English Learner Subgroup Self-Assessment (ELSSA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Accountability Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) Presented.
Advertisements

Mt. Diablo Unified School District
ABC Board of Education Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Valencia Mayfield, Assistant Superintendent Academic Services Mike McCoy, Director of Child.
Program Improvement Unit Collaborating to increase student achievement and fundamentally improve the interaction between the teacher and the students to.
California English Language Development Test (CELDT) and Reclassification Palm Middle School
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
English Language Learner Placement WHITTIER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT “To Achieve and Maintain Excellence” Office of Federal & State Categorical Programs.
Report Cards 101. ELD Progress Report Cards Complete ELD portfolios. Only score the standards you have taught. Score individual standards on assessments/work.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations & Implications for California’s Accountability System Robert Linquanti Cathy George Project Director & Sr.
Los Angeles County Office of Education Title III Office October 14, 2011 Magdalena Ruz Gonzalez, Director Silvina Rubinstein, Title III Lead English Learner.
ON TARGET WITH AMAOS 1, 2, 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS September 29, 2009 Welcome.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Annual Title I Parent Meeting Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School.
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
Best Counseling Practices for Addressing the Needs of Long Term English Learners June 28, 2013 New English Language Development and Common Core State Standards.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
English Learner PLC Workshop Grossmont union high school district English Learner Programs September 23, 2009.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction English Learner Subgroup Self-Assessment Edition.
Cambrian School District Board of Education Presentation April 3, 2014 Local Educational Agency Plan (LEAP)
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction English Learner Subgroup Self-Assessment (ELSSA) 2010ᅳ11.
Silvia C. Dorta-Duque de Reyes San Diego County Office of Education
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Dr. Chun-Wu Li Assessment and Accountability Services.
English Learners Equity and Access Paul Gothold, Chief Academic Officer January 24, 2012 Lynwood Unified School District.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Aligned Implementation of Title I, Title II, and Title III.
Academic Program Survey Kern County Superintendent of Schools Office RSDSS Region 8.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
EMERY PARK SCHOOL English Learner Advisory Committee (ELAC) School Advisory Committee (SAC) 1.
English Learner Subgroup Self-Assessment (ELSSA) and the Title III Year 4 Plan Montague Charter Academy for the Arts and Sciences Prepared and Presented.
ESEA Title III Accountability System. JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 22 Title III Requires States to: Define two annual measurable.
Perris Elementary School District Jean Marie Frey, Assistant Superintendent, Educational Services LCAP Meeting May 4, 2016.
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Accountability
Regional Assessment Network (RAN)
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
DMUSD LCAP Update Spring 2015.
Student Achievement and School Support Division
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) for K-12 Administrators Session 1 Local District.
January 14, 2016 Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist
California's Accountability System
Implementing the Specialized Service Professional State Model Evaluation System for Measures of Student Outcomes.
Title III AMAO Improvement Plan Webinar
Anderson Elementary School
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
EL Programs Budget Training LD South
CELDT MOVEMENT BY LEVELS
Priority 1 – Teachers, Materials, Facilities
Campus Improvement Planning
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Gateway High School-Alt.Ed Annual Title 1 Parent Workshop
New English Language Development and Common Core State Standards Institute Best Counseling Practices for Addressing the Needs of Long Term English Learners.
Local District G ENGLISH LEARNER / CCR REVIEW FINDINGS
Guide to the Single Plan for Student Achievement
DELAC Meeting March 14, 2017.
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
RECLASSIFICATION
Presentation transcript:

English Learner Subgroup Self-Assessment (ELSSA) 2011-12 Edition Antonio Mora, Title III Region 9 COE Co-Lead

Needs Assessment

Why do an EL Needs Assessment? The needs assessment provides a comprehensive view of the current reality of the programs and services that support English learners in your LEA. It presents baseline data to ensure decisions are based on data rather than personal agendas and preferences.

Components of the EL Needs Assessment Quantitative Data: Achievement data Attendance data A-G completion rates Participation in Special Education Services Specific Special Education Placement Course placement

Components of the EL Needs Assessment Qualitative Data Holistic classroom observations Teacher and administrator interviews Parent focus groups Classified staff focus groups Job-alike focus groups with staff that serve ELs TOSAs or Specialists Resource Teachers Coordinators

Data is Analyzed The results of the examination of the qualitative and quantitative data lead to findings and recommendations. The recommendations will be used to create an improvement plan.

ELSSA

Purpose of ELSSA The ELSSA is a required tool for Local Education Agencies (LEAs) that have not met Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) in Title III for two or four consecutive years. It is also required for LEAs in Title I Program Improvement due to their English learner (EL) subgroup.

The Purpose of ELSSA It may be used by LEAs that wish to examine their programs and services for ELs. Helps identify key challenge areas, explore root causes for English learners not meeting the AMAOs. Assists LEAs with plan creation.

ELSSA helps LEAs formulate key questions… How well are ELs progressing on California English Language Development Test (CELDT)? How many reach English proficient in reasonable time? How do ELs meeting CELDT criterion (proficient) perform on CST?

More questions… How do Redesignated Fluent English Proficient (RFEP) perform on California Standardized Testing (CST)? How do ELs and RFEPs perform on California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE)? How well are we implementing relevant program components?

What ELSSA Does Assembles data from CELDT, CST and CAHSEE that relate to AMAOs 1, 2, and 3. Disaggregates the data by years in U.S. schools and by language proficiency.

What ELSSA Does Helps identify areas of challenge that can be addressed to improve EL achievement. Provides guiding questions to facilitate conversations around what the data shows.

ELSSA Guides Plan Development Must be completed and uploaded/attached to: Title III Year 2 Improvement Plan Addendum Title III Year 4 LEA Action Plan Title I Program Improvement Plan related to the English learner subgroup

What ELSSA does NOT do: Give school level information Analyze data Address Highly Qualified Teachers or other aspects of NCLB not directly related to English learners Evaluate the programs and services for English learners

What’s new on the revised ELSSA? The tool will have the same data tables as the original version, but in a different order based on feedback. As well as new AMAO 2 tables to reflect changes SBE approved in May 2010.

Table Functionality The revised ELSSA has one worksheet for LEAs to input data and a separate worksheet for staff to view the data and respond to guiding questions and survey items related to EL programs and services.

Table Functionality Once the data is added, it cannot be accidentally altered by staff facilitating the data analysis and survey item administration.

Table Functionality Tables are color coded in yellow to indicate where LEA staff need to supply data or respond to questions and survey items. Notes to guide the preparer are clickable, italicized and shaded green.

The Survey Items The Survey Items have been moved from a separate worksheet of the tool and placed directly below the data table that best relates to each respective item.

The Survey Items The Survey Items on the ELSSA are rated on a Likert-scale using the same ratings as are used in the APS. All items must receive at least a rating of 3 for the school or LEA to be considered as performing that objective at an acceptable level.

The Survey Items The 3 rating indicates a substantial level of implementation. The chart on the next slide describes the criteria of each objective per rating level.

ELSSA and APS Rating Scale 1 Minimal level of Implementation Few = Less than 50% of students Rarely = Less than 50% of the time 2 Partial level of Implementation Some = 50% of students Inconsistently = 50% of the time 3 Substantial level of Implementation Most = 75% of students Consistently = 75% of the time 4 Full level of Implementation All = 100% of students Uniformly = 100% of the time

Who Should Complete the Survey? District Office Administrators Site Administrators Title III Director/Coordinator Teacher Leaders

Tabulation The responses to the survey items will be tabulated by each table and will be aggregated into a table in a separate worksheet by EL program and service categories. The categories are: 1. ELD 2. Access/Opportunity to learn    a. ELA    b. Mathematics c. Intervention    d. Placement 3. Professional Development 4. Assessment 5. Accountability

Administration of the ELSSA The ELSSA Toolkit provides instructions for the administration of the survey items after the tables have been completed. Alternate options are also described for the administration of the tool and additional data an LEA might want to examine.

Live Demo