Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AB 109 Public Safety Realignment December 5, 2013.
Advertisements

Virginia Juvenile Justice Association EFFECTIVE PAROLE TRANSITION & RE-ENTRY: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN & HOW November 2, 2006 David M. Altschuler, Ph.D.
Individual Risk and Need Assessment in Criminal Justice Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency Criminal Justice Advisory Board Conference State.
Delivering the Tri-borough programme YOUTH OFFENDING SERVICE Combining services to tackle common problems, improve people’s lives and make public money.
COMPAS is the Pathfinder ! NYS Probation Officers Association Annual Conference August 9, 2012 Presenters: Sharon Lansing, DCJS Nancy Andino, DCJS Gary.
Evidence-Based Intervention Services Community Corrections Partnership October 27, 2011.
Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March
National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention April 2 & 3, Square miles 1,000,000 + people 10 th largest U.S. city 4 th Safest U.S. city.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Reentry Services Project Shelley Ford, MN Department of Corrections Sally Dandurand, Reentry Services Project June 2008, Connecting Youth to Success 1.
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Evidence-based Practices (EBP) in Corrections
Evidence-Based Sentencing. Learning Objectives Describe the three principles of evidence- based practice and the key elements of evidence-based sentencing;
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Juvenile Probation Commission.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Planning for Re-alignment in San Diego
NAMI Conference February 10, 2015 “Changing Lives: Changing Futures” Operating Rehabilitative Detention Facilities NAMI Conference February 10, 2015 “Changing.
Offender Rehabilitation
North Carolina TASC Clinical Series Training Module One: Understanding TASC.
Prison Population Management John Baldwin Director Iowa Department of Corrections.
NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES.
The Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol ~SPEP~
Classification and Supervision in Probation and Parole
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
Community-Based Corrections for Juveniles
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
National Center for Youth in Custody First Things First: Risk and Needs Assessment Data to Determine Placement and Services Alternatives.
Chapter 14 Prevention and Corrections in the Community 1.
Behavioral Health Integration of Services for Justice Involved Clients Veronica Kelley, LCSW Assistant Director San Bernardino County.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
MARIN COUNTY PROBATION Michael Daly, Chief Probation Officer.
Evidenced Based Protocols for Adult Drug Courts Jacqueline van Wormer, PhD Washington State University NADCP/NDCI.
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Board of Supervisors,
County Uniform Recidivism Measure Project Progress Report and First Exploration of Big Picture Themes Dr. Tony Fabelo Jessy Tyler Dr. Rebecca Cohen Justice.
Jail Diversion Programs
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
An Examination of AB109 Recidivism In San Joaquin County In Year 4
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Department of Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Prison Population and Prison Closures in Pennsylvania
Summit County Probation Services
Intercept 5 Community Supervision
Santa Barbara County Re-Alignment Strategy Study
Transition from Prison to Community: the German Case
Presented by: Charlie Granville CEO, Capita Technologies Chris Baird
7. Develop a plan to strengthen employer relationships
California Jail Programs Association General Membership Conference
Family Preservation Services
California State Association of Counties
Bergen County Division of Family Guidance
Transitional Housing for Offender Reentry
Sarah L. Desmarais, Ph.D. North Carolina State University
Transforming Hidalgo County CSCD into an Evidence Based Agency
JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER FRAMEWORK CONCEPT: AN OVERVIEW
Community Corrections Alternative Program
The Arc of the District of Columbia, Inc.
History (Continued) In May, 2011, Federal Court required that the prison population of California be decreased from 180% of prison capacity to no more.
Marion County Re-Entry Coalition Presentation to CWF coaches
Federal Pretrial Services
A Decade of Youthful Offender Supervision
October 2005 Kim Pascual Research & Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population? Jessica Foy Acting Supervising Probation Officer

Objectives Build an understanding of Evidence-Based Practices (EBP) case planning and the impact these practices can have on community safety through the reduction of recidivism. Create an understanding of the use of the COMPAS assessment in determining housing needs. Describe current residential needs of the population supervised by Probation and current resources.

Definition of EBP Programs & interventions that have been proven to reduce recidivism Research-based

National Institute of Corrections (NIC) Evidence-Based Practice Model

The COMPAS Tool

What is COMPAS? Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions COMPAS is a computerized decision-support system for criminal justice placement, supervision and treatment planning and management Assesses Recidivism Risks – Low/Medium/High Identifies Criminogenic Needs Numerical Scores Generates Case Plans Create Referrals through the Community Resource Directory Needs Scores 1-5 Unlikely 6-7 Probable 8-10 Highly Probable

COMPAS Risk Assessment Output Pre-Trial Release Risk Violent Recidivism General Recidivism Pre-Trial Release Risk

COMPAS Assesses Criminogenic Risk Factors Characteristics, traits, problems, or issues of an individual that directly relate to the individual's likelihood to re-offend and commit another crime. Two Types of Criminogenic Risk Factors: 1) Static 2) Dynamic

Static Criminogenic Risk Factors Static factors cannot be changed or addressed by any sort of program or therapy in the prevention of future crimes. Generally, these are structural elements of a person's life that partially led them to commit crime.

Examples of Static Criminogenic Needs Age at the time of first arrest Criminal history Residing/ raised in a single-parent home Family Criminality

Dynamic Criminogenic Risk Factors Changeable factors that may be in flux throughout one’s lifetime These needs can be addressed by therapy, training, education, and/or targeted programming and subsequently altered to result in more law-abiding behavior. Also called Criminogenic Needs

Examples of Dynamic Criminogenic Needs Assessed by the COMPAS Tool Anti-Social Attitudes and Personality Anti-Social Associates Family/Marital Problems Few Pro-Social Activities/Isolation Work/Education Problems Substance Abuse Residential Instability

The Balanced Approach to Supervision Behavioral Management Driven by Court Order Compliance Checks 4th Waiver Searches Drug Testing Behavioral Shaping Customized Case Plans Use of Incentives & Sanctions Contacts support Case Planning Objectives Motivational Interviewing PO as case manger

What is Residential Instability? Measures the degree to which the individual has long-term ties to the community.  Does not mean transient. A low score indicates a person who has a stable and verifiable address, local telephone and long term ties.  A high-score indicates a person who does not have a regular living situation, has lived at the present address for a short time, is isolated from family, has no telephone, and/or frequently changes residences.  Cut-off Scores: Low 1-5, Medium 6-7, High 8-10.

Number of Probationers assessed to be High Needs for Residential Instability Supervision Level Number of Individuals with COMPAS Assessments Number of Individuals Scoring High in Residential Instability Percentage of Individuals with Assessments Scoring High in Residential Instability Formal Low and Medium Risk                                      7,347                                  2,404 33% Formal High Risk                                        979                                            521 53% PRCS                                     1,561                                            853 55% MS                                        629                                            274 44% Total                                   10,516                                        4,052 39%

How do Officers address the need? Probation has the ability to house AB109 offenders scoring high in Residential Instability through contractual agreements with several different housing providers in the community. Referrals are made to address that criminogenic need in an effort to lower the offender’s likelihood to reoffend. Referrals are included in the offender’s case plan and made through the CRD.

CRD: Community Resource Directory Comprehensive directory of community based resources designed to link and match services to address criminogenic needs. Allows open communication between the provider and the Probation Officer https://crd.sdcounty.ca.gov 20 different housing providers with a total of 51 houses Does not include homeless shelters

CRD Referral Form

CRD Referral Form (Cont.)

CRD Referral Form (Cont.)

Current Funded Housing Providers Probation contracts directly with the following providers to provide housing for realigned adult and youthful offenders: Second Chance Foundations in Recovery JH Therapeutic National Crossroads Etheridge Center

Enhancing Public Safety The assessment is the foundation of effective case planning Resource utilization Advocacy

Jessica Foy, Acting Supervising Probation Officer Contact Information: Jessica Foy, Acting Supervising Probation Officer Intake & Reentry Unit at the Community Transition Center Collaborative Courts Division San Diego County Probation Department 619-235-0080 Jessica.Foy@sdcounty.ca.gov