jessop Prof. Jim Austin University of York.
1 Understanding Cataloging with DLESE Metadata Karon Kelly Katy Ginger Holly Devaul
A LexWiki-based Representation and Harmonization Framework for caDSR Common Data Elements Guoqian Jiang, Ph.D. Robert Freimuth, Ph.D. Harold Solbrig Mayo.
RiceWiki: a wiki-based database for community curation of rice genes Available at
Proposed Research Problem Solving Environment for T. cruzi Intuitive querying of multiple sets of heterogeneous databases Formulate scientific workflows.
1 Developing an Ontology of Ontologies for OOR Preparation for Ontology Summit 2008 Panel Discussion April 10, 2008 Barry Smith and Michael Gruninger.
Many life sciences organizations have deployed Microsoft Office SharePoint Server-based collaborative portals for communication and data sharing. A collaborative.
1 An Introduction to Ontology for Scientists Barry Smith University at Buffalo
High Risk 1. Ensure productive use of GRID computing through participation of biologists to shape the development of the GRID. 2. Develop user-friendly.
Visual Knowledge ® Software Inc. Visual Knowledge BioCAD Case Study Parallels to Other Domains VK Semantic Web Server.
High throughput biology data management and data intensive computing drivers George Michaels.
AP Biology Revised Framework MSTA 2012 Tina Wagner.
Biomedical Informatics and Health. What is “Biomedical Informatics”?
Deep Indexing in ProQuest Health and Medical Databases.
Using Living Atlas 3D Layer Brian Sims. Why 3D? Traditionally we manage our GIS like this…
1998 NSF Information and Data Management Workshop Research Agenda for the 21st Century.
Using VIVO for Scientific Applications Matt Mayernik (National Center for Atmospheric Research) Anne Wilson (Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics)
Don’t know much about philosophy: The confusion over bio-ontologies
Mark A. Musen, M.D., Ph.D. Stanford University
BioPortal as (the only functional) OOR SandBox (so far)
Solutions to Clinical Data Visualization and Analysis
KnowEnG: A SCALABLE KNOWLEDGE ENGINE FOR LARGE SCALE GENOMIC DATA
CCNT Lab of Zhejiang University
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (KM) Session # 14
Collaborating with the National Center for Biomedical Ontology
ISARIC – INTERNATIONAL SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY INFECTION CONSORTIUM
An ecosystem of contributions
Carolina Mendoza-Puccini, MD
A Snapshot of the OWL Web
Collaborative RO1 with NCBO
Consortium: National networks in 16 European countries.
The National Center for Biomedical Ontology
Consortium: National networks in 16 European countries.
Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph.D. Rutgers, The State University of NJ
Libraries and Open Innovation:
Presentation transcript:

The National Center for Biomedical Ontology Stanford – Berkeley Mayo – Victoria – Buffalo UCSF – Oregon – Cambridge http://www.bioontology.org

Ontologies are essential to make sense of biomedical data

Biologist have adopted ontologies To provide canonical representation of scientific knowledge To annotate experimental data to enable interpretation and comparison across databases To facilitate knowledge-based applications for Decision support Natural language-processing Data integration

A Portion of the OBO Library

Knowledge workers seem trapped in a pre-industrial age Most ontologies are of relatively small scale Most ontologies are built and refined by small groups working arduously in isolation Success rests heavily on the particular talents of individual artisans, rather than on standard operating procedures There is an urgent need for technologies to make this process “faster, better, cheaper”

A consortium that brings together investigators at Founded in September 2005 to provide a national focus on the use of ontologies in the biomedical sciences A consortium that brings together investigators at Stanford University (Ontology-management technology) Lawrence Berkeley Labs (Use of ontologies for data annotation) University of Victoria (Ontology and data visualization) Mayo Clinic (Access to controlled clinical terminologies) SUNY Buffalo (Best practices for ontology development) Our goal: Industrial-strength technology for use of ontologies in e-science

Capture and index experimental results National Center for Biomedical Ontology Capture and index experimental results Open Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) Open Biomedical Data (OBD) BioPortal Revise biomedical understanding Relate experimental data to results from other sources 2005

E-science needs technologies To help build and extend ontologies To locate ontologies and to relate them to one another To visualize relationships and to aid understanding To facilitate evaluation and annotation of ontologies

Goals for the National Center for Biomedical Ontology Integrated ontology libraries in cyberspace Meta-data standards for ontology annotation Comprehensive methods for ontology indexing and retrieval Easy-to-use portals for ontology access, annotation, and peer review End-user platforms for putting ontologies to use for Data annotation Decision support Natural-language processing Information retrieval And applications that we have not yet thought of!

Opportunities to collaborate with the Center Using the Center’s technology Contributing ontologies to the OBO library Submitting a proposal to the NIH for a “collaborating R01” grant Defining a biological driving project http://www.bioontology.org