Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VISTA and Supervisor Orientation <<DATE>>
Advertisements

Connecting Personality Type, Career, & Leadership
Kamran Waheed (Fa2012/MSc-EM/CE/ 001) INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION.
Building Your Leadership Profile By Carrie Pilant Presented at Imogene Gideon Elementary Monday, November 15, 2010.
Who Do You Want on Your Team? Lesson on Communication Styles in the Classroom Randi Purvis CPSY 646.
1 Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Carl G. Jung’s theory of psychological types Differences between normal healthy people Source of misunderstanding and miscommunication.
Sherfield and Moody Cornerstones
Getting to know me…. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.
Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator – MBTI
What’s Your Type? Understanding personality types: How people see the world and make decisions differently Robert Ford World Academy Facilitator.
Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator – MBTI Lecture 3
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP Knowing Yourself and Others… Heidi Lender, M.A. Assistant Director Strommen Career and Internship Center.
LEARNING ABOUT YOUR PERSONALITY TYPE YOUR CAREER DEVELOPMENT.
DJE– If you had to describe yourself in one word, what would it be?
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. MBTI Background Based on Jung – late 1800’s and early 1900’s – Interested in individual differences to explain behavior Preferences.
Lecture 5 PERSONALITY II: Dimensions of Personality.
Understanding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Kelsey Tate ObjectivesWhat is MBTI? What is my type?
July 7, 2011 By A.V. Vedpuriswar. Why awareness of personality type is important People who know themselves and the others around are at an advantage.
Julie Law, Career Center Understanding the MBTI. Objective Understand how preferences influence our behaviors and impact the way we make decisions Understand.
1 Helping you discover your own personal leadership style using Meyers Briggs using Meyers Briggs Nick Mathys, Ph.D. Leadership Assessment.
Myers-Briggs Type Inventory (MBTI) Carl Jung: Theory explaining predictable patterns of behavior Predictable differences caused by differences in how people.
Personality and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator®
Looking At Type Looking At Type A Description of the Preferences Reported by The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator By Earle C. Page CAPT.
Leadership Programme Asia Pacific 2012 Module 1 Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.
1 Professional Assessment Program The professional assessment (PA) program provides a systematic review of the student’s personal & professional gifts,
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP Knowing Yourself and Others… Heidi Lender, M.A. Assistant Director Strommen Career and Internship Center.
Internship and career services Summer Fusion 2015.
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
CARRIE ROBERSON North/Far North Regional Consortium Reporting Out Activity.
ARNIE DAHLKE THE MBTI.
Alice price rushmore.  Learn about your personality traits  Explore the different personalities  Discover your personal communication style.
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Overview 1.Self-Report Instrument 2.Nonjudgmental Instrument 3.Preference Indicator 4.Well Researched Instrument.
08 Aug 2005CSE403, Summer'05, Lecture 14 Lecture 14: Personality Types Valentin Razmov.
MBTI – KGI Myers-Briggs Type Indicator – Klein Group Instrument Robert R. Klein, Ed.D.
Improvement Leaders Collaboratives Residential Module MBTI.
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP Knowing Yourself and Others… Heidi Lender, M.A. Assistant Director Strommen Career and Internship Center.
And LEARNING SYTLE. Extroverts Extroverts focus on the outer world of people and things. Extroverts need interaction with people. In school extroverts.
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter Seven: Learn Cornerstone: Creating Success through Positive Change 6 th edition Robert M. Sherfield.
WHAT IS SOCIAL WELLNESS? Contribution you make to your surroundings and community by becoming more aware of your importance in society and the impact.
Your Learning Style.
Facilitating Learning Personality Preferences and Student Learning.
Personality Type and Learning Style of the Intro to Business Student: A Bridge to Stronger Teams
Cornerstones for Career College Success 3rd edition
Heather LaPerle David Freeman Linda Kirby Nancy Barger
Amity Business School Amity School of Business BBA, SEMESTER II INDIVIDUAL, SOCIETY AND NATION Divya Goel Module 1.
Paragon Learning Style Inventory (PLSI)
Powered by the MBTI tool
Psychodynamic Approach
Copyright Type Association Benelux
Sherfield and Moody Cornerstones
What kind of person are you?
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP
Enhancing Instructional Practices by Understanding Others
Personality Profiles.
Bishop Stang High School
Extraversion Introversion
Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Rationale
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP
Future Leadership Programme
Myers – Briggs Type Indicator ( MBTI )
Understand your audience and aligning the communication for your RIA
Paragon Learning Style Inventory (PLSI)
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP
Enhancing Instructional Practices by Understanding Others
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP
MYERS-BRIGGS WORKSHOP
Leadership style Task Planful flexible People Introduction:
Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator – MBTI
Presentation transcript:

Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Determining Leadership Style: Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Cathy O. Robbins Nonprofit Executive Leadership Program // Northeast Region // June 1-3rd, 2016

The MBTI® Instrument A “measure” of personality type Based on Carl J. Jung’s work 8 personality preferences Organized into 16 types

Development The MBTI® Instrument was developed by: Katharine C. Briggs & Isabel Briggs Myers (mother 1875-1968) (daughter 1897-1980) Based on: Carl Gustav Jung’s psychological types (contemporary of Sigmund Freud 1875-1961)

IT IS NOT A MEASURE OF: INTELLIGENCE OR PATHOLOGY

They’re simply different. Personality preferences are not absolute: people react differently to situational factors Differences in preferences are not: right or wrong, better or worse They’re simply different.

WRITE YOUR NAME 1.

Four Preferences E I S N T F J P Where do you process and gain energy? What kinds of data do you focus on? What is the basis of your decisions? What type of lifestyle do you prefer? E S T J I N F P

KEY ASSUMPTIONS Preferences are “inborn” Environment enhances or impedes expression of your type All of the types are equally valuable Behaviorally you are all types, but have a “preference” toward one

WHY BOTHER? BE AWARE OF OTHERS’ DIFFERENCES INCREASE FLEXIBILITY APPRECIATE VARYING STRENGTHS WHY BOTHER? BUILD COMPLEMENTARY TEAMS USE OTHERS AS RESOURCES

Extraversion ||| Introversion Where do you get your energy? Other people & external experiences? Inner resources & internal experiences?

I | E : Source of Energy INTROVERSION: EXTRAVERSION: “I like to read a book” Prefer reflection over action Attuned to inner world EXTRAVERSION: “I like to talk to people” Prefer action over reflection Attuned to external environments

I | E : Source of Energy I E Communication style: -writing/email Learning style: -mental practice and reflection Work style: -alone or in pairs Private and contained E Communication style: -talking Learning style: -doing and discussing with others Work style: -prefer groups Sociable and expressive

FREQUENT INTERRUPTIONS WHICH IS HARDER? NO INTERRUPTIONS or FREQUENT INTERRUPTIONS

Extraversion Introversion % of participants N = 16 Based on research compiled by the Center for Creative Leadership

What kind of data do you pay attention to? Sensing ||| iNtuition What kind of data do you pay attention to? Hard data Gut feeling

N | S : Taking in Information INTUITION: “I like to imagine possibilities” Emphasize the theoretical Prefer high level/general concepts Value imagination Oriented toward future possibilities SENSING: “I like to learn the facts” Emphasize the pragmatic Prefer facts & details Specificity helps Value realism Oriented to present realities

N | S : Taking in Information See trends and patterns in data Use a “sixth sense” or gut feeling Follow hunches Quick conclusions Trust inspiration S Observe and remember through 5 senses Build carefully and thoroughly to decisions Slow but thoughtful Trust experiences

NO SENSE OF PRESENT REALITY WHICH IS HARDER? NO SENSE OF PRESENT REALITY OR NO SENSE OF FUTURE POSSIBILITIES

Sensing iNtuition % of participants N = 16 Based on research compiled by the Center for Creative Leadership

Feeling ||| Thinking How do you make decisions? Values or beliefs based Objective evaluation

T | F : Decision Making THINKING: FEELING: “I like to decide logically” Analytical Use cause-and-effect reasoning Solve problems with logic and data FEELING: “I like to consider people” Empathetic Guided by personal values Assess impact of decisions on people

T | F : Decision Making T F Strive for objective standard of truth Described as reasonable Search for flaws in an argument Fairness: everyone treated equally F Strive for harmony and positive interactions Described as compassionate Search for point of agreement in an argument Fairness: everyone treated as an individual

WORKING IN AN ENVIRONMENT THAT LACKS LOGIC WHICH IS HARDER? WORKING IN AN ENVIRONMENT THAT LACKS LOGIC OR THAT LACKS HARMONY

Thinking Feeling % of participants N = 16 Based on research compiled by the Center for Creative Leadership

Judging ||| Perceiving How are you oriented to the world? In a planned, orderly way, wanting to regulate and control life In a flexible, spontaneous way, seeking to experience and understand life

J | P : Decision Making JUDGING: PERCEIVING: “I like to organize my schedule” Scheduled/organized Finish one project before starting another Like to have things decided PERCEIVING: “I like to adapt to change as it comes” Spontaneous/flexible Start many projects, but have trouble finishing Like things loose and open to change

J | P : Decision Making J P Try to avoid last minute stresses Finish tasks well before the deadline Try to limit surprises See routine as effective P Feel energized by last minute pressures Finish tasks at the deadline Enjoy surprises See routines as limiting

WHICH IS HARDER? WINGING IT OR ADHERING TO A SCHEDULE

Judging Perceiving % of participants N = 16 Based on research compiled by the Center for Creative Leadership

TYPES IN SOCIETY ISTJ 11.6% ISFJ 3.8% INFJ 1.5% INTJ 2.1% ISTP 5.4% ISFP 8.8% INFP 4.3% INTP 3.3% ESTP 4.3% ESFP 8.5% ENFP 8.1% ENTP 3.2% ESTJ 8.7% ESFJ 12.3% ENFJ 2.4 ENTJ 1.8%

Predictions about teams (p. 1) The more similar the types, the sooner the team members will understand each other Groups with high similarity reach quicker decisions, but make more errors Leadership roles may shift as the tasks to be done require the skills of different types

Predictions about teams (p. 2) Team members who are opposite on all four preferences may have difficulty achieving understanding The person who is the only representative of a preference may be seen as different Teams that come to appreciate and use differences have less conflict

We need to create work environments where we as leaders: KNOW OURSELVES RELY ON EACH OTHER TO BUILD A TEAM MANAGE UNDER-DEVELOPED TRAITS EXPAND OURSELVES LEAD WITH OUR STRENGTHS

FOR EACH ACTIVITY: PREPARE A BRIEF REPORT 2. SELECT A SPEAKER

E | I : Extraversion & Introversion Take five minutes for each of these: What work environment allows you to be most effective? Prepare two questions for the other group, to enhance your understanding.

S | N : Sensing & Intuition Take five minutes to: Write down several words or phrases that describe the picture.

T | F : Thinking & Feeling Take ten minutes to discuss: How do you want to be appreciated or recognized? What do you want to be appreciated or recognized for? What happens when you don’t get appreciation or recognition in your preferred way?

J | P : Judging & Perceiving Take ten minutes to: Plan an end of summer vacation before you return to school.

Share a learning or a take-away How will you use what you learned?