INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Anthony Campanaro & Dennis Hernandez
Advertisements

CT is a self-directed process by which we take deliberate steps to think at the highest level of quality. CT is skillful, responsible thinking that is.
Evaluating Thinking Through Intellectual Standards
CRITICAL THINKING Basic Nursing: Foundations of Skills & Concepts Chapter 2.
Critical Thinking Be a critical thinker!. Our Flawed Thinking… Most of our thinking is… Biased Distorted Partial Uninformed Prejudiced Shoddy thinking.
Critical Thinking Course Introduction and Lesson 1
Unlocking the mind to critical thinking. “Thinking about Thinking”
INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING. “There are multiple decisions which you have to make entirely by yourself. You can’t lean on anybody else. And a good.
Critical Thinking: Close Reading of Texts Presented by Dr. Cheryl Torok Fleming November, 2013 Based on Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2006). Critical Thinking:
Critical Thinking Implementing the hypothesis and supporting evidence.
Learning to Think Critically
Critical Thinking -Introduction -The Elements of Thought - The Standards.
Learning to Think Critically pages Objectives Define thinking & reflection Identify 3 functions of the brain Describe how thinking impacts decision.
EKU will graduate informed, critical and creative thinkers who can communicate effectively.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
January 29, 2010ART Beach Retreat ART Beach Retreat 2010 Assessment Rubric for Critical Thinking First Scoring Session Summary ART Beach Retreat.
Home Enrichment (HE) TEST THE IDEA. DAY ONE (1) Focus: Purpose & Questions at Issue 4 Home Enrichment (HE)- 4/13 Do Nightly / Due on Fri. 4/17 TEST THE.
Critical Thinking Models Presented by STEVE COXON, Ph.D. Assistant professor of gifted education.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Types of Informative Speeches.
Rigor and Relevance: Paul’s Reasoning Model Ms. Reilly Science grade 8 Oct 2013.
University of Nizwa Critical Thinking John Kerrigan and Tom Grogan University of Wisconsin Oshkosh April 2009.
A Checklist for Reasoning & Questions Using the Elements of Thought
Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools (Foundation for Critical Thinking, 2001)
Argumentative Writing Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a.
INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING CRITICAL THINKING Definitions History of Critical Thinking (CT) Universal Standards Fallacies.
Using Fundamental and Powerful Concepts to Help Students Think Critically about Your Course Bill Reynolds Associate Professor of Social Work Director,
Fahim Haider Jafari PhD. Learning Objectives Describe what is critical thinking Describe what is lateral thinking Use critical and lateral thinking in.
A Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools
ASSE3211: Learning Outcome Assessment 2
Nahid Al-Bakri ( ) Aisha Al_khaldi( ) Lama Al-bassam( )
What is Philosophy?.
IE 102 Lecture 6 Critical Thinking.
A review of the literature
Instructional Critical Thinking Assessment Item Development
Chapter 15 Strategic Thinking
Cognitive Apprenticeship: A Roadmap for Critical Thinking
Science and Technology of Consciousness
INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING
How Do You Teach Students to Think Well?
How Do We Teach and Assess Critical Thinking Skills?
Chapter 15 Strategic Thinking Part One
Learning to Think Critically
Learning to Think Critically
Elements of Reasoning:
Critical Thinking.
Creating an Active Learning environment
Creating an Active Learning environment
Critical & Creative Thinking
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Author: dr. Martin Rusnák
Critical Thinking Skills
CT is a self-directed process by which we take deliberate steps to think at the highest level of quality. CT is skillful, responsible thinking that is.
The Elements of Thought
How to nurture critical thinking in our daughters?
What are the “Facets of Understanding”
Medical-Surgical Nursing: An Integrated Approach, 2E Chapter 2
Learning to Think Critically
A LEVEL Paper Three– Section A
Defining the Problem Questions that Clarify: Why do you say that?
ACADEMIC DEBATE.
Socratic Seminars.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Zimbabwe 2008 Critical Thinking.
Scientists argue, but they argue about ideas.
Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric
Implementing the hypothesis and supporting evidence
Critical Thinking Skills
The Elements The Standards SEEI Intellectual Traits of Mind
Presentation transcript:

INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING

OVERVIEW History of Critical Thinking Fundamentals of Critical Thinking Skills Needed to Think Critically Intellectual Standards Elements of Reasoning Common Fallacies

HISTORY The Beginning: Socrates Early Years: Plato, Aristotle and other Greek philosophers Middle Ages: Francis Bacon Today: Albert Einstein, Mark Twain, Harry Houdini and Carl Sagan

FUNDAMENTALS The Essence of Critical Thinking is: - The ability to assess reasoning - The ability to take apart thoughts to draw logical conclusions

CRITICAL THINKING DEFINED A logical process that makes the decision making of leaders more manageable.

COMMUNICATIONS SKILLS Critical Listening: Listening to maximize the accurate understanding of what others say

COMMUNICATIONS SKILLS Critical Reading: An active, intellectually engaged process of reading, interpreting and understanding text

COMMUNICATIONS SKILLS Critical Writing: Arranging our ideas in a logical order to express ourselves in a disciplined manner

COMMUNICATIONS SKILLS Effective/Critical Questioning: Get the value based responses you are looking for Answer the right question or solve the right problem At the right time

INTELLECTUAL STANDARDS 1. Clarity - A gateway standard relevant to all others - A statement or question must be clear to determine accuracy, relevance, logicalness

INTELLECTUAL STANDARDS 2. Accuracy - A statement may be clear but not accurate - Ask questions to determine truth, source legitimacy

INTELLECTUAL STANDARDS 3. Precision - A statement may be clear and accurate, but nor precise - Precision is achieved by asking for more details or specific explanations

INTELLECTUAL STANDARDS 4. Relevance - A statement may be clear, accurate, precise, but not relevant to a discussion or issue - Probe how the stated position connects to the question or bears on the issue

INTELLECTUAL STANDARDS 5. Depth - A statement can have clarity, accuracy, precision, relevance – but is superficial - Ask yourself how you are addressing complexities of an issue - Consider if you are addressing the most significant factors

INTELLECTUAL STANDARDS 6. Breadth - A line of reasoning may be clear, accurate, precise, relevant and deep, but one-sided - Ask if there is another point of view; another way to look at the question; a differing perspective

INTELLECTUAL STANDARDS 7. Logicalness - A combination of thoughts that is mutually supporting and makes sense in combination - Ask if your thoughts make sense, or if, and how, they follow from what you said

INTELLECTUAL STANDARDS 8. Significance - Concentrating on the most significant and important information - Address: what is the most significant information; how it is important in context; and which questions/ideas are most significant/important

INTELLECTUAL STANDARDS 9. Fairness - Justifying thought by thinking fairly in context - Many questions to consider: What justifies your thinking? Are you considering all evidence? Is your purpose fair? What is my “agenda?” Is it an obstacle?

WHY INTELLECTUAL STANDARDS? Just and reasonable conclusions Reasoning is made easier

ELEMENTS OF REASONING 1. Purpose - Reasoning has an end, or objective - Ask yourself about clarity of purpose, and how it’s stated - Is the purpose significant? Achievable? Realistic? Justifiable?

ELEMENTS OF REASONING 2. Question at issue – Is it the right question and are there other relevant questions? - Probe what are the fundamental issues, the precise question(s), its complexity and why it’s so - Ask if there are other questions needing to be explored

ELEMENTS OF REASONING 3. Point of View – a frame of reference - You should ask, from which point of view do you start? - Are you “locked” to a view, allowing no inclusion of other views in your thinking? - Are there multiple views to consider?

ELEMENTS OF REASONING 4. Information/Data - probing veracity, significance - Ask if your data is accurate, clear, fair - Ask what data is most important, and if sources are reliable - Ask if you have avoided personal bias - What are alternate, valid sources of information?

ELEMENTS OF REASONING 5. Concepts, Theories and Ideas – these contribute to depth of thought - Determine most fundamental concept to consider - How does it connect to key concepts in your life? - How might clarity of your concepts be altered to change your point of view?

ELEMENTS OF REASONING 6. Assumptions - reasoning starts with having a certain assumption(s) - You should ask if your assumptions are justifiable or should be questioned. - What are you taking for granted?

ELEMENTS OF REASONING 7. Implications/Consequences -understanding decision implications - Tracing logical consequences in advance - Considering most significant implications of a decision. - Affecting whom, when, where and how?

ELEMENTS OF REASONING 8. Inferences - reasoning proceeds by steps - Perceiving a situation, reviewing facts, and coming to a conclusion, or inference - Who makes the inference? - Is there more than one inference that can be made? - Can you conclude your inference is sound in your reasoning?

FALLACY What is a fallacy? An argument that appears sound, at first glance, but contains a flaw in reasoning which makes it unsound

Example: “Two wrongs make a right” EXAMPLES OF FALLACIES Burden of Proof (a.k.a. Appeal to Ignorance) Example: “Two wrongs make a right”

FALLACIES Hasty generalization Example: A pair of shoes I bought wore out quickly; I conclude that all shoes of this brand are shoddy Post hoc reasoning Example: I walk under a ladder and soon after I have an accident; I conclude that walking under a ladder is bad luck

FALLACIES Band Wagon (peer pressure) Guilt by Association

SUMMARY History of Critical Thinking Fundamentals of Critical Thinking Skills Needed to Think Critically Intellectual Standards Elements of Reasoning Common Fallacies